DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kapal.v20i3.54715

Numerical Analysis of The Effects of Propeller High Thrust Distribution on Propulsion System Performance

Irfan Eko Sandjaja  -  Department of Marine , ITS, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya,Indonesia,60117, Indonesia
I Made Ariana  -  Department of Marine Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS) Surabaya, Indonesia., Indonesia
*Erwandi Erwandi  -  Research Center For Hydrodynamics Technology, National Research And Innovation Agency, Surabaya 60112, Indonesia, Indonesia
Mahendra Indiaryanto  -  Research Center For Hydrodynamics Technology, National Research And Innovation Agency, Surabaya 60112, Indonesia, Indonesia
Muryadin Muryadin  -  Research Center For Hydrodynamics Technology, National Research And Innovation Agency, Surabaya 60112, Indonesia, Indonesia
Berlian Arswendo Adietya  -  Department of Naval Architecture Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

High ship propulsion performance is the main goal of designers, propeller is one component of the propulsion system that also affects the performance of the propulsion. In propeller planning, it is necessary to pay attention to the efficiency of the propeller, in addition to reducing ship operating costs and reducing CO2 gas emissions which is one of the requirements for ships built above 2013, the rules have been made into the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) standard. At this time the propeller that is widely used is the B Series propeller including the propeller design used on mini LNG ships, namely the B6.40 propeller, the B Series propeller has a pitch character from the Wageningen Propeller Series study. Innovations are made to get better propeller efficiency by varying the pitch distribution. The B6.40 propeller of the standard constant pitch type was modified to B6.40 variable pitch (high thrust). Propellers with high thrust have better efficiency especially for non-fast boats. This study was conducted to obtain the best propeller efficiency of a constant pitch propeller and three high thrust propeller units using Numeca's Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) numerical self-propulsion test. For validation of the simulation program by comparing the results of the open water test B6.40 Wageningen while resistance validation by comparing the ship resistance model test. The results of the self-propulsion test using Disc Actuator show that the propulsion coefficient (PC) of Modified-2 and Modified-3 high thrust propellers is better when compared to constant pitch. The magnitude of the increase in PC value reaches ± 4% higher than the constant pitch type on the Modified-3 propeller.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: CFD; High Pitch Distribution, Propeller Design, Self Propulsion Test.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Evaluating Wave Potential and Assessing the Economic Viability of Wave Energy Converters in the South Java Seas Study of the Motion Performance of Marine Current Power Plant Turbine Floaters Due To Ocean Current Forces under Moored Conditions Analysis of the Application of the Rest Hour Maritime Labor Convention 2006 on MV. Pan Energen Crews to Improve Working Conditions With Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method More recent articles
Most cited articles
ANALISA PENGARUH BENTUK LAMBUNG AXE BOW PADA KAPAL HIGH SPEED CRAFT TERHADAP HAMBATAN TOTAL PERANCANGAN FLOATING DOCK UNTUK DAERAH PERAIRAN PELABUHAN KOTA TEGAL ANALISA GERAKAN SEAKEEPING KAPAL PADA GELOMBANG REGULER ANALISA PENGARUH MODIFIKASI BENTUK HALUAN KAPAL TERHADAP HAMBATAN TOTAL DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN CFD Estimation of Effective Wave Slope Coefficient of Ships with Large Breadth and Draught Ratio More cited articles
  1. M. Ridwan, “Parameter Design Propeller Kapal,” Kapal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 206–211, 2012
  2. J. Hüffmeier and M. Johanson, “State-of-the-Art Methods to Improve Energy Efficiency of Ships,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 9, no. 4, p. 447, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3390/jmse9040447
  3. I. K. A. P. Utama, “Potential for Improvement of Future Ship Efficiency: Overview of Ship Design And Operational Aspects (In bahasa Indonesia),” ALE Proceeding, vol. 1, no. April, pp. 1–15, 2018
  4. M. Polakis, P. Zachariadis, and J. O. de Kat, “The Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI),” in Sustainable Shipping, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 93–135. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-04330-8_3
  5. K. Mizzi, Y. K. Demirel, C. Banks, O. Turan, P. Kaklis, and M. Atlar, “Design optimisation of Propeller Boss Cap Fins for enhanced propeller performance,” Appl. Ocean Res., vol. 62, pp. 210–222, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2016.12.006
  6. I Made Ariana, Riyan Bagus Prihandanu, Dhimas Widhi Handani, and AAB Dinariyana, “Investigation of the Effects of the Pre-Duct in a Ship on Propeller–Hull Interactions Using the CFD Method,” CFD Lett., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 17–30, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.37934/cfdl.15.4.1730
  7. Niki Veranda Agil Permadi and Erik Sugianto, “CFD Simulation Model for Optimum Design of B-Series Propeller using Multiple Reference Frame (MRF),” CFD Lett., vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 22–39, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.37934/cfdl.14.11.2239
  8. J. Xu, W. Song, X. Yang, and H. Nie, “Aerodynamic Performance of Variable-Pitch Propellers for High-Altitude UAVs,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 686, no. 1, p. 12019, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/686/1/012019
  9. A. Trimulyono, P. Manik, and N. Huda, “PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN ENERGY SAVING DEVICE PADA PROPELLER B4 55 DENGAN METODE CFD,” 2013
  10. B. Agastiya, I. Made Ariana, and A. Baidowi, “Analysis of Self-propulsion Test for Propeller KP-505 with and without Pre-Swirl Stator,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1081, no. 1, p. 12055, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012055
  11. C. Ma, H. Cai, Z. Qian, and K. Chen, “The design of propeller and propeller boss cap fins (PBCF) by an integrative method,” J. Hydrodyn., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 586–593, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(14)60066-4
  12. D. Chrismianto, P. Manik, and T. Perkapalan, “ANALISA EFFECTIVE WAKE FRICTION AKIBAT PENAMBAHAN STERN TUNNELS PADA KAPAL TROPICAL PRINCESS CRUISES MENGGUNAKAN METODE CFD (COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMIC),” 2016
  13. The Wageningen Propeller Series. MARIN Publication, 1992
  14. A. Kaplan, “INSIDE THIS ISSUE Propeller Pitch Distributions: (Part 1) Measurements,” 2020
  15. A. Fitriadhy, N. A. Adam, C. J. Quah, J. Koto, and F. Mahmuddin, “CFD prediction of B-series propeller performance in open water,” CFD Lett., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 58–68, 2020
  16. P. B. Setyabudi, D. Chrismianto, and G. Rindo, “ANALISA NILAI THRUST DAN TORQUE PROPELLER TIPE B-SERIES PADA KAPAL SELAM MIDGET 150M DENGAN VARIASI SKEW ANGLE DAN BLADE AREA RATIO (AE/AO) MENGGUNAKAN METODE CFD,” Kapal, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 109, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.14710/kpl.v13i3.12352
  17. ITTC, “ITTC-Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Practical Guidelines for Ship Self-Pro-pulsion CFD ITTC Quality System Manual Recommended Procedures and Guidelines Guideline Practical Guidelines for Ship Self-Propulsion CFD.”
  18. A. Purwana, I. M. Ariana, and W. Wardhana, “Numerical study on the cavitation noise of marine skew propellers,” J. Nav. Archit. Mar. Eng., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 97–107, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3329/jname.v18i2.38099
  19. D. C. Niko Bayu Prasetyo, Untung Budiarto, “Jurnal teknik perkapalan,” Tek. Perkapalan, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 368–374, 2020

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-01 13:28:42

No citation recorded.