skip to main content

Design of Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicle (ROUV) for Underwater Metal Detection

*Raden Sjarief Widjaja scopus  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya, Indonesia 60111, Indonesia
Dedi Budi Purwanto  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya, Indonesia 60111, Indonesia
Andi Trimulyono  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Faculty of Technology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Muhammad Nur Abdullah Hafizh  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Kampus ITS Sukolilo, Surabaya, Indonesia 60111, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The underwater surveys and inspections in Indonesia were carried out mostly by the operation of practical divers who were limited to shallow waters. The deep - sea exploration requires more advanced technology. The development of underwater technology is required to support many functions of underwater surveys and inspections. The purpose of this study was to design a Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicle (ROUV) for detecting objects with metallic materials. The ROV was designed with a Penta Tubular model and camera assistance for navigation, the JSNSR04T ultrasonic sensor to detect object distances, and the LJ12A3 inductive proximity sensor as a metal detector. ROUV rides are controlled using a keyboard with certain keywords and monitored using a smartphone. Testing the JSN-SR04T Ultrasonic sensor uses 5 variations of distance, namely 20cm, 40cm, 60cm, 80cm, and 100cm, with the detection object in the form of a plate with dimensions of 35cm x 35cm. For testing the inductive proximity sensor, the LJ12A3 type uses 3 variations of materials, namely steel plate, aluminum plates as metal objects, and PVC plates as control materials. Tests were carried out in two mediums, namely in air and underwater. Based on the results of data retrieval testing of the ultrasonic distance sensor in the air, the smallest error percentage is 0.06%, and the highest error percentage is 0.705%. In the underwater test, the error percentage was 0.49% for a distance variation of 100 cm. The ultrasonic distance sensor type JSN-SR04 cannot read distance data below 89.75 cm in water due to differences in the speed of sound propagation in different media. The Inductive Proximity Sensor can work well in air and water mediums with 100% accuracy on steel plates, aluminum plates, and PVC plates.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicle (ROUV), Ultrasonic Sensor, Inductive Proximity Sensor

Article Metrics:

  1. Á. Gómez, L. M. Aristizábal, C. A. Zuluaga, J. C. Correa, and R. E. Vásquez, “Development and Implementation of a High-Level Control System for the Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle VISOR3,” in IFAC-PapersOnLine, Elsevier B.V., Jul. 2017, pp. 1151–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.400
  2. F. A. Azis, M. S. M. Aras, M. Z. A. Rashid, M. N. Othman, and S. S. Abdullah, “Problem identification for Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV): A case study,” in Procedia Engineering, Elsevier Ltd, 2012, pp. 554–560. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.211
  3. A. Nergaard, N. Architect, and P. Engineer, “The Magic of Buoyancy and Hydrostatics –Buoyancy and Effective Forces,” Mod Appl Sci, vol. 11, p. 77, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.5539/mas.v11n12p77
  4. F. R. Anwar, “Rancang Bangun Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicle Dengan Sensor Jarak Untuk Deteksi Obyek Di Bawah Air,” 2021
  5. S. Azhary et al., “Design of Remotely Operated Vehicle Prototype for Ship Biofouling Inspection on Berth,” in 2021 International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, Intelligent Manufacture and Industrial Automation, ICAMIMIA 2021 - Proceeding, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2021, pp. 223–228. doi: 10.1109/ICAMIMIA54022.2021.9807777
  6. H. Kahraman, “OPEN-LOOP vs. CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS,” CONTROL SYSTEMS LABORATORY EXPERIMENT 4
  7. F.- Puspasari, I.- Fahrurrozi, T. P. Satya, G.- Setyawan, M. R. Al Fauzan, and E. M. D. Admoko, “Sensor Ultrasonik HCSR04 Berbasis Arduino Due Untuk Sistem Monitoring Ketinggian,” Jurnal Fisika dan Aplikasinya, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 36, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.12962/j24604682.v15i2.4393
  8. M. Mariano and K. Scicluna, “Design and Implementation of an Electronic Speed Controller for Brushless DC motors,” 2017. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17641.29286
  9. EBINGER Prüf- und Ortungstechnik GmbH, “The Challenge of Metal Detection at the Bottom of the Sea,” Cologne, 2016. [Online]. Available: www.ebinger.org
  10. P. Passeraub, “An integrated inductive proximity sensor,” Jan. 1999, doi: 10.5075/epfl-thesis-1939
  11. B. Saragih and C. Bancin, “PERANCANGAN PENGUKUR JARAK SECARA WIRELESS MENGGUNAKAN SENSOR GELOMBANG ULTRASONIK BERBASIS ARDUINO UNO ATmega 328 DENGAN TAMPILAN DI LAPTOP,” JURNAL TEKNOLOGI ENERGI UDA, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 74–80, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/en/ATmega328p
  12. E. Sulistyarini, “PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR FISIKA SMA MATERI GELOMBANG BUNYI BERBASIS INTERACTIVE PDF,” 2015
  13. H. Sofian, “Permasalahan Arkeologi Bawah Air Di Indonesia,” Kapata Arkeologi, vol. 6, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.24832/kapata.v6i11.144

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-17 00:06:39

No citation recorded.