Semantic Contrastive Analysis of the Adjectives Usui and Tipis in Japanese and Indonesian

Tiara Kurnia Fajriati; Dedi Sutedi; Linna Meilia Rasiban

doi:10.14710/kiryoku.v9i2.470-480

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v9i2.470-480

Semantic Contrastive Analysis of the Adjectives Usui and Tipis in Japanese and Indonesian

Tiara Kurnia Fajriati , Dedi Sutedi

, Linna Meilia Rasiban

Departement of Japanese Language Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudi No.229, Isola, Kec. Sukasari, Bandung, Indonesia 40154B, Indonesia

Citation Format:

Abstract

This study compares the semantic similarities and differences between the Japanese adjective usui and the Indonesian adjective tipis. Using a qualitative method based on Koyanagi’s linguistic phenomena, data were collected from a Japanese language corpus such as nlb.ninjal.ac.jp from 1985 to 2005 and news articles in both Japanese and Indonesian (asahi.com, nhk.co.jp, jawapos.com, cnbcindonesia.com, antaranews.com and tribunnews.com from 2015 to 2024). The findings reveal seven shared meanings: (1) a short distance between two surfaces, (2) thin layers, (3) low gas density, (4) sparse hair or fur, (5) minimal impact or benefit, (6) subtle emotional expression, and (7) weak belief or confidence. Differences in semantic scope were also identified. Usui includes additional meanings such as (1) pale in color, (2) diluted, and (3) bland in taste or senses that not present in tipis. Conversely, tipis also conveys the meaning of (1) being easily irritated, which is not found in usui. Additionally, the study identifies instances of icchi, ketsujou, and shinki. These findings offer valuable insights that may benefit beginner to semi-advanced Japanese language learners and Japanese language teaching, particularly in the field of language education and semantic understanding.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download | CTAP

Copyright Transfer Agreement for Publishing (CTAP)

Subject
Type	CTAP
	Download (179KB) Indexing metadata

Keywords: Semantics; Lexical meanings; Contrastive analysis; Adjectives; Japanese languages; Indonesian languages; usui; tipis

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Articles

Language : EN

In Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan (In progress)

Recent articles

Kepribadian Neurotik Tokoh Utama Ryuhei Sasaki dalam Naskah Film Tokyo Sonata Karya Sutradara Kiyoshi Kurosawa Educational Content in Japanese Manga: Learning Science, History, and Ethics through Pop Culture Pagelaran Budaya di Sakura Matsuri Sebagai Strategi Diplomasi Untuk Mengundang Masyarakat Indonesia Mengunjungi Jepang More recent articles

Most cited articles

Verba Kompon Hajimeru, Dasu, Dan Kakeru Sebagai Penanda Aspek Inkoatif Bahasa Jepang More cited articles

Ara, A. (2021). Contrastive Analysis and its Implications for Bengali Learners of ESL. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 9(3), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v9i3.3827
Backhouse, A. (2006). KOI and USUI : Multiple meaning in English and Japanese. Jinbun Sousho, 3. https://glim-re.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4130/files/sosho_3_165_173.pdf
Burhanudin, & Sukmara, R. (2020). Analisis Kontrastif Kata Bantu Bilangan dalam Bahasa Jepang dengan Kata Bantu Bilangan dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Bahasa Jepang Taiyou, 1(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22236/taiyou.v1i1.6093
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi IV. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Dessari, W., Sutedi, D., & Haristiani, N. (2023). The Contrastive Analysis of Hiroi and Luas Adjective in Japanese and Indonesian. Proceeding of International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities, 5, 373–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34010/icobest.v3i.161
Ghaisani, N., Sutedi, D., & Haristiani, N. (2023). Contrastive Analysis of Adjective Asai in Japanese and Dangkal in Indonesian. Proceeding of International Conference on Business, Economics, Social Sciences, and Humanities, 5, 357–367. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34010/icobest.v3i.159
Hida, Y., & Asada, H. (1991). Gendai Keiyoushi Youhou Jiten. Tokyodo Shuppan
Hidetoshi, K. (2001). Sanseido Kokugo Jiten. Sanseido
Jingyi, L. (2022). Keiyōshi No Imi Tokuchō To Nihongo Kyōzai Reberu No Taiō Kankei No Bunseki. Chikyū Shakai Tōgō Kagaku, 28(2), 24–35. https://catalog.lib.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Koyanagi, K. (2004). Nihongo Kyoushi no Tame no Atarashii Gengo Shuutoku Gairon. 3A Corporation
Kridalaksana, H. (2005). Kelas Kata dalam Bahasa Indonesia. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Melano, N. R., Sutedi, D., & Haristiani, N. (2021). “The Analysis of Koi and Usui as Japanese Polysemic Adjectives.” Proceeding of International Conference on Japanese Studies, 2(1), 14–26. https://proceedings.aspbji.id/index.php/icjsle/article/view/35
Mutoharoh, M., Sulaeman, A., & Goziyah, G. (2018). Interferensi Morfologi dalam Karangan Narasi Mahasiswa Thailand Semester IV Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 1(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i1.10
Nisa N. F. (2018). Analisis Kontrastif Kata Wakai dalam Bahasa Jepang dan Kata ‘Muda’ dalam Bahasa Indonesia [Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia]. http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/34352
Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Tesaurus Bahasa Indonesia. Pusat Bahasa
Putri, E. K., & Soepardjo, D. (2019). Analisis Kontrastif Verba “Kangaeru” 「考える」 dalam Bahasa Jepang dengan Verba “Berpikir” dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Hikari: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 10(1), 1–8. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/hikari/article/download/28153/25757/32810
Qiu, C. (2015). Jigen Keiyoushi no Tagisei ni Tsuite no Nicchuu Taishou Kenkyuu: Nihongo no Nijigen Keiyoushi “Futoi–Hosoi” “Atsui–Usui” o Chuushin ni. [Kyushu University]. https://api.lib.kyushu-u.ac.jp/scholar/sco0249
Riyanti, A. (2020). Teori Belajar Bahasa. Tidar Media
Saputri, S. Y., Sutedi, D., & Rasiban, L. M. (2025). Analisis Kontrastif Adjektiva Amai dalam Bahasa Jepang dan Adjektiva Manis dalam Bahasa Indonesia. KIRYOKU, 9(1), 128–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v9i1.%25p
Sutedi, D., Hayati, N., & Widianti, S. (2024). A Contrastive Analysis of Indirect Passive Sentences of Japanese Language and Sundanese Passive Sentences. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(3), 497–508. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i3.6662
Sutedi, D., & Widianti, S. (2016). KALIMAT PENGANDAIAN BAHASA JEPANG: KAJIAN SINTAKTIS DAN SEMANTIS. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 16(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v15i2
Tasman, A. Q., Sutedi, D., & Rasiban, L. M. (2023). The Contrastive Analysis of Ookii and Besar Adjective in Japanese and Indonesian. KIRYOKU, 7(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v7i2.99-113
Trahutami, S. W. I. (2021). Makna Verba Bahasa Jepang “Tsukuru” Dan Bahasa Indonesia “Membuat.” KIRYOKU, 5(1), 136–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/kiryoku.v5i1.136-144

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-17 14:31:46

No citation recorded.

Copyright Notice

Starting from 2017, the author(s) whose article is published in the Kiryoku journal attain the copyright for their article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting the manuscript to Kiryoku, the author(s) agree with this policy. No special document approval is required.

The author(s) guarantee that:

their article is original, written by the mentioned author(s),
has never been published before,
does not contain statements that violate the law, and
does not violate the rights of others, is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), is free from the rights of third parties, and the necessary written permission to quote from other sources has been obtained by the author(s).

The author(s) retain all rights to the published work, such as the following rights:

Copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article, such as patents,
The right to use the substance of the article in its own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for its own purposes,
The right to archive all versions of the article in any repository, and
The right to enter into separate additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of published versions of the article (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), acknowledging its initial publication in this journal (Kiryoku: Jurnal Studi Kejepangan).

Suppose the article was prepared jointly by more than one author. Each author submitting the manuscript warrants that all co-authors have given their permission to agree to copyright and license notices (agreements) on their behalf and notify co-authors of the terms of this policy. Kiryoku will not be held responsible for anything arising because of the writer's internal dispute. Kiryoku will only communicate with correspondence authors.

Authors should also understand that their articles (and any additional files, including data sets and analysis/computation data) will become publicly available once published. The license of published articles (and additional data) will be governed by a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Kiryoku allows users to copy, distribute, display and perform work under license. Users need to attribute the author(s) and Kiryoku to distribute works in journals and other publication media. Unless otherwise stated, the author(s) is a public entity as soon as the article is published.

Notes for Usage of Generative AI in Scientific Writing

The following guidance refers only to the writing process, and not to the use of AI tools to analyse and draw insights from data as part of the research process:

Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies should only be used in the writing process to improve the readability and language of the manuscript.
The technology must be applied with human oversight and control and authors should carefully review and edit the result, as AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete or biased.
Authors are ultimately responsible and accountable for the contents of the work.
Authors must not list or cite AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author on the manuscript since authorship implies responsibilities and tasks that can only be attributed to and performed by humans.
The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing must be declared by adding a statement at the end of the manuscript when the paper is first submitted.
We do not permit the use of Generative AI or AI-assisted tools to create or alter images in submitted manuscripts.
The use of generative AI or AI-assisted tools in the production of artwork such as for graphical abstracts is not permitted. The use of generative AI in the production of cover art may in some cases be allowed, if the author obtains prior permission from the journal editor and publisher, can demonstrate that all necessary rights have been cleared for the use of the relevant material, and ensures that there is correct content attribution.