DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i2.56534

Measuring The Effectiveness of Private Electronic System Organizers Regulations In Developing Social Media Equilibrium

*Tundjung Herning Sitabuana scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
Ade Adhari orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
Leony Sondang Suryani orcid  -  SHAPE-SEA, The Institute of Human Right and Peace Studies, Mahidol University, Thailand
Dixon Sanjaya  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Ibra Fulenzi Amri  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2023 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Technological developments, especially social media, potentially have a negative impact that pretend to social disintegration and instability. To prevent and create a healthy and conducive digital space, the Government issued the Minister of Communication and Information Regulation No.5/2020 concerning Private ESOs. This regulation gives the government authority to supervise Private ESOs and protect social media content. This research aims to examine ministerial regulation effectiveness in realizing social media equilibrium and its impact on digital democracy in Indonesia. This is a sociolegal research. The data was obtained from observation, expert interviews, and literature studies which were analyzed qualitatively. Normatively, restrictions and supervision to the right to use social media through private ESOs can be carried out to be in line with Pancasila’s Spirit. However, there are fundamental errors in ministerial regulation: (1) multiple interpretations norm; (2) unclear parameters of supervision; and (3) weak legal position of ministerial regulations in law enforcement. Sociologically, the presence of ministerial regulations is weak and ineffective because they are: (1) rejected by stakeholders; (2) easy to change; and (3) slowly responded in socialization process and community compliance. More comprehensive implementation regulation is required with, supervision through an electronic system approach to increase the role and participation of community.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Private Electronic System Organisers; Regulation Effectiveness; Social Media Equilibrium

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Measuring The Effectiveness of Private Electronic System Organizers Regulations In Developing Social Media Equilibrium The Urgency of Presidential Institution Regulations in Strengthening the Presidential Government System Implementing of Restorative Justice to Build the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia: A Study of the Batak Toba Justice System Preventive and Evaluative Mechanism Analysis on Regulatory and Legislation Reform in Indonesia Legal Policy on the Use of Heir Certificates (SKAW) for Registration of Land Rights Transfers in Indonesia More recent articles
Most cited articles
PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA PENDIDIKAN HUKUM SEBAGAI PENDIDIKAN MANUSIA IMPLEMENTASI PENILAIAN KEBARUAN DAN PRINSIP ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PERLINDUNGAN DESAIN INDUSTRI PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG COUNTER TERRORISM BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME SEBAGAI UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Adhi, Muhammad Isnaeni Puspito., & Soponyono, Eko. (2021). Crime Combating Policy of Carding in Indonesia in the Political Perspective of Criminal Law. Law Reform, Vol. 17,(No.2),pp.135-144. https://doi.org/10.147 10/lr.v17i2.41736
  2. Agus, A. Aco. (2016). Relevansi Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Terbuka di Era Reformasi. Jurnal Office, Vol.2, (No.2), pp. 229-238. https://doi. org/10.26858/jo.v2i2.2958
  3. Agusta, H. (2022). Telaah Yuridis Aplikasi Zoom Dalam Mengumpulkan Data Pribadi Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik. Krtha Bhayangkara, Vol.16,(No.1),pp.177-196. https://doi.org/10. 31599/krtha.v16i1.1076
  4. Ali, Mohamed Sami B. (2020). Does ICT Promote Democracy Similarity in Developed and Developing Countries? A Linear and Nonlinear Panel Threshold Framework. Telematics and Informatics, Vol.50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101382
  5. Alincia, Devi., & Sitabuana, Tundjung Herning. (2021). Urgency of Law Amandment as Foundation of the Implementation of Cyber Notary. Law Reform, Vol.17, (No.2), pp 214-231. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v17i2.41749
  6. Annas, Faris Budiman., Petranto, Hasya Nailan., & Pramayoga, Asep Aji. (2019). Public Opinion of Political Polarization on Social Media. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi dan Pembangunan, Vol.20, (No.2), pp. 111-122. https://doi.org/10.31 346/jpikom.v20i2.2006
  7. Benuf, Kornelius., & Azhar, Muhamad. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Gema Keadilan, Vol.7, (No.1),pp. 20-33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk. 2020.7504
  8. Chourasia, Subhangi., Pandey S.M., & Keshri, Anup Kumar. (2023). Prospects and Challenges with Legal Informatics and Legal Metrology Framework in the Context of Industry 6.0. Mapan: Journal of Metrology Science of India, Vol.38, (Issue 4), pp.1027-1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-023-00664-8
  9. Cyras, Vytautas., & Lachmayer, Friedrich. (2023). Different Views to Legal Information Systems: Separate Legal Meanings and Legal Sublevels. Law, Governance, and Technology Series, Vol.54, pp. 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27957-7_18
  10. Hasib, M. (2016). Pembentukan Hukum yang Bermoral Dalam Dimensi Memaknai Kembali Ideologi Pancasila. Diversi: Jurnal Hukum, Vol.2,(No.2),pp.484-501. https://doi.org/10.32503/ diversi.v2i2.152
  11. Igari, N. (2014). How to Successfully Promote ICT Usage: A Comparative Analysis of Denmark and Japan. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 31, pp. 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele. 2012.10.001
  12. Itasari, Endah R. (2021). Kepatuhan Hukum Negara Indonesia Terhadap ICESCR. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksa, Vol.9, (No.2), pp. 414-422. https://doi.org/10.23887/ jpku.v9i2.34143
  13. Jayadi, A. (2017). What Constitues as Limitation of (Human) Rights in Indonesian Legal Context?. Hasanuddin Law Review, Vol.3, (Issues 3), pp. 290-306. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.20956/halrev.v3i 3.1203
  14. Kamarudin. (2016). Membangun Kesadaran dan Ketaatan Hukum Masyarakat Dalam Persepktif Law Enforcement. Jurnal Al-‘Adl, Vol.9, (No.2), pp.150. https://dx.doi.org/10.31332/aladl.v9i2. 683
  15. Lopez, Mar., Carbo, Javier., Molina, Jose M., & Pedraza, Juanita. (2017). Electronic Institutions and Neural Computing Providing Law-Compliance Privacy for Trusting Agents. Journal of Applied Logic, Vol. 24, pp. 119-131. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jal.2016.11.019
  16. Nurhayati, Yati., Ifrani., & Said, M. Yasir. (2021). Metode Normatif dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, Vol.2, (Issue 1), pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14
  17. Perdana, Andre Pebrian., & Yusuf, Winardi. (2020). UU ITE Tentang Efek Media Sosial Terhadap Generasi Millenial. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, Vol.8, (No.3), pp. 297-308. http://journalbalitbangdalampung.org/
  18. Pöysti, T. (2023). Governance of Societal Cyber and Information Security Risks: How Legal Informatics Can Help Future-Looking Law. Jusletter IT, (February Edition), pp. 39-56. DOI: 10.38023/1a8abe46-9b7f-452f-ad2a-6a4adc09d22a
  19. Rahadjo, Ridho Dwi., & Afifah, Wiwik. (2022). Kesesuaian Permenkominfo Nomor 5 Tahun 2020 Dengan Prinsip Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi Dalam Hak Asasi Manusia. Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Government,Vol.2,(No.2),pp.472-486. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau. v2i2.48
  20. Siagian, Launder., Budiarto, Arief., & Simatupang. (2018). Peran Keamanan Siber Dalam Mengatasi Konten Negatif Guna Mewujudkan Ketahanan Informasi Nasional. Jurnal Prodi Perang Asimetris, Vol.4, (No.3), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.33172/pa.v4i3.268
  21. Sonata, Depri L. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Karakteristik Khas Dari Metode Meneliti Hukum. Fiat Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.8, (No.1), pp. 15-35. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.283
  22. Sulaiman. (2018). Paradigma Dalam Penelitian Hukum. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.20, (No.2), pp. 255-272. https://doi.org/10.24815/ kanun.v20i2.10076
  23. Susanto, Rahkasiwi., & Irwansyah. (2021). Media Sosial, Demokrasi, dan Penyampaian Pendapat Politik Milenial di Era Pasca Reformasi. Jurnal Lontar,Vol.9,(No.1),pp. 65-77. https://doi.org/10.30656/lontar.v9i1.32 49
  24. Utami, P. (2018). Hoax in Modern Politics: The Meaning of Hoax in Indonesian Politics and Democracy. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Vol.22, (Issue 2), pp.85-97. https://doi. org/10. 22146/jsp.34614
  25. Wahyudi, A.T. (2016). Universalitas dan Partikularitas Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Al-Ahkam, Vol.1, (No.1), pp. 93-102. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam. v1i1.82
  26. Widagso, Kisnu., & Hariyani, Orisa Shinta. (2016). Hybrid Pilicing as an Alternative Model of Policing Against Cybercrime in the Information Society. Indonesia Journal of International Law, Vol.12, (No.4), pp. 577-597. https://doi. org/10.17304/ijil.vol13.4.670
  27. Wilona, Mariska Zena., & Purwadi, Hadi. (2021). Privacy Policy on Smart Contracts in E-Commerce Transactions. Law Reform, Vol.17, (No.1), pp. 47-60. https://doi.org/ 10.14710/lr.v 17i1.37552
  28. Yoon, Jin Choi., Byeong, Jin Jeon., & Hee, Woong Kim. (2021). Identification of Key Cyberbullying: A Text Mining and Social Network Analysis Approach. Telematics and Informatics,Vol.56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101504
  29. Yudiana, Teguh Cahya., Rosadi, Sinta Dewi., & Priowirjanto, Enni Soerjati. (2022). The Urgency of Doxing on Social Media Regulation and Implementation of Right to be Forgotten on Related Content for the Optimalization of Data Privacy Protection in Indonesia. Padjajaran Journal of Law, Vol.9, (No.1), pp.24-45. https://doi.org/10.22304/ pjih.v9n1.a2
  30. Matnuh, H. (2017). Law as a Tool of Social Engineering. In Proceeding 1st International Conference on Social Science Education “Multicultural Transformation in Education, Social Science, and Wetland Environment”. (pp.118-120). London: Atlantis Press
  31. Hidayat, A. (2019). Negara Hukum Berwatak Pancasila. Presented in Workshop "Peningkatan Pemahaman Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara Bagi Asosiasi Dosen Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (ADPK) & Asosiasi Profesi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Indonesia (AP3KnI)". Bogor: 21 Agustus 2019
  32. Sitabuana, Tundjung H. (2022). Meneguhkan Tekad dan Semangat Mewujudkan Tujuan Negara Berdasarkan Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 (Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Hukum dan Politik). In Pidato Pengukuhan Profesor Bidang Ilmu Hukum. 2 Juli 2022. (Jakarta: Universitas Tarumanagara)
  33. Kemp, S. (2022). Digital 2022: Indonesia. Laporan Tahunan. 15 Februari 2022. pp. 1-113
  34. Masyarakat Telematika Indonesia (Mastel). (2019). Hasil Survei Wabah Hoax Nasional 2019. Laporan Penelitian. pp. 1-35
  35. Ali, Achmad., & Heryani, Wiwie. (2013). Menjelajahi Kajian Empiris Terhadap Hukum. Cet.2. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group
  36. Gunawan, Budi., & Ratmono, Barito Mulyo. (2021). Demokrasi di Era Post Truth. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia
  37. Longo, E. (2022). The Risk of Social Media Platforms for Democracy. In Custer, Bart., & Villaronga, Eduard Fosch (eds). (2022). Law and Artificial Intelligent: Regulating AI and Applying AI in Legal Practice. Leiden: ASSER Press
  38. Pianini, Danilo., & Omicini, Andrea. Democratic Process and Digital Platform: An Engineering Perspective. In Contucci, Pierluigi., Omicini, Andrea., Pianini, Danilo., & Sirbu, Alina (Eds). (2019). The Future of Digital Democracy: An Interdisciplinary Approach. London: Springer
  39. Savitri, A. (2019). Revolusi Industri 4.0.: Mengubah Tantangan Menjadi Peluang di Era Disrupsi 4.0. Yogyakarta: Genesis
  40. Anggraini, F. (2023, January 5). Medsos Jadi Tempat Merangkul, Bukan Wahana Saling Memukul. Media Indonesia
  41. Anonim (a). (2023, February 2). Literasi Digital Masih Hadapi Tantangan. Kompas
  42. Anonim (b). (2023, January 30). Bijak Memproduksi Konten di Media Sosial. Koran Sindo
  43. Anonim (c). (2021, February 21). Basa-Basi Revisi Undang-Undang ITE. Tempo
  44. Anonim (d). (2023, January 31). Menjadi Konsumen Cerdas di Era Digital. Koran Sindo
  45. Dongoran, H. A. (2022, August 7). Cara Licik Mematikan Kritik. Tempo
  46. Hasan, M. (2023, January 25). Ada Konsekuensi Serius Dari Setiap Unggahan. Media Indonesia
  47. Musarovah, E. (2017). in Riyanto, Djoko & Baliyanto, Lindu. Pemantapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Kepada Generasi Muda Sebagai Jati Diri Bangsa yang Sejati. Wira: Media Informasi Kementerian Pertahanan, Vol.68 (No. 52), pp. 6-11
  48. Pakpahan, Faorick., & Nararya, Ananda. (2023, January 30). Stop Konten Eksploitasi Lansia-Anak!. Koran Sindo
  49. Shamil. (2023, January 19). Lato-Lato Lawan Dominasi Game Online. Koran Sindo
  50. Sugihartati, R. (2023, January 30). Kejahatan Siber di Era Masyarakat Berisiko. Media Indonesia
  51. Zuhdi, N. (2023, January 16). Sekolah Lambat Respons Literasi Digital. Media Indonesia
  52. Annur, Cindy M. (2021, September 15). Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia di Era Jokowi Cenderung Menurun. Databoks. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapubli sh/2021/09/15/indeks-demokrasi-indonesia-di-era-jokowi-cenderung-menurun. Accessed 15th March 2023
  53. CNN Indonesia. (2019, October 18). Kebebasan di Era Jokowi dan Jerat Lima Pasal ‘Panas’ UU ITE. Retrieved from https://www.cnn indonesia.com/teknologi/201 91018171905-185-440771/kebebasan-di-era-jokowi-dan-jerat-lima-pasal-panas-uu-ite. Accessed 19th March 2023
  54. Ernes, Y. (2020, December 24). Polda Metro Tangani 443 Kasus Cyber Selama 2020, 1.448 Akun di-Take Down. Detik News. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita /d-5308010/polda-metro-tangani-443-kasus-cyber-selama-2020-1448-akun-di-take-down. Accessed 18th February 2023
  55. Kemenkominfo. (2023). Perusahaan Anda Termasuk Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik?. Retrieved from https://pse.kominfo.go.id/ home/pse-domestik. Accessed 22nd May 2023
  56. Nafi’an, Muhamad I. (2020, April 18). Menkominfo: Ada 554 Isu Hoax Soal Covid-19, 89 Orang Jadi Tersangka. Detik News. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4982087/men kominfo-ada-554-isu-hoax-soal-covid-19-89-orang-jadi-tersangka. Accessed 18th February 2023
  57. Nurhanisah, Y. (2022). Apa Beda PSE Badan Publik dan Privat. Retrieved from https://indo nesiabaik.id/infografis/apa-beda-pse-badan-publik-dan-privat. Accessed 18th May 2023
  58. Sudoyo, W. (2023, January 12). Selama 2022. Kominfo Blokir 238.226 Konten Negatif. Info Publik. Retrieved from https://infopublik.id/ kategori/nasional-sosial-budaya/701902/ sela ma-2022-kominfo-blokir-238-226-konten-negatif. Accessed 22nd May 2023
  59. Supriadi, D. (2023, February 14). Kedewasaan Digital Pers Indonesia 2023. Kompas.com. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.com/ tren/read/2023/02/14/174238465/kedewasa an-digital-pers-indonesia-2023?page=2. Accessed 18th February 2023
  60. Yahya, Achmad Nasrudin., & Krisiandi. (2021, December 13). Ruang Kebebasan Berekspresi Sepanjang 2021 Dinilai Kian Menyempit. Kompas. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/ 12/13/19164621/ruang-kebebasan-berekspresi-sepanjang-2021-dinilai-kian-menyempit?page=all. Accessed 18th March 2023
  61. Widiatno, A. (2023). Lecturer in Cyber Law and Telematics, Faculty of Law, Trisakti University. Haryantomataram Library, Trisakti University, Jakarta: June 13th, 2023
  62. Wijaya, E. (2023). Lecturer in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Tarumanagara University. Jakarta by Zoom Meeting [online]: May 25th, 2023

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-10 13:50:57

No citation recorded.