skip to main content

Legal Qualification of the Ferienjob Program as Human Trafficking under Indonesian Law

1Department of Criminal Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia

2Program of Forensic Science, Postgraduate School, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

3Master Maritime Policy, University of Wollongong, Australia

Open Access Copyright 2026 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

The Ferienjob program offers short-term employment opportunities for Indonesian students in Germany during academic breaks. However, its implementation has triggered serious issues related to manipulative recruitment, irregular placement procedures, debt bondage, and exploitative working conditions. However, legal studies examining in-depth whether the Ferienjob practice meets the elements of human trafficking (TPPO) as stipulated in Law Number 21 of 2007 are still very limited. This study aims to analyze the fulfillment of the legal elements of TPPO in the program and evaluate institutional governance during its implementation. By combining a normative juridical approach and case studies, this research utilizes primary and secondary legal materials, as well as public documents related to the Ferienjob case. The analysis focuses on three main elements of TPPO under Indonesian law: process, method, and exploitation. The study results indicate that the implementation of Ferienjob for Indonesian students has met all three elements. The process element is evident in the structured recruitment of 1,047 students from 33 universities and their placement in Germany. The method element is evident through fraud, debt bondage, and exploitation of victims' vulnerabilities. Meanwhile, elements of exploitation are reflected in harsh working conditions, wage cuts, and facts on the ground that are far from the initial promises. This research also found weak oversight and coordination between institutions in monitoring student recruitment. Based on the available evidence and the framework of Law No. 21/2007, this study concludes that the practice of Ferienjob can be legally qualified as human trafficking (TPPO). These findings expand the legal literature on human trafficking hidden within official mechanisms and emphasize the importance of tightening regulations on recruitment agencies, conducting due diligence by universities, and strengthening cross-border protection.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
Law Reform Copyright Transfer Agreement Heni Siswanto
Subject
Type Other
  Download (125KB)    Indexing metadata
Email colleagues
Keywords: Exploitation; Ferienjob Program; Human Trafficking

Article Metrics:

  1. Andre, G. M., Arief, B. N., Sularto, R. B., Azizah, F. N., & Nabela, N. Proof of Element of Unlawfulness Acts in The National Criminal Code. Law Reform, 21(2), 482-495. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v21i2.67253
  2. Al-Anzi, A.-S. H. (2024). International Efforts in Combating Women Trafficking Within Human Rights Protection Framework: International and National Measures to Combat Trafficking in Women. Journal of Ecohumanism,3(6),1048–1063. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i6.4073
  3. Alfani, T. N. (2024). Analisis Pasal TPPO dalam Kasus Feirieinjob: Peran Lembaga Internasional dan Organisasi Kemanusiaan. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmiah Pertahanan, Politik Dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.62383/ amandemen.v1i3.316
  4. Angela, M., Permatasari, D. S., & Tedjokusumo, D. D. (2024). Modus Operandi Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang di Negara Anggota ASEAN. PALAR (Pakuan Law Review),10(3),1–14. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v10i3
  5. Anwary, I. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of public administration policies in the development of stringent legal framework: An analysis of the criminal justice system in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminal Justice Science, 17(2), 312–323. https://ijcjs.com/menu-script/index.php/ijcjs/ article/view/613
  6. Arafah, R., & Triadi, I. (2025). Analisis Peran Hukum Internasional Dalam Menghadapi Perdagangan Manusia Di Indonesia. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15683889
  7. Archibald, M. M. (2016). Investigator Triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research,10(3),228–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815570092
  8. Aryani, C. (2021). Mendorong lahirnya RUU Keamanan Laut dalam penguatan sistem keamanan laut nasional. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.11086
  9. Azhar, M., & Suhartoyo, S. (2022). Konsep Perlindungan Anak Buah Kapal Perikanan Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Law, Development and Justice Review, 5(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v5i2.17352
  10. Azizurrahman, S. H., Ismawati, S., Siagian, P., Had, A., Tahir, M., & Alkadri, S. M. R. R. M. (2023). The Early Warning System in Preventing Human Trafficking: Border (In) Security and Challenges for Indonesia. Hasanuiddin Law Review, 9(3), 287. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v9i3.4692
  11. Basuki, U. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Atas Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Varia Justicia,13(2),132–146. https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v13i2.1887
  12. Berliani, C. K. S., Sonhaji, S., & Suhartoyo, S. (2019). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemenuhan Kewajiban Penyeliaan Pelatihan Kerja Bagi Calon Pekerja Migran Indonesia (CPMI) PT. Phinisi Sumber Daya Semarang. Diponegoro Law Journal, 8(3), 1844–1853. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2019.25985
  13. Boister, N. (2016). Their Cooperation Provisions of their UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime: A ‘Toolbox’ Rarely Used? International Criminal Law Review, 16(1), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01601008
  14. Broad, R., & Turnbull, N. (2019). From Human Trafficking to Modern Slavery: The Development of Anti-Trafficking Policy in the UK. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 25(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9375-4
  15. Campbell, I., Boese, M., & Tham, J-C. (2016). Inhospitable workplace? International students and paid work in food services. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 51(3), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2016.tb01232.x
  16. Cockbain, E., & Bowers, K. (2019). Human trafficking for sex, labour and domestic servitude: how do key trafficking types compare and what are their predictors? Crime, Law and Social Change, 72(1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-019-09836-7
  17. Cooper, F. I., van Bemmel, S. R., van de Leur, J. P., & Kunst, M. J. J. (2024). Factors that influence the criminal justice response to human trafficking: a systematic review of North American and European studies. Crime, Law and Social Change, 82(3), 623–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10161-x
  18. Daud, B. S., & Sopoyono, E. (2019). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Perdagangan Manusia (Human Trafficking) Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia,1(3),352–365. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i3.352-365
  19. Faisol, F. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengurus Korporasi Terkait Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Yurispruden, 2(2), 164. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v2i2.2776
  20. Farrell, A., Dank, M., de Vries, I., Kafafian, M., Hughes, A., & Lockwood, S. (2019). Failing victims? Challenges of the police response to human trafficking. Criminology & Public Policy,18(3),649–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12456
  21. Faturohman, F., Suhartini, S., & Adawiyah, R. (2024). HAM dan penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana perdagangan orang. Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(3),38-45. https://doi.org/10.55606/jhpis.v3i3.3877
  22. Gerry, F., Muraszkiewicz, J., & Iannelli, O. (2018). The drive for virtual (online) courts and their failure to consider obligations to combat human trafficking – A short note of concern on identification, protection and privacy of victims. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(4), 912–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.06.002
  23. Greenbaum, J., Bodrick, N., Flaherty, E. G., Idzerda, S. M., Laskey, A. T., Legano, L. A., Leventhal, J. M., Gavril, A. R., Suchdev, P. S., Chan, K. J., Howard, C. R., McGann, P. T., St. Clair, N. E., & Yun, K. (2017). Global Human Trafficking and Child Victimization. Pediatrics,140(6). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3138
  24. Handono, J., & Setiyono, J. (2023). Corporate Accountability for the Illegal Crimes of Human Trafficking in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(08). https://doi.org/ 10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i8-86
  25. Indarti, E. (2022). Penegakan Hukum, Kepolisian Masyarakat Dan Kewarganegaraan: Studi Kajian Filsafat Hukum. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.141-152
  26. Johannes, A. E., Kusumasari, B., Hadna, A. H., & Retnandari, N. D. (2023). Human Trafficking: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 27(2), 107. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.84709
  27. Junaidi, M., & Khikmah, K. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Dan Penempatan Pekerja Migran Indonesia Di Luar Negeri. Jurnal Usm Law Review,7(1),490–501. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v7i1.8127
  28. Darmayanti, K. N., Dantes, K. F., Ardhya, S. N., & Setianto, M. J. (2022). Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Human Trafficking) Sebagai Transnational Crime. Ganesha Law Review, 4(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/ 10.23887/glr.v4i2.1425
  29. Khan, Z., Kamaluddin, M. R., Meyappan, S., Manap, J., & Rajamanickam, R. (2023). Prevalence, causes, and impacts of human trafficking in Asian countries: A scoping review. F1000Research, 11, 1021. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.124460.3
  30. Khasanah, D. R. A. U., Rizkiana, R. E., Khanifa, N. K., Pongantung, R. J., & Muzammil, M. (2023). Penerapan Pendamping Pekerja Migran Perempuan Dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Di Kabupaten Kendal. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 52(3), 249–261. https://doi.org/10. 14710/mmh.52.3.2023.249-261
  31. Kusuma, R., Pujiyono, P., & Sasmini, S. (2025). Legal Protection for Indonesian Migrant Workers (IMW) Affected by Medical Treatment Malpractice in the Placement Country. In 6th International Conference on Education and Social Sciences (ICESS 2024) (pp.46-57). Atlantis Press. DOI: 10.2991/978-2-38476-392-4_5
  32. Langbroek, P., Van den Bos, K., Thomas, M. S., Milo, M., & Van Rossum, W. (2017). Editorial Methodology of Legal Research: Challenges and Opportunities. Utrecht Law Review,13(3),1-8. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.411
  33. Magistri, N. R. C. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Korban Tindak Pidana Penyiksaan Dalam Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i1.82-101
  34. Mahfud, M. A., Wibawa, K. C. S., ALW, L. T., & Saraswati, R. (2022). The Fulfillment of Rights to Citizenship for Migrant Workers Deportees in Nunukan District. Law Reform,18(1),1–15. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i1.44655
  35. Macy, R. J., Klein, L. B., Shuck, C. A., Rizo, C. F., Van Deinse, T. B., Wretman, C. J., & Luo, J. (2023). A scoping review of human trafficking screening and response. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1202-1219. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/15248380211057273
  36. Musa, M., Zulhuda, S., Endri, E., Susanti, H., & Rinaldi, K. (2024). Guidelines for Implementing Imprisonment Sentences with Single Formulation (A Critique of Book I of the National Criminal Code). Law Reform, 20(1), 106–134. https://doi.org/10. 14710/lr.v20i1.52851
  37. Nababan, N., Sularto, R. B., & Purwanti, A. (2019). Upaya Perlindungan Korban Dalam Lingkup Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Studi Putusan Nomor: 2044/PID. SUS/2013/PN. JKT. BAR). Diponegoro Law Journal, 8(3), 2247–2271. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2019.26000
  38. Ndraha, A. S., Jaya, N. S. P., & Pujiyono, P. (2019). Pendekatan Politik Kriminal Secara Integral dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Human Trafficking oleh Kepolisian Daerah (Polda) Jawa Tengah. Diponegoro Law Journal, 8(3), 1646–1670. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2019.24553
  39. Ninage, M. B., & Diamantina, A. (2022). Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan Izin Tinggal Kunjungan Warga Negara Asing Oleh Kantor Imigrasi Semarang. Journal Pengembangan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.197-212
  40. Nugroho, O. C. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Journal Of Personality Huikuim De Jure, 18(4), 543. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.V18.543-560
  41. Nugroho, D. R., & Suteki, S. (2020). Membangun Budaya Hukum Persidangan Virtual (Studi Perkembangan Sidang Tindak Pidana via Telekonferensi). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i3.8799
  42. Nugroho, B., & Roesli, M. (2017). Analisa hukum tindak pidana perdagangan orang (human trafficking). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 2(1), 106-114. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v2n1.9
  43. Nurfajriana, S., & Prasetyo, H. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia Korban Eksploitasi Program Magang Ferienjob di Jerman. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(3),260–268. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11666797
  44. Nurillah, M., Ashghor, A., & Lestari, M. P. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Perdagangan Orang Dalam Program Magang Mahasiswa di Jerman. Journal of Law and Security Studies,2(1),1–10. https://doi.org/10.31599/aj63pei40
  45. Oktavian, A. (2024). International law and human trafficking: Prevention and control in Indonesia. Russian Law Journal, 12(1), 577-585. https://www.russianlawjournal.org/index.php/journal/article/view/3736
  46. Panjaitan, A. C. D. (2022). Harmonisasi Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Dengan Protokol Palermo Dalam Perlindungan Perdagangan Orang Di Indonesia. Jurnal Yustitia,16(1),1–13. https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v16i1.895
  47. Pinilih, S. A. G., Sulistyawan, A. Y., Cahyaningtyas, I., & Prabandari, A. P. (2022). The Legal Policy of Citizenship in Fulfilling the Rights of Stateless Persons as an Effort to Fulfill Human Rights in Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 7(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.1. 2022.17-33
  48. Planitzer, J., & Katona, N. (2017). Criminal Liability of Corporations for Trafficking in Human Beings for Labour Exploitation. Global Policy, 8(4), 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12510
  49. Prakken, H., & Sartor, G. (2015). Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective. Artificial Intelligence, 227, 214–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.005
  50. Pujiyono, P. (2016). Corporation Criminal Responsibility Model Based on Restorative Justice Approach in Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 1(1), 127. https://doi.org/10. 14710/dilrev.1.1.2016.127-142
  51. Purwadi, H., Lukitasari, D., Mayastuti, A., Abd Aziz, H., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2024). Regulatory Framework on Compensation in the Restoration of Victims of Sexual Violence. Law Reform, 20(2), 383–407. DOI: 10.14710/lr.v20i2.58181
  52. Purwanegara, D. S. (2020). Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang melalui media sosial. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika, 15(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v15i2.2020.118-127
  53. Purwanti, A. (2017). Protection and Rehabilitation for Women Victims of Violence According to Indonesian Law (Study on Central Java Government’s Handling Through KPK2BGA). Diponegoro Law Review, 2(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.2.2017.68-81
  54. Putra, A. W., & Sutanti, R. D. (2020). Kebijakan formulasi pidana mati bersyarat dalam perspektif pembaruan hukum pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3),319-330. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.8801
  55. Putri, A. R. H., & Arifin, R. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang di Indonesia (Legal Protection for Victims of Human Trafficking Crime in Indonesia). Res Judicata, 2(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.29406/rj.v2i1.1340
  56. Ridlwan, Z., Budiyono, B., Akib, M., Sumarja, F. X., & Fardiansyah, A. I. (2025). Curbing Elitist Populism in Indonesia's Lawmaking: A Constitutional Law Perspective. Lex Scientia Law Review, 9(2), 1260-1294. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v9i2.27909
  57. Rahmania, N., & Nirmala, A. Z. (2024). Yurisdiksi Indonesia Atas Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Terhadap Pengungsi Rohingya. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 5(1),114–126. https://doi.org/10.29303/risalahkenotariatan.v5i1.227
  58. Raskolnikov, A. (2020). Criminal Deterrence: A Review of the Missing Literature. Supreme Court Economic Review, 28, 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1086/710158
  59. Resa, M. K., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2021). Problematika Gugus Tugas Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Dan Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Human Trafficking). Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 50(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.14710/ mmh.50.2.2021.161-171
  60. Retnowinarni, R. (2017). Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi. Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 15(1), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.56444/hdm.v15i1.646
  61. Rivanie, S. S., Muchtar, S., Muin, A. M., Prasetya, A. M. D., & Rizky, A. (2022). Perkembangan Teori-teori Tujuan Pemidanaan. Halu Oleo Law Review, 6(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.33561/holrev.v6i2.4
  62. Rinaldi, K., & Tutrianto, R. (2023). Polemik Pengendalian Sosial, Kejahatan dan Hukuman Mati (Studi Pada Diskursus Pemberlakuan Penghukuman Mati terhadap Pengedar Narkotika di Indonesia). Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(3), 523-536. https://doi.org/10. 14710/jphi.v5i2.19558
  63. Rozah, U. (2017). The Parental Responsibility Concept in Replacing Criminal Responsibility of Child to Parent (The Study Of Indonesian Tribes Culture In Lampung And Aga Balinese Tribes). Diponegoro Law Review, 2(2), 342. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.2.2017.98-104
  64. Santoso, B., & Pati, U. K. (2024). Balancing corporate rescue and workers' protection in pandemic crises: lessons from selected European countries. Law Reform, 20(2), 250-277. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i2.62885
  65. Setlight, M. M. M., & Pangemanan, D. R. (2024). Potret Empirik Model Pencegahan dan Penanganan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Amanna Gappa, 32(1), 12-18. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/agjl/article/view/33251
  66. Setiyono, J. (2020). Integrated policy management of narcotics trafficking as transnational organized crime in Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 5(2), 260-276. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.5. 2.2020.260-276
  67. Siahaan, H. M. (2020). Law Enforcement in The Handling of People Smuggling Crime in Indonesia. Law Reform, 16(2), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33769
  68. Sitania, L. V., & Suponyono, E. (2020). Akomodasi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Dalam Aspek Hukum Internasional Dan Nasional. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i1.38-54
  69. Suganda, A. G., Rozah, U., & Astuti, A. M. E. S. (2022). Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Menyebarkan Berita Bohong Yang Menimbulkan Keonaran (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 203/Pid.Sus/2019/PN Jkt. Sel.). Diponegoro Law Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2022.32895
  70. Sumaya, P. S. (2024). Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kasus Perdagangan Orang di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Implementasi UU Nomor 21 Tahun 2007. MANIFESTO Journal Gagasan Komunikasi, Politik, Dan Budaya, 2(1). https://journal.awatarapublisher.com/index.php/manifesto/article/view/232
  71. Sundram, P. (2024). ASEAN cooperation to combat transnational crime: progress, perils, and prospects. Frontiers in Political Science,6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1304828
  72. Suriyawong, C., Sinthupinyo, S., & Triukose, S. (2026). An Innovation Model of Crime Mapping in Prevention and Suppression of Human Trafficking. Journal of Human Trafficking,1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2026.2676866
  73. Susianawati, A. T., & Faozi, S. (2022). Optimalisasi Perlindungan Hukum Korban Perdagangan Orang (Human Trafficking) Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Hukum, 23(2), 152–165. https://doi.org/10.35315/dh.v23i2.9082
  74. Sutiyono, R. (2025). Analisis Efektivitas Penindanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Jurnal Dimensi Hukum, 8(1), 42–52. https://jurnal.ubt.ac.id/index.php/dimensi_hukum/article/view/321
  75. Taekema, S. (2021). Methodologies of Rule of Law Research: Why Legal Philosophy Needs Empirical and Doctrinal Scholarship. Law and Philosophy, 40(1), 33–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-020-09388-1
  76. Thalib, H., Rahman, S., & Semendawai, A. H. (2017). The Role of Justice Collaborator in Uncovering Criminal Cases in Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 2(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.1.2017.27-39
  77. Utami, S. N., & Nasrudin, N. (2024). Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Human Trafficking) Terhadap Mahasiswa Indonesia Melalui Program Magang di Jerman. Qanuniya: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 1(1),1–9. https://doi.org/10.15575/qanuiniya.v1i1.816
  78. Widyawati, A., Pujiyono, P., Rochaeti, N., Maskur, M. A., & Latifiani, D. (2022). Development of online system applications as an effort to handle cases of violence and human trafficking. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol.2573,No.1). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0104098
  79. Wardhana, R. A. K., & Sularto, R. B. (2022). Studi Komparasi Formulasi Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia Dan Malaysia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(2),227-244. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i2.13787
  80. Yang, P. (2020). Toward a Framework for (Re)Thinking their Ethics and Politics of International Student Mobility. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(5), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319889891
  81. Yanti, T. O., & Putri, M. K. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Perempuan Korban Perdagangan Orang Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Causa: Journal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 6(5),91–100. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v2i9.2461
  82. Yusitarani, S. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Migran Korban Perdagangan Manusia Oleh Pemerintah Indonesia. Journal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i1.24-37
  83. Yusran, R. (2018). The ASEAN Convention Against Trafficking in Persons: A Preliminary Assessment. Asian Jouirnal of International Law, 8(1), 258–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251317000108
  84. Mallia, N. (2023). Combating human trafficking: the importance of international and national collaboration. L-Università ta' Malta
  85. Allain, J. (2015). No Effective: Trafficking Definition Exists: Domestic Implementation of the Palermo Protocol. In The Law and Slaveiry (pp. 265–294). The Netherlands: Brill Nijhoff
  86. Amir, A. (2024). Human Trafficking in a New Form Case Study: The Germany Ferienjob Case. Rochester: SSRN
  87. Emeziem, C. (2023). Mapping Their Trends: Human Trafficking, COVID-19 Pandemic and International Law. Leids: Emerald Publishing Limited
  88. Smith, E. (2019). Transnational crime in Asia: causes, effects, challenges. In Research Handbook on Transnational Crime. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing
  89. UNODC. (2022). Global Report on Trafficking in Persons 2022
  90. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2024). Global report on trafficking in persons 2024. Stylus Publishing, LLC
  91. ASEAN. (2023). ASEAN Leaders’ Declaration on Combating Trafficking in Persons Caused by The Abuse of Technology. Retrieved from https://asean.org/asean-leaders-declaration-on-combating-trafficking-in-persons-caused-by-the-abuse-of-technology/
  92. Aulia, M. R. (2024). Migrant Watch Tegaskan Ferienjob di Jerman bukan TPPO. Retrieved from https://www.medcom.id/ nasional/hukum/GbmPln1N-migrant-watch-tegaskan-ferienjob-di-jerman-bukan-tppo
  93. Cpiet. (2024). INP Uncover Human Trafficking in German Internship Scam. Retrieved from https://inp.polri.go.id/artikel/inp-uncover-human-trafficking-in-german-internship-scheme
  94. KemenPPPA. (2024). KemenPPPA: Perkuat Sinergi dan Kolaborasi Multipihak untuk Pencegahan TPPO. Retrieved From https://www.kemenpppa.go.id/index.php/siaran-pers/kemenpppa%C2%A0-perkuat-sinergi-dan-kolaborasi-multipihak-untuk-pencegahan-tppo
  95. Rahmawaty, L. (2024). Bareskrim Polri sebut “ferienjob” adalah program resmi di Jerman. Retrieved from https://www.antaranews.com/berita/4031034/bareskrim-polri-sebut-ferienjob-adalah-program-resmi-di-jerman
  96. Santoso, A. (2024). Bareskrim Bongkar Perdagangan Orang Modus Magang Ferienjob ke Jerman. Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7250374/bareskrim-bongkar-perdagangan-orang-modus-magang-ferienjob-ke-jerman
  97. The Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia in Berlin. (2020). Ferienjob = Kerja Paruh Waktu Dalam Masa Libur. Ferienjob Bukan Kerja Magang. Ferienjob Adalah Bagian Dari Job Market. Retrieved from https://indonesianembassy.de/news/ferienjob-kerja-paruh-waktu-dalam-masa-libur-ferienjob-bukan-kerja-magang-ferienjob-adalah-bagian-dari-job-market-2/
  98. Tribrata. (2023a). Kapolri Catat Ada 982 Kasus TPPO di Sepanjang 2023. Retrieved from https://tribratanews.polri.go.id/blog/nasional-3/kapolri-catat-ada-982-kasus-tppo-di-sepanjang-2023-68169
  99. Tribrata. (2023b). Polri Telah Amankan 898 Tersangka TPPO, Modus PRT Paling Banyak Dilakukan. Retrieved from https://tribratanews. riau.polri.go.id/read-19158-polri-telah-amankan-898-tersangka-tppo-modus-prt-paling-banyak-dilakukan.html
  100. U.S. Department of State. (2024). Indonesia - United States Department of State. Retrieved from https://www.state. gov/reports/2023-trafficking-in-persons-report/indonesia/
  101. European Union Directive 2011/36/EU on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims
  102. European Union Employer Sanctions Directive 2009/52/EC on sanctions and measures against employers of illegally staying third-country nationals
  103. German Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch)
  104. German Employment Ordinance (Beschäftigungsverordnung/BeschV)
  105. Indonesian Law No. 18 of 2017 on Protection of Indonesian Migrant Workers
  106. Indonesian Law No. 21 of 2007 on the Eradication of the Crime of Human Trafficking
  107. Ministry Circular No. 1032/E.E2/DT.00.05/2023 (Directorate General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology) - regarding cessation of Ferienjob program participation
  108. United Nations Convention on Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC) (2000)
  109. United Nations. (2000). Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children. New York

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-09-03 13:41:31

No citation recorded.