DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v22i1.71136

The Potential Application of The Bridging Approach In Community-Based Corrections In Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective

*Hamja Hamja orcid scopus  -  School of Postgraduate Studies, Univeristas Wiralodra, Indonesia
Bhanu Prakash Nunna orcid scopus  -  School of Law, RV University, India
Endang Sutrisno orcid scopus publons  -  School of Postgraduate Studies, Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati, Indonesia
Nandang Sambas orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
Ermania Widjajanti orcid scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2026 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Electronic Monitoring (EM) constitutes a sophisticated surveillance mechanism that epitomizes technological advancements within the legal sphere and acts as a feasible substitute for conventional detention practices. Nations such as South Korea have adeptly incorporated EM into a meticulously designed, community-centric training framework. Indonesia is encouraged to adopt EM; however, the effective realization of this initiative necessitates alterations to the prevailing legal and social infrastructure. This research endeavors to investigate the feasibility of EM implementation in Indonesia through a comparative analysis with the established framework in South Korea, focusing particularly on the alignment of correctional institutions, technological systems, and community engagement. Employing a comparative judicial methodology, this study assesses the legal framework, institutional arrangements, and operational procedures pertaining to EM in both jurisdictions. Findings indicate that South Korea has established a comprehensive national framework for EM, supported by centralised monitoring facilities located in Seoul and Daejeon, regional parole offices, and coordinated oversight in conjunction with law enforcement agencies. In contrast, Indonesia's correctional system remains hampered by fragmented regulatory measures, inadequate institutional collaboration, and limited technological capabilities. The lack of EM as a formally recognised legal instrument limits alternative sentencing options and exacerbates prison overcrowding. This study concludes that Indonesia requires legislative reform, capital investment in monitoring infrastructure, and enhanced inter-agency collaboration to facilitate the effective implementation of EM.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Community-Based Corrections; Electronic Monitoring; Indonesian Criminal Code; Rehabilitation Technology

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Inequality Between The Potential of Fishery Resources and The Poverty Level of Fisherman Communities in Coastal Areas The Potential Application of The Bridging Approach In Community-Based Corrections In Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective More recent articles
Most cited articles
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA COUNTER TERRORISM BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME SEBAGAI UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA GLOBALISASI LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, DAN TRANSGENDER (LGBT): PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN AGAMA DALAM LINGKUP HUKUM DI INDONESIA PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA PENDIDIKAN HUKUM SEBAGAI PENDIDIKAN MANUSIA More cited articles
  1. Adonara, F. F., Ohoiwutun, Y. T., & Taniady, V. (2025). The Application of the Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine as a Principle of Evidence in Medical Malpractice. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 7(3), 365. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i3.179-197
  2. Al-Mahasneh, A., Al-Raggad, M., Albalawee, N., & Heilat, O. Al. (2024). Electronic Monitoring as an Alternative to Deprivation of Liberty in Jordanian and Emirati Law. Pakistan Journal of Criminology,16(2), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482
  3. Arvante, J. Z. Y., Sulistyawan, A. Y., & Riyanto, Y. P. (2025). The Role of Legal Theory in the Era of Digital Globalization: A Perspective of Law Theory as a Tool of Social Engineering. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia,7(2),315. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i2.128-145
  4. Badriyah, S. M., Suharto, R., Saraswati, R., & Marjo, M. (2025). Revamping Partnership Agreements to Empower Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises in the Processed Marine Fish Food Industry. Lentera Hukum, 12(2),329-371. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v12i2.48815
  5. Belur, J., Thornton, A., Tompson, L., Manning, M., Sidebottom, A., & Bowers, K. (2020). A systematic review of the effectiveness of electronic monitoring of offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice, 68. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101686
  6. Berry, C. R., & Berry, M. A. (2024). Countering surveillance: using actor-network theory to understand how organized crime is displaced and harm arises as offenders become invisible to the gaze of electronic monitoring and law enforcement. Crime, Law and Social Change, 82, 1189–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10168-4
  7. Beyens, K. (2017). Electronic monitoring and supervision: A comparative perspective. European Journal of Probation, 9(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220317704130
  8. Buccafurri, F., De Angelis, V., Idone, M. F., & Labrini, C. (2024). Improving electronic monitoring of sex offenders. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments, 10, 463-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-024-00227-x
  9. Budd, K. M., & Mancini, C. (2017). Public Perceptions of GPS Monitoring for Convicted Sex Offenders: Opinions on Effectiveness of Electronic Monitoring to Reduce Sexual Recidivism. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61 (12), 1335–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15622841
  10. Chamberlain, A. W., Smith, S. M., Turner, S. F., & Jannetta, J. (2020). Global positioning system monitoring of high-risk sex offenders: Implementation challenges and lessons learned. Criminal Justice Policy Review,31(9),1259-1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419884723
  11. Citrawan, H., & Utomo, N. A. (2025). Conscientious Avoidance: How Knowledge in the Prosecutorial System Shapes Indonesia’s Transition?. Sriwijaya Law Review,9(2),399-415. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.v9i2.969
  12. Diamantina, A. (2017). Management, Distribution, and Redemption of Village Fund. Diponegoro Law Review, 2(1), 203-226. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.1.2017.203-226
  13. Feka, M., Pujiyono, P., Sularto, R. B., & Pareke, J. T. (2025). Navigating the Legal Minefield: The Impact of Articles 27A and 27B of Indonesia’s EIT Law on Freedom of Expression and the Path to Legal Reform. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 6(1), 265-304. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v6i1. 19116
  14. Ganapathy, N., & Balachandran, L. (2016). Crime and Punishment in Asia. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(3), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986216656672
  15. Graham, H., & McIvor, G. (2017a) . Advancing electronic monitoring in Scotland: Understanding the influences of localism and professional ideologies. European Journal of Probation, 9(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220317697659
  16. Graham, H., & Mcivor, G. (2017b). Electronic monitoring in the criminal justice system. In Inisghts,40. https://www.iriss.org.uk/resources/insights/electronic-monitoring-criminal-justice-system#:~:text=Electronic monitoring (EM) is a,'stand-alone' option
  17. Grenet, J., Grönqvist, H., & Niknami, S. (2024). The effects of electronic monitoring on offenders and their families. Journal of Public Economics, 230. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jpubeco.2023.105051
  18. Handayani, E., & Hardiyanti, M. (2025). Forging a legal culture: criminal law enforcement in environmental protection amidst the sustainable development era. Clio. Revista de Historia, Ciencias Humanas y Pensamiento Critico, 5(10), 249-281. https:/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14975866
  19. Hawkes, A. L., Sellbom, M., & Gilmour, F. E. (2024). Under surveillance: Does Global Positioning System monitoring of offenders reduce recidivism? Criminology and Criminal Justice,24(4),862-881. https://doi. org/10.1177/17488958231188414
  20. Jin-young, H. (2024). Understanding Criminal Law in Korea. Journal of Korean Law, 23, 101–135. https://doi.org/10.23110/jkl.2024.23.1.004
  21. Hutauruk, R. H., Febriyani, E., Nurlaily, N., Anwar, N. P., & Fitri, W. (2025). Rekonstruksi Hukum Perlindungan Lingkungan dan HAM dalam Konteks Climate Resilience. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 7(2), 1854. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i2.1-19
  22. Indarti, E. (2016). Bridging The Gaps : A Paradigmatic Insight Into Philosophy of Law. Diponegoro Law Review, 1(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.14710/vol%viss%ipp1-11
  23. Jones, R. (2014). The electronic monitoring of offenders: Penal moderation or penal excess? Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(4),475-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9537-3
  24. Kim, H-B., Choi, N., Kwon, H-J., & Kim, H. (2023). Surveillance System for Real-Time High-Precision Recognition of Criminal Faces From Wild Videos. IEEE Access, 11 (June), 56066–56082. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3282451
  25. Kornhauser, R., & Laster, K. (2014). Punitiveness in Australia: electronic monitoring vs the prison. Crime, Law and Social Change, 62(4),445–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-014-9538-2
  26. Latifiani, D., Yusriadi, Y., Sarono, A., Al Fikry, A. H., & Cholis, M. N. (2022). Reconstruction of E-court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies,7(2),413. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.59993
  27. Lee, S-M., Lee, S-H., & Park, J. (2022). A multidimensional approach to wearability assessment of an electronic wrist bracelet for the criminal justice system. Fashion and Textiles,9(25),1–19. https://doi.org/10.118 6/s40691-022-00301-z
  28. Natalis, A., & Purwanti, A. (2025). Dissecting Masculinity: Transformative Strategies to Address Smoking in Indonesia. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 54(2), 434-444. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v54i2.17915
  29. Nugrahenti, M. C., Herliana, H., & Sugiharti, R. R. (2025). Reconstruction of Arbitration Agreement Arrangements to Prevent Pathological Arbitration Clauses in Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia,7(3),420. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i3.405-427
  30. Nurhayati, N., & Suryadi, R. (2017). Democratic Challenges of Indonesia on The Social Media Era. Diponegoro Law Review, 2(2), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol%viss%ipp1-15
  31. Page, J., & Soss, J. (2021). The predatory dimensions of criminal justice. Science, 374(6565),291–294. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABJ7782
  32. Park, M. S., & Lee, H. (2020). Smart city crime prevention services: The Incheon free economic zone case. Sustainability (Switzerland),12(14),1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145658
  33. Piquero, A. R., Cullen, F. T., Unnever, J. D., Piquero, N. L., & Gordon, J. A. (2010). Never too late: Public optimism about juvenile rehabilitation. Punishment & Society,12(2),187–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474509357379
  34. Polanský, I. (2024). Electronic Monitoring Is Not the Only Problem Here: The Challenges of House Arrest Application Practice in the Czech Republic. Bratislava Law Review, 8(1),131. https://doi.org/10.46282/blr.2024.8.1.860
  35. Prudenza, S., Panzitta, A., Bax, C., & Capelli, L. (2022). Electronic Nose for Real-time Monitoring of Odour Emissions at a Wastewater Treatment Plant. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 95, 169-174. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2295029
  36. Purnaningrum, S., & Roisah, K. (2025). Legal Protection for Consumers Receiving Defective Products in Online Transactions. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 7(2),280. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i2.94-108
  37. Purwanti, A. (2017). Protection and Rehabilitation for Women Victims of Violence According to Indonesian Law (Study on Central Java Government’s Handling Through KPK2BGA). Diponegoro Law Review, 2(2), 312-325. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev. 2.2.2017.68-81
  38. Rahayu, W. K., Purwanti, A., Astuti, R. S., & Lituhayu, D. (2025). The influence of mass media in the protection of women through the implementation of regional regulation no. 5 of 2013 on the protection of women and children in west Sumatra province. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology,9(1),1154-1162. https://doi.org/ 10.55214/25768484.v9i1.4364
  39. Richter, M., Ryser, B., & Hostettler, U. (2021). Punitiveness of electronic monitoring: Perception and experience of an alternative sanction. European Journal of Probation, 13(3), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 20662203211038489
  40. Saputra, R., Setiodjati, J. P, & Barkhuizen, J. (2023). Under-Legislation in Electronic Trials and Renewing Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia (Comparison with United States). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1), 243–288. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.67632
  41. Setyowati, R., Abubakar, L., & Rodliah, N. (2017). Sharia Governance on Islamic Banking: Spiritual Rights Perspective on Consumer Protection on Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review,2(1),227-244. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.1.2017.227-244
  42. Shabrina, S., & Putrijanti, A. (2022). Online Legal Counselling As Business Strategy: Exploring The Mediating Role of Notarial Code of Ethics. Corporate Law and Governance Review, 4(2), 69. https://doi.org/10.22495/clgrv4i2p8
  43. Sugiharti, L., Esquivias, M. A., Shaari, M. S., Agustin, L., & Rohmawati, H. (2022). Criminality and Income Inequality in Indonesia. Social Sciences, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11030142
  44. Turisno, B. E., Natalis, A., Asy’Arie, M. A. H. A., & Anggayasti, U. H. (2025). Beyond Textual Reform: A Semiotic and Feminist Critique of Indonesian Civil Code. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 38(7), 2261-2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10314-8
  45. Utama, Z. A, & Asokawati, D. (2024). Pembaharuan Sistem Hukum Terhadap Penyelenggaran Sistem Elektronik Dalam Pencegahan Kejahatan SYNERGY: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal, 2(1), 62–74. https://e-journal.naureendigition. com/index.php/sjim/article/view/1543
  46. Wang, V., & Tucker, J. V. (2023). People watching: Abstractions and orthodoxies of monitoring. Technology in Society, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102178
  47. Wardana, K. A., Rahayu, R., & Sukirno, S. (2024). Redefining Indonesia’s Blasphemy Law in The Digital Age: A Human Rights Perspective. Diponegoro Law Review, 9(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.1.2024
  48. Weswasi, A. E., & Bäckman, O. (2025). The effects of replacing incarceration with electronic monitoring on crime, mortality, and labor market exclusion. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,41(2),169. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10940-024-09595-2
  49. Weswasi, A. E. (2025). Effect of early prison release with electronic monitoring. Journal of Criminal Justice, 97, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102379
  50. Williams, J., & Weatherburn, D. (2022). Can Electronic Monitoring Reduce Reoffending? Review of Economics and Statistics, 104 (2),232–245. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00954
  51. Yusliwidaka, A., & Roisah, K. (2025). Gauging Justice in Outer Space Exploration and Use for All Countries. Novum Jus, 19(2), 193-212. https://doi.org/10.14718/Novum Jus.2025.19.2.7
  52. Zackseski, C. (2020). Criminal Policy and Technology: Electronic monitoring in Brazil and Argentina in a comparative perspective. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 6 (6),1–35. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1167
  53. Han, M. (2017). The Effectiveness of Electronic Monitoring in Korea. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot
  54. Galleguillos, S., Koetzle, D., & Mellow, J. (2024). Legal Reforms, Non-Custodial Sanctions, and Parole in Chile. In The Routledge Handbook on Global Community Corrections, 459–478. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003305149-30
  55. Kaylor, L. E. (2021). Electronic monitoring as an alternative to incarceration as part of criminal justice reform. In Handbook of Issues in Criminal Justice Reform in United States, 701–716. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77565-0_35
  56. Lee, C. S. (2024). The Past, Present, and the Future of Community Corrections in South Korea: Focusing on Probation. In The Routledge Handbook on Global Community Corrections, 113–125. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/ 9781003305149-10
  57. Lee, S. C., Yoon, J., & Keum, Y. (2024). An overview of crime trends and rehabilitation practices in South Korea. In Approaches to Offender Rehabilitation in Asian Jurisdictions, 106–123. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003360919-9
  58. Prize, A., Alam, M., & Anand, P. (2025). Exploring the mechanics of judicial transformations. In S. P. de Souza & J. Wellhausen (Eds.), Digitalising Courts in Asia, 1–266. Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom: Edinburgh University Press
  59. Park, S., & Kim, G. (2023). Intelligent electronic monitoring supervision system based on multi-label classification. In Proceedings of the International Conference on ICT Convergence, 1170–1172. New York, NY, United States: IEEE/conference organiser. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC58733.2023.10393682
  60. Setyowati, N., Suwadi, P., & Muryanto, Y. T. (2024). Electronic court in Indonesia: Challenges and concerns in the development of responsive law reform. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Law, Economic & Good Governance, 174–178. Paris, France: Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-218-7_27
  61. Suhartono, A., Rahmadiyanti, D., & Sarayar, O. (2021). Optimization of technology use in the new normal parole program: A comparative study of Indonesia, the United States and the United Kingdom. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law and Human Rights, 165. Paris, France: Atlantis Press. https://www.atlantis-press.com/ proceedings/iclhr-21/125963845
  62. Bae, S., Choi, J., Kim, B., & Kim, H. (2023). Legal Analysis and International Case Study on the Supervisory Authority of Probation Officers in Electronic Monitoring. KICJ Research Reports. https://www.kicj.re.kr/ board.es?mid=a20201000000&bid=0029&list_no=14168&act=view
  63. Bottoms, A. (2006). Alternatives to Prison. The Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies, 12 (July), 34–37. http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/ccr
  64. Rytter, T. M., & Kambanella, K. (2020). Reducing Overcrowding in Pre-Trial Detention and Prison in The Context of Covid-19: Increasing The Use Of Non-Custodial Measures. Dignity – Danish Institute Against Torture. https://dignity.dk/wp-content/uploads/DIGNITY-COVID19-Guidance-Document-on-Non-Custodial-Measures.pdf
  65. Bail Project. (2023). Electronic monitoring: Costs, consequences, and alternatives. Retrieved from https://bailproject.org/policy/electronic-monitoring/
  66. Dong-Hwan, K. (2021). Probation officers complain of burnout from constant monitoring of former sex offenders. Retrieved from https://www.koreatimes. co.kr/southkorea/law-crime/20210303/ probation-officers-complain-of-burnout-from-constant-monitoring-of-former-sex-offenders?
  67. HyeongMin, K. (2021). Ministry of Justice Launches Rapid Investigation Team to Prevent Recidivism from Electronic Ankle Bracelet Tampering. Retrieved from https://cm.asiae.co.kr/en/article/2021101 310361032004?
  68. LBH Masyarakat. (2022). Unpacking the Tangerang Overcrowding Situation from a Human Rights Perspective. Retrieved from https://lbhmasyarakat.org/opinion-unpacking-the-tangerang-overcrowding-situation-from-a-human-rights-perspective/
  69. Scottish Government. (2019). Electronic monitoring: uses, challenges and successes. Retrieved from https:// www.gov.scot/publications/electronic-monitoring-uses-challenges-successes/ pages/7/
  70. Ministry of Justice Crime Prevention Policy Bureau. (2021). Electronic Monitoring against High-Risk Offenders. Retrieved from https://www.moj.go.kr/cppb_eng/ 2826/subview
  71. Nellis, M. (2021). Electronic Monitoring Around the World. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/criminology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264079-e-642
  72. Kim, S. (2022). The Recent Development in Korean Electronic Monitoring. Retrieved from https://www.cep-probation.org/the-recent-development-in-korean-electronic-monitoring/

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-01-30 10:53:47

No citation recorded.