DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.53.3.2024.326-335

MAKNA FILOSOFIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW DAN URGENSI JUDICIAL ACTIVISM

*Geofani Milthree Saragih  -  Magister Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Mirza Nasution  -  Magister Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Eka N.A.M Sihombing  -  Magister Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MK) secara global sering kali menandai transisi dari pemerintahan otoriter ke pemerintahan demokratis, dengan constitutional review sebagai kewenangan utamanya. Studi tentang pembentukan MK di Eropa, Amerika, Afrika, dan Asia menyoroti perannya dalam menegakkan demokrasi. Judicial activism muncul sebagai pendekatan progresif dalam constitutional review, memperkuat konstitusi dan prinsip checks and balances. Namun, dalam praktiknya, beberapa putusan MK tidak diindahkan oleh para adresatnya, meskipun putusan tersebut memiliki makna filosofis dalam kerangka ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Penelitian normatif ini menggunakan studi kasus dan studi perbandingan hukum untuk menekankan kekuatan filosofis dalam putusan MK, terutama dalam kewenangan constitutional review. Judicial activism dipandang penting untuk menegakkan konstitusi dan menjaga nilai-nilai filosofis Pancasila yang terkandung dalam UUD 1945.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Constitutional Review; Mahkamah Konstitusi; Pancasila

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : ID
Recent articles
CHOICE OF PARADIGM IN ARBITRATION: ARBITRATOR’S AUTONOMY OR PARTIES’ AUTHORITY? MAKNA FILOSOFIS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW DAN URGENSI JUDICIAL ACTIVISM LEGAL PROTECTION OF YEI PEOPLE'S KNOWLEDGE OF LOCAL MEDICINES AND MEDICINAL PLANTS FROM EXTINCTION More recent articles
Most cited articles
Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Pada Kasus Pencurian di Kepolisian Surakarta FAKTOR KRIMINOGEN ILLEGAL MINING TIMAH DI BANGKA BELITUNG IMPLEMENTASI DIVERSI TERHADAP ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM (STUDI KASUS DI PULAU LOMBOK) PERAN STRATEGIS PERGURUAN TINGGI DALAM PERCEPATAN PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PENGGANTI DALAM HUKUM PAJAK DI INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Alemparte, B. (2022). Towards a theory of neoliberal constitutionalism: Addressing Chile’s first constitution-making laboratory. Global Constitutionalism, 11(1), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000058
  2. Ali Marwan HSB. (2017). Konsep Judicial Review Dan Pelembagaannya Di Berbagai Negara. Setara Press
  3. Andiraharja, D. G. (2021). Judicial Review oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Fungsi Ajudikasi Konstitusional di Indonesia. Khazanah Hukum, 3(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v3i2.9012
  4. Baggio, R. C., Berni, P. E., & Carpenedo, A. (2024). Authoritarian Legality and Constitutional Jurisdiction in Chile: Continuities and Ruptures in the Formation of Constitutionalism from the 1990’s. Beijing Law Review, 15(03), 1158–1177. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2024.153070
  5. Barrientos, J. P. V. (2021). De Las Bases Constitucionales De 1823 a La Constitución Política De La República De Guatemala De 1985. Revista Auctoritas Prudentium, 24
  6. Bošnjak, M., & Zajac, K. (2023). Judicial Activism and Judge-Made Law at the ECtHR. Human Rights Law Review, 23(3), ngad015. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngad015
  7. Carle, S. D. (2023). The Failed Idea of Judicial Restraint: A Brief Intellectual History. Law & Social Inquiry, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2023.66
  8. Cebulak, P., Bribosia, E., & Levrat, N. (2014). Judicial Activism Of The Court Of Justice Of The Eu In The Pluralist Architecture Of Global Law [Thesis]. Université libre de Bruxelles and Université de Genève
  9. Coutinho, L. P., La Torre, M., & Smith, S. D. (Ed.). (2015). Judicial Activism: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the American and European Experiences (Vol. 44). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18549-1
  10. Denis Kurniawan. (2024). Absolute Competence And Judicial Activism In The Role Of The Supreme Court In Reviewing Political Party Bylaws In Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi dan Demokrasi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/JKD.v4i1.1404
  11. Diedrich, J. (2019). Article III, Judicial Restraint, and this Supreme Court. SSRN Electronic Journal, 72(2). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3339963
  12. Florczak-Wątor, M. (2020). Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts (1 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022442
  13. G. A. Bryan. (2002). Black’s Law Dictionary (7th ed.). West Group Publication
  14. Geofani Milthree Saragih, Mexsasai Indra, & Dessy Artina. (2023). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Praktik Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap UUD’45. Raja Grafindo Persada
  15. H. Abdul Latif. (2009). Mahkamah Konstitusi Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi. Kreasi Total Media
  16. Hilpold, P. (2021). So Long Solange? The PSPP Judgment of the German Constitutional Court and the Conflict between the German and the European ‘Popular Spirit.’ Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 23, 159–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2021.3
  17. Hwang, J.-Y., Kuo, M.-S., & Chen, H.-W. (2020). 2018 Global Review Of Constitutional Law: Taiwan. The I• CONnect-Clough Center
  18. Igarashi, T. (2021). When did the ROC abandon “Retaking the Mainland”? The transformation of military strategy in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(1), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.1904599
  19. Indra, M., Saragih, G. M., & Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Strength of Constitutional Court Decisions in Judicial Review of the 1945 Constitution in Indonesia: Kekuatan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2026
  20. Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. PT Bhuana Komputer
  21. Kokushubila Lwabukuna, O. (2022). Reconstructing the Rule of Law in Plural Madagascar. Dalam O. M. Akinlabi, Policing and the Rule of Law in Sub-Saharan Africa (1 ed., hlm. 157–182). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003148395-13
  22. Kos, M. (2021). The PSPP Judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Slovenian Constitutional System. Central European Journal of Comparative Law, 2(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.47078/2021.1.93-118
  23. Lothar Determann & Markus heintzen. (2018). Constitutional Review of Statutes in Germany and the United States Compared. Jurnal UC Hastings Ressearch Paper, No. 299
  24. Mamta Devi. (2024). The Role Of Judicial Activism In Shaping Constitutional Law Of India. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (IJMR), 10(2), 387–391. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra15921
  25. Mathebe, L. (2021). The Constitutional Court of South Africa: Thoughts on its 25-Year-Long Legacy of Judicial Activism. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620946848
  26. Mirza Nasution & Geofani Milthree Saragih. (2024). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia (Suatu Pengantar Dasar). Kencana
  27. Moh. Mahfud MD. (2012). Konstitusi Dan Hukum Dalam Kontroversi Isu. PT RajaGrafindo Persada
  28. Mohammad Fajrul Falaakh. (2014). Perubahan dan Model Konstitusi Serta Perubahan UUD 1945 Oleh Presiden, DPR Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Gadjah Mada University Press
  29. Mohammad Mahdi Saidi. (2023). Oversight of the Constitutionality of Laws: A Comparative Study between Egyptian and American Law. Journal of Comparative Legal Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22034/cls.2023.183657
  30. Muhammad Abdur Rozaq, Surya Daniel Batara, & Muhamad Ramdan Jaya. (2024). Urgensi Check and Balance oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Judicial Activism dalam Praktik Demokrasi di Indonesia. UNES Law Review, 6(3), 8796-8805. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1780
  31. Stiansen, Ø., & Voeten, E. (2020). Backlash and Judicial Restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. International Studies Quarterly, 64(4), 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa047
  32. Theunis Robert Roux. (2021). Judicial Activism. Elgar Encyclopedia on Comparative Law
  33. Traser, J. S., Béres, N., Marinkás, G., & Pék, E. (2020). The Principle of the Primacy of EU Law in Light of the Case Law of the Constitutional Courts of Italy, Germany, France, and Austria. Central European Journal of Comparative Law, 1(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.47078/2020.2.151-175
  34. Watanasukh, P. (2020). When the Minority Overruled the Majority: The Politics of the Constitutional Amendment Regarding the Acquisition of Senators in Thailand in 2013. Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 11(2)
  35. Whelan, E. (2019). The Presumption Of Constitutionality. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 42(1)

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-06-27 18:24:21

No citation recorded.