skip to main content

Politics of Cemetery: Religious Minority in Local Indonesia

Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract

In post-authoritarian Indonesia, although the position of followers of belief (kepercayaan) before the state has relatively positive progress, some still face problems related to their religious identity. One of the followers of belief groups that still receive religious discrimination is the Sapta Darma community in Brebes, Central Java, Indonesia. For example, the followers of Sapta Darma in this region face problems of the availability of cemetery for their deceased members, while just like some other religions; a burial ground is an important part of their religious ritual and identity. This article attempts to explain what restrictions prevent the Sapta Darma community from obtaining cemetery land for their members and what the Sapta Darma community has conducted to settle the problem. This article is based on qualitative research that was conducted in Brebes. This article shows that the availability of Public Cemetery (TPU) and some people’s acceptance of this community serve as the main restriction for the Sapta Darma community to fulfill their need for cemetery land. To settle this problem, they have made some attempts, including seeking the state’s recognition and solution independently.

 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: minority religion; Sapta Darma; cemetery

Article Metrics:

  1. Chao, E. (2014). In each other’s shadow: Building Pentecostal churches in Muslim Java, Religious Diversity in the Muslim-Majority States in Southeast Asia. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies
  2. Crouch, M. (2007). Regulating places of worship in Indonesia: Upholding freedom of religion for religious minorities, Sing. J. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 96–116
  3. Kong, L., & Woods, O. (2016). Religion and Space: Competition, Conflict, and Violence in the Contemporary World. Bloomsbury Publishing
  4. Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Clarendon Press
  5. Leftwich, A. (2004). The Political Approach of Human Behaviour: People, Resources and Power, in Leftwich, A. (ed) What is Politics: The Activity and Its Study. Polity
  6. Maarif, A. S., Maarif, A. S., Ali-Fauzi, I., & Panggabean, S. R. (2010). Politik Identitas dan Masa Depan Pluralisme Kita. Centre for the Study of Islam and Democracy
  7. Pawenang, S. et. al . (2010). Sejarah Penerimaan Wahyu Wewarah Sapta Darma dan Perjalanan Panuntun Agung Sri Gutama. Sekretariat Tuntunan Agung Kerokhanian Sapta Darma Unit Penerbitan
  8. Rodman, M. C. (1992). Empowering Place: Multilocality and Multivocality. American Anthropologist, 94(3), 640–656
  9. Sugiarto, B. (2017). Negotiating Muslim Deathscapes In Balinese Hindu Society. Istiqro, 15(1), 169–204
  10. Teather, E. K. (2001). The case of the disorderly graves: Contemporary deathscapes in Guangzhou. Social & Cultural Geography, 2(2), 185-202
  11. Tully, J. (1995). Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge University Press
  12. Yang, F. (2014). Oligopoly is not pluralism. In Giordan, G., & Pace, E. (Eds.), Religious Pluralism: Framing Religious Diversity in the Contemporary World. Springer, 49–59
  13. Yang, F. . (2010). Oligopoly Dynamics: Consequences of Religious Regulation. Social Compass, 57(2), 194–205
  14. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton University Press

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-04-25 13:40:48

No citation recorded.