skip to main content

A Model for Developing Political Training Curriculum for Political Parties in Indonesia

1Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

2Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright (c) 2024 Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This paper presents a model for developing a political training curriculum within the context of a political party in Indonesia. It underscores the importance of incorporating institutional values, system enhancement, autonomy in decision-making, and public interaction within the party. As stipulated in Indonesia’s constitution, there are two possible focuses depending on the subjects of such training either the party's administrators and cadres or the general public or community. The paper highlights the need for different teaching strategies and content, depending on the target audience, and emphasizes the necessity for both formative and summative evaluations to ensure the curriculum's ongoing relevance and effectiveness. Ultimately, it provides a blueprint for political parties to create effective, relevant political education programs, tailored to their unique objectives and the needs of their constituents.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: curriculum development; political training; political parties; Indonesia; institutionalization theory; party autonomy; training needs analysis; curriculum design; curriculum implementation; curriculum evaluation

Article Metrics:

  1. Beauchamp, G.A. (1975). Curriculum Theory. Illinois: The Kagg Press
  2. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. F. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company
  3. Burnell, P., & Gerrits, A. (Eds.). (2010). Promoting Party Politics in Emerging Democracies. London: Routledge
  4. Carothers, T. (2006). Confronting the Weakest Link: Aiding Political Parties in New Democracies. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
  5. Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2005). Assessing the quality of democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press
  6. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Seabury Press
  7. Gordon, W.R., Taylor, R. T., & Oliva, P. F. (2019). Developing the Curriculum (9th Ed.). London: Pearson
  8. Harmel, R. & Svåsand, L.G. (eds). (2019). Institutionalisation of Political Parties: Comparative Cases. Washington: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers/ECPR Press
  9. Hatta, M. (1957). The Co-operative Movement in Indonesia. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press
  10. Huntington, S.P. Political order in changing societies. New Haven : Yale University Press, 1968
  11. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). https://kbbi.web.id/
  12. Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2011). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. London: Routledge
  13. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
  14. Kratoska, P. (2001). South East Asia, Colonial History: Imperialism before 1800, Volume 1 of South East Asia, Colonial History. Taylor & Francis
  15. Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Curriculum Development: Inductive Models. Schooling. Volume 2, Number 1, 2011
  16. Moraes, Frank (1956). Jawaharlal Nehru. Jaico Publishing House
  17. Niemi, R.G., & Junn, J. (1998). Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
  18. Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F.P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, Principles, and Issues. England: Pearson
  19. Panebianco, A. (1988). Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  20. Peterson, P. E. (1981). City Limits. University of Chicago Press
  21. Peterson, Paul E. (1981). "Jefferson and Public Education: National Power and Local Freedom". Journal of American History. 68 (2): 363–365
  22. Pridham, G., & Lewis, P. G. (1996). Stabilising fragile democracies: Comparing new party systems in Southern and Eastern Europe. Routledge
  23. Randall, V., & Svasand, L. (2002). Party Institutionalization in New Democracies. Party Politics, 8, 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068802008001001
  24. Saylor, J.G., Alexander, W.M., Lewis, A.J. (1981). Curriculum Planning for Better Teaching and Learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  25. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP evaluation model checklist: A tool for applying the fifth installment of the CIPP model to assess long-term enterprises. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University, Evaluation Center
  26. Sukmadinata, N. S. (1997). Pengembangan kurikulum: Teori dan Praktek. Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya
  27. Svasand, L., & Randall, V. (2002). Party institutionalization in new democracies. Party Politics, 8(1), 5-29
  28. Taba, H. (1970). Curriculum development: theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World
  29. Thijs, A. & van Akker, J. (2009). Curriculum in Development. The Netherlands: Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development (SLO)
  30. Tyler, R. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
  31. UU No. 2/2008 tentang Partai Politik
  32. UU No. 2/2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 Tentang Partai Politik
  33. Visscher-Voerman, I & Gustafson, K.L. (2004). Paradigms in the Theory and Practice of Education and Training Design. ETR&D, Vol. 52, No. 2

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-03 02:01:44

No citation recorded.