DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/politika.16.1.2025.68-83

Internet Freedom and the Impact of Social Media: Political Buzzer Behavior In Indonesia And Thailand

1Department of Government Studies, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

2Department of Social Welfare, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract
The presence of political buzzers in many countries shows that the democratic process has experienced a serious setback. This paper specifically looks at the practice of working political buzzers in Indonesia and Thailand. These two countries were chosen because the condition of their democratic institutionalization is still low, marked by the massive violence, provocations, and black campaigns on social media due to the actions of political buzzers. The internet, which is supposed to strengthen democracy by providing space for egalitarian and democratic political participation through social media, has become a new arena for the practice of violence and the creation of political polarization carried out by political buzzers. To clarify these assumptions, this study uses a qualitative descriptive method. The main data was obtained from literature studies. This study shows that political buzzers in Thailand and Indonesia have the same motivation, namely maintaining the continuity of power. The difference lies in the power relationship, where in Indonesia, buzzers are not directly and legally affiliated with power, while in Thailand, it is the opposite
Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Pengaruh Globalisasi Terhadap Peningkatan Interdependensi Negara Berkembang di Asia Tenggara Pada Negara Tiongkok The Concept and Future of Electronic Voting in Election Systems Tata Kelola Kolaboratif dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Lokal: Studi Kasus BUMDes Guwosari Maju Sejahtera More recent articles
Most cited articles
Politika Jurnal Ilmu Politik PEREMPUAN DAN KORUPSI PADA RANAH PUBLIK (Ditinjau dari Gaya Kepemimpinan, Politik, Agama, Psikologi dan Budaya Ketimuran) MODEL KEPEMIMPINAN POLITIK KYAI: Studi Peran Kyai Dalam Pergeseran Perilaku Politik Massa NU PKB dan PPP PEMEKARAN DAERAH DI INDONESIA FAKTOR DETERMINAN KEMENANGAN KANDIDAT PADA PEMILUKADA KABUPATEN BATANG 2011 More cited articles
  1. Ahdiat, A. (2023). Mayoritas Negara ASEAN Cacat Demokrasi, Sisanya Otoriter. Katadata.Co.Id. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2023/02/03/mayoritas-negara-asean-cacat-demokrasi-sisanya-otoriter
  2. Almqvist, M. F. (2016). Piracy and the politics of social media. Social Sciences, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci5030041
  3. Archer, C., Wolf, K., & Nalloor, J. (2021). Capitalising on chaos – exploring the impact and future of social media influencer engagement during the early stages of a global pandemic. Media International Australia, 178(1), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20958157
  4. Arifin, M. Z. (2021). Cara Buzzer dan “Panasbung” Thailand Memburu Pengkritik Monarki. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/cara-buzzer-dan-panasbung-thailand-memburu-pengkritik-monarki-ggwJ
  5. Boulianne, S. (2019). Revolution in the making? Social media effects across the globe. Information Communication and Society, 22(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1353641
  6. Bradshaw, S., & Howard, P. N. (2019). The Global Disinformation Order 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation
  7. Bunse, S. (2020). Global Cyber Troops Country Profile: Costa Rica
  8. Campbell-Smith, U., & Bradshaw, S. (2019). Global Cyber Troops Country Profile: India. February, 1–9. http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2019/05/India-Profile.pdf
  9. Cano-Orón, L., Calvo, D., Llorca-Abad, G., & Mestre-Pérez, R. (2021). Media crisis and disinformation: The participation of digital newspapers in the dissemination of a denialist hoax. Profesional de La Informacion, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.12
  10. Christensen, H. S. (2012). Simply slacktivism? Internet participation in Finland. EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v4i1.93
  11. CIPG. (2017). DI BALIK FENOMENA BUZZER: Memahami Lanskap Industri dan Pengaruh Buzzer di Indonesia. Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance
  12. Crothers, C. (2015). Using the Internet in New Zealand elections and support for e-voting. Political Science, 67(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318715610165
  13. Demirhan, K., & Çakir-Demirhan, D. (2015). Gender and politics: Patriarchal discourse on social media. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 308–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.010
  14. Dovbysh, O., & Somfalvy, E. (2021). Understanding media control in the digital age. Media and Communication, 9(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4861
  15. Dwifatma, A. (2021). Media Komunitas Sebagai Bentuk Demokrasi Partisipatoris ( Studi Pada “ Warta Desa ” di Pekalongan , Jawa Tengah ). Jurnal InterAct |, 10(1), 1–9
  16. Editor. (2016). Lese Majeste, “pasal pelindung” keluarga Kerajaan Thailand. BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/dunia/2016/10/161012_dunia_thailand_lese_majeste_explainer
  17. Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2020). Social Media and Protest Participation: Evidence From Russia. Econometrica, 88(4), 1479–1514. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA14281
  18. Erdem, R., & Ozejder, I. (2021). Use of social media for political purposes: The case of diyarbakir. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 72, 187–209. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.72.13
  19. Evans, O. (2019). Digital politics: internet and democracy in Africa. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-08-2017-0234
  20. Fadil, I. (2019). Fenomena Buzzer Politik dan Kemenangan Jokowi di Pilpres 2019. Merdeka.Com. https://www.merdeka.com/politik/fenomena-buzzer-politik-dan-kemenangan-jokowi-di-pilpres-2019.html
  21. Fukuyama, F. (2018). Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  22. Haryanto, A. (2021). Apa Itu Buzzer Politik? Arti, Strategi, Sejarah dan Pola Rekrutmen. Tirto.Id. https://tirto.id/apa-itu-buzzer-politik-arti-strategi-sejarah-dan-pola-rekrutmen-gaaE
  23. Hilabi, S. S., Harso Supangat, S., Hendric Spits Warnars, H. L., Prabowo, H., & Mursitama, T. N. (2020). Model Technology Service E-Participation - Voting (E-PV) for Political Communication between the Council of Regional Representatives (DPRD) and the Citizens Using the Framework Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL V.3) Transition Domain Ser. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS50791.2020.9307578
  24. Horstink, L. (2017). Online participation and the new global democracy: Avaaz, a case study. Global Society, 31(1), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1235552
  25. Ibrahim, M., Abdillah, O., Wicaksono, A. F., & Adriani, M. (2016). Buzzer Detection and Sentiment Analysis for Predicting Presidential Election Results in a Twitter Nation. Proceedings - 15th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop, ICDMW 2015, 1348–1353. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDMW.2015.113
  26. Idris, I. K. (2018). Government social media in Indonesia: Just another information dissemination tool. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2018-3404-20
  27. Irawanto, B. (2019). Making it personal : The Campaign battle on social media in Indonesia’s 2019 Presidential Election. Perspective, 28, 1–11
  28. Jha, C. K., & Kodila-Tedika, O. (2020). Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling, 42(2), 271–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.05.010
  29. Karatas, D., & Saka, E. (2017). Online political trolling in the context of post-gezi social media in Turkey. International Journal of Digital Television, 8(3), 383–401. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdtv.8.3.383_1
  30. Kurniawati, R. (2023). Buzzer Sebagai Alat Politik Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v8i2.2313
  31. Lacko, I. (2013). Tracey Scott Wilson’s Buzzer and the myth of post-racial America. American and British Studies Annual, 6, 37–46
  32. Laungaramsri, P. (2016). Mass surveillance and the militarization of cyberspace in post-coup Thailand. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 9(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-2016.2-2
  33. Lee, S. Y., Díaz-Puente, J. M., & Martin, S. (2019). The Contribution of Open Government to Prosperity of Society. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1405446
  34. Lim, M. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
  35. Lim, Merlyna. (2017). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188
  36. Lindquist, E. A., & Huse, I. (2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital-era governance. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 627–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12243
  37. MácHová, R., Volejníková, J., & Lněnička, M. (2018). Impact of E-government Development on the Level of Corruption: Measuring the Effects of Related Indices in Time and Dimensions. Review of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2018-0006
  38. Marsden, C., Meyer, T., & Brown, I. (2020). Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation? Computer Law and Security Review, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105373
  39. Masduki. (2021a). Media control in the digital politics of indonesia. Media and Communication, 9(4), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4225
  40. Masduki. (2021b). Media control in the digital politics of indonesia. Media and Communication, 9(4), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4225
  41. Nam, T. (2011). Whose e-democracy the democratic divide in American electoral campaigns. Information Polity, 16(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2011-0220
  42. Nguyen, D., & Luong, A. (2021). How The Vietnamese State Uses Cyber Troops to Shape Online Discourse. 22, 1–16
  43. Ong, J. C., & Tapsell, R. (2022). Demystifying disinformation shadow economies: fake news work models in Indonesia and the Philippines. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.1971270
  44. Panatra, A. J., Chandra, F. B., Darmawan, W., Warnars, Utomo, W. H., & Matsuo, T. (2019). Buzzer Detection to Maintain Information Neutrality in 2019 Indonesia Presidential Election. Proceedings - 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2019, 873–876. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2019.00177
  45. Ramasoota, P. (2016). Online Social Surveillance and Cyber-Witch Hunting in Post-2014 Coup Thailand. In Globalization and Democracy in Southeast Asia (pp. 269–288). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/978-1-137-57654-5_13
  46. Rautela, S., & Singhal, T. K. (2020). Deconstructing the seven Cs of social media: A summative perspective. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(3), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i03.10490
  47. Salter, L. (2014). Emergent Social Movements in Online Media and States of Crisis: Analyzing the Potential for Resistance and Repression Online. In Cyberactivism on the Participatory Web (p. 24). Routledge
  48. Sari, D. P., Masruroh, N. A., & Asih, A. M. S. (2021). Consumer intention to participate in e‐waste collection programs: A study of smartphone waste in Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052759
  49. Sasipornkarn, E. (2022). Thailand: Bagaimana Nasib Gerakan Protes Menentang Monarki? Www.Dw.Com. https://www.dw.com/id/thailand-apa-yang-terjadi-pada-gerakan-protes-menentang-monarki/a-63814296
  50. Schaffar, W., & Thabchumpon, N. (2019). Militant far-right royalist groups on Facebook in Thailand. Methodological and ethical challenges of Internet-based research. In Researching Far-Right Movements Ethics, Methodologies, and Qualitative Inquiries (p. 19). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429491825-8/militant-far-right-royalist-groups-facebook-thailand-methodological-ethical-challenges-internet-based-research-wolfram-schaffar-naruemon-thabchumpon
  51. Seto, A. (2019a). Islamist buzzers: Message flooding, offline outreach, and astroturfing. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0021
  52. Seto, A. (2019b). Islamist buzzers: Message flooding, offline outreach, and astroturfing. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 12(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.14764/10.ASEAS-0021
  53. Solomon, E. M., & van Klyton, A. (2020). The impact of digital technology usage on economic growth in Africa. Utilities Policy, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101104
  54. Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2018a). Conservative Civil Society in Thailand. In The Mobilization of Conservative Civil Society (pp. 27–33). Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Youngs_Conservative_Civil_Society_FINAL.pdf
  55. Sombatpoonsiri, J. (2018b). Manipulating Civic Space: Cyber Trolling in Thailand and the Philippines. GIGA. https://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publications/giga-focus/manipulating-civic-space-cyber-trolling-in-thailand-and-the-philippines
  56. Suh, C. S., Vasi, I. B., & Chang, P. Y. (2017). How social media matter: Repression and the diffusion of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Social Science Research, 65, 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.01.004
  57. Syahputra, I., Ritonga, R., Purwani, D. A., Masduki, Rahmaniah, S. E., & Wahid, U. (2021). Pandemic politics and communication crisis: How social media buzzers impaired the lockdown aspiration in Indonesia. Journal of Media and Communication Research, 13(1), 31–46
  58. Talamayan, F. (2020). Policing cyberspace: Understanding online repression in Thailand and the philippines. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 8(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v8i2.6769
  59. Wahid, U., & Syahputra, I. (2020). Hoax Logic in the Political Activities of Indonesian Netizens on Twitter. International Journal of Innovation, 14(2), 1415–1432. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_14/Iss_2/14291_Wahid_2020_E_R.pdf
  60. Widyatama, R., & Mahbob, M. H. (2024). The Potential Hazards of Fake Accounts and Buzzer Behaviour on Deliberative Democracy. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40(1), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2024-4001-18
  61. Wolfsfeld, G., Segev, E., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Social Media and the Arab Spring: Politics Comes First. International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212471716/FORMAT/EPUB/EPUB/XHTML/INDEX.XHTML
  62. Yuniarta, G. A., & Gusti Ayu Purnamawati, I. (2020). Key elements of local government transparency in new public governance. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(4), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.09

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-06-05 17:23:18

No citation recorded.