skip to main content

GWP, AP, and EP Contribution on Potential Improving Scenarios of Domestic SWM in Padang City: A Review

*Suci Wulandari  -  Universitas Andalas, Indonesia
Slamet Raharjo  -  Universitas Andalas, Indonesia

Citation Format:

The increase in solid waste generation is incompatible with solid waste management (SWM). Padang city have a small processing percentage of 5% through composting and recyling. Improper and nonoptimal SWM lead to many obstacles including climate change, water and soil contamination, to creatures life disturbance. By conducting Impact Assessment and Contribution Analysis, this study examines the most impact contributor of unit processes in four scenarios of domestic solid waste management in Padang City. Scenario 0 presents the existing condition; scenarios 1, 2, and 3 present the improvement of Scenario 0 in recycling percentage rate and technology implementation in a row by composting, incineration, and anaerobic digestion. CML2001, impact assessment method by Center of Environmental Sciences of Leiden University, is used to assess the environmental impact of Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), and Eutrophication Potential (EP). This study found that the significant impact for the four scenarios is GWP by the contribution percentage over 72%. While EP is the second place in the contribution range of 1.70% to 5.46%, and followed by AP under 0.91%. Scenario 1 is the best scenario due to the small contribution of impact compared to other scernarios, and potentially to be applied by modification in increase of composting percentage and additional recovery gas in landfill.


Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Impact contribution, contribution analysis, solid waste management, LCIA

Article Metrics:

  1. Al-Rumaihi, Aisha., Hamish Robert Mackey., Tareq Al-Ansari. 2020.Environmental impact assessment of food waste management using two composting techniques. Sustainability, 12 (4):1595
  2. Aziz, R. and Febriardy, F.2016. Analisis Sistem Pengelolaan Sampah Perkantoran Kota Padang Menggunakan Metode Life Cycle Assessment. Jurnal Dampak,13(2):60-67
  3. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. 2010. Indonesia Climate Change Sectoral Roadmap (ICCSR). Indonesia: Waste Sector
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. 2016. Kota Padang dalam Angka: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Padang
  5. Candra, S. A. and Aini, N. 2018. Mengurai Permasalahan Sampah di Kota Padang. Padang : Republika
  6. Darmanto and Achmad, D. 2020. Masyarakat Adat Cireundeu Peringati 15 Tahun Longsor Sampah TPA Leuwigajah. Jurnal Desa,
  7. Elcock, D. 2007. Life-Cycle Thinking for the Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Industry. United States: Agronne National Library
  8. Ferronato, N. and Torretta, V. 2019. Waste mismanagement in Developing Countries: A review of Global Issues. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(6):1060
  9. Hafizh, M. 2017. Potensi Daur Ulang Sampah Domestik Kota Padang Tahun 2016. Padang :Universitas Andalas
  10. Hallback, M. 2017. Evaluation of waste water incineration, Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology. Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology
  11. Hutton, B., Horan, E. and Norrish, M. 2009.Waste management options to control greenhouse gas emissions — Landfill, compost or incineration. Paper presented to the ISWA Annual Congress 2009 Lisbon, Portugal: 12-15 October 2009
  12. Jaishankar, M., Tenzin,T., Naresh, A., Blessy, B. .2014. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 7(2):60-72
  13. Jatmiko, B. P. 2011. Sampah Picu Perubahan Iklim. Indonesia : National Geographic
  14. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2017. Indonesia - Finlandia bahas kerjasama pengelolaan sampah menjadi energi : KemenLHK
  15. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2018a. Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional dan Daerah Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga dan Sampah Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga. Pekanbaru: KemenLHK
  16. Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2018b. Kebijakan dan Strategi Nasional Pengelolaan Sampah. Semarang: KemenLHK
  17. Kim, T. H. and Chae, C. U. 2016. Environmental impact analysis of acidification and eutrophication due to emissions from the production of concrete. Sustainability Switzerland, 8(6):578
  18. Komilis, D. P. and Ham, R. K. 2004. Life-Cycle Inventory of Municipal Solid Waste and Yard Waste Windrow Composting in the United States. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 130(11)
  19. Lee, K.-M. and Inaba, A. 2004. Life Cycle Assessment: Best Practices of International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14040 Series
  20. Levis, J. W. and Barlaz, M. A. 2013a. Anaerobic Digestion Process Model Documentation. North Carolina: NC State University
  21. Levis, J. W. and Barlaz, M. A. 2013b. Composting Process Model Documentation. North Carolina: NC State University
  22. McDougall, F. R., Peter, R., Marina, f., Peter, H. 2007. Integrated solid waste management: A life cycle inventory: Second edition, Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Life Cycle Inventory: Second Edition. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 6 (5)
  23. Mendes, M. R., Aramaki, T. and Hanaki, K. 2004. Comparison of the environmental impact of incineration and landfilling in São Paulo City as determined by LCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41(1):47-63
  24. Naveen, B. P., Sumalatha, J. and Malik, R. K. 2018. A study on contamination of ground and surface water bodies by leachate leakage from a landfill in Bangalore, India. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 9(1)
  25. Nhubu, T. and Muzenda, E. 2019. Determination of the least impactful municipal solid waste management option in Harare, Zimbabwe. Processes, 7(11):785
  26. Nunez, C. 2019.What is acid rain. National Geographic
  27. Palesaraei, Ashkan Nabavi., Reza, B., Homa, H,B., Hadi,A., Kwok, W, C. 2017 .Modeling of energy consumption and environmental life cycle assessment for incineration and landfill systems of municipal solid waste management-A case study in Tehran Metropolis of Iran. Journal Cleaner Production, 148:427-440
  28. PE International AG.2012. Gabi 6 Education. ThinkStep
  29. Raharjo, S., Toru, M., Taufiq, I., Indriyani, R. 2017. Community-based solid waste bank program for municipal solid waste management improvement in Indonesia: a case study of Padang city. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 19(1)
  30. Ripaldi, G. 2015. Life Cycle Assessment of Waste Management System. The case of Avezzano. Italy :Royal Institute of Technology
  31. Sundqvist, J.-O .1999. Life cycles assessments and solid waste: Guidelines for solid waste treatment and disposal in LCA
  32. Tue, N. M., Akitoshi, G., Shin, T., Takaaki, I. 2016. Release of chlorinated, brominated and mixed halogenated dioxin-related compounds to soils from open burning of e-waste in Agbogbloshie (Accra, Ghana). Journal of Hazardous Materials., 302
  33. United Nations Environment Programme (2009) Marine Litter : A Global Challenge
  34. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2016. Effects of Acid Rain,
  35. Vongdala, N., Hoang, D., Tran, D., Rolf, T. 2019. Heavy metal accumulation in water, soil, and plants of municipal solid waste landfill in Vientiane, Laos. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(1):22
  36. Wulandari, S. 2018. Analisis Komparatif Pengelolaan Sampah Domestik Kota Kitakyushu dan Kota Padang Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pengelolaan Sampah Kota Padang. Padang : Universitas Andalas
  37. Wulandari, S., Raharjo, S., Rachman., Matsumoto, T. 2020. LCA Analysis on Improving Scenario of Domestic Solid Waste Management in Padang City based on the case in Kitakyushu City. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-07-20 05:18:26

No citation recorded.