DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v20i1.196-207

Inventories of Methane Emission for Enteric and Decomposition Gasses from Cattle Manure and Its Mitigation Strategies

*Dodi Devitriano  -  Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Hutwan Syarifuddin  -  Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Jalius Jalius  -  Universitas Jambi, Indonesia
Yudha Gusti Wibowo orcid scopus publons  -  Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Livestock is a significant contributor to global methane (CH4) emissions, accounting for 18% to 51% of total emissions worldwide. The purpose of this study is to estimate the CH4 emissions from livestock in Jambi Province, using the Tier-1 method recommended by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The results show that CH4 emissions range from 7,464,728 to 7,833,349 tons per year, with feces management contributing 160,261 to 166,667 tons per year, and buffalo enteric emissions contributing 2,511,135 to 2,616,185 tons per year. These findings highlight the significant impact of the livestock sector in Jambi Province on global warming. Moreover, this study presents a brief overview of mitigation strategies that can be implemented to reduce CH4 emissions from the livestock sector.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Methane emission; global warming; climate change; dairy cattle emission

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Biofuel Successful Strategies towards Sustainable Development: A Bibliometrics Analysis Application of Free Water Surface Constructed Wetland for Reduction of Brantas River Pollutants Compost Quality of Compost Process Grass Waste with Composting Bin Method Optimizing Utilization of Hazardous Waste and Biomass as Solid Fuel for Co-Firing Assessment of Surface Water Quality Status Using the Pollution Index Method in Tukad Badung River Solid Waste Management System in Tanjungpura University: 3Rs concept integrated with the Waste Bank Potential of Heavy Metal Pollution (Cd) in the Kapuas Kecil River More recent articles
Most cited articles
POTENSI NITRIFIKASI OLEH BAKTERI YANG TERDAPAT DI LAUT ALIRAN KALI PLUMBON, LAUT ALIRAN KALI BANJIR KANAL BARAT DAN LAUT ALIRAN KALI BANJIR KANAL TIMUR ANALISIS KUALITAS AIR DAN STRATEGI PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN AIR SUNGAI BLUKAR KABUPATEN KENDAL KEMAMPUAN PENYERAPAN ECENG GONDOK TERHADAP AMONIAK DALAM LIMBAH RUMAH SAKIT BERDASARKAN UMUR DAN LAMA KONTAK (STUDI KASUS: RS PANTI WILASA, SEMARANG) STUDI PENGARUH PENCAMPURAN SAMPAH DOMESTIK, SEKAM PADI, DAN AMPAS TEBU DENGAN METODE MAC DONALD TERHADAP KEMATANGAN KOMPOS KONSERVASI ENERGI BERBASIS RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY DENGAN PEMANFAATAN TEKNOLOGI MICROBIAL More cited articles
  1. Al-Ghussain, L. 2019. Global warming: review on driving forces and mitigation. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 38, 13–21
  2. Boadi, D., Benchaar, C., Chiquette, J., Massé, D. 2004. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review. Can J Anim Sci 84, 319–335
  3. Broudiscou, L.P., Papon, Y., Broudiscou, A.F. 2000. Effects of dry plant extracts on fermentation and methanogenesis in continuous culture of rumen microbes. Animal Feed Science and Technology 87, 263–277
  4. Bustamante, M.M.C., Nobre, C.A., Smeraldi, R., Aguiar, A.P.D., Barioni, L.G., Ferreira, L.G., Longo, K., May, P., Pinto, A.S., Ometto, J.P.H.B. 2012. Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from cattle raising in Brazil. Climatic Change 115, 559–577
  5. Chagas, J.C., Ramin, M., Krizsan, S.J. 2019. In vitro evaluation of different dietary methane mitigation strategies. Animals 9
  6. Chianese, D., Rotz, C.A., Richard, T. 2010. Whole-Farm Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Review with Application to a Pennsylvania Dairy Farm. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 25
  7. Fawzy, S., Osman, A.I., Doran, J., Rooney, D.W. 2020. Strategies for mitigation of climate change : a review Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Environmental Chemistry Letters 18, 2069–2094
  8. Fiore, A.M., West, J.J., Horowitz, L.W., Naik, V., Schwarzkopf, M.D. 2008. Characterizing the tropospheric ozone response to methane emission controls and the benefits to climate and air quality. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 113, 1–16
  9. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2009. The State of Food and Agriculture
  10. Fuglestvedt, J.S., Isaksen, I.S.A., Wang, W.C. 1996. Estimates of indirect global warming potentials for CH4, CO and NOx. Climatic Change 34, 405–437
  11. Hao, X., Chang, C., Larney, F.J., Travis, G.R. 2002. Greenhouse gas emissions during cattle feedlot manure composting. Journal of Environmental Quality 31, 700–700
  12. Harrison, B.P., Gao, S., Gonzales, M., Thao, T., Bischak, E., Ghezzehei, T.A., Berhe, A.A., Diaz, G., Ryals, R.A. 2022. Dairy manure co-composting with wood biochar plays a critical role in meeting global methane goals. Environmental Science and Technology 56, 10987–10996
  13. Hernández-Zepeda, J.S., Vargas-López, S., Vargas-Monter, J., Cruz-Mendoza, M.L., Nieto-Aquino, R. 2017. Waste and contaminant production from peri-urban family dairy production in Ocoyucan, Puebla, México. Agroproductividad 10, 46–51
  14. Herrero, M., Henderson, B., Havlík, P., Thornton, P.K., Conant, R.T., Smith, P., Wirsenius, S., Hristov, A.N., Gerber, P., Gill, M., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Valin, H., Garnett, T., Stehfest, E. 2016. Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nature Climate Change 6, 452–461
  15. Hristov, A.N., Melgar, A., Wasson, D., Arndt, C. 2022. Symposium review: Effective nutritional strategies to mitigate enteric methane in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 105, 8543–8557
  16. Inubushi, K., Otake, S., Furukawa, Y., Shibasaki, N., Ali, M., Itang, A.M., Tsuruta, H. 2005. Factors influencing methane emission from peat soils: comparison of tropical and temperate wetlands. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 71, 93–99
  17. IPCC. 2006. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, intergovernmental panel on climate change
  18. IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2013 the physical science book. refugee children: towards the next horizon 1–214
  19. Jiao, H.P., Dale, A.J., Carson, A.F., Murray, S., Gordon, A.W., Ferris, C.P. 2014. Effect of concentrate feed level on methane emissions from grazing dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 7043–7053
  20. Klevenhusen, F., Kreuzer, M., Soliva, C.R. 2011. Enteric and manure-derived methane and nitrogen emissions as well as metabolic energy losses in cows fed balanced diets based on maize, barley or grass hay. Animal 5, 450–461
  21. Knapp, J.R., Laur, G.L., Vadas, P.A., Weiss, W.P., Tricarico, J.M. 2014. Invited review: enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 3231–3261
  22. Min, B., Lee, S., Jung, H., Miller, D.N. 2022. Enteric methane emissions and animal performance in dairy and beef cattle production: strategies, opportunities, and impact of reducing emissions. Animals 12, 1–27
  23. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2023. Effects _ facts – climate change_ vital signs of the planet
  24. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2019. Climate change impacts | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Noaa.Gov
  25. Nurhayati, I., Widiawati, Y. 2017. emisi gas rumah kaca dari peternakan di pulau jawa yang dihitung dengan metode tier-1 IPCC 292–300
  26. Patel, M.R., Rathore, N., Panwar, N.L. 2021. Influences of biochar in biomethanation and CO2 mitigation potential. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
  27. Pragna, P., Chauhan, S.S., Sejian, V., Leury, B.J., Dunshea, F.R. 2018. Climate Change and Goat Production : Enteric Methane Emission and Its mitigation. Animals 8, 1–17
  28. Reay, D.S., Smith, P., Christensen, T.R., James, R.H., Clark, H. 2018. Methane and global environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 43, 165–192
  29. Res, C., Silvia, M., Araujo, M. De, Campos, C.P. De. 2007. Historical emissions , by country , of N 2 O from animal manure management and of CH 4 from enteric fermentation in domestic livestock. Climate Research 34, 253–258
  30. Robertson, L.J., Waghorn, G.C. 2002. New Zealand Society of Animal Production online archive Dairy industry perspectives on methane emissions and production from cattle fed pasture GREENHOUSE GAS ( GHG ) ISSUES AND THE NEW ZEALAND DAIRY. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 62, 213–218
  31. Soren, N.M., Sejian, V., Terhuja, M., Dominic, G. 2017. enteric methane emission in sheep: process description and factors influencing production bt - sheep production adapting to climate change. In: Sejian, V., Bhatta, R., Gaughan, J., Malik, P.K., Naqvi, S.M.K., Lal, R. (Eds.), . Springer Singapore, Singapore, pp. 209–233
  32. Syarifuddin, H., Rahman, A., Suryono. 2021. Strategi mitigas gas ch4 dari pengelolaan kotoran sapi bali. In: Seminar Nasional Pertanian. pp. 198–207
  33. Syarifuddin, H., Sy, A.R., Devitriano, D. 2019. Inventarisasi emisi gas rumah kaca (ch4 dan n2o) dari sektor peternakan sapi dengan metode tier-1 ipcc di kabupaten muaro jambi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan 22, 84–94
  34. Tong, C., Wang, W.Q., Zeng, C.S., Marrs, R. 2010. Methane (CH4) emission from a tidal marsh in the Min River estuary, southeast China. Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering 45, 506–516
  35. Wibowo, Y.G., Safitri, H., Ramadan, B. surya, Sudibyo. 2022a. Adsorption test using ultra-fine materials on heavy metals removal. Bioresource Technology Reports 19, 101149
  36. Wibowo, Y.G., Safitri, H., Ramadan, B.S., Sudibyo. 2022b. Adsorption test using ultra-fine materials on heavy metals removal. Bioresource Technology Reports 154166
  37. Zehetmeier, M., Baudracco, J., Hoffmann, H., Heißenhuber, A. 2012. Does increasing milk yield per cow reduce greenhouse gas emissions? A system approach. Animal 6, 154–166

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-21 21:08:38

No citation recorded.