DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v22i1.196-208

Exploring the Factor and Cluster of Green Building Practices for Urban Liveability: Case Study Jakarta, Indonesia

Sapta Suhardono  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
*Iva Yenis Septiariva  -  Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Imelda Masni Juniaty Sianipar  -  National Dong Hwa University, Indonesia
I Wayan Koko Suryawan orcid scopus  -  Universitas Pertamina, Indonesia

How to cite (IEEE): S. Suhardono, I. Y. Septiariva, I. M. J. Sianipar, and I. W. K. Suryawan, "Exploring the Factor and Cluster of Green Building Practices for Urban Liveability: Case Study Jakarta, Indonesia," Jurnal Presipitasi : Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 196-208, Mar. 2025. https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v22i1.196-208
Citation Format:
Abstract

This study investigates the multifaceted landscape of green building practices, focusing on their factor structure and cluster characteristics concerning environmental responsibility and urban livability. A comprehensive analysis identifies distinct factors and clusters, each representing different dimensions of sustainable urban development. This study embarks on an exploration of the complex domain of green building practices, employing Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and k-means clustering to dissect the factor structure and clustering characteristics pertinent to environmental responsibility and urban liability. The factors encompass environmental sustainability and urban convenience, highlighting the delicate balance between ecological consciousness and urban functionality. Delving into demographic variables like income, higher education, age, and marital status, our findings reveal statistically significant correlations, emphasizing the pivotal role these individual characteristics play in shaping preferences towards green building practices. Specifically, our analysis crystallizes into two primary clusters. Cluster 1 emphasizes the essence of "Environmental Sustainability," marked by a strong inclination towards energy efficiency, sustainable materials, and green spaces, reflecting a commitment to ecological stewardship. In contrast, Cluster 2, denoting "Urban Convenience and Access," underscores the importance of proximity to public transport, shopping centres, and workplaces, encapsulating a desire for accessibility and convenience in urban design.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Green building practice; factor analysis; cluster analysis; environmental responsibility; urban livability

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Regional Case Study
Language : EN
Recent articles
Analysis of Human Activities and Deforestation Impact on Air Quality: a Paper Review An Overview of the Utilization of PET Plastic Bottle Waste for Membrane Fabrication Impact of Green Building Implementation on Health and Well-being of Building Users in Indonesia The Efficacy of Anaerobic Biofilter and Pre-Aeration with Microbubble Generator for Tofu Wastewater Treatment Enhancing Ibuprofen Degradation through Optimization of ZrCo Synthesis Catalyst in Membrane Distillation Application of Anaerobic Aerobic Biofilter Systems for Reducing Organic Matter in Cracker-Wastewater Treatment Forecasting Methane Emission Reduction through 3R Waste Treatment Facility: The Case of Janti-Sidoarjo Differences in Before and After Temephos Intervention in Bengkulu City: Larvae Free Rate of Aedes spp. Spatial Modeling for River Quality Assessment to Enhance Sustainable Water Resource Management Regulations More recent articles
Most cited articles
STUDI PENGARUH PENCAMPURAN SAMPAH DOMESTIK, SEKAM PADI, DAN AMPAS TEBU DENGAN METODE MAC DONALD TERHADAP KEMATANGAN KOMPOS Kajian Dampak Rencana Pembangunan Kawasan Wisata Marina di Pesisir Kabupaten Belitung terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Sekitarnya PENGOLAHAN AIR LINDI DENGAN PROSES KOMBINASI BIOFILTER ANAEROB-AEROB DAN WETLAND EVALUASI PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH RUMAH SAKIT PUSAT ANGKATAN DARAT GATOT SOEBROTO Simple Technology to Convert Coconut Shell Waste into Biochar; A Green Leap Towards Achieving Environmental Sustainability More cited articles
  1. Amaral, R.E.C., Brito, J., Buckman, M., Drake, E., Ilatova, E., Rice, P., Sabbagh, C., Voronkin, S., Abraham, Y.S., 2020. Waste management and operational energy for sustainable buildings: A review. Sustainability
  2. Ayuningtyas, U., Susanto, D.A., Buwana, E., Emelia, T., 2022. The compliance of water conservation aspects of clean water, wastewater, and rainwater management for residential buildings to support the green building concept. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1108:12015
  3. Basto, M., Pereira, J.M., 2012. An SPSS R-Menu for ordinal factor analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 46:1–29
  4. Bradley, R.L., Anantatmula, S.V., 2011. Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. Journal of Management in Engineering 27:48–57
  5. Cohen, C., Pearlmutter, D., Schwartz, M., 2019. Promoting green building in Israel: A game theory-based analysis. Building and Environment 163:106227
  6. Cui, M., Ferreira, F., Fung, T.K., Matos, J.S., 2021. Tale of two cities: How nature-based solutions help create adaptive and resilient urban water management practices in Singapore and Lisbon. Sustainability
  7. Deb, C., Schlueter, A., 2021. Review of data-driven energy modelling techniques for building retrofit. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 144:110990
  8. Debrah, C., Chan, A.P.C., Darko, A., 2022. Green finance gap in green buildings: A scoping review and future research needs. Building and Environment 207:108443
  9. Du, X., Zhang, Y., Lv, Z., 2020. Investigations and analysis of indoor environment quality of green and conventional shopping mall buildings based on customers’ perception. Building and Environment 177:106851
  10. Fan, Y., Xia, X., 2018. Energy-efficiency building retrofit planning for green building compliance. Building and Environment 136:312–321
  11. Florida, R., Rodríguez-Pose, A., Storper, M., 2023. Critical commentary: Cities in a post-COVID world. Urban Studies 60:1509–1531
  12. Grzegorzewska, M., Kirschke, P., 2021. The impact of certification systems for architectural solutions in green office buildings in the perspective of occupant well-being. Buildings
  13. He, Y., Kvan, T., Liu, M., Li, B., 2018. How green building rating systems affect designing green. Building and Environment 133:19–31
  14. Hewa Welege, N.M., Pan, W., Kumaraswamy, M.M., 2023. Engaging stakeholders to overcome the common constraints for delivering low carbon buildings in high-rise high-density cities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 149:4022157
  15. Hine, J., Scott, J., 2000. Seamless, accessible travel: Users’ views of the public transport journey and interchange. Transport Policy 7:217–226
  16. Houghton, A., Castillo-Salgado, C., 2017. Health co-benefits of green building design strategies and community resilience to urban flooding: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  17. Huo, X., Yu, A.T.W., Darko, A., Wu, Z., 2019. Critical factors in site planning and design of green buildings: A case of China. Journal of Cleaner Production 222:685–694
  18. Junaid, M.F., Rehman, Z. ur, Ijaz, N., Čekon, M., Čurpek, J., Babeker Elhag, A., 2022. Biobased phase change materials from a perspective of recycling, resources conservation and green buildings. Energy and Buildings 270:112280
  19. Kraakman, N.J.R., González-Martín, J., Pérez, C., Lebrero, R., Muñoz, R., 2021. Recent advances in biological systems for improving indoor air quality. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 20:363–387
  20. Lau, S.S.Y., Gou, Z., Liu, Y., 2014. Healthy campus by open space design: Approaches and guidelines. Frontiers of Architectural Research 3:452–467
  21. Liu, Y., Guo, X., Hu, F., 2014. Cost-benefit analysis on green building energy efficiency technology application: A case in China. Energy and Buildings 82:37–46
  22. Lu, W., Chi, B., Bao, Z., Zetkulic, A., 2019. Evaluating the effects of green building on construction waste management: A comparative study of three green building rating systems. Building and Environment 155:247–256
  23. Masia, T., Kajimo-Shakantu, K., Opawole, A., 2020. A case study on the implementation of green building construction in Gauteng province, South Africa. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 31:602–623
  24. Morrison, M., Srinivasan, R.S., Ries, R., 2016. Complementary life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment plants: An integrated approach to comprehensive upstream and downstream impact assessments and its extension to building-level wastewater generation. Sustainable Cities and Society 23:37–49
  25. Nadeem, M.W., Goh, H.G., Hussain, Mudassar, Ponnusamy, V. a/p, Hussain, Muzammil, Khan, M.A., 2021. Internet of Things for green building management
  26. Oluwunmi, A.O., Oladayo, O.P., Role, B.A., Afolabi, T.O., 2019. Benefits and barriers to the implementation of green building standards in universities: What are students’ views? IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 640:12031
  27. Palmisani, J., Di Gilio, A., Viana, M., de Gennaro, G., Ferro, A., 2021. Indoor air quality evaluation in oncology units at two European hospitals: Low-cost sensors for TVOCs, PM2.5 and CO2 real-time monitoring. Building and Environment 205:108237
  28. Phan, T.T., Nguyen, V. V, Nguyen, H.T., Lee, C.-H., 2022. Integrating citizens’ importance-performance aspects into sustainable plastic waste management in Danang, Vietnam. Sustainability
  29. Sianipar, I.M.J., Lee, C.-H., 2024. Reshaping marine debris management post-COVID-19: Integrating adaptive attributes for enhanced community engagement. Ocean and Coastal Management 253:107149
  30. Sianipar, I.M.J., Lee, C.-H., Wang, H.-J., Kim, D.-C., 2024. Unraveling factors influencing local willingness to participate in sustainable Komodo conservation and protected area tourism. Forests and Society 8:350–371
  31. Steinemann, A., Wargocki, P., Rismanchi, B., 2017. Ten questions concerning green buildings and indoor air quality. Building and Environment 112:351–358
  32. Suhardono, S., Fitria, L., Suryawan, I.W.K., Ulhasanah, N., Sari, M.M., Septiariva, I.Y., Prayogo, W., 2024. Multidimensional factors of community behavioral responses and implications to landfill closures: A case study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Environmental Advances 16:100533
  33. Suhardono, S., Septiariva, I.Y., Prayogo, W., Suryawan, I.W.K., Sari, M.M., 2023. Current situation of solid waste management to archive sustainability in Klungkung Regency, Bali. Journal of Sustainable Infrastructure 2
  34. Suryawan, I.W.K., Gunawan, V.D., Lee, C.-H., 2024a. Assessing the importance-performance analysis of adaptive capacity programs for sustainable mangrove conservation in the Taman Nasional Bali Barat conservation area. Ocean and Coastal Management 257:107345
  35. Suryawan, I.W.K., Lee, C.-H., 2024. Importance-performance dynamics and willingness to pay in coastal areas for climate-adaptive marine debris management. Regional Studies in Marine Science
  36. Suryawan, I.W.K., Lee, C.-H., 2023. Citizens’ willingness to pay for adaptive municipal solid waste management services in Jakarta, Indonesia. Sustainable Cities and Society 97
  37. Suryawan, I.W.K., Mulyana, R., Yenis Septiariva, I., Prayogo, W., Suhardono, S., Sari, M.M., Ulhasanah, N., 2024b. Smart urbanism, citizen-centric approaches and integrated environmental services in transit-oriented development in Jakarta, Indonesia. Research Global 8:100181
  38. Suryawan, I.W.K., Septiariva, I.Y., Fauziah, E.N., Ramadan, B.S., Qonitan, F.D., Zahra, N.L., Sarwono, A., Sari, M.M., Ummatin, K.K., Wei, L.J., 2022. Municipal solid waste to energy: Palletization of paper and garden waste into refuse derived fuel. Journal of Ecological Engineering 23:64–74
  39. Suryawan, I.W.K., Septiariva, I.Y., Sari, M.M., Ramadan, B.S., Suhardono, S., Sianipar, I.M.J., Tehupeiory, A., Prayogo, W., Lim, J.-W., 2023. Acceptance of Waste to Energy (WtE) technology by local residents of Jakarta City, Indonesia to achieve sustainable clean and environmentally friendly energy. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems 11:1004
  40. Sutrisno, A.D., Chen, Y.-J., Lee, C.-H., 2023a. Building a community’s adaptive capacity for post-mining plans based on important performance analysis: Case study from Indonesia. Land
  41. Sutrisno, A.D., Chen, Y.-J., Suryawan, I.W., Lee, C.-H., 2023b. Establishing integrative framework for sustainable reef conservation in Karimunjawa National Park, Indonesia. Water
  42. Sutrisno, A.D., Lee, C.-H., Suhardono, S., 2024. Evaluating factors influencing community readiness for post-mining environmental development strategies. Journal of Environmental Management 366:121823
  43. Tehupeiory, A., Mulyana, R., Sianipar, I.M.J., Septiariva, I.Y., Prayogo, W., 2023. The environmental challenges of urban living: Why willingness to pay for apartments matters. Environmental Challenges 100766
  44. Torres-Bagur, M., Ribas, A., Vila-Subirós, J., 2019. Incentives and barriers to water-saving measures in hotels in the Mediterranean: A case study of the Muga River Basin (Girona, Spain). Sustainability
  45. Vijayan, D.S., Devarajan, P., Sivasuriyan, A., Stefańska, A., Koda, E., Jakimiuk, A., Vaverková, M.D., Winkler, J., Duarte, C.C., Corticos, N.D., 2023. A state of review on instigating resources and technological sustainable approaches in green construction. Sustainability
  46. Wadu Mesthrige, J., Kwong, H.Y., 2018. Criteria and barriers for the application of green building features in Hong Kong. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment 7:251–276
  47. Wan, S., Ding, G., Runeson, G., Liu, Y., 2022. Sustainable buildings’ energy-efficient retrofitting: A study of large office buildings in Beijing. Sustainability
  48. Wang, W., Lin, Z., Zhang, L., Yu, T., Ciren, P., Zhu, Y., 2019. Building visual green index: A measure of visual green spaces for urban building. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 40:335–343
  49. Wei, W., Ramalho, O., Mandin, C., 2015. Indoor air quality requirements in green building certifications. Building and Environment 92:10–19
  50. Wu, Z., Shen, L., Yu, A.T.W., Zhang, X., 2016. A comparative analysis of waste management requirements between five green building rating systems for new residential buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:895–902
  51. Yang, H., Zhang, Q., Helbich, M., Lu, Y., He, D., Ettema, D., Chen, L., 2022. Examining non-linear associations between built environments around workplace and adults’ walking behaviour in Shanghai, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 155:234–246
  52. Zhang, D., Tu, Y., 2021. Green building, pro-environmental behavior and well-being: Evidence from Singapore. Cities 108:102980
  53. Zhou, X., 2021. Ecological civilization in China: Challenges and strategies. Capitalism Nature Socialism 32:84–99

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-03-29 03:59:22

No citation recorded.