skip to main content

Evaluating Environmental Management Accounting of Community Driven Material Recovery Facility (CDRMF)

*Wilda Auwalina Istigfarin  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Arum Prastiwi  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Amirul Shah Md Shahbudin  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Noval Adib  -  Universiti Sains Malaysia, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) has gained attention, yet its use in grassroots waste management remains limited, especially in communities with scarce resources. This study explores how Community driven Material Recovery Facility (CdMRF), or known as waste bank, Mitra Kita in Blitar, Indonesia, applies EMA principles in its daily operations. The focus is on how local groups adapt accounting practices to stay accountable, transparent, and sustainable despite financial and operational constraints. A qualitative case study was conducted through interviews, observations, and document analysis, supported by triangulation and member validation. Findings show that the CdMRF develops practical financial routines recording expenses, calculating unit costs, and preparing semiannual reports which strengthen transparency and trust among members. Community participation plays a central role, as routine activities generate financial, social, and ecological value. However, long-term sustainability is challenged by limited managerial skills, dependence on key leaders, and fluctuating waste prices. This study expands EMA discussions by shifting attention from formal institutions to community initiatives in developing contexts. It demonstrates that simplifying accounting can make environmental management more grounded and adaptable. The findings offer guidance for policymakers seeking to strengthen CdMRFs and similar programs within broader circular economy and sustainability efforts. 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Circular economy; community driven material recovery; environmental management accounting; sustainability; waste bank
Funding: -

Article Metrics:

  1. Al Safadi, M.E., Ooi, S.K., 2024. Factors Affected EMA Adoption: The Moderating Role of Resource Bricolage. Stud. Syst. Decis. Control 223, 529–537
  2. Alam, P., Ahmade, K., 2013. Impact of Solid Waste on Health and the Environment. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. … 2, 165–168
  3. Anh, T.C., 2025. The Factors Affecting the Application of Environmental Management Accounting in Vietnam National Tobacco Corporation. Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag. 16
  4. Asiri, N., Khan, T., Kend, M., 2020. Environmental management accounting in the Middle East and North Africa region: Significance of resource slack and coercive isomorphism. J. Clean. Prod. 267
  5. Atkinson-Palombo, C., 2010. New housing construction in Phoenix: Evidence of “new suburbanism”? Cities 27, 77–86
  6. Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., 2014. Accounting and sustainable development: An exploration. Accounting, Organ. Soc. 39, 395–413
  7. Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., O’Dwyer, B., Thomson, I., 2021. Routledge Handbook of Environmental Accounting. Taylor & Francis Group
  8. Bennett, N.J., Whitty, T.S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., Allison, E.H., 2018. Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework. Environ. Manage. 61, 597–614
  9. Budihardjo, M.A., Ardiansyah, S.Y., Ramadan, B.S., 2022. Community-driven material recovery facility (CdMRF) for sustainable economic incentives of waste management: Evidence from Semarang City, Indonesia. Habitat Int. 119
  10. Budiyarto, A., Clarke, B., Ross, K., 2024. Overview of waste bank application in Indonesian regencies. Waste Manag. Res. 43, 306–321
  11. Burritt, R., Christ, K., 2016. Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: a new revolution? Asian J. Sustain. Soc. Responsib. 1, 23–38
  12. Creswell, J.W., Creswell, J.D., 2018. A Mixed-Method Approach, Writing Center Talk over Time
  13. Dahar, R., Rahmi, F., Yanti, N.S.P., Maharani, K.S., 2023. Penggunaan Aplikasi Akuntansi Bagi Asosiasi Bank Sampah Kota Padang. Pros. Konf. Nas. Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy. dan Corp. Soc. Responsib. 6, 1–8
  14. Denzin, N.K., 2017. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Res. Act A Theor. Introd. to Sociol. Methods 1–368
  15. Doan, T.N., Nguyen, T.A., Vu, H.L., Nguyen, H.A., Dam, H.A., Nguyen, T.S., 2023. Factors Affecting the Application of Environment Management Accounting: Evidence From Manufacturing Enterprises. Corp. Bus. Strateg. Rev. 4, 144–155
  16. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N.M.P., Hultink, E.J., 2017. The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 143, 757–768
  17. Group, W.B., 2022. Solid Waste Management [WWW Document]. World Bank Gr
  18. Gündüz, Meral, Gündüz, Murat, 2025. Environmental Accounting Disclosures and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Sector. Sustain. 17, 1–14
  19. Hertati, D., Arif, L., 2022. Collaborative Governance in the Management of a Waste Bank. KnE Soc. Sci. 2022, 1–13
  20. ISO, 2011. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD Environmental management — Material flow cost accounting — General framework iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW iTeh STANDARD PREVIEW 2011
  21. Ives, C.D., Kidwell, J., 2019. Religion and social values for sustainability. Sustain. Sci. 14, 1355–1362
  22. Khalid, F.M., 2023. Environmental Management Accounting Practices: A Review of the Literature. Proc. Int. Symp. Exhib. Bus. Account. 2022 (ISEBA 2022), 28 Sept. 2022, Malaysia 1, 186–197
  23. Kinanti, N., 2025. Masalah Sampah Masih Jadi PR di Kabupaten Blitar, Produksi Per Hari Capai 500 Ton [WWW Document]. Suara Jatim Pos
  24. Komarudin, M.F., Hasanudin, A.I., Hanifah, I.A., Mulyasari, W., 2025. Managing Environment-Prospective Accounting for Sustainable Development in Operation Management Practices Systems: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Impacts 08, 575–582
  25. Kubota, R., Horita, M., Tasaki, T., 2020. Integration of community-based waste bank programs with the municipal solid-waste-management policy in Makassar, Indonesia. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 22, 928–937
  26. Kumar, S., Smith, S.R., Fowler, G., Velis, C., Kumar, S.J., Arya, S., Rena, Kumar, R., Cheeseman, C., 2017. Challenges and opportunities associated with waste management in India. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4
  27. Latifah, S.W., Soewarno, N., 2023. The environmental accounting strategy and waste management to achieve MSME’s sustainability performance. Cogent Bus. Manag. 10
  28. Liu, J., Kua, H.W., Wang, C.H., Tong, Y.W., Zhang, J., Peng, Y., 2023. Improving urban ecosystem holistic sustainability of municipal solid waste-to-energy strategy using extended exergy accounting analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 904, 166730
  29. Maryati, S., Arifiani, N.F., Humaira, A.N.S., Putri, H.T., 2018. Factors influencing household participation in solid waste management (Case study: Waste Bank Malang). IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 124
  30. McCammon, H.J., Hewitt, L., Smith, S., 2004. “No weapon save argument”: Strategic frame amplification in the U.S. woman suffrage movements. Sociol. Q. 45, 529–556
  31. Miftahorrozi, M., Khan, S., Bhatti, M.I., 2022. Waste Bank-Socio-Economic Empowerment Nexus in Indonesia: The Stance of Maqasid al-Shariʻah. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 15
  32. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., Saldana, J., 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook, SAGE
  33. Muljaningsih, S., Andayani, W., Ekawaty, M., Nur Asrofi, D.A., 2025. Circular Economy–Based Waste Management for Climate Change Mitigation: Sustainable Development Goals Through Waste Banks. Int. J. Environ. Sustain. 21, 53–78
  34. Mustika, I., Oktavendi, T.W., Affan, M.W., 2023. Environmental Cost Accounting Practices in Waste Management. J. Multiperspectives Account. Lit. 1, 8–20
  35. Nowaczek, A., Kulczycka, J., Dziobek, E., Kalnina, D., 2021. Transparency in extractive industry as a driver for circular economy implementation – case of poland. Gospod. Surowcami Miner. / Miner. Resour. Manag. 37, 145–162
  36. Nu, T.T., Chi, B.L., Bac, D.T., Huong, H.D., Hai, N.T.T., 2025. Factors affecting the implementation of environmental management accounting - A study of manufacturing enterprises. Edelweiss Appl. Sci. Technol. 9, 1620–1638
  37. Razak, N.A.B.A., Tajuddin, N.A.B., 2020. Ecological Modernization: in Malaysia: A Review of Pakatan Harapan’s Manifesto Manifesto During the 14th General Election Within the Context of Ecological Modernization Framework. Light Eng. 28
  38. Saputri, D.Y., Asrowi, Sukarmin, Riyadi, 2025. An analysis of the university waste bank role in increasing students’ environmental awareness. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 1462
  39. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., 2017. Contemporary Environmental Accounting, Greenleaf Publishing Limited
  40. SEEA, 2020. System of Environmental Economic Accounting. United Nations Stat. Div. 17, 29
  41. Sharma, R., 2025. Unveiling the effects of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on company sustainability reporting practices: a case of German companies. Sustain. Accounting, Manag. Policy J
  42. Sumiyati, S., Budihardjo, M., Ramadan, B., Al-Hafidz, A., Salman, H., Wirawan, R., Fadhilah, H., 2021. Improving Recycling Behaviour Through Waste Bank Implementation in Diponegoro University. E3S Web Conf. 317, 1–6
  43. Tran, H.T.L., Nguyen, H.T., 2025. Environmental Management Accounting Strategy: a Case of Cement Companies. Corp. Bus. Strateg. Rev. 6, 193–201
  44. UNEP, 2020. Greening the Blue Report 2020. Green. Blue Rep. 2020
  45. United Nations Environment Programme, 2024. Beyond an age of waste - Turning rubbish into a resource, Global Waste Management Outlook 2024
  46. Wang, S., Wang, H., Wang, J., 2019. Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: Do top management support and perceived benefit work? Bus. Strateg. Environ. 28, 233–243
  47. Wijayanti, D.R., Suryani, S., 2015. Waste Bank as Community-based Environmental Governance: A Lesson Learned from Surabaya. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 184, 171–179
  48. Winans, K., Kendall, A., Deng, H., 2017. The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68, 825–833
  49. Xia, L., Cao, Z., Bilawal Khaskheli, M., 2025. How Digital Technology and Business Innovation Enhance Economic–Environmental Sustainability in Legal Organizations. Sustain. 17
  50. Yin, R.K., 2018. Case study research: design and method. Sage Publication, Inc
  51. Zurbrügg, C., Rothenberger, S., 2013. Determinants of resilience in community-led waste management. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Waste Resour. Manag. 166, 93–100

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-12-18 14:36:24

No citation recorded.