skip to main content

Evaluating Environmental Management Accounting of Community-driven Material Recovery Facility (CdRMF)

*Wilda Auwalina Istigfarin  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Arum Prastiwi  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Amirul Shah Md Shahbudin  -  Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
Noval Adib  -  Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Environmental management accounting (EMA) has gained attention; however, its use in grassroots waste management remains limited, especially in communities with scarce resources. This study explores how community-driven material recovery facilities (CdMRFs), or known as waste banks, Mitra Kita in Blitar, Indonesia, apply EMA principles in their daily operations. The focus is on how local groups adapt accounting practices to maintain accountability, transparency, and sustainability, despite financial and operational constraints. A qualitative case study was conducted through interviews, observations, and document analysis, supported by triangulation and member validation. The findings show that the CdMRF develops practical financial routines for recording expenses, calculating unit costs, and preparing semiannual reports, which strengthen transparency and trust among members. Community participation plays a central role, as routine activities generate financial, social, and ecological value. However, long-term sustainability is challenged by limited managerial skills, dependence on key leaders, and fluctuating waste prices. This study expands EMA discussions by shifting attention from formal institutions to community initiatives in developing contexts. It demonstrates that simplifying accounting can make environmental management more grounded and adaptable. The findings offer guidance for policymakers seeking to strengthen CdMRFs and similar programs within broader circular economy and sustainability efforts.

Keywords: Circular economy; community driven material recovery; environmental management accounting; sustainability; waste bank
Funding: -

Article Metrics:

  1. Al Safadi M.E. and Ooi S.K. 2024. Factors affected EMA adoption: the moderating role of resource bricolage. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 223, 529-537
  2. Alam P. and Ahmade K. 2013. Impact of solid waste on health and the environment. International Journal of Sustainable Development 2, 165-168
  3. Anh T.C. 2025. The factors affecting the application of environmental management accounting in Vietnam National Tobacco Corporation. International Journal of Asian Business and Information Management 16
  4. Asiri N., Khan T., and Kend M. 2020. Environmental management accounting in the Middle East and North Africa region: significance of resource slack and coercive isomorphism. Journal of Cleaner Production 267
  5. Atkinson-Palombo C. 2010. New housing construction in Phoenix: evidence of new suburbanism? Cities 27, 77-86
  6. Bebbington J. and Larrinaga C. 2014. Accounting and sustainable development: an exploration. Accounting, Organizations and Society 39, 395-413
  7. Bebbington J., Larrinaga C., O’Dwyer B., and Thomson I. 2021. Routledge handbook of environmental accounting. Taylor and Francis Group
  8. Bennett N.J., Whitty T.S., Finkbeiner E., Pittman J., Bassett H., Gelcich S., and Allison E.H. 2018. Environmental stewardship: a conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management 61, 597-614
  9. Budihardjo M.A., Ardiansyah S.Y., and Ramadan B.S. 2022. Community-driven material recovery facility (CdMRF) for sustainable economic incentives of waste management: evidence from Semarang City, Indonesia. Habitat International 119
  10. Budiyarto A., Clarke B., and Ross K. 2024. Overview of waste bank application in Indonesian regencies. Waste Management and Research 43, 306-321
  11. Burritt R. and Christ K. 2016. Industry 4.0 and environmental accounting: a new revolution? Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility 1, 23-38.
  12. Creswell, J.W., and Creswell, J.D. 2018. A mixed-method approach, writing center talk over time
  13. Dahar R., Rahmi F., Yanti N.S.P., and Maharani K.S. 2023. Penggunaan aplikasi akuntansi bagi asosiasi bank sampah Kota Padang. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Corporate Social Responsibility 6, 1-8
  14. Denzin N.K. 2017. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods
  15. Doan T.N., Nguyen T.A., Vu H.L., Nguyen H.A., Dam H.A., and Nguyen T.S. 2023. Factors affecting the application of environmental management accounting: evidence from manufacturing enterprises. Corporate and Business Strategy Review 4, 144-155
  16. Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N.M.P., and Hultink E.J. 2017. The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production 143, 757-768.
  17. Group, W.B., 2022. Solid waste management [WWW Document]. World Bank Gr
  18. Gündüz, Meral., and Gündüz, Murat. 2025. Environmental accounting disclosures and financial performance: evidence from the banking sector. Sustain. 17, 1–14
  19. Hertati, D., and Arif, L. 2022. Collaborative governance in the management of a waste bank. Kne Social Science 2022, 1–13
  20. ISO, 2011. Environmental management — material flow cost accounting — general framework. ISO 14051. Geneva: International Organization for Standarization
  21. Ives, C.D., and Kidwell, J. 2019. Religion and social values for sustainability. Sustainability Science 14, 1355–1362
  22. Khalid, F.M. 2023. Environmental management accounting practices: a review of the literature. Proceedings of International Symposium and Exhibition on Business and Accounting. 2022 (ISEBA 2022), 28 Sept. 2022, Malaysia 1, 186–197
  23. Kinanti, N. 2025. Masalah sampah masih jadi pr di kabupaten blitar, produksi per hari capai 500 ton [WWW Document]. Suara Jatim Pos
  24. Komarudin, M.F., Hasanudin, A.I., Hanifah, I.A., and Mulyasari, W. 2025. Managing environment-prospective accounting for sustainable development in operation management practices systems: a review. International Journal of Environmental Impacts 08, 575–582
  25. Kubota, R., Horita, M., and Tasaki, T. 2020. Integration of community-based waste bank programs with the municipal solid-waste-management policy in Makassar, Indonesia. Journal of Material Cycles Waste Management 22, 928–937
  26. Kumar, S., Smith, S.R., Fowler, G., Velis, C., Kumar, S.J., Arya, S., Rena, Kumar, R., and Cheeseman, C. 2017. Challenges and opportunities associated with waste management in India. Royal Society Open Science 4
  27. Latifah S.W. and Soewarno N. 2023. The environmental accounting strategy and waste management to achieve MSME’s sustainability performance. Cogent Business and Management 10
  28. Liu J., Kua H.W., Wang C.H., Tong Y.W., Zhang J., and Peng Y. 2023. Improving urban ecosystem holistic sustainability of municipal solid waste-to-energy strategy using extended exergy accounting analysis. Science of the Total Environment 904, 166730
  29. Maryati S., Arifiani N.F., Humaira A.N.S., and Putri H.T. 2018. Factors influencing household participation in solid waste management (case study: waste bank Malang). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 124
  30. McCammon H.J., Hewitt L., and Smith S. 2004. No weapon save argument: strategic frame amplification in the U.S. woman suffrage movements. Sociological Quarterly 45, 529-556
  31. Miftahorrozi M., Khan S., and Bhatti M.I. 2022. Waste bank-socio-economic empowerment nexus in Indonesia: the stance of Maqasid al-Shariʻah. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 15
  32. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M., and Saldana J. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Sage Publications
  33. Muljaningsih S., Andayani W., Ekawaty M., and Nur Asrofi D.A. 2025. Circular economy-based waste management for climate change mitigation: sustainable development goals through waste banks. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development 21, 53-78
  34. Mustika I., Oktavendi T.W., and Affan M.W. 2023. Environmental cost accounting practices in waste management. Journal of Multiperspectives in Accounting Literature 1, 8-20
  35. Nowaczek, A., Kulczycka, J., Dziobek, E., and Kalnina, D. 2021. Transparency in extractive industry as a driver for circular economy implementation – case of poland. Gospodarka Surowcami Minerlnymi - Mineral Resource Management 37, 145–162
  36. Nu T.T., Chi B.L., Bac D.T., Huong H.D., and Hai N.T.T. 2025. Factors affecting the implementation of environmental management accounting: a study of manufacturing enterprises. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology 9, 1620-1638
  37. Razak N.A.B.A. and Tajuddin N.A.B. 2020. Ecological modernization in Malaysia: a review of Pakatan Harapan’s manifesto during the 14th general election within the context of ecological modernization framework. Lighting Engineering 28
  38. Saputri D.Y., Asrowi, Sukarmin, and Riyadi. 2025. An analysis of the university waste bank role in increasing students’ environmental awareness. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1462
  39. Schaltegger S. and Burritt R. 2017. Contemporary environmental accounting. Greenleaf Publishing Limited
  40. SEEA. 2020. System of environmental-economic accounting. United Nations Statistics Division
  41. Sharma R. 2025. Unveiling the effects of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) on company sustainability reporting practices: a case of German companies. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal
  42. Sumiyati S., Budihardjo M., Ramadan B., Al-Hafidz A., Salman H., Wirawan R., and Fadhilah H. 2021. Improving recycling behaviour through waste bank implementation in Diponegoro University. E3S Web of Conferences 317, 1-6
  43. Tran H.T.L. and Nguyen H.T. 2025. Environmental management accounting strategy: a case of cement companies. Corporate and Business Strategy Review 6, 193-201
  44. UNEP. 2020. Greening the blue report 2020. United Nations Environment Programme
  45. United Nations Environment Programme. 2024. Beyond an age of waste: turning rubbish into a resource. Global Waste Management Outlook 2024
  46. Wang S., Wang H., and Wang J. 2019. Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: do top management support and perceived benefit work? Business Strategy and the Environment 28, 233-243
  47. Wijayanti D.R. and Suryani S. 2015. Waste bank as community-based environmental governance: a lesson learned from Surabaya. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 184, 171-179
  48. Winans K., Kendall A., and Deng H. 2017. The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68, 825-833
  49. Xia L., Cao Z., and Bilawal Khaskheli M. 2025. How digital technology and business innovation enhance economic-environmental sustainability in legal organizations. Sustainability 17
  50. Yin R.K. 2018. Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications
  51. Zurbrügg C. and Rothenberger S. 2013. Determinants of resilience in community-led waste management. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Waste and Resource Management 166, 93-100.0

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-03-31 08:19:17

No citation recorded.