skip to main content

Integrated Management of Scope 3 Emissions in the Steel Supply Chain

*Raktim Dasgupta  -  Jadavpur University, India
Sadhan Kumar Ghosh  -  Jadavpur University, India
Arup Ranjan Mukhopadhyay  -  Indian Statistical Institute, India
Biswanath Dolui  -  Jadavpur University, India

Citation Format:
Abstract

Scope 3 emissions constitute the largest and most difficult-to-manage component of the steel industry’s carbon footprint, yet remain under explored due to fragmented data systems and the absence of holistic analytical approaches. This study presents an integrated, real-data-driven framework for quantifying and reducing Scope 3 emissions in a medium-scale steel supply chain in West Bengal, India. Primary operational data were collected across upstream suppliers, midstream manufacturing operations, and downstream distributors using transport logs, meter-based energy records, scrap inspection sheets, on-site walk through, and structured stakeholder interviews. Environmental Value Stream Mapping (EVSM) coupled with life-cycle emission accounting was applied to six process stages (UP1, UP2, MS1, MS2, DS1, DS2), revealing the Electric Arc Furnace (MS1) as the dominant hotspot, contributing more than 90% of total Scope 3 emissions. Circularity metrics, the Scrap Quality Index (SQI) and Material Circularity Index (MCI), demonstrated that higher scrap quality and increased recycled content can significantly decrease upstream embodied emissions. A cooperative game-theoretic model quantified abatement opportunities for suppliers, the manufacturer, and distributors, showing that full coalition formation {U, M, D} generated the highest net payoff (₹1.89 million). Shapely value allocation confirmed the manufacturer as the major beneficiary (97.6%), with proportionate gains assigned to suppliers and distributors. Results highlight that collaborative governance, enhanced circularity, optimized logistics, and renewable energy integration, particularly solar-based electricity substitution, collectively offer a high-impact pathway for Scope 3 decarbonisation. The proposed multi-method framework provides a transparent, equitable, and industry-ready decision-support system for accelerating low-carbon transitions in the Indian steel sector.

Fulltext

Article Metrics:

  1. Abbass, K, Qasim, M Z, Song, H, Murshed, M, Mahmood, H, & Younis, I 2022 A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 42539–42559
  2. CDP 2022 Engaging the chain: why suppliers must act on climate change CDP Global Supply Chain Report
  3. Chiarini, A 2021 Environmental value stream mapping: a tool to enhance sustainability performance Production Planning & Control, 32(3), 169–183
  4. Delarue, E 2020 Cooperative game theory for renewable energy cost allocation: a review Energy Policy, 144, 111608
  5. DEFRA 2023 UK government GHG conversion factors for company reporting Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs
  6. Faulkner, W, & Badurdeen, F 2014 Sustainable value stream mapping (Sus-VSM): methodology to visualize and assess manufacturing sustainability performance Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 8–25
  7. Feldmann, A, & Přebinda, F 2020 The application of environmental value stream mapping in industrial practice Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 172–179
  8. Goldmann, D, & Worrell, E 2019 Opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in industrial supply chains Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(3), 496–508
  9. Greenhouse Gas Protocol 2004 Corporate value chain (Scope 3) accounting and reporting standard World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development
  10. Hasanbeigi, A, & Springer, C 2019 How clean is the U S steel industry? Global Efficiency Intelligence
  11. International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) 2023 IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures
  12. IPCC 2021 2021 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  13. Liu, Z, Zhang, H, & Chen, Y 2022 Carbon emissions of downstream logistics in developing economies: a case study of freight patterns Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 103, 103196
  14. Madani, K 2013 Modeling cooperation in shared water systems using game theory: review of concepts and applications Water Resources Management, 27, 11–40
  15. Rockström, J, Gaffney, O, Rogelj, J, Meinshausen, M, Nakicenovic, N, & Schellnhuber, H J 2017 A roadmap for rapid decarbonization Science, 355(6331), 1269–1271
  16. Shapley, L S 1953 A value for n-person games In H Kuhn & A Tucker (Eds), Contributions to the theory of games II (pp 307–317) Princeton University Press
  17. Tang, R, Chen, L, & Wang, J 2021 Emissions from multimodal transport of steel products: an integrated LCA approach Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125720
  18. Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures 2017 Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures
  19. World Steel Association 2020 Steel industry energy and CO₂ emissions report
  20. Zhao, H, Jin, M, & Zhou, L 2020 Cooperative game-based allocation of environmental benefits in industrial symbiosis Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 159, 104825

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-11-30 23:01:49

No citation recorded.