skip to main content

Integrated Management of Scope 3 Emissions in the Steel Supply Chain

*Raktim Dasgupta  -  Jadavpur University, India
Sadhan Kumar Ghosh  -  Jadavpur University, India
Arup Ranjan Mukhopadhyay  -  Indian Statistical Institute, India
Biswanath Dolui  -  Jadavpur University, India

Citation Format:
Abstract

Scope 3 emissions constitute the largest and most difficult-to-manage component of the carbon footprint of the steel industry; however, they remain underexplored owing to fragmented data systems and the absence of holistic analytical approaches. This study presents an integrated, real-data-driven framework for quantifying and reducing Scope 3 emissions in a medium-scale steel supply chain in West Bengal, India. Primary operational data were collected from upstream suppliers, midstream manufacturing operations, and downstream distributors using transport logs, meter-based energy records, scrap inspection sheets, on-site walk-throughs, and structured stakeholder interviews. Environmental Value Stream Mapping (EVSM) coupled with life-cycle emission accounting was applied to six process stages (UP1, UP2, MS1, MS2, DS1, and DS2), revealing the Electric Arc Furnace (MS1) as the dominant hotspot, contributing more than 90% of the total Scope 3 emissions. Circularity metrics, namely the Scrap Quality Index (SQI) and Material Circularity Index (MCI), demonstrated that higher scrap quality and increased recycled content can significantly decrease upstream embodied emissions. A cooperative game-theoretic model quantified abatement opportunities for suppliers, the manufacturer, and distributors, showing that full coalition formation {U, M, D} generated the highest net payoff (₹1.89 million). Shapley value allocation confirmed the manufacturer as the major beneficiary (97.6%), with proportionate gains assigned to suppliers and distributors. The results highlight that collaborative governance, enhanced circularity, optimized logistics, and renewable energy integration, particularly solar-based electricity substitution, collectively offer a high-impact pathway for Scope 3 decarbonization. The proposed multi-method framework provides a transparent, equitable, and industry-ready decision support system for accelerating low-carbon transitions in the Indian steel sector. 

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Circular economy; electric arc furnace; environmental value stream mapping; scope 3 emissions; steel industry

Article Metrics:

  1. (ISSB), I. S. S. B. 2023. IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures
  2. Altan, B. & Özener, O. Ö. 2020. A game theoretical framework for allocating cost and gas emission responsibilities in a collaborative setting
  3. Association, W. S. 2020. Steel industry energy and CO₂ emissions report
  4. Bosch, G., Van Zanten, H., Zamprogna, A., Veenenbos, M., Meijer, N., Van der Fels-Klerx, H. & Van Loon, J. 2019. Conversion of organic resources by black soldier fly larvae: Legislation, efficiency and environmental impact. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222(355-363
  5. Burggräf, P., Steinberg, F., Diebel, M., Becher, A., Sauer, C. R., Wigger, M., Baeck, L. & Germann, N. Enhancing Resource Efficiency And Monetization In Metal Recycling Through Supply Chain-Wide Digitalization: An Approach For Single-Variety Metal Stream Optimization And CO2 Reduction. Proceedings of the Conference on Production Systems and Logistics: CPSL 2024, 2024. Hannover: publish-Ing., 729-740
  6. CDP. 2022. Engaging the chain: why suppliers must act on climate change CDP Global Supply Chain Report,
  7. Conejo, A. N., Birat, J.-P. & Dutta, A. 2020. A review of the current environmental challenges of the steel industry and its value chain. Journal of environmental management, 259(109782
  8. Darvish Shahrbabaki, S. A. 2011. Green and Lean Production Visualization Tools; A Case Study exploring EVSM
  9. Disclo, T. F. o. C.-R. F. 2017. Recommendations of the task force on climate-related financial disclosures,
  10. Faulkner, W. & Badurdeen, F. 2014. Sustainable Value Stream Mapping (Sus-VSM): methodology to visualize and assess manufacturing sustainability performance. Journal of cleaner production, 85(8-18
  11. Garza-Reyes, J. A., Romero, J. T., Govindan, K., Cherrafi, A. & Ramanathan, U. 2018. A PDCA-based approach to environmental value stream mapping (E-VSM). Journal of cleaner production, 180(335-348
  12. Goldman, D. & Worrel, E. 2019. Opportunities to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in industrial supply chains. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(3), pp 496-508
  13. Golvaskar, M., Ojo, S. A. & Kannan, M. 2024. Recent Advancements in Material Waste Recycling: Conventional, Direct Conversion, and Additive Manufacturing Techniques. Recycling, 9(3), pp 43
  14. Hasanbeigi, A., Springer, C. & Global, E. 2019. How clean is the US steel industry. An International Benchmarking of Energy and CO2 Intensities
  15. Hettler, M. & Graf‐Vlachy, L. 2024. Corporate scope 3 carbon emission reporting as an enabler of supply chain decarbonization: A systematic review and comprehensive research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), pp 263-282
  16. Huang, Y. A., Weber, C. L. & Matthews, H. S. 2009. Categorization of scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. ACS Publications
  17. Kennelly, C., Berners-Lee, M. & Hewitt, C. 2019. Hybrid life-cycle assessment for robust, best-practice carbon accounting. Journal of cleaner production, 208(35-43
  18. Lu, Y., Liu, Q., Li, B., Jiang, Q. & Li, Q. 2024. Energy mix-driven dynamic life cycle assessment on greenhouse gas emissions of passenger cars in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 466(142817
  19. Madani, K. 2013. Modeling international climate change negotiations more responsibly: Can highly simplified game theory models provide reliable policy insights? Ecological Economics, 90(68-76
  20. Ong, H. Y., Wang, C. & Zainon, N. 2018. Developing a quality-embedded EVM tool to facilitate the iron triangle in architectural, construction, and engineering practices. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(9), pp 04018079
  21. Pinto, J. 2019. Sustainable resource management in european steel supply chains. Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020]; Háskóli Islands
  22. Pozzi, R., Cannas, V. G. & Ciano, M. P. 2022. Linking data science to lean production: a model to support lean practices. International Journal of Production Research, 60(22), pp 6866-6887
  23. Rockström, J., Gaffney, O., Rogelj, J., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N. & Schellnhuber, H. J. 2017. A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science, 355(6331), pp 1269-1271
  24. Roosen, T. & Pons, D. 2013. Environmentally lean production: the development and incorporation of an environmental impact index into value stream mapping. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2013(1), pp 298103
  25. Shapley, L. S. 1953. A value for n-person games
  26. Shi, Y., Liu, P. & Wang, X. 2024. Energy Chain Value Mapping: A New Approach to Improve the Energy Value of Energy Flexible Manufacturing System. Available at SSRN 4845095
  27. Sovacool, B. K., Bazilian, M. D., Kim, J. & Griffiths, S. 2023. Six bold steps towards net-zero industry. Energy Research & Social Science, 99(103067
  28. Wang, L., Wu, Z. & Wang, X. 2023. Multimodal transportation and city carbon emissions over space and time: Evidence from Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 425(138987
  29. Wbcsd, W. 2004. The greenhouse gas protocol. A corporate accounting and reporting standard, Rev. ed. Washington, DC, Conches-Geneva
  30. Zhang, X., Jiao, K., Zhang, J. & Guo, Z. 2021. A review on low carbon emissions projects of steel industry in the World. Journal of cleaner production, 306(127259
  31. Zhao, H., Wang, H., Jin, S. & He, Z. 2023. Evolutionary game and simulation analysis of collaborative innovation mechanisms of industrial internet Platform-Based ecosystem. Sustainability, 15(6), pp 4884

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-12-22 19:56:23

No citation recorded.