DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/teknik.v43i2.38536

Indikator Penentu Kepuasan Dalam Penilaian Kota Layak Huni Menggunakan Metode Important Performance Analysis

*Edi Purwanto scopus  -  Department of Architecture, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Very Darmawan  -  Departemen Arsitektur, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 TEKNIK

Citation Format:
Abstract
Membangun kota yang layak huni telah menjadi tujuan penting akibat dampak dari urbanisasi yang terjadi pada kota-kota besar di Indonesia. Upaya untuk mengukur kepuasan masyarakat terhadap kota layak huni di kota-kota besar tersebut bermanfaat untuk perencanaan dan perancangan kota serta untuk pembuatan kebijakan mengenai pembangunan kota layak huni kedepannya. Namun demikian bukti ilmiah tentang seberapa besar tingkat kepuasan masyarakat terhadap kota layak huni yang mereka tempati masih belum banyak. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis indikator penentu kepuasan dalam menilai kota layak huni dengan mengambil objek kota Semarang dengan  menggunakan metode Importance Performance Analysis. Temuan penelitian memberikan penjelasan bahwa tingkat kepuasan responden terhadap status kota Semarang sebagai kota layak huni secara total sebesar 64,61%. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang diperoleh, dari 30 indikator kota layak huni, terdapat 11 indikator dengan prioritas tinggi dengan kinerja kepuasan rendah dan menjadi prioritas perhatian pemerintah kota Semarang.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: kota layak huni; tingkat kepuasan; importance performance analysis; kinerja indikator
Funding: Universitas Diponegoro under contract MetMu123456

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Artikel
Language : ID
Recent articles
Analisis Perubahan Jumlah Slot pada Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator (PMSG) untuk Mencapai Nilai Optimal Back EMF dan KE Berbasis Finite Element Method (FEM) Non-Microplastic Microbeads From Sago Liquid Waste With The Addition Of Chitosan as Antibacterial Function: A Review ANALISIS PERUBAHAN KONSENTRASI TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLID SECARA MULTITEMPORAL MENGGUNAKAN CITRA SENTINEL 2A (STUDI KASUS: DANAU RAWA PENING, JAWA TENGAH) Back Matter Front Matter More recent articles
Most cited articles
PEMETAAN ANCAMAN BANJIR KOTA SEMARANG MENGGUNAKAN FUZZY LOGIC DAN SIG Pengaruh Activity Support terhadap Kualitas Visual Koridor Jalan K.H. Agus Salim Semarang INVENTARISASI PERUBAHAN WILAYAH PANTAI DENGAN METODE PENGINDERAAN JAUH (STUDI KASUS KOTA SEMARANG) KARAKTERISTIK AKTIVITAS PEDAGANG KAKI LIMA PADA KAWASAN KOMERSIAL DI PUSAT KOTA Studi Kasus: Simpang Lima, Semarang LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF PAPER TOWEL AND ELECTRIC DRYER AS HAND DRYING METHOD IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE More cited articles
  1. Athey, G., et al. (2007). Innovation and the city: How innovation has developed in five cityregions. London: Nesta
  2. Badland, H., et al. (2014). Urban liveability: Emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Social Science & Medicine, 111, 64–73
  3. Brandt, D.R., 2000. An “outside-in” approach to determining customer-driven priorities for improvement and innovation. White Paper Series, 2(2), pp.1-8
  4. Dodman, D. (2009). Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories. Environment & Urbanization, 21(1), 185–201
  5. Dong, H., & Qin, B.(2017). Exploring the link between neigborhood environment and mental wellbeing: A case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning. 164, 71-80
  6. Dragin-Jensen, C., Schnittka, O., & Arkil, C. (2016). More options do not always create perceived variety in life: Attracting new residents with quality- vs. quantity-oriented event portfolios. Cities, 56, 55–62
  7. Evans, P. B. (2002). Livable cities?: Urban struggles for livelihood and sustainability. Berkeley: University of California Press
  8. Folke, C., Jansson, A., Larsson, J., & Costanza, R. (1997). Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio, 26(3), 167–172
  9. Hahlweg, D. (1997). The City as a family. In S. H. Lennard, S. von Ungern Sternberg, H. L. Lennard, & M. C. Livable (Eds.). International making cities livable conferences. Gondolier Press
  10. Ikatan Ahli Perencanaan Indonesia. (2017). Indonesia Most Livable City Index 2017
  11. Kashef, M. (2016). Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(2), 239–253
  12. Klopp, J. M., & Petretta, D. L. (2017). The urban sustainable development goal: Indicators, complexity and the politics of measuring cities. Cities, 63, 92–97
  13. Kytta, M. et al. (2016). Urban happiness: Context sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environment and Planning. B Planning & Design. 43(1), 34-57
  14. Latu, T.M. and Everett, A.M., (2000). Review of satisfaction research and measurement approaches. Wellington, NZ: Department of Conservation
  15. Li, Z., & Wu, F. (2007). Socio-spatial differentiation and residential inequalities in shanghai: A case study of three neighbourhoods. Housing Studies, 21(5), 695–717
  16. Mahmoudi, M., Ahmad, F., & Abbasi, B. (2015). Livable streets: The effects of physical problems on the quality and livability of Kuala Lumpur streets. Cities, 43, 104–114
  17. Martilla, J.A. and James, J.C., (1977). Importance performance analysis. The journal of marketing, pp.77-79
  18. Norouzian-Maleki, S., et al. (2015). Developing and testing a framework for the assessment of neighbourhood liveability in two contrasting countries: Iran and Estonia. Ecological Indicators, 48, 263–271
  19. Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2011). City life: Rankings (livability) versus perceptions (satisfaction). Social Indicators Research, 110(2), 433–451
  20. Ouyang, W., et al. 2017. Spatial deprivation of urban public services in migrant enclaves under the context of a rapidly urbanizing China: An evaluation based suburban Shanghai. Cities, 60, 436-445
  21. Pacione, M. (1990). Urban liveability: A review. Urban Geography, 11(1), 1–30
  22. Ruth, M., & Franklin, R. S. (2014). Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications. Applied Geography, 49, 18–23
  23. Saitluanga, B. L. (2013). Spatial pattern of urban livability in Himalayan region: A case of Aizawl City, India. Social Indicators Research, 117(2), 541–559
  24. Sofeska, E. (2017). Understanding the livability in a city through smart solutions and urban planning toward developing sustainable livable future of the City of Skopje. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 442–453
  25. Timmer, V., & Seymoar, N. K. (2005). The livable city. Vancouver working group discussion paper, the world urban forum 2006
  26. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, & Population Division (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revisionn, highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/ 352), s.l.: s.n
  27. Vojnovic, I. (2014). Urban sustainability: Research, politics, policy and practice. Cities, 41, S30–S44
  28. Wheeler, Stephen M. (2004). Planning For Sustainability, Creating Livable, Equitable, And Ecological Communities. New York: Routledge
  29. Zhan, D., Kwanc Mei-Po, Zhanga, W., Fana, J., Yua, J., Dang, Y. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities. 79, 92-101
  30. Zhang, W. & Gao, X. (2008). Spatial differentiations of traffic satisfaction and its policy implication in Beijing. Habitat International. 32(4), 437-451

Last update:

  1. Mitigating Climate Change Towards Livable City (Case: Bandung City, West Java)

    June Ekawati, Herdi Sofari, Winda Rahmawati, Suci Indah Permata, Edo Setiawan. Journal of Architectural Design and Urbanism, 6 (1), 2024. doi: 10.14710/jadu.v6i1.21612

Last update: 2024-12-25 17:33:48

No citation recorded.