SUSTAINABLE REVITALIZATION IN HERITAGE KAMPONG KAUMAN SURAKARTA SUPPORTED BY SPATIAL ANALYSIS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.0.0.191-204
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Published: 25-04-2018
Section: Articles
Tell your colleagues Email the author
Kelurahan Kauman is one of the cultural heritage kampong in Surakarta. It began to grow when Pakubowono III built the Great Mosque in 1757 AD.  The scholar courtiers and its students lived around the Great Mosque which was later named ”Kauman”.  The wife of scholar courtiers opened the batik business households and grew rapidly in 1800 until mid 1900, marked with many beautiful houses built at that time.  However, from 1939 to 1970 their handmade batik industries went bankrupt followed by environmental degradation. Neighborhood revitalization is needed so that the district becomes more comfortable and healthier to live in, and it can be developed into a tourism village in order to improve the welfare of society. There has been an effort to revitalize mentor of the society in Kauman since 2006, but the results are not optimal yet.  The issues raised in this research include how to explore the current condition and the continuation of revitalization program in Kauman.  This research is an applied research with rasionalistic qualitative approach, data collection of environmental condition and occupants using field survey, interview and satelite imagery observations. Sampling is done purposively; the selected sample can be considered to represent the case.  The theory of figure ground, linkage and place is used to analyze physical and non-physical needs of the area as a basis for determining the design concept of district planning. The aspects analyzed are the environment, socio-cultural, economy, resources and involvement. The steps of sustainable revitalisastion is done as follows: 1) preparation;2) determination of the work program;3) policy settings;4) action plan;5) monitoring, evaluation and training.

Keywords

Sustainable revitalization, heritage kampong, spatial analysis

  1. Musyawaroh Musyawaroh 
    Doctoral Candidate Study Program of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Universitas Sebelas Maret. Study Program of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia

    Doctoral Candidate Study Program of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Universitas Sebelas Maret.


    Lecturer Study Program of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

  2. Titis Srimuda Pitana 
    Study Program of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Universitas Sebelas Maret. Study Program of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia., Indonesia
    Lecturer Study Program of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Universitas Sebelas Maret.
    Lecturer Study Program of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret.
  3. Mohammad Masykuri 
    Study Program of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia., Indonesia
    Lecturer Study Program of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Universitas Sebelas Maret
  4. Nandariyah Nandariyah 
    Study Program of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
    Lecturer Study Program of Environmental Science, Graduate School of Universitas Sebelas Maret
  1. Antariksa. (14 April 2012). Makna Kultural Bangunan dan Strategi Pelestarian. Citing Internet sources www.academia.edu.  Website
  2. Akkam, A., J., M. (14 July 2012), Urban Heritage in Baghdad:Toward a Comprehensive Sustainable Framework. Journal of Sustainable Development; Vol. 6 No. 2 pp. 39-55; 2013 Published by Canadian Centerof Science and Education. Citing Internet sources e-resources.pnri.go.id  Journal
  3. Arslan, T., V. (14 Jul 2015). Developing A Strategic Approach For Managing Sustainable. International Journal of Architectural Research, Volume 9 - Issue 1 - March 2015 - (289-304) – Regular Section. Citing Internet sources e-resources.pnri.go.id.  Journal
  4. Chung, T. (5 December 2009). Valuing Heritage in Macau: On Contexts and Processes of Urban Conservation, in: Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 38, 1, 129-160.ISSN:1868-4874 (online), ISSN: 1868-1026 (print). Citing Internet sources hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de.  Journal
  5. Darban, AA. (2000). Sejarah Kauman, Menguak Identitas Kampung Muhammadiyah, Tarawang, Yogyakarta.  Book
  6. Laelabilkis. (13 Octber 2005). Teori Morfologi Dalam Penentuan Kawasan Konservasi Kota. Citing Internet sources www.scribd.com.  Website Article
  7. Miles, M., B. & Huberman, A., M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 3rd edition, Sage Publication Inc, USA.  Book
  8. Muhadjir, N. (1992). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Rake Sarasin, Yogyakarta.  Book
  9. Musyawaroh, 2009a, Strategy To Revitalize Slum On Heritage Kampong Kauman Surakarta, Proceeding International Conference on Informal Settlement and Affordable Housing 2009, PWK UNS, April 16 th 2009, CIB Report Publication, page II-185 to II-196, ISBN : 978-979-19694-0-6.  Proseeding
  10. Musyawaroh, 2009b, Upaya Revitalisasi Bangunan Kuno di Kauman Surakarta, Makalah Diskusi Nasional ”Arsitektur Reka-Matra” Tgl. 9 Juni 2009, Arsitektur Undip, halaman 54, ISBN : 978.979.704.753.5.  Proseeding
  11. Musyawaroh. (2016a). Model Pengelolaan Revitalisasi Kawasan Cagar Budaya Berbasis Arsitektur Berkelanjutan Studi Kasus Kelurahan Kauman Surakarta, Penelitian Disertasi dan Doktor Baru, Universitas Sebelas Maret.  Disertation research
  12. Musyawaroh, dkk. (2016b). Identifikasi Masalah dan Pengukuran Lapangan Penataan Saluran Drainase di Kelurahan Kauman Kecamatan Pasar Kliwon Kota Surakarta, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Sebelas Maret.  Community service program
  13. Nasution, S., Prof, Dr, 1987, Metode Research, Jemmars, Bandung.  Book
  14. Neuman, W., L., 2013, Metodologi Penelitian Sosial : Pendekatan Kualitatif Dan Kuantitatif, terjemahan, Edisi 7, Sofia, E., T., PT. Indeks, Jakarta Barat.  Book
  15. Nur, M.S., DR. MHD., 2009, Manajemen Pengelolaan Warisan Sejarah Di Sumatera Barat, Mencari Model Yang Dapat Memelihara Pelestarian Nilai Keaslian, artikel ilmiah, diakses dari repository.unand.ac.id tanggal 8 Agustus 2012.  Website Article
  16. Priatmodjo, D. (11 January 2009). Revitalisasi Bangunan Cagar Budaya : Konservasi + Nilai Ekonomi + Manfaat Bagi Masyarakat Luas, bulletin BKTRN. Citing Internet sources penataanruang.pu.go.id tanggal 11 Januari 2012.  Website Article
  17. Sajid. (1984). Babad Sala, Rekso Pustoko Perspustakaan Istana Mangkunegaran, Solo.  Book
  18. Santoso, J. (2008). Arsitektur-kota Jawa, Kosmos, Kultur & Kuasa, Centropolis- Magister Teknik dan Perencanaan Universitas Tarumanegara, Jakarta.  Book
  19. Sidharta & Budihardjo, E. (1989). Konservasi Lingkungan dan Bangunan Kuno Bersejarah di Surakarta, Gadjah Mada Press, Yogyakarta.  Book
  20. Seroso, A. & Susilo, Y. (2009). Nilai Ekonomi Barang Kebudayaan, Modus Vol. 21 (1) : 23-29, 2009  Journal
  21. Suparmoko, M. (2006). PDRB Hijau (Konsep dan Metdlogi), Materi disampaikan pada Pelatihan Penyusunan PDRB Hijau dan Perencanaan Kehutanan Berbasis Penataan Ruang  Presentation report
  22. Wijayanti, W. (2010). Prioritas Strategi Konservasi Kawasan Kauman Surakarta dengan Pendekatan Konsep Revitalisasi, Tesis S2 Magister Teknik Sipil UNS, Surakarta.  Thesis