Improving the Quantity and Quality of Biogas Production in Tehran Anaerobic Digestion Power Plant by Application of Materials Recirculation Technique

Reza Naghavi  -  Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran,, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Mohammad Ali Abdoli  -  Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran,, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Abdolreza Karbasi scopus  -  Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran,, Iran, Islamic Republic of
*Mehrdad Adl orcid scopus  -  Department of Energy, Materials and Energy Research Center, Karaj, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Received: 26 Mar 2020; Revised: 19 Apr 2020; Accepted: 30 Apr 2020; Published: 15 Jul 2020; Available online: 2 May 2020.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Renewable Energy Development
License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language: EN
Statistics: 749 227
Abstract
Tehran anaerobic digestion power plant has been built on the eastern margin of the urban district by the purpose of processing the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. One of the most suitable methods for the treatment of organic matter is the use of anaerobic digestion (AD) process, which in addition to significant reduction of organic solid wastes, will produce valuable energy. Contributing to maintain the environment, improve urban health, saving on fossil fuels and producing rich fertilizer for agricultural use are important advantages of anaerobic digestion. The plant has been set up in 2014 with a nominal acceptance capacity of 300 tons of organic solid wastes per day and the nominal power generation of 2000 kWe. This system has been faced with considerable challenges in terms of quantity and quality of biogas during operation. The high concentration of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in produced biogas and the lack of appropriate technologies in the plant for biogas refining are critical for the biogas generator engine deployed in the complex. The purpose of this article is to investigate the factors affecting the quality and quantity of Tehran's AD plant biogas using various H2S reduction approaches and selection of appropriate implementing technologies. The results showed that the recirculation of the digester slurry increased the methane content by more than 30% and reduced H2S by more than 98%.©2020. CBIORE-IJRED. All rights reserved
Keywords: Organic waste; anaerobic digestion; biogas; hydrogen sulfide; material recirculation; waste management

Article Metrics:

  1. Adl, M. and Omrani, G. (2008) Background of biogas technology and its recent developments in Iran. Int J Global Energy Issues, 29(1),273-283 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2008.018008
  2. APHA (American Public Health Association), (1998) Standard methods for the Experimental of Water and Wastewater, APHA Washington, D.C..
  3. Bauer, F., Persson, T., Hulteberg, C., & Tamm, D. (2013). Biogas upgrading- Technology overview, comparison and perspectives for the future. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 7(5), 499-511 https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1423
  4. Cosoli, P., et al. (2008) Hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas by zeolite adsorption, Part II: MD simulations. Chemical Engineering Journal. 145(1): 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.08.013
  5. Dezham, P., Rosenblum, E., Jenkins, D. (1988) Digester gas control using iron salts. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation, 514-517
  6. EBA (2018) Annual Statistical Report of the European Biogas Association: European Overview Chapter
  7. Haryanto A., Marotin F., Triyono S., Hasanudin U. (2017) Developing a family size biogas-fueled electricity generating system. Int. Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 6(2): 111-118 https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.6.2.111-118
  8. Holliger C., Fruteau H., Hack G. (2017) Methane production of full-scale anaerobic digestion plants calculated from substrate's biomethane potentials compares well with the one measured on-site. Frontiers in Energy Research, 5:12. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2017.00012https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2017.00012
  9. Hospido, A., Moreira, T., Martin A., Rigola M., Feijoo G. (2005). Environmental evaluation of different treatment processes for sludge from urban wastewater treatments: Anaerobic digestion versus thermal processes. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment,. 10(5): 336-345. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.05.210
  10. Janetaisong, P., V. Lailuck, and S. Supasitmongkol (2017). Pelletization of iron oxide based sorbents for hydrogen sulfide removal. In: Key Engineering Materials. Trans Tech Publication https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.751.449
  11. Khalid A., Arshad, M., Anjum, M.Mahmood, T., Dawson L. (2011) The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste management, 31(8), 1737-1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021
  12. Krayzelova, L., Bartacek, J., Diaz I., Jenicek, P. (2015) Micro-aeration for hydrogen sulfide removal during anaerobic treatment: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 14(4): 703-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-015-9386-2
  13. Lissens, G., Vandevivere, P., De Baere L., Makaly Biey E., Verstrae W. (2001). Solid waste digesters: process performance and practice for municipal solid waste digestion. Water science and technology, 44(8): 91-102 https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0473
  14. Massé, D.I., Rajagopal, R., and Singh, G. (2014) Technical and operational feasibility of psychrophilic anaerobic digestion biotechnology for processing ammonia-rich waste. Applied Energy,. 120: 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.034
  15. Micolucci, F., Gottardo, M., Bolzonella, D., Pavan, P. ( 2014) Automatic process control for stable bio-hythane production in two-phase thermophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 39(31): 17563-17572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.136
  16. Moestedt, J., Nordell, E., Shakeri Y.S., Lundgeren J., Marti, A., Sundberg C., Ejlertsson J., Svensson, B.H., Björn A. (2016) Effects of trace element addition on process stability during anaerobic co-digestion of OFMSW and slaughterhouse waste. Waste management,. 47: 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.007
  17. Municipality of Tehran, Waste Management Organization. (2018) Report on field investigations for solid wastes composition and quantity within 22 urban districts of Tehran during 2008 and 2017. http://pasmand.tehran.ir (in Persian) accessed on 15 October 2019
  18. Park, C.M., Novak,J.T. (2013) The effect of direct addition of iron (III) on anaerobic digestion efficiency and odor causing compounds. Water Science and Technology, 68(11): 2391-2396. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.507
  19. Silvestre, G., A. Bonmatí, and B. Fernández, (2015) Optimisation of sewage sludge anaerobic digestion through co-digestion with OFMSW: effect of collection system and particle size. Waste Management,. 43: 137-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.029
  20. Syed, M., Sore.anu, G., Flatella, P., Beland, M. (2006) Removal of hydrogen sulfide from gas streams using biological processes- A review. Canadian Biosystems Engineering, 48: 2.1-2.14
  21. Tsachidou B. Scheuren M., Gennen J., Debbaut V., Toussaint B., Hissler C., George I., Delfosse, P. (2019) Biogas residues in substitution for chemical fertilisers: A comparative study on a grassland in the Walloon Region. Sci Total Environ. 666, 212-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.238
  22. Vögeli, Y. (2014) Anaerobic digestion of biowaste in developing countries: Practical information and case studies. Eawag-Sandec.
  23. Wellinger, A., Murphy, J.D. and Baxter D. (2013) The biogas handbook: science, production and applications. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097415
  24. Wu, C., Huang, Q., Yu, M., Ren, Y., Wang, Q., Sakai, K. (2018) Effects of digestate recirculation on a two-stage anaerobic digestion system, particularly focusing on metabolite correlation analysis. Bioresource Technology. 251: 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.020
  25. Zulkefli, N.N., Masdar M.S., Wan Isahak, W.N., Md Jahim, J., Md Rejab S.A., Lye,C.C. (2019) Removal of hydrogen sulfide from a biogas mimic by using impregnated activated carbon adsorbent. PLOS ONE. 14(2): e0211713. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211713https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211713

No citation recorded.