DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.49298

Effect of Pretreatment and C/N Ratio in Anaerobic Digestion on Biogas Production from Coffee Grounds and Rice Husk Mixtures

1Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

2Vocational School, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

3Study Program of Environmental Science, Faculty of Mathematic and Natural Science, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia

Received: 30 Sep 2022; Revised: 28 Nov 2022; Accepted: 19 Dec 2022; Published: 1 Jan 2023.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Indonesia has great potential in producing large quantities of renewable energy sources, such as biomass. Biogas is a renewable energy source produced from biomass. It is can be developed in agricultural countries producing rice and coffee, where a large amount of waste is produced in the form of rice husks and coffee grounds. This study examined the effect of physiochemical pretreatment and the C/N ratio on biogas production using coffee grounds and rice husk mixtures. Physical pretreatment was conducted by grinding the mixture up to 50 mesh size, followed by chemical pretreatment by soaking the mixture in 3% KOH; moreover, the variation in the C/N ratio was set at 25 and 30. Anaerobic bacteria were acquired from rumen fluid. The ratio of the coffee ground material, rice husks, and rumen fluid was 1:1:1. This research was conducted in duplicate under batch conditions at ambient temperature (25–35 oC) with a digester volume of 1.5 L. Biogas productivity was measured every 2 d for 60 d. The experimental results indicated that biogas production with a C/N ratio of 30 was 13.3–66.5% higher than that with a C/N ratio of 25. The inclusion of physical pretreatment at a C/N ratio of 30 increased biogas production by up to 31.3%. Moreover, the inclusion of a chemical pretreatment at a C/N ratio of 30 resulted in 30.3% higher biogas production. The kinetics model of biogas production showed that a C/N ratio of 30 with physical and alkaline pretreatment can produce maximum biogas yields of 6,619 mL and 6,570 mL, respectively. Overall, both pretreatments sequentially increased the biogas production significantly.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Biogas; coffee grounds; rice husks; physical pretreatment; chemical pretreatment; C/N ratio
Funding: Universitas Diponegoro under contract 118-19/UN.7.6.1/PP/2021

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Optimization of a Management Algorithm for an Innovative System of Automatic Switching between Two Photovoltaic and Wind Turbine Modes for an Ecological Production of Green Energy Experimental Study of Rice Husk Fluidization Without a Sand Bed Material on a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier Numerical Analysis of Transfer of Heat by Forced Convection in a Wavy Channel The Various Designs of Storage Solar Collectors: A Review More recent articles
Most cited articles
Adaptation of VSC-HVDC Connected DFIG Based Offshore Wind Farm to Grid Codes: A Comparative Analysis Cultivation of Chlorella sp. as Biofuel Sources in Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) Thermal and Ash Characterization of Indonesian Bamboo and Its Potential for Solid Fuel and Waste Valorization Optimization of Lipid Extraction from Municipal Scum Sludge for Biodiesel Production Using Statistical Approach Evaluating the potential energy of a heliostat field and solar receiver of solar tower power plants in the southern region of Turkey More cited articles
  1. Ahmad, F., Silva, E. L., & Varesche, M. B. A. (2018). Hydrothermal processing of biomass for anaerobic digestion – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.008
  2. Brown, D., & Li, Y. (2013). Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of yard waste and food waste for biogas production. Bioresource Technology, 127, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.081
  3. Bruni, E., Jensen, A. P., & Angelidaki, I. (2010). Comparative study of mechanical, hydrothermal, chemical and enzymatic treatments of digested biofibers to improve biogas production. Bioresource Technology, 101(22), 8713–8717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.108
  4. Budiyono, B., Riyanta, A. B., Sumardiono, S., Jos, B., & Syaichurrozi, I. (2021). Optimization of parameters for biogas production from bagasse using taguchi method. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30(5), 4453–4461. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/129914
  5. Budiyono, B., Syaichurrozi, I., Suhirman, S., Hidayat, T., & Jayanudin, J. (2021). Experiment and modeling to evaluate the effect of total solid on biogas production from the anaerobic co-digestion of Tofu liquid waste and rice straw. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30(4), 3489–3496. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/127277
  6. Budiyono, D. Primaloka, A., Ardhannari, L., H.A. Matin, H., & Sumardiono, S. (2018). Study of Biogas Production from Cassava Industrial Waste by Anaerobic Process. MATEC Web of Conferences, 156, 03052. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815603052
  7. Chandra, R., Takeuchi, H., Hasegawa, T., & Kumar, R. (2012). Improving biodegradability and biogas production of wheat straw substrates using sodium hydroxide and hydrothermal pretreatments. Energy, 43(1), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.04.029
  8. Chouaibi, M., Daoued, K. Ben, Riguane, K., Rouissi, T., & Ferrari, G. (2020). Production of bioethanol from pumpkin peel wastes: Comparison between response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Industrial Crops and Products, 155(4), 112822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112822
  9. Dwi Nugraha, W., Syafrudin, Fadhila Keumala, C., Hawali Abdul Matin, H., & Budiyono. (2018). The Effect of Acid Pre-Treatment using Acetic Acid and Nitric Acid in The Production of Biogas from Rice Husk during Solid State Anaerobic Digestion (SS-AD). E3S Web of Conferences, 31, 01006. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183101006
  10. Ficara, E., & Malpei, F. (2011). Maize mono-digestion efficiency: results from laboratory tests. Water Science and Technology, 64(10), 2029–2037. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2011.659
  11. Hawali Abdul Matin, H., Syafrudin, S., & Suherman, S. (2020). Solid State Anaerobic Digestion for Biogas Production from Rice Husk. E3S Web of Conferences, 202, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020208005
  12. International Coffee Organization. (2021). World Coffee Production
  13. Jha, A. K., Li, J., Nies, L., & Zhang, L. (2011). Research advances in dry anaerobic digestion process of solid organic wastes. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(65), 14242–14253. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajb11.1277
  14. Karimi, K., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2016). A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: Composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresource Technology, 200, 1008–1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.022
  15. Kim, J., Kim, H., Baek, G., & Lee, C. (2017). Anaerobic co-digestion of spent coffee grounds with different waste feedstocks for biogas production. Waste Management, 60, 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.015
  16. Liang, Y.-G., Cheng, B., Si, Y.-B., Cao, D.-J., Li, D.-L., & Chen, J.-F. (2016). Effect of solid-state NaOH pretreatment on methane production from thermophilic semi-dry anaerobic digestion of rose stalk. Water Science & Technology, 73(12), 2913–2920. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.145
  17. Liew, L. N., Shi, J., & Li, Y. (2011). Enhancing the solid-state anaerobic digestion of fallen leaves through simultaneous alkaline treatment. Bioresource Technology, 102(19), 8828–8834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.005
  18. Lim, J. S., Abdul Manan, Z., Wan Alwi, S. R., & Hashim, H. (2012). A review on utilisation of biomass from rice industry as a source of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 3084–3094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.051
  19. Limantara, J., Tedjokoesoemo, P. E. D., & Rizqy, M. T. (2019). Penggunaan Ampas Kopi Sebagai Material Alternatif pada Produk Interior. Jurnal Intra, 7(2), 846–849
  20. Mancini, G., Papirio, S., Lens, P. N. L., & Esposito, G. (2018). Increased biogas production from wheat straw by chemical pretreatments. Renewable Energy, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.045
  21. Matin, H. H. A., & Hadiyanto, H. (2018). Optimization of biogas production from rice husk waste by solid state anaerobic digestion (SSAD) using response surface methodology. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(3), 147–156. https://doi.org/10.3923/jest.2018.147.156
  22. Mirtsou-Xanthopoulou, C., Jurado, E., Skiadas, I. V., & Gavala, H. N. (2014). Effect of aqueous ammonia soaking on the methane yield and composition of digested manure fibers applying different ammonia concentrations and treatment durations. Energies, 7(7), 4157–4168. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7074157
  23. Monlau, F., Barakat, A., Steyer, J. P., & Carrere, H. (2012). Comparison of seven types of thermo-chemical pretreatments on the structural features and anaerobic digestion of sunflower stalks. Bioresource Technology, 120, 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.040
  24. Mustafa, A. M., Poulsen, T. G., Xia, Y., & Sheng, K. (2017). Combinations of fungal and milling pretreatments for enhancing rice straw biogas production during solid-state anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology, 224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.028
  25. Nugraha, W. D., Syafrudin, Kusumastuti, V. N., Matin, H. H. A., & Budiyono. (2020). Optimization of biogas production in Indonesian region by liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD) method from rice husk using response surface methodology (RSM). IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 845, 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/845/1/012042
  26. Ryckebosch, E., Drouillon, M., & Vervaeren, H. (2011). Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35(5), 1633–1645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033
  27. Salehian, P., Karimi, K., Zilouei, H., & Jeihanipour, A. (2013). Improvement of biogas production from pine wood by alkali pretreatment. Fuel, 106, 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.12.092
  28. Sivagurunathan, P., Kumar, G., Mudhoo, A., Rene, E. R., Saratale, G. D., Kobayashi, T., Kim, D. H. (2017). Fermentative hydrogen production using lignocellulose biomass: An overview of pre-treatment methods, inhibitor effects and detoxification experiences. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.091
  29. Sumardiono, S., Matin, H. H. A., Hartono, I. I., & Choiruly, L. (2022). Biogas production from corn stalk as agricultural waste containing high cellulose material by anaerobic process. Materials Today: Proceedings, 63, S477–S483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.135
  30. Syafrudin, Dwi Nugraha, W., Bahrani, A., Hawali Abdul Matin, H., & Budiyono. (2020). The Effect of Grinding on Biogas Production from Rice Husk Waste during Solid State Anaerobic Digestion (SS-AD). E3S Web of Conferences, 202, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020208004
  31. Syafrudin, Dwi Nugraha, W., Sarima Agnesia, S., Hawali Abdul Matin, H., & Budiyono. (2018). Enhancement of Biogas Production from Rice Husk by NaOH and Enzyme Pretreatment. E3S Web of Conferences, 31, 02002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183102002
  32. Syafrudin, Nugraha, W. D., Matin, H. H. A., Margaretha, F., & Budiyono. (2020). Optimization of biogas production from water hyacinth by liquid anaerobic digestion (L-AD) using response surface methodology. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 845(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/845/1/012046
  33. Taherdanak, M., & Zilouei, H. (2014). Improving biogas production from wheat plant using alkaline pretreatment. Fuel, 115, 714–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.094
  34. Taherzadeh, M. J., & Karimi, K. (2008). Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: A review. In International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms9091621
  35. Thiyageshwari, S., Gayathri, P., Krishnamoorthy, R., Anandham, R., & Paul, D. (2018). Exploration of rice husk compost as an alternate organic manure to enhance the productivity of blackgram in typic haplustalf and typic rhodustalf. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020358
  36. Ullah Khan, I., Hafiz Dzarfan Othman, M., Hashim, H., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A. F., Rezaei-DashtArzhandi, M., & Wan Azelee, I. (2017). Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage. Energy Conversion and Management, 150, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2017.08.035
  37. Zheng, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, F., & Li, Y. (2014). Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enhanced biogas production. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 42(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2014.01.001
  38. Zhu, J., Wan, C., & Li, Y. (2010). Enhanced solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover by alkaline pretreatment. Bioresource Technology, 101(19), 7523–7528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.060

Last update:

  1. Performance and environmental sustainability studies on a dual-fuel IC engine working with producer gas of variable calorific values from rural biomass

    Arun Prasad Gunasekaran, Murugan Paradesi Chockalingam, Joseph Sekhar Santhappan, Ahmed Said Ahmed Al-Shahri, Saji Raveendran Padmavathy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34029-8

  2. Using Dielectric Constant Measurement to Monitor Ethanol Fermentation and Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Lignocellulosic Biomass

    Zoltán Péter Jákói, Balázs Lemmer, Réka Dobozi, Cecilia Hodúr, Sándor Beszédes. Fermentation, 9 (10), 2023. doi: 10.3390/fermentation9100902

  3. Investigations on the performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a dual-fuel diesel engine fueled with induced bamboo leaf gaseous fuel and injected mixed biodiesel-diesel blends

    Van Nhanh Nguyen, Biswajeet Nayak, Thingujam Jackson Singh, Swarup Kumar Nayak, Dao Nam Cao, Huu Cuong Le, Xuan Phuong Nguyen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 54 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.074

  4. Unlocking the power of synergy: Cosubstrate and coculture fermentation for enhanced biomethane production

    Vishal Ahuja, Chhavi Sharma, Debarati Paul, Diptarka Dasgupta, Ganesh Dattatraya Saratale, J. Rajesh Banu, Yung-hun Yang, Shashi Kant Bhatia. Biomass and Bioenergy, 180 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106996

  5. Biogas Production from the Potato Peel Waste: Study of the Effect of C/N Ratio, EM-4 Bacteria Addition and Initial PH

    Hashfi Hawali Abdul Matin, Bonifasius Yulidesra Damarjati, Muhammad Idham Gaffar Shidqi, Budiyono Budiyono, Nur Hidayati Othman, Yoyon Wahyono. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18 (6), 2024. doi: 10.24857/rgsa.v18n6-039

Last update: 2024-11-20 07:50:22

No citation recorded.