DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2023.46864

Techno-Economic Assessment of a 100 kWp Solar Rooftop PV System for Five Hospitals in Central Southern Thailand

1Faculty of Industrial Technology, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand

2Research Center in Energy and Environment, Faculty of Science, Thaksin University (Phatthalung Campus), Phatthalung, Thailand

3Faculty of Engineering, Thaksin University (Phatthalung Campus), Phatthalung, Thailand

4 School of Accountancy and Finance, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand

5 Université de Moncton, Edmundston, New Brunswick, Canada

View all affiliations
Received: 13 Jun 2022; Revised: 15 Aug 2022; Accepted: 15 Sep 2022; Available online: 14 Oct 2022; Published: 1 Jan 2023.
Editor(s): Grigorios Kyriakopoulos
Open Access Copyright (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
This paper presents a techno-economic assessment of a 100 kWp solar rooftop photovoltaic (PV) system at five hospitals in central southern Thailand.  The system encompasses 100 kWp PV panels, 100 kW grid-tied inverters and balance of system (BOS) under the grid code of the Provincial Electricity Authority (PEA).  The latest PV technology of bifacial mono-crystalline solar panels, inverters and BOS were simulated along with the Meteonorm 7.3 database using the PVsyst simulation toolkit with different tilt angles, orientations, solar radiations and ambient temperature.  The technical aspects of solar rooftop PV power generation systems include the annual energy output and the performance ratio (PR) under IEC standard.  Further, an economic analysis of the model was examined using a cost benefit analysis (CBA) and various assumptions.  Four main financial criteria, i.e., benefit cost ratio (BCR), net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback period (PBP) were evaluated under three different scenarios: (1) self-consumption scheme, (2) feed-in tariff (FiT) scheme, and (3) private power purchase agreement (PPA) scheme.  Finally, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) was also calculated.  The results reveal that the Takua Thung hospital is characterized by the maximum average global horizontal irradiation (GHI) and the maximum annual produced energy of 199 kWh/m2 and 164.8 MWh/year, respectively.  The PR calculated for all hospital sites is above 85%. The outcomes of the financial analysis show that the optimum scenarios are PPA and FiT schemes.  The LCOE analysed in this study indicates that the Takua Thung hospital site has the lowest LCOE at 2.47 THB/kWh (0.07 USD/kWh).  This research confirms the potential for hospitals and stakeholders in central southern Thailand for investments in solar rooftop PV systems
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Solar Rooftop PV; Bifacial Photovoltaic; Performance Ratio; Levelized Cost of Energy; Economic Analysis.

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Optimization of a Management Algorithm for an Innovative System of Automatic Switching between Two Photovoltaic and Wind Turbine Modes for an Ecological Production of Green Energy Experimental Study of Rice Husk Fluidization Without a Sand Bed Material on a Bubbling Fluidized Bed Gasifier The Conductivity Enhancement of 1.5Li2O-P2O5 Solid Electrolytes by Montmorillonite Addition The Various Designs of Storage Solar Collectors: A Review More recent articles
Most cited articles
Electricity from Wind for Off-Grid Applications in Bangladesh: A Techno-Economic Assessment Performance Evaluation of PV Panel Under Dusty Condition Numerical Study of Effect of Blade Twist Modifications on the Aerodynamic Performance of Wind Turbine Empowering Distributed Solar PV Energy for Malaysian Rural Housing: Towards Energy Security and Equitability of Rural Communities A Novel Integration of PCM with Wind-Catcher Skin Material in Order to Increase Heat Transfer Rate More cited articles
  1. Alhammami, H., and An, H. (2021). Techno-economic analysis and policy implications for promoting residential rooftop solar photovoltaics in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Renewable Energy, 167, 359-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.091
  2. Ali, H., and Khan, H. A. (2020). Techno-economic evaluation of two 42 kWp polycrystalline-Si and CIS thin-film based PV rooftop systems in Pakistan. Renewable Energy, 152, 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.144
  3. Anang, N., Syd Nur Azman, S. N. A., Muda, W. M. W., Dagang, A. N., and Daud, M. Z. (2021). Performance analysis of a grid-connected rooftop solar PV system in Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia. Energy and Buildings, 248, 111182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111182
  4. APRICUM. (2021). Solar Market Profile: Thailand. Retrieved from https://apricum-group.com/solar-power-in-asean-a-snapshot-and-outlook-of-the-solar-power-markets-and-growing-ma-scene/?cn-reloaded=1 (accessed 17.05.22)
  5. Boddapati, V., Nandikatti, A. S. R., and Daniel, S. A. (2021). Techno-economic performance assessment and the effect of power evacuation curtailment of a 50 MWp grid-interactive solar power park. Energy for Sustainable Development, 62, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.03.005
  6. Buonocore, J. J., Luckow, P., Norris, G., Spengler, J. D., Biewald, B., Fisher, J., and Levy, J. I. (2016). Health and climate benefits of different energy-efficiency and renewable energy choices. 6(1), 100-105. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2771
  7. Chaianong, A., Bangviwat, A., Menke, C., and Darghouth, N. R. (2019). Cost–Benefit Analysis of Rooftop PV Systems on Utilities and Ratepayers in Thailand. 12(12), 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12122265
  8. Chaianong, A., and Pharino, C. (2015). Outlook and challenges for promoting solar photovoltaic rooftops in Thailand. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48, 356-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.042
  9. Chaianong, A., Tongsopit, S., Bangviwat, A., and Menke, C. (2019). Bill saving analysis of rooftop PV customers and policy implications for Thailand. Renewable Energy, 131, 422-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.057
  10. Chang, S., Cho, J., Heo, J., Kang, J., and Kobashi, T. (2022). Energy infrastructure transitions with PV and EV combined systems using techno-economic analyses for decarbonization in cities. Applied Energy, 319, 119254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119254
  11. Chelbi, M., Gagnon, Y., and Waewsak, J. (2015). Solar radiation mapping using sunshine duration-based models and interpolation techniques: Application to Tunisia. Energy Conversion and Management, 101, 203-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.04.052
  12. DEDE. Areas with solar power potential. Retrieved from http://weben.dede.go.th/webmax/content/areas-solar-power-potential (accessed 19.05.22)
  13. Dincer, I. J. E. p. (1999). Environmental impacts of energy. 27(14), 845-854. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00068-3
  14. Eltamaly, A. M., and Mohamed, M. A. (2018). 8 - Optimal Sizing and Designing of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems in Smart Grid Applications. In I. Yahyaoui (Ed.), Advances in Renewable Energies and Power Technologies (pp. 231-313): Elsevier
  15. Emmanuel, M., Akinyele, D., and Rayudu, R. (2017). Techno-economic analysis of a 10 kWp utility interactive photovoltaic system at Maungaraki school, Wellington, New Zealand. Energy, 120, 573-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.107
  16. Eskew, J., Ratledge, M., Wallace, M., Gheewala, S. H., and Rakkwamsuk, P. (2018). An environmental Life Cycle Assessment of rooftop solar in Bangkok, Thailand. Renewable Energy, 123, 781-792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.045
  17. Formica, T. J., Khan, H. A., and Pecht, M. G. (2017). The Effect of Inverter Failures on the Return on Investment of Solar Photovoltaic Systems. IEEE Access, 5, 21336-21343. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2753246
  18. Gharakhani Siraki, A., and Pillay, P. (2010, 2010-09-15). Comparison of PV system design software packages for urban applications, WEC
  19. Gómez-Navarro, T., Brazzini, T., Alfonso-Solar, D., and Vargas-Salgado, C. (2021). Analysis of the potential for PV rooftop prosumer production: Technical, economic and environmental assessment for the city of Valencia (Spain). Renewable Energy, 174, 372-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.049
  20. Gul, E., Baldinelli, G., Bartocci, P., Bianchi, F., Piergiovanni, D., Cotana, F., and Wang, J. (2022). A techno-economic analysis of a solar PV and DC battery storage system for a community energy sharing. Energy, 244, 123191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123191
  21. Haffaf, A., Lakdja, F., Ould Abdeslam, D., and Meziane, R. (2021). Solar energy for air conditioning of an office building in a case study: Techno-economic feasibility assessment. Renewable Energy Focus, 39, 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2021.09.002
  22. Han, X., Garrison, J., and Hug, G. (2022). Techno-economic analysis of PV-battery systems in Switzerland. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 158, 112028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112028
  23. Hansen, K., and Vad Mathiesen, B. (2018). Comprehensive assessment of the role and potential for solar thermal in future energy systems. Solar Energy, 169, 144-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.039
  24. Hassan, M. U., Saha, S., and Haque, M. E. (2021). PVAnalytX: A MATLAB toolkit for techno-economic analysis and performance evaluation of rooftop PV systems. Energy, 223, 120074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120074
  25. Husain, A. A. F., Phesal, M. H., Ab Kadir, M. Z., and Ungku Amirulddin, U. A. (2021). Techno-Economic Analysis of Commercial Size Grid-Connected Rooftop Solar PV Systems in Malaysia under the NEM 3.0 Scheme. Applied Sciences, 11(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112110118
  26. IEA. (2021). Solar PV, IEA, Paris. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv (accessed 16.05.22)
  27. Imam, A. A., and Al-Turki, Y. A. J. S. (2019). Techno-economic feasibility assessment of grid-connected PV systems for residential buildings in Saudi Arabia—A case study. Sustainability, 12(1), 262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010262
  28. IRENA. (2017). Renewable Energy Outlook: Thailand, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org/-/media/files/irena/agency/publication/2017/nov/irena_outlook_thailand_2017.pdf (accessed 01.08.22)
  29. IRENA. (2019). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019: Latest Trends and Drivers. Retrieved from https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Webinars/2020/Jun/IRENAinsight-webinar_RPGC-in-2019-Overview.pdf?la=enandhash=80A08A29C8807989DC9DBA8E78E55B6124DC5E42 (accessed 13.05.22)
  30. IRENA. (2020). Renewable power generation costs in 2019. Retrieved from International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi: https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2019 (accessed: 16.05.22)
  31. Kamdar, I., Ali, S., Taweekun, J., and Ali, H. M. (2021). Wind Farm Site Selection Using WAsP Tool for Application in the Tropical Region. Sustainability 13(24), 13718. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413718
  32. Kopp, R. J., Krupnick, A. J., and Toman, M. (1997). Cost-benefit analysis and regulatory reform: an assessment of the science and the art. Retrieved from https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-DP-97-19.pdf (accessed 20.05.22)
  33. Lang, T., Ammann, D., and Girod, B. (2016). Profitability in absence of subsidies: A techno-economic analysis of rooftop photovoltaic self-consumption in residential and commercial buildings. Renewable Energy, 87, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.059
  34. Leurent, M., Da Costa, P., Rämä, M., Persson, U., and Jasserand, F. J. E. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis of district heating systems using heat from nuclear plants in seven European countries. Energy, 149, 454-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.149
  35. Mokhtara, C., Negrou, B., Settou, N., Bouferrouk, A., and Yao, Y. (2021). Optimal design of grid-connected rooftop PV systems: An overview and a new approach with application to educational buildings in arid climates. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101468
  36. Pikas, E., Kurnitski, J., Thalfeldt, M., and Koskela, L. J. E. (2017). Cost-benefit analysis of nZEB energy efficiency strategies with on-site photovoltaic generation. Energy, 128, 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.158
  37. Poudyal, R., Loskot, P., and Parajuli, R. (2021). Techno-economic feasibility analysis of a 3-kW PV system installation in Nepal. Renewables: Wind, Water, and Solar, 8(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-021-00068-9
  38. Prapanukool, C., and Chaitusaney, S. (2020). A novel methodology for designing solar power purchase agreement of rooftop PVs under the behind-the-meter scheme. Energy Reports, 6, 407-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.221
  39. Quansah, D. A., Adaramola, M. S., Appiah, G. K., and Edwin, I. A. (2017). Performance analysis of different grid-connected solar photovoltaic (PV) system technologies with combined capacity of 20 kW located in humid tropical climate. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(7), 4626-4635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.119
  40. Ramadhan, M., and Naseeb, A. (2011). The cost benefit analysis of implementing photovoltaic solar system in the state of Kuwait. Renewable Energy, 36(4), 1272-1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.10.004
  41. Remund, J., Müller, S., Schilter, C., and Rihm, B. (2010). The use of Meteonorm weather generator for climate change studies. EMS Annual Meeting Abstracts, 7, EMS2010-417
  42. Reniers, G., Talarico, L., and Paltrinieri, N. (2016). Chapter 16 - Cost-Benefit Analysis of Safety Measures. In N. Paltrinieri and F. Khan (Eds.), Dynamic Risk Analysis in the Chemical and Petroleum Industry (pp. 195-205): Butterworth-Heinemann
  43. Sabziparvar, A. A., and Shetaee, H. (2007). Estimation of global solar radiation in arid and semi-arid climates of East and West Iran. Energy, 32(5), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.05.005
  44. Schultz, D., Clark, W. W., and Sowell, A. (2010). Chapter 7 - Life-Cycle Analysis: The Economic Analysis of Demand-Side Programs and Projects in California. In W. W. Clark (Ed.), Sustainable Communities Design Handbook (pp. 99-137). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann
  45. Sewchurran, S., and Davidson, I. E. (2021). Technical and financial analysis of large-scale solar-PV in eThekwini Municipality: Residential, business and bulk customers. Energy Reports, 7, 4961-4976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.134
  46. Shabbir, N., Kütt, L., Raja, H. A., Jawad, M., Allik, A., and Husev, O. (2022). Techno-economic analysis and energy forecasting study of domestic and commercial photovoltaic system installations in Estonia. Energy, 253, 124156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.124156
  47. Shukla, A. K., Sudhakar, K., and Baredar, P. (2016). Simulation and performance analysis of 110 kWp grid-connected photovoltaic system for residential building in India: A comparative analysis of various PV technology. Energy Reports, 2, 82-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2016.04.001
  48. Solargis. (2019). Solar Resource Map: Photovoltaic Power Potential Thailand. Retrieved from https://solargis.com/maps-and-gis-data/download/thailand (accessed 19.05.22)
  49. Spillias, S., Kareiva, P., Ruckelshaus, M., and McDonald-Madden, E. J. N. C. C. (2020). Renewable energy targets may undermine their sustainability. Nature Climate Change, 10(11), 974-976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00939-x
  50. Sykes, J. (2021). Solar Panel Maintenance: Costs, Methods and Cleaning. Retrieved from https://www.solarchoice.net.au/blog/solar-panel-maintenance-costs-methods-cleaning/ (accessed 12.05.22)
  51. Tantisattayakul, T., and Kanchanapiya, P. (2017). Financial measures for promoting residential rooftop photovoltaics under a feed-in tariff framework in Thailand. Energy Policy, 109, 260-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.061
  52. Thanarak, P., and Lhazom, K. (2021). Economic Feasibility Analysis of Off-Grid PV Systems for Remote Settlements in Bhutan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11, 206-214. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10665
  53. Tomar, V., and Tiwari, G. N. (2017). Techno-economic evaluation of grid connected PV system for households with feed in tariff and time of day tariff regulation in New Delhi – A sustainable approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 822-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.263
  54. Tongsopit, S. (2015). Thailand's feed-in tariff for residential rooftop solar PV systems: Progress so far. Energy for Sustainable Development, 29, 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.10.012
  55. Tongsopit, S., Junlakarn, S., Wibulpolprasert, W., Chaianong, A., Kokchang, P., and Hoang, N. V. (2019). The economics of solar PV self-consumption in Thailand. Renewable Energy, 138, 395-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.087
  56. Tongsopit, S., Moungchareon, S., Aksornkij, A., and Potisat, T. (2016). Business models and financing options for a rapid scale-up of rooftop solar power systems in Thailand. Energy Policy, 95, 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.023
  57. Waewsak, J., Ali, S., and Gagnon, Y. (2020). Site suitability assessment of para rubberwood-based power plant in the southernmost provinces of Thailand based on a multi-criteria decision-making analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy, 137, 105545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105545
  58. Waewsak, J., Chancham, C., Mani, M., and Gagnon, Y. (2014). Estimation of Monthly Mean Daily Global Solar Radiation over Bangkok, Thailand Using Artificial Neural Networks. Energy Procedia, 57, 1160-1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.10.103
  59. Yoomak, S., Patcharoen, T., and Ngaopitakkul, A. (2019). Performance and Economic Evaluation of Solar Rooftop Systems in Different Regions of Thailand. Sustainability, 11(23), 6647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236647

Last update:

  1. Techno-economic analysis of fixed versus sun-tracking solar panels

    Akram Elahi Gol, Milan Ščasný. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 12 (3), 2023. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2023.50165

  2. An Economic and Environmental Study of a Hybrid System (Wind and Diesel) in the Algerian Desert Region using HOMER Software

    Issam Griche, Mohamed Rezki, Kamel Saoudi, Ghania Boudechiche, Fares Zitouni. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 13 (2), 2023. doi: 10.48084/etasr.5651

  3. Microgrid Hybrid Solar/Wind/Diesel and Battery Energy Storage Power Generation System: Application to Koh Samui, Southern Thailand

    Rawit Khamharnphol, Ismail Kamdar, Jompob Waewsak, Weerasak Chaichan, Sakrapee Khunpetch, Somphol Chiwamongkhonkarn, Chuleerat Kongruang, Yves Gagnon. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 12 (2), 2023. doi: 10.14710/ijred.2023.47761

Last update: 2024-04-18 06:46:33

No citation recorded.