Performance evaluation of common rail direct injection (CRDI) engine fuelled with Uppage Oil Methyl Ester (UOME)

D.N. Basavarajappa -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, GMIT, Davangere, India
*N. R. Banapurmath -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, GMIT, Davangere, India
S.V. Khandal -  Department of Mechanical Engineering, B. V. B. College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli, India
G. Manavendra -  Department of Mechanical Engineering BIET, Davangere Karnataka, India
Published: 15 Feb 2015.
Open Access

For economic and social development of any country energy is one of the most essential requirements. Continuously increasing price of crude petroleum fuels in the present days coupled with alarming emissions and stringent emission regulations has led to growing attention towards use of alternative fuels like vegetable oils, alcoholic and gaseous fuels for diesel engine applications. Use of such fuels can ease the burden on the economy by curtailing the fuel imports. Diesel engines are highly efficient and the main problems associated with them is their high smoke and NOx emissions.  Hence there is an urgent need to promote the use of alternative fuels in place of high speed diesel (HSD) as substitute. India has a large agriculture base that can be used as a feed stock to obtain newer fuel which is renewable and sustainable. Accordingly Uppage oil methyl ester (UOME) biodiesel was selected as an alternative fuel. Use of biodiesels in diesel engines fitted with mechanical fuel injection systems has limitation on the injector opening pressure (300 bar). CRDI system can overcome this drawback by injecting fuel at very high pressures (1500-2500 bar) and is most suitable for biodiesel fuels which are high viscous. This paper presents the performance and emission characteristics of a CRDI diesel engine fuelled with UOME biodiesel at different injection timings and injection pressures. From the experimental evidence it was revealed that UOME biodiesel yielded overall better performance with reduced emissions at retarded injection timing of -10° BTDC in CRDI mode of engine operation.

Other format:


Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language: EN
Full Text:
Statistics: 1071 882
  1. WHO, 2006, indoorair/publications/ fuel for life / en/index.html.
  2. Mahendra Lalwani, Mool Singh. (2010) Conventional and Renewable Energy Scenario of India: Present and Future, Canadian Journal on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 6, 122-40.
  3. Abdul Kalam APJ. (2007). Energy independence and plant and earth. Inaugural address on 94th Indian Science Congress. Annamalai University, Chidambaram, January 5, p. 3.
  4. Banapurmath N.R., Tewrai P.G., Vinodkumar V. (2009), combustion and emission characteristics of DI compression ignition engine when operated on Marotti oil methyl ester and its blends Marotti oil methyl ester with diesel, Sustainable Engineering, Vol.2, No.3, 192 -200.
  5. Banapurmath, N.R., Tewari, P.G. Performance, combustion, and emissions characteristics of a single-cylinder compression ignition engine operated on ethanol–biodiesel blended fuels, Proc. IMechE, Part A: J. Power and Energy, Vol.224, (2010) 533 – 43.
  6. Kjarstad J., Johnsson F. Resources and future supply of oil. Energy Policy, Vol. 37, (2010), 441–64.
  7. Planning Commission of India, Report of the Expert Committee on Integrated Energy policy, (2006).
  8. Banapurmath N.R., Tewari P.G. and Hosmath R.S. (2008), Combustion and emission characteristics of a direct injection, compression-ignition engine operated on Honge oil, HOME and blends of HOME and diesel. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. Vol.1, No.2, 80–93.
  9. Sahoo P K, Das L M, Babu M K G, Arora P, Singh V P, Kumar N R &Varyani T S. (2009).Comparative evaluation of performance and emission characteristics of jatropha, karanja and polanga based biodiesel as fuel in a tractor engine. Fuel.
  10. Sahoo P.K and Das L.M. (2009) Combustion analysis of Jatropha, Karanja and Polanga based biodiesel as fuel in a diesel engine. Fuel 88, 994–99.
  11. Haldar S K, Ghosh B B and Nag A. Studies on the comparison of performance and emission characteristics of a diesel engine using three degummed non edible oils, Biomass and Bioenergy 33 (2009), 1013-18.
  12. Abhishek Sharma and S. Murugan. (2013) Investigation on the behavior of a DI diesel engine fuelled with Jatropha Methyl Ester (JME) and Tyre Pyrolysis Oil (TPO) blends. Fuel 108, 699–708.
  13. R. Prakash, R.K. Singh, S. Murugan. (2013) Experimental investigation on a diesel engine fueled with bio-oil derived from waste wood-biodiesel emulsions. Energy 55, 610-18.
  14. B. Tesfa, R. Mishra, C. Zhang, F. Gu, A.D. Ball. (2013) Combustion and performance characteristics of CI (compression ignition) engine running with biodiesel. Energy 51, 101-15.
  15. Guisheng Chen, YinggangShen, Quanchang Zhang, Mingfa Yao, ZunqingZheng, Haifeng Liu. (2013) Experimental study on combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with 2,5-dimethylfuranediesel, n-butanol-diesel and gasoline diesel blends. Energy 54, 333-42.
  16. Altin Recep, Cetinkaya Selim, and Yucesu Huseyin Serdar (2001), The potential of using vegetable oil fuels as fuel for diesel engine, Energy Conversion and Management, 42, 529-538.
  17. Koji Nagata, state-of-Art technologies For Diesel Common Rail system. SAE, 2004-28-0068, 442-474.
  18. Baiju B., M.K. Naik, L.M. Das, (2009), A comparative evaluation of compression ignition engine characterizes using methyl and ethyl of karanja oil, Renewable Energy1-6.
  19. Myung Yoon Kim, Seung Hyung Yoon, Jin Woo Hwang. (2008), Characteristics of particulate emissions of compression ignition engine fueled with biodiesel derived from soybean. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power VOL.130/052805-1.
  20. Gerardo Valentino, Luigi Allocca, Stefano Lannuzzi, Alessandro Montanaro. (2011), Biodiesel/Mineral diesel fuel mixtures Spray evolution and engine performance and emissions characterization. Energy 36, 3924-32.
  21. Song.H, Tompkins.B.T, Bittle.J.A, Jacobs.T.J. (2012), Comparison of NO emissions and soot constrations from biodiesel-fuelled diesel engine. Fuel 96, 446-53.
  22. Hwanam Kim, Byungchul Choi. (2009) The effect of biodiesel and bio ethanol blended diesel fuel on nanoparticles and exhaust emissions from CRDI diesel engine. Renewable Energy 35, 157–63.
  23. Carlo N. Grimaldi, LucioPostrioti and Michele Battistoni. Common Rail HSDI engine combustion and emissions with fuel/ Bio-derived Fuel Blends. 2002-01-0865,1453-1460
  24. Lee C.S., Park S.W., (2002), An experimental and numerical study on fuel atomization characteristics of high pressure diesel injection sprays. Fuel 81, 2417-23.
  25. Mueller C. J, Boehman A.L, Martin G. (2009) An experimental investigation of the origin of increased NOx emissions when fueling a heavy duty compression ignition engine with soy biodiesel. SAE paper 2009-01-1792.
  26. Wang X., Huang Z., Kuti O.A., Zhang W., Nishida K. (2010) Experimental and analytical study on biodiesel and diesel spray characteristics under ultra-high injection pressure. International Journal of Heat Fluid Flow 31:659-66.
  27. Ye P., Boehman A.L., (2010), Investigation of the impact of engine injection strategy on the biodiesel NOx effect with a common-rail turbocharged direct injection diesel engine. Energy Fuels 24:4215-25.
  28. Labecki L., Ganippa L.C. (2012) Effects of injection parameters and EGR on combustion and emission characteristics of rapeseed oil and its blends in diesel engines. Fuel 812417-23.
  29. Joonsik Hwang, Donghui Qi, Yongjin Jung, Choongsik Bae. (2014) Effect of injection parameters on the combustion and emission characteristics in a common-rail direct injection diesel engine fueled with waste cooking oil biodiesel. Renewable Energy 63, 9-17.
  30. Benajes J, Payri R, Molina S, Soare V. (2005) Investigation of the influence of injection rate shaping on the spray characteristics in a diesel common rail system equipped with a piston amplifier. Journal of Fluid Engineering 1102/ Vol. 127.
  31. Octavia Armas, Juan J Hernandez, Maria D Cardenas,: “Reduction of diesel smoke opacity from vegetable oil methyl ester during transient operation”, Fuel, Vol. 85, 2006, pp. 2427 – 2438
  32. Monyem A, Gerpen JH, Canakci M. The effect of timing and oxidation on emissions from biodiesel-fueled engines. Trans ASAE 2001; 44:35–42.
  33. Senatore, A. , Cardone, M. Buono D., (2008) Combustion Study of a Common Rail Diesel Engine Optimized to be Fueled with Biodiesel Energy & Fuels 02/2008; 22(3).
  34. Peng Ye, Boehman Andre L., (2011). An investigation of the impact of injection strategy and biodiesel fueling on engine NOx and particulate matter emissions with a common rail turbocharged DI diesel engine Fuel 97, 476-488.
  35. Leung D, Luo Y, Chan T. Optimization of exhaust emissions of a diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel. Energy Fuels 2006; 20: 1015e23
  36. Sayin C, Ilhan M, Canakci M, Gumus M. (2009) Effect of injection timing on the exhaust emissions of a diesel engine using diesel methanol blends. Renew Energy 34:1261e9.
  37. Bakar RA, Ismail S, Ismail AR, Am J. (2008) Fuel injection pressure effect on performance of direct injection diesel engines based on experiment. Am J Appl Sci 5:197e202.
  38. Puhan S, Jegan R, Balasubbramanian K, Nagarajan G. (2009) Effect of injection pressure on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of high linolenic linseed oil methyl ester in a DI diesel engine. Renew Energy 34:1227e33.
  39. Charles J. Mueller André L. Boehman, and Glen C. Martin. (2009) An Experimental Investigation of the Origin of Increased NOx Emissions When Fueling a Heavy-Duty Compression-Ignition Engine with Soy Biodiesel. SAE 2009-01-1792
  40. Chang Sik Lee, Sung Wook Park, and Sang Il Kwon. (2005) An Experimental Study on the Atomization and Combustion Characteristics of Biodiesel-Blended Fuels. Energy Fuels, , 19 (5), pp 2201–2208
  41. Yakup I, Duran A. (2003) Effect of fuel cetane number and injection pressure on a DI diesel engine performance and emissions. Energy Convers Manag;44: 389e97.