Promotion of Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union


Article Metrics: (Click on the Metric tab below to see the detail)

Article Info
Submitted: 19-10-2015
Published: 15-10-2015
Section: Articles
Fulltext PDF Tell your colleagues Email the author
One of the important goals of European energy policy is to increase the share of renewable energy resources in the energy supply. The instruments used in the member states are not fully compatible with the rules of the European internal market. In a theoretical section, this paper analyses possible different instruments for promoting renewable energy. Some countries use feed in tariffs - using fixed prices to increase incentives for producers to invest into renewable energy, other countries use quantity-based systems like quotas that lead to a premium above the market price. In an institutional analysis we show that on the basis of effectiveness and efficiency considerations for the European Union, in the long-term quantity oriented systems of promotion are preferable if combined with elements of a capacity market. The main reason for this conclusion is that price-based systems cannot give enough incentives for backup capacities necessary to cope with intermittent production of renewable sources. In addition price-based systems violate the basic rules of the open internal European market because feed in tariffs are a considerable barrier for trade of renewable energy products.


Promotion of RES; Policy; European Union

  1. Roland Menges 
    Technische Universität Clausthal,, Germany
  2. Wolfgang Pfaffenberger 
    Jacobs University Bremen, GERMANY, Germany
  1. Bauknecht, D., Brunekreeft, G. und Meyer, R. From Niche to Mainstream (2013) The Evolution of Renewable Energy in the German Electricity Market. Evolution of Global Electricity Markets (ed. P. Sioshansi). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 169-198
  2. Buchan, David (2012) The Energiewende - Germany's gamble. Oxford : The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
  3. Cramton, P. und Ockenfels, A. (2012) Economics and Deisgn of Capacity markets for the Power Sector. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft. 36, 113-134.
  4. EU (2009) Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, Brussels.
  5. EU. Energy 2020, A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy, COM(2010) 639 final. Brüssel.
  6. EU. Richtlinie zur Förderung der Nutzung von Energie aus erneuerbaren Quellen, 2009/28/EG. Brüssel.
  7. Haas, R., et al. (2004) How to Promote Renewable Energy Systems Successfully and Effectively. Energy Policy. 2004, 32, 833-839.
  8. Haas, R.., et al. (2011) Efficiency and effectiveness of promotion systems for electricity generation from renewable energy sources - Lessons from EU countries. Energy, 36, 2186-2193.
  9. Häder, M. (2010) Klimaschutzpolitik in Deutschland – eine ökonomische Konsistenzanalyse der Rahmenbedingungen für den Strommarkt, Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft, 11-19.
  10. Knieps, G. (2013) Renewable energy, efficient electricity networks and sector-specific market regulation. Evolution of Global Electricity Markets (ed. P. Sioshansi). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 147-168
  11. Kopp, Oliver, Eßer-Frey, Anke und Engelhorn, Thorsten (2012) Können sich erneuerbare Energien langfristig auf wettbewerblich organsierten Strommärkten finanzieren? Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft., 36, 243-255
  12. Maurer, C., Tersteegen, B. und Zimmer, C. (2012) Anforderungen an den konventionellen Kraftwerkspark - wieviel und welche Kraftwerkskapazität wird benötigt. Zeitschrift für Energie-wirtschaft, 36, 147-154.
  13. Menanteau, P., Finon, D. und Lamy, M.-L. (2003) Prices versus Quantities – Choosing Policies for Promoting the Development of Renewable Energy. Energy Policy, 31, 799-812.
  14. Menges, R. und Traub, S. (2009) An Experimental Study on the Gap between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Donate for Green Electricity. Finanzarchiv, 335-357.
  15. Netzentwicklungsplan (2012). Netzentwicklungsplan Strom 2012 Entwurf der Übertragungsnetzbetreiber, Berlin
  16. Perman, R. et al. (2012) Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. 4th ed. Essex .
  17. Schmalensee, R. (2012) Evaluating Policies to Increase Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 45-64.
  18. Schneider, F. und Volkerts, J. (1999) No Chance for Incentive-oriented Environmental Policies in Representative Democracies? A Public Choice Analysis. Ecological Economics, 123-138.
  19. Van Dijk, A., et al.(2003) Renewable Energy Policies and Market Developments. Amsterdam : ECN Project report number 7.4114.
  20. Weimann, Joachim (2008) Die Klimapolitikkatastrophe. Marburg : Metropolis.
  21. Weitzman, Martin L. (1974) Prices vs. Quantities. The Review of Economic Studies. 41, 477-491.
  22. Wiser, R. (2007) Using Contingent Valuation to Explore Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Comparison of Collective and Voluntary Payment Vehicles. Ecological Economics, 419-432.