DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.23.2.544-554

Willingness To Pay (WTP) Pekebun Kelapa Sawit Rakyat Terhadap Jasa Ekosistem di Provinsi Riau

1Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Persada Bunda, Indonesia

2Jl. Diponegoro No. 42 Pekanbaru, Indonesia

3Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi (STIE) Persada Bunda, Indonesia, Indonesia

4 Program Studi Doktor Ilmu Lingkungan Universitas Riau, Indonesia, Indonesia

View all affiliations
Received: 19 Feb 2024; Revised: 22 Aug 2024; Accepted: 3 Jan 2025; Available online: 15 Mar 2025; Published: 31 Mar 2025.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract

Provinsi Riau memeliki perkebunan kelapa sawit terluas di Indonesia mencapai 3.494.583 ha telah memberikan kontribusai terhadap perekeonomian, meningkatkan kesejahteraan dan berdampak terhadap lingkungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghitung ketersediaan barang hipotetik pada perkebunan kelapa sawit rakyat, besarnya kesediaan membayar terhadap barang hipotetik dan mengetahui factor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Penelitian ini bersifat kualitatif dan kuantitatif dengan menggunakan dengan pendekatan Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) menggunakan metode analisis spasial, analisis full costing, dan analisis regresi logistik biner. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kondisi optimal daya dukung lingkungan hidup telah terlampauiseluas 19,34 ha, sedangkan kondisi daya dukung air dan pangan masih belum terlampaui. Responden yang bersedia membayar (WTP) sebanyak 181 orang rerata pendapatan sebesar Rp.1,353,143/ha/bln, sedangkan responden yang tidak bersedia membayar WTP sebanyak 79 orang dengan rerata pendapatan sebesar Rp. 865,118 /ha/bln. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi WTP melibatkan variabel luas lahan, pendidikan pekebun, produktivitas lahan, pendapatan pekebun, daya dukung pangan, daya dukung air, legalitas lahan, dan kesesuaian ruang. Sementara itu, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi besarnya pembayaran (WTP) melibatkan variabel luas lahan, pendidikan pekebun, produktivitas lahan, pendapatan pekebun, daya dukung air, dan legalitas lahan. Program PSR dengan menerapan Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) dan sertifikasi ISPO secara lingkungan dapat meningkatkan DDDTLH, daya dukung air dan daya dukung pangan. Program PSR bertujuan untuk meningkatkan produktivitas lahan, pendapatan pekebun, kepastian legalitas lahan dan meningkatkan sumberdaya manusia pekebun. Kesimpulan menunjukan bahwa pekebun yang mengikuti program PSR dan menerapkan GAP akan bersedia dan membayar WTP lebih besar.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Data Analysis
2024_Data Riset JIL
Subject Smallholder palm oil, carrying capacity, income, willingness to pay,
Type Data Analysis
  Download (21KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: sawit rakyat; daya dukung; pendapatan; kesediaan membayar; WTP

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : ID
Recent articles
Keanekaragaman dan Potensi Tumbuhan Bawah sebagai Pakan Ternak pada Lahan Kelapa Sawit Menghasilkan Economic Valuation of Bifemnasi Sonmahole Forest Area (Case: Taekas and Femnasi Village in North Central Timor Regency) Peran Kinerja Pengelolaan Lingkungan Terhadap Pencapaian Akreditasi pada Puskesmas di Kabupaten Lebong dan Kabupaten Rejang Lebong More recent articles
Most cited articles
TEKNIK BIOREMEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF DALAM UPAYA PENGENDALIAN PENCEMARAN AIR PENGARUH EMISI UDARA PADA SENTRA PENGOLAHAN BATU KAPUR TERHADAP KAPASITAS VITAL PARU PEKERJA DAN MASYARAKAT DI DESA KARAS KECAMATAN SEDAN KABUPATEN REMBANG Emisi Gas Rumah Kaca dan Hasil Padi dari Cara Olah Tanah dan Pemberian Herbisida Di Lahan Sawah MK 2015 Perencanaan Kegiatan Wisata Pendidikan Dalam Kawasan Geopark Rinjani Lombok Berbasis Daya Dukung Lingkungan (Studi Daerah Aik Berik) PENGARUH FAKTOR-FAKTOR SOSIAL-EKONOMI TERHADAP PERILAKU PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DOMESTIK DI NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR More cited articles
  1. Amalia, R., Dharmawan, A. H., Prasetyo, L. B., & Pacheco, P. (2019). Perubahan Tutupan Lahan Akibat Ekspansi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit: Dampak Sosial, Ekonomi dan Ekologi. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 17(1), 130. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.17.1.130-139
  2. Apriyanto, M., Partini, Mardesci, H., Syahrantau, G., & Yulianti. (2021). The Role of Farmers Readiness in the Sustainable Palm Oil Industry The Role of Farmers Readiness in t he Sustainable Palm Oil Industry. Journal of Physics: Conference Serie, 1764(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012211
  3. Bakce, R., & Mustofa, R. (2021). Kesempatan Kerja Dan Kelayakan Ekonomi Usaha Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit Rakyat Di Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(7), 2213–2220
  4. Bibi, F., & Jamil, M. (2021). Testing environment Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in different regions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), 13581–13594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11516-2
  5. Braat, L. C. (2012). Ecosystem services-science, policy and practice: Introduction to the journal and the inaugural issue. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.007
  6. Bull, J. W., Suttle, K. B., Gordon, A., Singh, N. J., & Milner-Gulland, E. J. (2013). Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx, 47(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531200172X
  7. Chaudhary, A., Gustafson, D., & Mathys, A. (2018). Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nature Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03308-7
  8. Chaudhary, S., McGregor, A., Houston, D., & Chettri, N. (2018). Environmental justice and ecosystem services: A disaggregated analysis of community access to forest benefits in Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 29(October 2017), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.020
  9. Choong, C. G., & McKay, A. (2014). Sustainability in the Malaysian palm oil industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.009
  10. CIFOR. (2018). Oil palm and biodiversity: a situation analysis by the IUCN Oil Palm Task Force. In Oil palm and biodiversity: a situation analysis by the IUCN Oil Palm Task Force. https://doi.org/10.2305/iucn.ch.2018.11.en
  11. Córdoba, D., Abrams, J., & Selfa, T. (2022). Achieving Palm Oil Sustainability Under Contract: Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil and Family Farmers in the Brazilian Amazon. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100160
  12. Curtsdotter, A., Banks, H. T., Banks, J. E., Jonsson, M., Jonsson, T., Laubmeier, A. N., Traugott, M., & Bommarco, R. (2019). Ecosystem function in predator–prey food webs—confronting dynamic models with empirical data. Journal of Animal Ecology, 88(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12892
  13. Dani, J. L., Mojiol, A. R., & Fatt, B. S. (2023). Willingness to Pay for Conservation: A Study in Serinsim Substation, Kinabalu Geopark, Sabah. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1145(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1145/1/012014
  14. Darsani, Y. R., & Subagio, H. (2016). Analisis investasi jangka panjang. In Pusat Perpustakaan dan Penyebaran Teknologi Pertanian Kementerian Pertanian. http://repository.pertanian.go.id/handle/123456789/7058
  15. Dharmawan, A. H., Nasdian, F. T., Barus, B., Kinseng, R. A., Indaryanti, Y., Indriana, H., Mardianingsih, D. I., Rahmadian, F., Hidayati, H. N., & Roslinawati, A. M. (2019). Kesiapan Petani Kelapa Sawit Swadaya dalam Implementasi ISPO: Persoalan Lingkungan Hidup, Legalitas dan Keberlanjutan. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 17(2), 304. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.17.2.304-315
  16. Dirjenbun. (2022). Buku Statistik Perkebunan 2020-2022
  17. Durán-Román, J. L., Cárdenas-García, P. J., & Pulido-Fernández, J. I. (2021). Tourists’ willingness to pay to improve sustainability and experience at destination. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2020.100540
  18. Fish, R., Church, A., Willis, C., Winter, M., Tratalos, J. A., Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2016). Making space for cultural ecosystem services: Insights from a study of the UK nature improvement initiative. Ecosystem Services, 21(September), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.017
  19. Fish, R., Church, A., & Winter, M. (2016). Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services, 21(September), 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002
  20. Fuadah, Tsamrotul. D., & Ernah, . (2018). Management of Oil Palm Plantation Based on ISPO Principles in PTPN VIII Cikasungka, West Java. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 23(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.18343/jipi.23.3.190
  21. Ghazali, I. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS 21 (I. Ghzali, Ed.; Ketujuh). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro
  22. Haque, M. I., & Basak, R. (2017). Land cover change detection using GIS and remote sensing techniques: A spatio-temporal study on Tanguar Haor, Sunamganj, Bangladesh. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 20(2), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2016.12.003
  23. Hermon, D., Iskarni, P., Oktorie, O., & Wilis, R. (2017). The Model of Land Cover Change into Settlement Area and Tin Mining and its Affecting Factors in Belitung Island, Indonesia. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 7(6), 32–39
  24. Hindayani, P., Bratanegara, A. S., & Pratama, A. R. (2023). Willingness To Pay (WTP) Wisatawan dalam Pelestarian Lingkungan Paska Perubahan Cagar Alam Kamojang ke Taman Wisata Alam Kamojang. Jurnal Ilmu Lingkungan, 22(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.14710/jil.22.1.43-49
  25. Hutabarat, S. (2017a). Rakyat Di Kabupaten Pelalawan, Riau Dalam Perubahan Perdagangan Global*. Pekanbaru Indonesia, 43, 47–64
  26. Hutabarat, S. (2017b). TANTANGAN KEBERLANJUTAN PEKEBUN KELAPA SAWIT RAKYAT DI KABUPATEN PELALAWAN, RIAU DALAM PERUBAHAN PERDAGANGAN GLOBAL*. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 43(1), 47–64. https://jmi.ipsk.lipi.go.id/index.php/jmiipsk/article/view/713
  27. Izakovičová, Z., Mederly, P., & Petrovič, F. (2017). Long-term land use changes driven by urbanisation and their environmental effects (example of Trnava City, Slovakia). Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091553
  28. Karsenty, A., Aubert, S., Brimont, L., Dutilly, C., & Sébastien Desbureaux, Driss Ezzine de Blas, G. L. V. (2017). The Economic and Legal Sides of Additionality in Payments for Environmental Services. Environmental Policy and Goverment, 27(5), 422–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1770
  29. Khalida, R., & Lontoh, A. P. (2019). Manajemen Pemupukan Kelapa Sawit (Elaeis Guineensis Jacq.), Studi Kasus pada Kebun Sungai Sagu, Riau. Buletin Agrohorti, 7(2), 238–245. https://doi.org/10.29244/agrob.7.2.238-245
  30. Lawolo, O., Pinem, L. D., Nainggolan, E. W., Sitopu, Y. D., & Nainggolan, H. L. (2022). ANALISIS PENDAPATAN USAHATANI KELAPA SAWIT RAKYAT DAN KONTRIBUSINYATERHADAP PENDAPATAN KELUARGA PETANI DI KABUPATEN TAPANULI SELATAN. PROSIDING SEMINAR NASIONAL UNIVERSITAS PGRI PALANGKA RAYA, 1. https://doi.org/10.54683/puppr.v1i0.8
  31. Lubis, A. U. (2008). Kelapa sawit (elaeis guineensis jacq.) di Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian Kelapa Sawit, 1–382
  32. MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Wetlands and Water Synthesis. Virginia Tech, 3994. https://doi.org/1-56973-597-2
  33. Mulyani, A., & Agus, F. (2018). Kebutuhan dan Ketersediaan Lahan Cadangan Untuk Mewujudkan Cita-Cita Indonesia Sebagai Lumbung Pangan Dunia Tahun 2045. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 15(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21082/akp.v15n1.2017.1-17
  34. Mustofa, R., & Bakce, R. (2019). Potensi Konflik Lahan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit. Unri Conference Series: Agriculture and Food Security, 1, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.31258/unricsagr.1a8
  35. Mustofa, R., Hapsoh, Syahza, A., & Suwondo, S. (2021). Food Carrying Capacity as an Indicator of Sustainability of Smallholder Oil Palm Plantations in Riau Province. 11, 111–121. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.08.11
  36. Muta’ Ali, L., Kinasih, S. S., & Sumini, K. (2012). Daya dukung lingkungan untuk perencanaan pengembangan wilayah
  37. Nitzko, S., Bahrs, E., & Spiller, A. (2024, January). Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free food products with different processing degrees: Does additional information on cultivation have an influence? Farming System; Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100059
  38. Nurkholis, A., & Sitanggang, I. S. (2019). A spatial analysis of soybean land suitability using spatial decision tree algorithm. Proc.SPIE, 11372. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2541555
  39. P3ES, P. P. P. E. S. (2021). Daya Dukung Daya Tampung Lingkungan hidup Jasa Ekosistem Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Provinsi Riau. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents
  40. Pacheco, P., Gnych, S., Dermawan, A., Komarudin, H., & Okarda, B. (2017). The palm oil global value chain: Implications for economic growth and social and environmental sustainability. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006405
  41. Pahan, I. (2012). Panduan Lengkap Kelapa Sawit Manajemen Agribisnis dari Hulu Hingga Hilir (R. Armando, Ed.). Penebar Swadaya
  42. Pahan, I. (2015). Panduan Teknis Budidaya Kelapa Sawit. (L. H. Apriyanti, Ed.; 1st ed.). Penebar Swadaya
  43. Phelps, J., Jones, C. A., Pendergrass, J. A., & Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2015). Environmental liability: A missing use for ecosystem services valuation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(39), E5370. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514893112
  44. Pittock, J., Cork, S., & Maynard, S. (2012). The state of the application of ecosystems services in Australia. Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.010
  45. Pourghasemi, H. R., Pradhan, B., & Gokceoglu, C. (2012). Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran. Natural Hazards, 63(2), 965–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0217-2
  46. Primmer, E., & Furman, E. (2012). Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: Do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems? Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008
  47. Ramli, F., & Samdin, Z. (2017). Willingness to pay for conservation fee using contingent valuation method: The case of Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve, Perak, Malaysia. Malaysian Forester, 80(1), 99–110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322482831
  48. Rhebergen, T., Fairhurst, T., Whitbread, A., Giller, K. E., & Zingore, S. (2018). Yield gap analysis and entry points for improving productivity on large oil palm plantations and smallholder farms in Ghana. Agricultural Systems, 165(February), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.05.012
  49. Saeri, Moh. (2018). Usahatani Dan Analisisnya (H. Subagyo, Ed.; 1st–136th ed.). Uninda Press
  50. Sembiring, J. (2006). Konflik Tanah Perkebunan Di lndonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 13(2), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol13.iss2.art9
  51. Sharma, S. K., H., B., P., P., & Y., L. (2017). Assessing impacts on ecosystem services under various plausible oil palm expansion scenarios in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Assessing Impacts on Ecosystem Services under Various Plausible Oil Palm Expansion Scenarios in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, 176. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006479
  52. Soedomo, S. (2012). Internalizing externalities through payments for environmental services. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 18(2), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.18.2.138
  53. Soedomo, S. (2017). Failure of forestry political economy of Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 23(2), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.23.2.111
  54. Sumarga, E., & Hein, L. (2014). Mapping ecosystem services for land use planning, the case of Central Kalimantan. Environmental Management, 54(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0282-2
  55. Suryahani, I., Anwar, N., Fakultas, D., Universitas, E., Soedirman, J., Indonesia, D., Jenderal, U., Purwokerto, S., Bunyamin, J. H. R., & Grendeng, K. (2011). Aplikasi Willingness To Pay : Proksi Terhadap Penentuan Harga ( Model Empirik Dalam Estimasi Permintaan Air Pdam Rumah Tangga Di Kabupaten Banyumas ). Eko-Regional, 6(2), 107–116
  56. Suwondo, Syahza, A., Wulandari, S., Darmadi, Gupta, P., Sharma, A. M., Behl, A., Singh, M., Devi, C. U., Bedarkar, M., Pandita, D., Janvale, G., Kendre, S., Mehrotra, S., Hh, R. P., F, D. D. E. D. O. L. D., Hanaysha, J., Ahmad, N., Decramer, A., … Nasrul, B. (2021). Development of Superior Plantation Commodities Based on Sustainable Development. Nternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 15(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160408
  57. Syahza, A. (2021). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN. In Edisi Revisi (p. 223)
  58. Syahza, A., & Irianti, M. (2021). Formulation of control strategy on the environmental impact potential as a result of the development of palm oil plantation. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 12(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-06-2019-0059
  59. Syahza, A., Robin, Suwondo, & Hosobuchi, M. (2021). Innovation for the development of environmentally friendly oil palm plantation in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 716(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/716/1/012014
  60. Taherdoost, H. (2018). Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research. SSRN Electronic Journal, 5(2), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
  61. Wicaksono, D. A., Rifin, A., & Pahan, I. (2018). The Sustainability of Three Indonesian Palm Oil Business Entities. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Agribisnis, 15(3), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.15.3.249
  62. Wijaya, M. S., & Susilo, B. (2013). Integrasi model spasial Cellular Automata dan Regresi Logistik Biner Untuk Pemodelan Dinamika Perkembangan Lahan Terbangun (Studi Kasus Kota Salatiga). Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 2(1), 125–133

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-04-01 02:36:09

No citation recorded.