skip to main content

Evaluasi Status Mutu Sungai Opak Terdampak TPST Piyungan Menggunakan Metode Biotilik dan Komparasinya dengan Metode STORET dan IP

Master Program of Environmental Science, Universitas Sebelas Maret Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A Surakarta 57 126, Central Java, Indonesia. Tel./Fax. +62-271-663375, Indonesia

Received: 21 May 2024; Revised: 17 Nov 2024; Accepted: 8 Jan 2025; Available online: 15 Mar 2025; Published: 31 Mar 2025.
Editor(s): Budi Warsito

Citation Format:
Abstract
Telah dilakukan evaluasi status mutu air sungai Opak menggunakan metode biotilik yang mudah, sederhana dan tergolong murah untuk pemantauan dan pengawasan lingkungan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan pengujian kualitas air sungai Opak pada 6 titik menggunakan metode biotilik dan dievaluasi status mutunya. Kualitas air sungai juga dilakukan uji pada parameter kimia, fisika dan mikrobiologi untuk selanjutnya dievaluasi dengan metode Storage and Retrieval (STORET) dan Indeks Pencemaran (IP). Evaluasi kualitas air sungai dengan metode biotilik kemudian diuji korelasi signifikansinya dengan metode STORET dan IP. Evaluasi kualitas air sungai Opak dengan metode biotilik pada titik T-1, T-2, T-3 dan O-3 diketahui tercemar berat. Evaluasi dengan STORET menunjukkan di semua titik sampling tercemar berat, sedangkan evaluasi dengan metode IP memberikan hasil yang sama dengan metode biotilik hanya berbeda di titik O-1 yang teridentifikasi tercemar ringan. Uji korelasi metode biotilik hanya berkorelasi dengan metode IP dimana besaran korelasi sebesar -0,871 dengan signifikansi sebesar 0,024.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: biotilik; kualitas; IP; pencemaran; STORET; sungai

Article Metrics:

  1. Al-Shami SA, Rawi CSM, Ahmad AH, Nor SAM. 2010. Distribution of Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) in polluted rivers of the Juru River Basin, Penang, Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Sciences 22: 1718–1727. DOI: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60311-9
  2. Andrade C. 2019. The P Value and Statistical Significance: Misunderstandings, Explanations, Challenges, and Alternatives. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 41:210. DOI: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_193_19
  3. Aristawidya M, Hasan Z, Herawati H. 2020. Status Pencemaran Situ Gunung Putri di Kabupaten Bogor Berdasarkan Metode STORET dan Indeks Pencemaran. LIMNOTEK Perairan Darat Tropis di Indonesia 27: 27–38. DOI: 10.14203/limnotek.v27i1.311
  4. Ariyani SF, Putra HP, Kasam, Damanhuri E, and Sembiring E. 2019. Evaluation of waste management in Piyungan landfill, Bantul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 280, 1–11. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201928005018
  5. Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, and Stribling JB. 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, Second Edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C
  6. Bernard M, Boutry S, Lissalde S dkk. 2019. Combination of passive and grab sampling strategies improves the assessment of pesticide occurrence and contamination levels in a large-scale watershed. The Science of The Total Environment 651:684–695. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.202
  7. Diwan V, Stålsby Lundborg C, Tamhankar AJ. 2013. Seasonal and temporal variation in release of antibiotics in hospital wastewater: estimation using continuous and grab sampling. PLoS ONE 8. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068715
  8. Dosskey MG, Vidon P, Gurwick NP, Allan CJ, Duval TP, Lowrance R. 2010. The Role of Riparian Vegetation in Protecting and Improving Chemical Water Quality in Streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46:261-277. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00419.x
  9. Hamid SA, Rawi CSM. Application of Aquatic Insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera) In Water Quality Assessment of Malaysian Headwater. Tropical Life Sciences Research 28:143-162. DOI: 10.21315/tlsr2017.28.2.11
  10. Hettige, ND, Hashim R, Kutty AA, Ash’aari, ZH, Jamil NR. 2022. Using Benthic Macroinvertebrate Distribution and Water Quality as Organic Pollution Indicators for Fish Farming Areas in Rawang Sub-basin, Selangor River, Malaysia: A Correlation Analysis. Journal of Fisheries and Environment, 46: 180–197
  11. Jerves-Cobo R, Everaert G, Iñiguez-Vela X, Córdova-Vela G, Díaz-Granda C, Cisneros F, Nopens I, Goethals PLM. 2017. A Methodology to Model Environmental Preferences of EPT Taxa in the Machangara River Basin (Ecuador). Water 159: 1-31. DOI: 10.3390/w9030195
  12. Kranzfelder P and Ferrington LC. 2018. Chironomidae (Diptera) species diversity of estuaries across a land use gradient on the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. Revica de Biologia Tropical 66: 1118-1134. DOI: 10.15517/rbt.v66i3.31927
  13. Li L. Zheng B, Liu L. 2010. Biomonitoring and Bioindicators Used for River Ecosystems: Definitions, Approaches and Trends. Procedia Environmental Science 2: 1510-1524. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.164
  14. Lumb A, Halliwell D, Sharma T. 2006. Application of CCME Water Quality Index to Monitor Water Quality: A Case of the Mackenzie River Basin, Canada. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 113: 411-429. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-9092-6
  15. Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Republik Indonesia. 2003. Keputusan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Nomor: 115 Tahun 2003 tentang Pedoman Penentuan Status Mutu Air. Departemen Lingkungan Hidup, Jakarta
  16. Naka LN, Werneck FP, Rosser N, Pil1 MW, and Boubli JP. 2022. Editorial: The role of rivers in the origins, evolution, adaptation, and distribution of biodiversity. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2022.1035859
  17. Nufutomo TK, Manalu YS, and B S Muntalif BS. 2022. STORET (Storage and Retrieval) method for analysis and identification of water pollutants in the Upper Citarum Watershed, West Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth Environmental Science 1201012050. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1201/1/012050
  18. Pemerintah Indonesia. 2021. Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomer 22 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Pemerintah Indonesia, Jakarta
  19. Shaeghi M, Dehghan H, Pakdad K, Nikpour F, Absavaran A, Sofizadeh A, Akhavan AA, Vatandoost H, Aghai-Afshar. 2017. Faunistic Study of the Aquatic Arthropods in a Tourism Area in Northern Iran. Iranian Journal of Arthropod-Borne Diseases 11(2):276-291. PMCID: PMC5641617
  20. Sriariyanuwath E, Sangpradub N, and Hanjavanit C. 2015. Diversity of chironomid larvae in relation to water quality in the Phong River, Thailand. AACL Bioflux, 8:933-945
  21. Tampo L, Kaboré I, Alhassan EH, Ouéda A, Bawa LM, Djaneye-Boundjou G dkk. 2021. Benthic macroinvertebrates as ecological indicators: their sensitivity to the water quality and human disturbances in a tropical river. Frontiers in Water 3. DOI: 10.3389/frwa.2021.662765
  22. Uherek CB, Gouveia FBP. 2013. Biological monitoring using macroinvertebrates as bioindicators of water quality of Maroaga stream in the Maroaga cave system, Presidente Figueiredo, Amazon, Brazil, International Journal of Ecology 2014 1–7. DOI: 10.1155/2014/308149
  23. Valenzuela EF, Menezes HC, and Cardeal ZL. 2020. Passive and grab sampling methods to assess pesticide residues in water. A Review Environtal Chemistry Letters 18:1019–1048. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-020-00998-8

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-04-01 05:00:42

No citation recorded.