skip to main content

Indonesian Society is Not Disabled Friendly?

*Napsiah Napsiah  -  Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universitas Islam, Indonesia
Yani Tri Wijayanti  -  Department of Communication Science, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

The case of a state official required a Deaf person to answer questions submitted to a Deaf person on World Disabilities Day in 2021 by using spoken language and refusing to use sign language because it was considered that the disabled have the same abilities as the non- disabled group. The perception of these state officials is a representation of the Indonesian population in understanding disabilities. The purpose of this research is to prove that Indonesia already has a policy to align the life positions of disabled people with non-disabled people, but these policies do not reach the community level, so that people are not friendly to people with disabilities. This research uses descriptive qualitative method by analyzing interview data and indirect observation, as well as combining secondary data obtained from previous research, the website found that facilities in the form of infrastructure were uneven and low sign language skills for non-disabled groups led to a lack of knowledge about the existence of disabilities. The result of this study shows that the disabled group cannot adapt to their own environment so that the existence of disabilities is not widely known by the public. The lack of knowledge about people with disabilities causes people to think that disabled groups are the same as non-disabled groups. Such perception is then considered by the people of Indonesia to be unfriendly to persons with disabilities.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Society; Disabled Friendly; Government Policy; Knowledge; Sign Language; Infrastructure.

Article Metrics:

  1. Abdul-Chani, M. M., Moreno, C. P., Reeder, J. A., Zuckerman, K. E., & Lindly, O. J. (2021). Perceived community disability stigma in multicultural, low-income populations: Measure development and validation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 115(May): 1–12. (doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103997)
  2. Admin, S. (2015). “Sarana Prasarana Bagi Penyandang Disabilitas. Mahkamah Agung Re- publik Indonesia Pengadilan Negeri Blambangan Umpu”, [online], Retreieved from https:// pnliwa.go.id/223y436rsW12194i7lh. (Accessed October 12, 2021)
  3. Ahmad, M. (2015). Independent-Mobility Rights and the State of Public Transport Accessibility for Disabled People: Evidence From Southern Punjab in Pakistan. Administration and Society, 47(2): 197–213. (doi: 10.1177/0095399713490691).[Online]
  4. Ansori Ade Nasihudin (2020). “Perbedaan Penguasaan Bahasa Bagi Penyandang Tuli dan Non Tuli”, [online] Liputan6.Com. https://www.liputan6.com/disabilitas/read/4395451/perbedaan
  5. -penguasaan-bahasa-bagi-penyandang-tuli-dan-non-tuli. (Accessed October 12, 2021)
  6. Apriyani, T., & Rahmiaji, L. R. (2022). Strategi Komunikasi Penanganan Perempuan Difa-
  7. bel Korban Kekerasan Seksual di SAPDA Yogyakarta. Inklusi, 8(2): 185–202. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080207).[Online]
  8. Atika, I. N., Kawai, N., & Funabashi, A. (2022). Attitudes of Secondary School Science Teachers toward Teaching Diverse Students. Inklusi, 8(2): 113–122. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080202)
  9. Biro Humas Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia., (2020). Kemensos Dorong Aksesibilitas Informasi Ramah Penyandang Disabilitas. https://kemensos.go.id/kemensos-dorong- aksesibilitas-informasi-ramah-penyandang-disabilitas. (Accessed October 20, 2021)
  10. Bodaghi, N. B., Cheong, L. S., Zainab, A. N., & Riahikia, M. (2017). Friendly Librarians: The culture of caring and inclusion experiences of visually impaired students in an aca- demic library. Information Development, 33(3): 229–242, (doi: 10.1177/0266666916641178),[Online]
  11. Bodaghi, N. B., & Zainab, A. N. (2013). Accessibility and facilities for the disabled in public and university library buildings in Iran. Information Development, 29(3): 241–250. (doi: 10.1177/0266666912461265),[Online[
  12. Chen, F. X., & Lee, A. (2021). Culture, assumptions about the world, and interpretations of children’s disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 111 (January): 1-3. (doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103877),[Online]
  13. Darmawan, E., Woromurtini, T., & Sari, S. R. (2014). Public Facility for Diffable and Elder- ly Problem in Semarang-Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 135: 36 –40, (doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.322),[Online]
  14. Delport, D. H. (2021). There Is More Than Meets the Eye: Success Stories of a Visual Im- paired Student and Lecturer. Inklusi, 8(1): 1-14. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080101),[Online]
  15. Druckman, J. N., Levy, J., & Sands, N. (2021). Bias in Education Disability Accommodations. Economics of Education Review, 85 (April): 1-22. (doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2021.102176),[Online]
  16. Febryan. A, Febrianto Adi Saputro, R. L. S. (2021). “Risma Paksa Tunarungu Bicara, Penga- mat: Cari Perhatian”, [online], Retrieved from Republika.ac.id. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/r3j6xf354/risma-paksa-tunarungu-bicara-pengamat-cari-perhatian. (Accessed December, 31, 2021)
  17. Ferry Firdaus, F. I. (2010). Aksesibilitas dalam Pelayanan Publik untuk Masyarakat dengan Kebutuhan Khusus. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 6(3): 9–10. [doi: 10.24258/jba.v6i3.64),[Online]
  18. Fikri, A. (2015). Resensi Buku: Fikih (Ramah) Difabel. INKLUSI Journal of Disability Stud- ies, 2(1): 1–10, (doi: /10.14421/ijds.020108),[Online]
  19. Gumelar, G., Hafiar, H., & Subekti, P. (2018). Konstruksi Makna Bisindo Sebagai Budaya Tuli Bagi Anggota Gerkatin. Informasi, 48(1): 65-78. (doi: 10.21831/informasi.v48i1.17727),[Online]
  20. Handoyo, R. T., Ali, A., & Scior, K. (2021). Attitudes of key professionals towards people with intellectual disabilities and their inclusion in society: A qualitative study in an In- donesian context. Transcultural Psychiatry 58(3): 379–391, (doi: 10.1177/1363461520909601),[Online]
  21. Hubermen, A.M., & Miles,M.B. (1994). Data management and Analysis Methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. 428-444. New York: Sage Publication, Inc
  22. Isrowiyanti. (2013). Mewujudkan Perpustakaan Perguruan Tinggi Yang Ramah Difabel. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, 34(1): 47–60, (doi: 10.14203/j.baca.v34i1.173),[Online]
  23. Isworo, T. (2020). “Lampung Rangkul Disabilitas Fasilitasi Pelayanan Berkelanjutan”, Lam- pung Post. [online]. Retrirved from https://m.lampost.co/berita-lampung-rangkul-disabilitas-fasilitasi-pelayanan- berkelanjutan.html. (Accessed October 20, 2021)
  24. Jensen, P., & Nielsen, C. W. (2001). Recycling for all: Preliminary Criteria for the Design of Disability-Friendly Receptacles. Waste Management and Research, 19(6): 498–503. (doi: 10.1177/0734242X0101900605),[Online]
  25. Karr, V. L., Van Edema, A., McCloskey, M., Geden, K., Murphy, J., & Nwangwu, U. (2022). The Inclusion of Persons With Disabilities in U.S. Foreign Policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 32(4): 235–244, (doi: 10.1177/1044207320959765)
  26. Kunnath, S. K., & Mathew, S. N. (2019). Higher Education for Students with Disabilities in India: Insights from a Focus Group Study. Higher Education for the Future, 6(2): 171–187. (doi: 10.1177/2347631119840540),[Online]
  27. Maftuhin, A. (2017). Mendefinisikan Kota Inklusif: Asal-Usul, Teori dan Indikator. Tatalo- ka, 19(2): 93-103. (doi: 10.14710/tataloka.19.2.93-103),[Online]
  28. Meekosha, H., & Soldatic, K. (2011). Human rights and the global South: The Case of Disa- bility. Third World Quarterly, 32(8): 1383–1397. (doi: 10.1080/01436597.2011.614800),[Online]
  29. Megawati, A. (2021). Pengetahuan dan Sikap Remaja Putri Difabel tentang Pencegahan Kekerasan Remaja Putri di Kota Bandung. INKLUSI Journal of Disability Studies, 8(1): 15–28. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080102),[Online]
  30. Mukhopadhyay, S., & Moswela, E. (2020). Disability Rights in Botswana: Perspectives of Individuals With Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 31(1): 46–56. (doi: 10.1177/1044207319871745),[Online]
  31. Munifah, M., & Ardiyansyah, B. (2022). Sinergi Pendampingan sebagai Modal Pembelaja- ran Pendidikan Inklusif di PKBM Yogyakarta. Inklusi, 8(2): 149–162. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080205),[Online]
  32. Nafisah, S. (2021). Sistem Monitoring Akademik Mahasiswa Difabel dengan Black Box Testing. Inklusi, 8(1): 43-62. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080104)
  33. Niko, N., & Nusantara, A. S. P. (2016). Menilik Ruang Terbuka Bagi Difabel : Problematika Keadilan Di Kota Bandung. Journal Of Special Education, II(2): 95–106. (doi: 10.15294/jllr.v2i2.46486),[Online]
  34. Nisa, U. (2021). Stigma Disabilitas di Mata Orang Tua Anak Difabel di Yogyakarta. Inklusi, 8(1): 75-88. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080106),[Online]
  35. Niyisabwa, O. T., & Musenyente, E. (2022). Orientation and Mobility Skills of Children with Visual Impairment in Low-income Families in Central Uganda. Inklusi, 8(2): 101–112. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080201),[Online]
  36. Pebrianto, F. (2021). “Menaker Sebut Hanya 7,5 Juta Penyandang Disabilitas yang Bekerja”. Tempo.Co. [online]. Retrieved from https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1436151/menaker-sebut-hanya-75-juta- penyandang-disabilitas-yang-bekerja. (Accessed October 10, 2021)
  37. Pinilla-Roncancio, M., & Alkire, S. (2021). How Poor Are People With Disabilities? Evi- dence Based on the Global Multidimensional Poverty Index. Journal of Disability Poli- cy Studies, 31(4): 206–216. (doi: 10.1177/1044207320919942),[Online]
  38. Plotner, A. J., & Walters, C. B. (2022). Perceptions of District- and School-Level Special Education Leaders on Guardianship and Adult Decision-Making Support. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 32(4): 290–300, (doi: 10.1177/104420732110063950),[Online]
  39. Prayogo, M. M., & Sholikhati, N. I. (2021). Adaptasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Pada Masa Pandemi Di Sekolah Inklusi. Inklusi, 8(1): 29-42. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080103),[Online]
  40. Ratnasari, D. E. (2021). Strategi Coping Mahasiswa Difabel dalam Menyelesaikan Skripsi di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Inklusi, 8(1): 89-100. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080107),[Online]
  41. Saputro, I. (2016). “Indonesia Kekurangan Juru Bahasa Isyarat”. [online] https:// solo.tribunnews.com/2016/09/25/indonesia-kekurangan-juru-bahasa-isyarat. (Accessed October 12, 2021
  42. Samboma, T. A. (2021). Leaving no one behind: Intellectual disability during COVID-19 in Africa. International Social Work, 64(2): 265–269. (doi: 10.1177/0020872820967413),[Online]
  43. Setyaningsih, R. T. dan Gutama, A. (2016). Pengembangan Kemandirian Bagi Kaum Difa- bel (Studi Kasus pada Peran Paguyuban Sehati dalam Upaya Pengembangan Ke- mandirian bagi Kaum Difabel di Kabupaten Sukoharjo) Rimale. Jurnal Sosiologi DI- LEMA, 31(1): 42–51. ISSN:0215/9635
  44. Stewart, R. C. (2020). Loop, Hook, Pull: Disabled by Design—Creating a Narrative Theolo- gy of Disability. Theology Today, 77(2): 179–185. (doi: 10.1177/0040573620920673),[Online]
  45. Suprihatiningrum, J. (2022). Pengalaman Sekolah Penyelenggara Pendidikan Inklusif dalam Menyediakan Pembelajaran Sains. Inklusi, 8(2): 123–136. (doi: 10.14421/ijds.080203),[Online]
  46. Tim detik Com.(2021). “Dikritik karena Paksa Tunarungu Bicara, Ini Penjelasan Mensos Risma”. [online]. Retreived from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5836914/dikritik-karena-paksa-tunarungu-bicara
  47. -ini-penjelasan-mensos-risma. (Accessed December 2, 2021)
  48. Weedon, E. (2017). The construction of under-representation in UK and Swedish higher ed- ucation: Implications for disabled students. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 12(1): 75–88. (doi: 10.1177/1746197916683470),[Online]

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-21 19:00:57

No citation recorded.