DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v14i2.20866

SEVERAL STRATEGIES TO ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRY

*Diastama Anggita Ramadhan  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2018 LAW REFORM

Citation Format:
Abstract

The death penalty practice have been an issue in various country. Since the deployment of the ICCPR, there are many country have succesfully abolish the practice of the death penalty or put it in to a moratorium. This international regulation is also affected the developing country. From all over country around the world, several developing countries are still actively use the death penalty as their capital punishment. They argued that executing people have successfully decrease the level of crime in their country. However, it is important to understand that the international regulation are ordered country to abolish the death penalty. This article then will give several strategies for developing country in order to promote the abolishment of the death penalty in all condition.

Keyword: Death Penalty; Abolition; Strategy.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
KAJIAN LEGALITAS DAN MANAJEMEN MEREK PADA UMKM MUNAKU SULAM PITA SEMARANG PROBLEMATIKA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH DI LOKASI TANJUNG SARI KABUPATEN BANGGAI IMPLIKASI PERUBAHAN STATUS PENERIMA LISENSI TERHADAP PERJANJIAN LISENSI HAK CIPTA PADA ORGANISASI KSBSI More recent articles
Most cited articles
PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA KEBIJAKAN FORMULASI HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MELINDUNGI TRANSAKSI E - COMMERCE DI INDONESIA IMPLEMENTASI PENILAIAN KEBARUAN DAN PRINSIP ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PERLINDUNGAN DESAIN INDUSTRI More cited articles
  1. Alston, Philip., & Robinson, Mary. (2005). The Challenges of Ensuring the Mutuality of Human Rights and Development Endeavours, Human Rights and Development Toward Mutual Reinforcement (OUP). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  2. Amnesty International. (1989). When the State Kills .Amnesty International Press
  3. Asikin dan Amirudin. (2004). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada
  4. Bye, Raymond T. ( 1919). Capital Punishment in the United States. Wisconsin: George Banta
  5. Currie, J. (2001). Public International Law. Ontario: Irwin Law
  6. Gershman, John., & Erwin, Alec. (2000). Getting a Grip on the Global Economy’ in Jim Yong Kim and others, Dying for Growth: Global Inequality and Health for the Poor.New York: Common Courage Press
  7. Hood, R. ( 2002). The Death Penalty, A Worldwide Perspective (3rd edn, OUP). Oxford: Oxford University Press
  8. Black Jr, Charles. L. (1974). Capital Punishment: The Inevitability of Caprice and Mistake. -: Norton
  9. Lauterpacht, H. (1950). International Law and Human Rights. London: Stevens and Son
  10. Mahoney, J. (2007). The Challenge of Human Rights. New Jersey: Blackwell
  11. Moreland, JP., & Geisler , Norman. L. (1990). The Life and Death Debate. Conneticut: Greenwood Press
  12. Myrdal, G. (1968). Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. New York: Pantheon
  13. Neumayer, E. ( 1994). Death Penalty Abolition’ in Robert A Burt and Ian Shapiro (eds), Democracy, Equality, and the Death Penalty.New York: New York University Press
  14. Pojman, Louis P. (1998). For the Death Penalty’ in Louis P Pojman and Jeffrey Reiman (eds), The Death Penalty, For and Against . Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers
  15. Risse, Thomas., and Ropp, Sthephen. (1999). International Human Rights Norms and Domestic Change: Conclusions’ in Thomas Risse, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (CUP). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  16. Schabas, William. A. (2002). The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law CUP, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  17. Soekanto, S. (1984). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press
  18. Yani, A. (2011). Pembentukan Undang-Undang & Perda. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
  19. Anckar, C. (2014). Why Countries Choose the Death Penalty.Brown Journal of World Affairs. Vol. 21 (Issue I) pp. 11-12
  20. Baral, Lok. R. (1981). The Relevance and Application of Human Rights to Development.Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 3 (No. 3) p. 32
  21. Baxi, U. (2008). What May the Third-World Expect from International Law?’ in Richard Falk. Routledge: International Law and the Third World. Vol. 27 (No. 5) pp. 9
  22. Beyleveld, D. (1979). Identifying, Explaining and Predicting Deterrence.British Journal of Criminology. Vol. 19 (No. 3, July) p. 218
  23. Brown, Ben., Buckler, Kevin., & Benedict, Reed. (2010). Support for the Death Penalty in Developing Democracies: A Binational Comparative Case Study.International Criminal Justice Review. Vol. 20 (Issue 4). p. 402
  24. Davis, M. (1986). Harm and Retribution.Philosophy and Public Affairs. Vol. 15 (No. 3) p. 237
  25. Deeney, Liam P. (2000). The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law.Suffolk Transnat'l L Rev
  26. Elias, O. (2012). Some Remarks on the Persistent Objector Rule in Customary International Law.The Denning Law Journal. Vol. 6 (No 1). p. 39
  27. Emerson, R. (1975). The Fate of Human Rights in the Third World.World Politics. Vol. 27 (No. 2, January) p. 207
  28. Goodpaster, G. (2003). Law Reform in Developing Countries.Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems. Vol. 13. p. 667
  29. Heredia, B. (1997). Prosper or Perish? Development in the Age of Global Capital.Current History. Vol. 96 (No. 613, November) p. 383
  30. Knop, K. (2000). Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts. -: New York University Journal of International Law& Politics. Vol. 32. p. 520
  31. Konz, P. (1969). Legal Development in Developing Countries.American Society of International Law. Vol. 63. p. 97
  32. LeBel, Louis ., & Chao, Gloria. (2002). The Rise of International Law in Canadian Constitutional Litigation: Fugue or Fusion? Recent Development and Challenges in Internalizing International Law. Supreme Court Law Review. Vol. 16 (Issue I). p. 24
  33. Malley, R. (1999). The Third Worldist Moment.Current History. Vol. 98 (No. 631). p. 369
  34. McCorquodale, Robert., & Fairbrother, Richard. (1999). Globalization and Human Right.Human Rights Quarterly. Vol. 21 (Issue 3) p. 756
  35. Miller, Monica. K., & Hayward, R. David. (2008). Religious Characteristics and the Death Penalty.Law and Human Behavior. Vol. 32 (No. 2) p. 114
  36. Monshipouri, M. (2001). Promoting Universal Human Rights: Dilemmas of Integrating Developing Countries.Human Rights and Development. Vol 4 (Issue 1) p. 28
  37. Pardesi, G. (1976). Foreign Policy of Developing Countries.Social Scientist. Vol. 4 (No. 12) p. 25
  38. Rankin, J. (1979). Changing Attitudes Toward Capital Punishment.Social Forces. Vol. 58 (No. 1) p. 202
  39. Rehman, J. (2002). The Influence of International Human Rights Law upon Criminal Justice System.Sage Journal of Criminal Law. Vol. 66 (Issue 6) p. 512
  40. Rosen, Sonia., & Journey, Stephen. (1993). Abolition of the Death Penalty: An Emerging Norm of International Law.Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy
  41. Schabas, William. A. (1998). International Law and the Abolition of the Death Penalty.Washington and Lee Law Review. Vol. 55 (Issue 3) p. 800
  42. Slaughter, Anne. Marie., & White, WilliamBurke. (2006). The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, The European Way of Law). Harvard: Harvard International Law Journal. Vol. 47 (No. 2) p. 332
  43. Warren, M. (2004). International Law Claims in Death Penalty Cases: Concepts, Strategies, and Sources.Guild Prac
  44. West, DavidG. (2008). Siting the Death Penalty Internationally.Law and Social Inquiry . Vol. 33 (Issue 2) p. 296
  45. Zavatta, L. (2017). Controversial Theories on the Death Penalty.Beijing Law Review. Vol. 8 (No. 2) p. 213
  46. American Convention on Human Rights. (1990). Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights to Abolish the Death Penalty (Pact of San Jose)
  47. Amnesty International. (2017). Death Sentences and Executions in 2016.. Amnesty International Press
  48. AmnestyInternational. (2015). Flawed Justice Unfair Trial and the Death Penalty in Indonesia’
  49. Angaman, P. (2012). The Role of Radio in the Promotion of Human Rights. Dakar: The Regional Seminar on the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Africa
  50. Anyangwe, C. (2012). The African Commission on Human Rights and the Working Group on the Death Penalty in Africa: Strategies Proposed by ACHPR. Dakar: The Regional Seminar on the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Africa
  51. Arab Charter on Human Rights . (1994). Arab Charter on Human Rights
  52. Davey, M. (2015). Amnesty Report Offers Grim View of Joko Widodo’s Death Penalty Record’ The Guardian
  53. Jabour, B. (2015). Joko Widodo Defends Death Penalty as ‘Positive’ for Indonesia’ The Guardian
  54. Mumisa, Michael., & others. (2015). Sharia Law and the Death Penalty; Would Abolition of the Death Penalty Be Unfaithful to the Message of Islam?, Penal Reform
  55. Nwanko, Victoria. Chioma. (2011). The Role of the Media in Promoting Human Rights: An Analysis of the BBC Documentary, Chocolate: the bitter truth. Swedia: Master Dissertation in Human Rights Practice, School of Global Studies, University of Gothenbergh
  56. OSCE Parliamentary Assembly. (2010). Resolution on the Death Penalty (adopted at the 19th Annual Session). Oslo
  57. Tajwar, A. (2015). Public Opinion on Capital Punishment in Pakistan in 2015
  58. UN ECOSOC. (1984). Safeguards Guaranteeing Protection of the Rights of Those Facing the Death Penalty art 1

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-25 19:56:12

No citation recorded.