skip to main content

Law Enforcement in the Recovery of State Funds from Corruption Crimes

*Arie Kartika orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Medan Area, Indonesia
Arizon Mega Jaya orcid  -  Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia
Asep Hakim Zakiran orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Bandung, Indonesia
Mentari Jastisia orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Wiralodra Indramayu, Indonesia
Suheflihusnaini Ashady orcid  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Edi Mulyadi Z.S  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Indonesia
Febryani Sabatira scopus  -  Master of Maritime Policy, University of Wollongong, Australia
Open Access Copyright 2024 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Corruption are not adequately addressed by the current legal framework, which fails to provide appropriate sanctions or follow the Constitution in dealing with such crimes. Simply imposing prison sentences is insufficient; efforts must also be made to recover state losses incurred due to corruption. there are still significant constraints in the implementation and enforcement of the law. This study aim to analyze how the applicable laws are enforced to recover financial losses incurred by the state in cases of criminal corruption; and identify the factors inhibiting the effective implementation of laws related to the recovery of these financial losses. This study employs both normative legal methods and empirical research. The research results suggest that to restore the country's economy affected by criminal corruption, it is necessary to undertake measures such as the foreclosure of assets owned by the convicted individuals. Sanctions should include not only monetary compensation equivalent to the value of the assets obtained through corruption but also criminal fines and decisions on the confiscation of goods. One major internal constraint in recovering state finances is the tendency of convicts to opt for prison sentences rather than paying damages as determined by the court.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Law Enforcement; Recovery of State Funds; Corruption Crimes; Recovering State; Financial Losses

Article Metrics:

  1. Amrullah, Rinaldy., Maroni., Pratama, Ronaldo Galang. (2023). Implementasi Perampasan Harta Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara (Studi Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kabupaten Lampung Barat). JIS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Vol.3, (No.1), pp.191-198. https://ejournal.penerbitjurnal.com/index.php/socialscience/article/view/100
  2. Anantama, Andika Try., Munawir, Zaini., & Rafiqi. R. (2020). Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Karyawan Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup (Studi Putusan No. 133/Pid. B/2013/Pn. Mbo). Juncto: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, Vol.2, (No.2), pp.119-131. https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v2i2.322
  3. Arifin, R. (2013). Empowering International Cooperation's Role in The Follow of Assets of Corruption's Result. Indonesian Journal of International Law, Vol.11,(No.3),pp.414-422. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol11.3.505
  4. Attas, Nasrah H. (2023). Eksekusi Uang Pengganti Dalam Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Delik Adpertisi,Vol.2,(No.1),pp.11-19. https://jurnal.adpertisi.or.id/index.php/jda/article/view/388
  5. Azman, Rahman Ab., Lokman, Nur Wahida., Zain, Lutfi Mohamed., Omar, Syed Mohd Najib Syed., Gunardi, Setiyawan. (2022). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Gejala Rasuah dan Cabaran Menanganinya di Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, Vol.10, (No.1), pp.90-97. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol10no1.387
  6. Bolifaar, Andhy Hermawan., Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra., Pujiyono., & Arif, Faisal. (2019). Authority of Indonesian attorney in handling the corruption crimes: A perspective of integrated criminal justice system. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, Vol.22, Issue 5, pp.1 – 8. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/authority-of-indonesian-attorney-in-handling-the-corruption-crimes-a-perspective-of-integrated-criminal-justice-system-8663.html
  7. Farahwati. (2021). Peran Aktif Masyarakat Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Merupakan Kejahatan Luar Biasa. Legalitas: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Vol.6,(No.2), pp. 58-77. http://ejurnal.untag-smd.ac.id/index.php/LG/article/view/5864/5519
  8. Fatah, Abdul., Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra., & Juliani, Henny. (2016). Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol.6(No.1),pp.1-15. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2017.13880
  9. Firman, Zul., Laia, Aturkian., & Laia, Bestari. (2023). Kebijakan Publik Melihat Produk Hukum Undang-Undang Pem-berantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Serta Implementasinya Dalam Praktek Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, Vol.2, (No.2), pp.38-49. https://jurnal.uniraya.ac.id/index.php/PanahKeadilan/article/view/1005
  10. Hafidz, J. (2011). Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Perkara Korupsi Dalam Rangka Percepatan Penyelamatan Uang Negara. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.11, pp.123-134. https://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/269
  11. Hanafi. (2017). Analisis Terkait Sanksi Pidana Bagi Pengguna Dan Pengedar Narkoba Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Voice Justisia: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol.1, (No.2), pp.17-44. https://journal.uim.ac.id/index.php/justisia/article/view/435
  12. Hikmawati, P. (2019). Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara dari Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Dapatkah Optimal?. Negara Hukum, Vol.10,(No.1),pp.89-107. DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v10i1.1217
  13. Ilham, Maya H. (2019). Kajian Atas Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, Dan Biaya Ringan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Pencari Keadilan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 246 K/Pid/2017). Jurnal Verstek, Vol.7(No.3),pp.212-219. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v7i3.38286
  14. Indriana, Y. (2018). Pengembalian Ganti Rugi Keuangan Negara Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Cepalo, Vol.2, (No.2), pp.123-130. http://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/cepalo/article/view/1769
  15. Irawan, Benny., Firdaus., Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., Taufiqurrohman, A.H Asari., Sari, Siti Wulan., & Furqoni, Sarah. (2024). State Responsibility and Strategy in Preventing and Protecting Indonesian Fisheries Crews Working on Foreign Fishing Vessels from Modern Slavery. Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs, pp.1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2024.2333107
  16. Jaya, Arizon M. (2017). Implementasi Perampasan Harta Kekayaan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Cepalo, Vol.1,(No.1),pp.19-28. https://jurnal.fh.unila.ac.id/index.php/cepalo/article/view/1752
  17. Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega. (2020). Transnational Criminal Case Settlement Through International Cooperation (A Case Study of Harun Masiku). Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol.4, (No.1), pp. 69-82. https://e-jurnal.lppmunsera.org/index.php/ ajudikasi/article/view/2203
  18. Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., Cahyani, Ferina Ardhi., Musfiroh, Melisa., & Islamiah, Kiki Rizki. (2024a). Pembagian Kewenangan Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Kapal Asing Yang Melakukan IUU Fishing Di WPPNRI. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Vol.11,(No.3).pp.1228-1238. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/ nusantara/article/view/15419
  19. Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., Sidiq, Permana., Fasyehhudin, Mohamad., & Solapari, Nuryati. (2024b). Republic of Indonesia Sovereign Right in North Natuna Sea according to United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, Vol.16,(No.1),pp.127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2023.2206261
  20. Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., Ridwan., Mucharom, Rully Syahrul., Wibowo, Dwi Edi., Aisah, Siti Nur., Sulastri, Alifvia, Novia Bella. (2023). Criticising the Implementation of the ACTIP in Southeast Asia. Sriwijaya Law Review Vol.7,(No.2), pp.355-373. http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/ index.php/sriwijayalawreview/article/view/2542
  21. Kabba, Sandi Herintus., Arjaya, I Made., & Widyantara, I Made Minggu. (2021). Prosedur Pengembalian Dan Pemulihan Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, Vol.2,(No.3),pp.573-579. https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/juinhum/article/download/4139/2949
  22. Kartika, Arie., Furqoni, Sarah., Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., Arafat, Muhammad Rusli., Swarianata, Vifi. (2023). Law Enforcement Strategies For Transnational Money Laundering Corruption Crimes In Criminal Law Reform In Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development. Vol.11, (No.10),pp.1-27. https://ojs.journalsdg. org/jlss/article/view/628
  23. Latif, Syahiruddin., & Ramadani, Rizki. (2022). The Recovery of State Losses through Corruption Asset Confiscation: Policies and Obstacles. Iapa Proceedings Conference, pp.312-321. https://journal.iapa.or.id/proceedings/article/view/703
  24. Lukas, Raiceel G. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Pemulihan Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Kepala Desa. Lex Administratum, Vol.10, (No.2),pp.1-9 https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/administratum/article/view/40416
  25. Mohas, Muhyi., Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., Fasyehhudin, Mohamad., & Jaya, Arizon Mega. (2021). The Indonesia Government's Strategy in Arrest and Confiscation of Criminal Corruption (Corruptor) Assets Abroad. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum. Vol.21,(No.3).pp.432-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.3.2882
  26. Miladmahesi, R. (2020). Dinamika Baru Dalam Pemulihan Aset Akibat Korupsi di Indonesia. Journal of Judicial Review, Vol. 22,(No.1),pp.14-31. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i1.720
  27. Pangaribuan, Piatur., & Fitriadi, Agus. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tahap Penyelidikan Dugaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Journal De Facto, Vol.7, (No.2), pp.194-213. https://jurnal.pascasarjana.uniba-bpn.ac.id/index.php/jurnaldefacto/article/view/90
  28. Prastika, Rizqi Y. (2020). Efektivitas Penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Dalam Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di PT Kereta Api Indonesia (Persero). Jurnal Idea Hukum, Vol.6, (No.1), pp.96-112. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jih.2020.6.1.134
  29. Pujiyono., Setiawan, Fajar A., Hutabarat, David MT. (2019). A New Approach To Preventing Corruption In Indonesia: A study of the TP4 in Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, Vol.10, Issue1,pp.93–115. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/485
  30. Ridwan., Jaya, Belardo Prasetya Mega., & Imani, Sarah Haderizqi. (2022). The Implementation of General Principles of Convention on The Rights of The Child During Covid-19 Pandemic in The City of Serang, Law Reform, Vol.18,(No.1), pp.16-27. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/ lawreform/article/view/44643
  31. Rofingi., Rozah, Umi., & Asga, Adifiyan Rahmat. (2022). Problems of Law Enforcement in Realizing The Principle of Equality Before The Law in Indonesia. Law Reform, Vol.18,(No.2),pp.222-237. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/lawreform/article/view/47477
  32. Rohromana, B. (2017). Pidana Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Sebagai Pidana Tambahan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, Vol.6, (No.1),pp. 44-65. https://e-journal.trisakti.ac.id/index.php/ prioris/article/view/1889
  33. Saputra, R. (2017). Tantangan Penerapan Perampasan Aset Tanpa Tuntutan Pidana (Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture) Dalam RUU Perampasan Aset Di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, Vol.3,(No.1),pp.115-130. http://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/158
  34. Sarıtaş, T., & Özmen, A. (2021). The Impact Of Public Institutional Quality On Economic Growth In EU Countries: panel data analysis. Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Vol.7, (No.2), pp.371-387. https://doi.org/10.46849/guiibd.931825
  35. Sianturi, Dealton Hezeikel Dian Brata Hasudungan., Huda, Moh. Choirul., Sudibyo, Nico., Fahrezi, Meika Eriq., & Bimantoro, Teguh Aryo. (2023). Pengembalian Keuangan Negara Dalam Konteks Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kepala Desa. Jurnal Anti Korupsi, Vol.3,(No.1),pp.17-31. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JAK/article/view/38934
  36. Simo-Kengne, Beatrice D., & Bitterhout, Siphiwo. (2023). Corruption's effect on BRICS Countries Economic Growth: A Panel Data Analysis. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Vol.28 (No.56),pp.257-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-04-2021-0041
  37. Suhariyanto, B. (2016). Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi Demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Vol.5,(No.3),pp.421-438. http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i3.153
  38. Suprayoga, Bima., Hartiwiningsih., & Rustamaji, Muhammad. (2023). Reconstruction of State Economic Losses in Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, Vol.17,(No.4),pp1-15. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n4-024
  39. Suteki., Jalil, Abdul., Natalis, Aga., & Nasution, Angelica Vanessa Audrey. (2024). Empowering Local Communities; Enhancing Engagement in Anti-Corruption Action Program. Lentera Hukum, Vol. 11, (No.1),pp.56-88. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v11i1.46552
  40. YS, Masyitoh., & Ratnawati, Elfrida. (2023). Penyelamatan Keuangan Negara Dari Perspektif Hukum Progresif. UNES Law Review, Vol.5,(No.3),pp.809-818. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i3.359
  41. Zebua, Frans Rudy Putra., Jauhari, Imam., & Siregar, Taufik. (2008). Tanggungjawab Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Ahli Warisnya Dalam Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Kerugian Keuangan Negara Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hukum Perdata (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Negeri Medan). Jurnal Mercatoria, Vol.1,(No.2),pp.150-162. https://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/mercatoria/article/view/635
  42. Nazikha, Frellyka Indana A. (2015). Pelaksanaan Sanksi Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Universitas Islam Indonesia
  43. Hasan, Iman N. (2020). Upaya Penegakan Hukum Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Universitas Islam Indonesia
  44. Adji, Indriyanto S. (2009). Korupsi Dan Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Diadit Media
  45. Atmaja, Arifin P. Surya. (2005). Pengertian Keuangan Negara Pasca Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Dalam Keuangan Publik Dalam Prespektif: Teori: Praktik Dan Kritik. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Indonesia
  46. Chazawi, A. (2017). Hukum Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Depok: Rajawali Pers
  47. Dellyana, S. (1988). Konsep Penegakan Hukum. Yogyakarta: Liberty
  48. Hartanti, E. (2008). Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
  49. Marzuki, Peter M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Grup
  50. Mulyadi, L. (2009). Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia, Normatif, Teoritif, Praktik dan Masalahnya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
  51. Nelson, Febby M. (2020). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dan Penanggulanagn Korupsi Di Indonesia. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada
  52. Soekanto, Soerjono., & Mamudji, Sri. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat Cet. 9. Jakarta: Rajawali Press
  53. Sutedi, A. (2022). Hukum Keuangan Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
  54. Yanuar, Purwaning M. (2007). Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi. Bandung: Alumni
  55. Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Crime
  56. Law Number 1 Year 2004 on State Treasury
  57. Law Number 48 Year 2009 on Judicial Power
  58. Muhammad, N. (2023). Ada 791 Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia pada 2023, Terbanyak di Desa. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata. co.id/datapublish/2024/05/20/ada-791-kasus-korupsi-di-indonesia-pada-2023-terbanyak-di-desa
  59. Transparancy International. (2023). Corruption Perceptions Index 2023. Retrieved from https://ti.or.id/corruption-perceptions-index-2023/

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-11 15:51:54

No citation recorded.