BibTex Citation Data :
@article{LR63943, author = {M Adli Abdullah and Teuku Muttaqin Mansur and Masrizal Masrizal and Laila Muhammad Rasyid and Ery Agus Priyono}, title = {The Influence of Law Enforcement on Restorative Justice-Based Conflict Resolution within the Customary Law in Aceh, Indonesia}, journal = {LAW REFORM}, volume = {22}, number = {1}, year = {2026}, keywords = {Restorative Justice; Customary Law; Law Enforcement; Police; Culture.}, abstract = { The Indigenous People Community (IPC) in Aceh engages in collaborative efforts with law enforcement agencies to mediate disputes via customary courts, as delineated in Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 pertaining to the Advancement of Customary Life and Traditions. Nevertheless, the escalating preeminence of formal legal frameworks has elicited apprehensions regarding the efficacy of customary sanctions in the context of community-driven conflict resolution. The objective of this research endeavor is to scrutinize the function of the police within the sphere of customary dispute resolution and to investigate the implications of their involvement on the jurisdiction of customary law institutions at the village level. The methodological approach employed in this inquiry is descriptive, supplemented by an empirical methodology. Primary data were acquired through direct observation and interviews with pivotal stakeholders, while secondary data were procured from ancillary documentation. The findings indicate that despite the successful resolution of 18 cases at the village level, the influence of the police tends to eclipse the authority of customary courts. The effectiveness of customary sanctions diminishes when formal law is accorded precedence, particularly in instances such as livestock theft or minor violent offenses. The conclusions that can be inferred suggest that excessive police involvement undermines the robustness of customary law, thereby contravening Article 13 paragraph (3) of Aceh Qanun 9/2008, which stipulates a preference for resolution through customary means at the village level. }, issn = {2580-8508}, pages = {150--167} doi = {10.14710/lr.v22i1.63943}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/lawreform/article/view/63943} }
Refworks Citation Data :
The Indigenous People Community (IPC) in Aceh engages in collaborative efforts with law enforcement agencies to mediate disputes via customary courts, as delineated in Aceh Qanun Number 9 of 2008 pertaining to the Advancement of Customary Life and Traditions. Nevertheless, the escalating preeminence of formal legal frameworks has elicited apprehensions regarding the efficacy of customary sanctions in the context of community-driven conflict resolution. The objective of this research endeavor is to scrutinize the function of the police within the sphere of customary dispute resolution and to investigate the implications of their involvement on the jurisdiction of customary law institutions at the village level. The methodological approach employed in this inquiry is descriptive, supplemented by an empirical methodology. Primary data were acquired through direct observation and interviews with pivotal stakeholders, while secondary data were procured from ancillary documentation. The findings indicate that despite the successful resolution of 18 cases at the village level, the influence of the police tends to eclipse the authority of customary courts. The effectiveness of customary sanctions diminishes when formal law is accorded precedence, particularly in instances such as livestock theft or minor violent offenses. The conclusions that can be inferred suggest that excessive police involvement undermines the robustness of customary law, thereby contravening Article 13 paragraph (3) of Aceh Qanun 9/2008, which stipulates a preference for resolution through customary means at the village level.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2026-03-09 07:24:07
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to Law Reform and Master Program of Law, Universitas Diponegoro as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
Law Reform and Master Program of Law, Universitas Diponegoro and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in Law Reform journal are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here: [Copyright Transfer Form Law Reform]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document or fax :
Prof. Dr. Kholis Roisah, S.H., M.Hum (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of Law Reform
Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Jl. Imam Bardjo, SH No.1, Semarang, Indonesia 50241
Telp. (024) 8313493
Email: jurnalmih.undip@gmail.com
Has been indexed in:
Statistics
LAW REFORM (p-ISSN:1858-4810, e-ISSN:2580-8508) is published by Master Program of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.