DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v22i1.64235

Copyright Protection of Computer Software: A Comparative Study of India and Indonesia

*Rahmi Jened orcid scopus  -  Faculty of law, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Ignasius Sumarsono Raharjo  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abhishek Kumar orcid scopus  -  Department of Law, Unversity of Allahabad, India
Aditya Rathi orcid  -  DAV College of Law, Maa Shakumbhari University, India
Betharia Noor Indah Sari orcid  -  Faculty of Humanities, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia
Shofiy Zulfah scopus  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2026 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Since its invention around fifty years ago, computer technology has drastically changed people's lives. As well as providing various conveniences, the existence of computers has also given rise to a number of legal issues. This research project aims to examine comparative law in the context of copyright protection for computer programs in Indonesia and India. Multiple approaches were used: comparative, statutory, conceptual and case. The results obtained are as follows: (1) In Indonesia, a country with a civil law tradition, the benchmark for protecting authors is a reward system. Meanwhile, India, which has a common law legal tradition, uses a benchmark of copyright on the object of work creation as an incentive system;(2) The standard of copyrightability in Indonesia emphasises originality and creativity to a high degree. India, however, places more emphasis on fixation;(3) Both countries provide automatic protection for computer programs for a term of 50 years;(4) In Indonesia, copyright encompasses both economic and moral rights. India, however, places more emphasis on economic rights;(5) There are limitations and exceptions to author's rights in Indonesia. India has a system of fair use or fair dealing;(6) Copyright infringement can be direct or indirect. In Indonesia, law enforcement includes criminal sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines. In India, it is mostly based on civil lawsuits and damages.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Copyright; Computer Program; Protection; Law Enforcement

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Inequality Between The Potential of Fishery Resources and The Poverty Level of Fisherman Communities in Coastal Areas Copyright Protection of Computer Software: A Comparative Study of India and Indonesia The Potential Application of The Bridging Approach In Community-Based Corrections In Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective Pretrial as Supervisory Mechanism for Protecting Suspects' Human Rights More recent articles
Most cited articles
PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG COUNTER TERRORISM BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME SEBAGAI UPAYA PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN TERORISME DI INDONESIA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM TRANSAKSI E-COMMERCE URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA GLOBALISASI LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, DAN TRANSGENDER (LGBT): PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN AGAMA DALAM LINGKUP HUKUM DI INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Al Asy'arie, M. A. H., Rahmanda, B., & Prasetyo, K. A. (2024). Transfer of Intellectual Property Right as a Company Asset in Bankruptcy in Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Review, 9(1), 53-69. https://doi.org/10. 14710/dilrev.9.1.2024.53-69
  2. Arvante, J. Z. Y., Sulistyawan, A. Y., & Riyanto, Y. P. (2025). The Role of Legal Theory in the Era of Digital Globalization: A Perspective of Law Theory as a Tool of Social Engineering. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 7(2), 307–324. https://doi.org/ 10.14710/jphi.v7i2.128-145
  3. Aryotejo, G., & Mufadhol, M. (2021). Open Source network boot server for low-cost computer network learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1943. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-6596/1943/1/ 012101
  4. Azoro, C. J. S., Onah, C. A., & Agulefo, Q. O. (2021). Weak Institutions and Poor Governance in Nigeria: A Socio-Legal Perspective. African Journal of Law, Political Research and Administration, 4(2), 61-70. DOI: 10.52589/AJLPRA-5IUFPPRU
  5. Budi, V H. S., Hutagalung, G. M., & Irawati, J. (2024). Integrating IPR Integrity and Freedom of Expression: A Normative Analysis. Law Reform, 20(1), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.62089
  6. Disemadi, H. S., & Agustianto, A. (2025). Paradoks Perlindungan Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Pencetakan 3D Hasil Desain Artificial Intelligence (AI): Indonesia vs. Vietnam. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 7(1),118–136. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i1.118-136
  7. Dosi, I. H., Santoso, B., & Njatrijani, R. (2017). Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Hak Cipta Program Komputer di dalam Creative Commons Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 6(2), 1-20. https://ejournal3.undip. ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/17433
  8. Du, W., He, Q., Cao, T., & Wu, J. (2025). Intellectual Property Protection and Platform Digitalization Empowering Technology Entrepreneurship in Emerging Markets. Operations Research Letters, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2025.107367
  9. Elmahjub, E., & Suzor, N. (2017). Fair Use and Fairness in Copyright: A Distributive Justice Perspective on Users’ Rights. Monash University Law Review, 43(1), 274-298. https://doi.org/10.26180/5db808ab07c90
  10. Feng, X., Pan, Y., & Xiao, N. an. (2025). The Development and Future of Digital Rights Management: A Review. Neurocomputing, 658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom. 2025.131672
  11. Fitriyanti, F., Devty, S., Putri, S., & Thora, R. E. (2024). Securing Personal Data in E-KYC Vital for Digital Economy Growth. Diponegoro Law Review, 9(1), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.1.2024.104-120
  12. Geiger, C., Gervais, D. J., & Senftleben, M. (2014). The Three-Step-Test Revisited: How to Use the Test’s Flexibility in National Copyright Law. American University Law Review, 29(3), 581-626. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.2139/ssrn.2356619
  13. Geofrey, M. J. C., & Roisah, K. (2020). Patenting Deal in Indonesia, Article 20 of The Patent Law in The Political Perspective of International Trade Law. Law Reform, 16(1),19-31. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i1.30302
  14. Ghosh, R., Ghosh, J., & Ghosh, P. (2023). Copyright Infringement and Exemption Clause on Indian Copyright Law: Issues and Challenges. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 29, 43-49. https://doi.org/ 10.56042/jipr.v29i1.872
  15. Hughes, J. (1988). The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Georgetown Law Journal, 77(287). http://justinhughes.net/docs/a-ip01.pdf
  16. Ikhwan, S., Purwanto, P., & Rochim, A. F. (2025). Optimizing Intrusion Detection in IoT through a Combination of Feature Selection and Deep Feedforward Neural Network. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 18(1), 624–637. https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2025.0229.44
  17. Kaundal, K. (2020). Analysis of Laws Regarding Software Piracy under Copyright Law. International Journal of Law Management & Humanities, 3(3), 150-162. https://ijlmh.com/analysis-of-laws-regarding-software-piracy-under-copyright-law/
  18. Kusuma, P. H., & Roisah, K. (2022). Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Dan Indikasi Geografis: Suatu Kekayaan Intelektual Dengan Kepemilikan Komunal. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i1.107-120
  19. Lin, I. J. (2017). Copyright Issues for Computer Software Program in the United States After Oracle. v. Google: Are the Laws Making the Intellectual Property Protections Easier or Harder? NTUT Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Management, 6(2),14–29. https://iip.ntut.edu.tw/var/file/92/1092/img/2036/researcharticle2_6.2.pdf
  20. Lumbanraja, A. D., & Khasanah, D. R. A. U. (2022). The Urgency of Product Authentication Validation Features in Providing Legal Protection Against Copyright Infringement in E-Commerce. Review of Economics and Finance, 20(1),128–132. https://doi.org/10.55365/1923.x2022.20.14
  21. Maxwell, W., Bolger, K., & Zeggane, T. (2009). A Comparative French and U.S. Law Approach to Scènes à Faire and other non-Protectable Elements in Copyright Law. Propriétés Intellectuelles, 11(30). https://www.hoganlovells.com/~/media/2b2d2cde1d424a9aa4c07013ecfcb61d.ashx
  22. Mayana, R. F., Santika, T., & Cintara, Z. (2024). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Digital Sebagai Bentuk Implementasi Pengembangan Kekayaan Intelektual Pada Sistem Elektronik. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,9(2),269-290. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2024.v8.i2.p269-290
  23. Mayana, R. F., Santika, T., Win, Y. Y., Matalam., J. A. K., & Ramli, A. M. (2024). Legal Issues of Artificial Intelligence – Generated Works: Challenges on Indonesian Copyright Law. Law Reform, 20(1),54-75. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr. v20i1.61262
  24. Meesala, P., & Thounaojam, D. M. (2026). Securing Copyright Protection for Retinal Images Through Watermark Image Encryption in a Robust Zero-Watermarking System. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control,111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2025.108237
  25. Mellema, C. L. (2023). Copyright Protection for Computer Software: An International View. Syracuse Journal of International Law and Commerce,11(1). https://surface.syr.edu/jilc/vol11/iss1/5
  26. Miyashita, Y. (1992). International Protection of Computer Software. UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law, 11(1), 71. https://repository.law.uic.edu/jitpl/vol11/iss1/3
  27. Mulqi, Tb Apriza., Ramli, Ahmad M., Hidayat, Dadang Rahmat., & Mayana, Ranti Fauza. (2025). Regulation on Broadcasting Rights in Indonesia Based on Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright and Law No. 32 Of 2022 on Broadcasting. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 30(4), 403-414. https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v30i4.3992
  28. Murjiyanto, R., Zahir, M. Z. M. Z., Zainol, Z. A., & Wibawanti, E. S.. (2025). Legal Issues of Scientific Works in the Copyright Declarative System in Indonesia and Malaysia. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 16(2),1–19. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2025.16.2.1
  29. Nim, P. (2023). Digitalisation and Copyright Trends. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research,5(2). https://www.ijllr.com/post/digitalisation-and-copyright-trends
  30. Njatrijani, R., Rahmanda, B., Prananda, R. R., & Uz Zaman, M. N. (2020). Business Development of Copyright and Fiduciary Guarantee in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(1),278-284. https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/439
  31. Nurhayati, N., & Suryadi, R. (2017). Democratic Challenges of Indonesia in the Social Media Era. Diponegoro Law Review, 2(2), 349-358. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol%viss%ipp1-15
  32. Pasetti, M., Santos, J. W., Corrêa, N. K., de Oliveira, N., & Barbosa, C. P. (2025, December 1). Technical, Legal, and Ethical Challenges of Generative Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of the Governance of Training Data and Copyrights. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 5(193),1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00379-6
  33. Pikhurets, O., Lytvyn, S., Miroshnykov, I., Mykolaiets, V., & Karashchuk, O. (2021). Copyright Regulation of Relations with Regard to Software: Current State and Perspectives. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering,11(11),161-168. https://doi.org/10.46338/IJETAE1121_18
  34. Puspita, D., Roisah, K., & Lestari, S. N. (2024). Open Access Institutional Repository in the Digital Era: Preventing or Increasing Plagiarism? Yustisia, 13(2),168–188. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v13i2.85098
  35. Rahayu, R., Roisah, K., Wardana K. A., & Erlangga, V. L. S. (2024). Human Rights Defenders in Indonesia's Digital Age: Navigating Limited Spaces in the Quest for Digital Democracy. Sriwijaya Law Review, 8(2),358-375. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss2.3860.pp358-375
  36. Rahman, I., Sibarani, S. Y., Aprianto, S., Paramansyah, A., & Santyaningtyas, A. C. (2024). Protecting Intellectual Property in the Digital Age with A Law. Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities,4(1),49-60. https://doi.org/10.47679/jrssh.v4i2.85
  37. Raza, A., Alam, G., & Talib, M. A. (2023). Copyright Law Declared by the Supreme Court of India. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, 28, 151-170. https://doi.org/ 10.56042/jipr.v28i2.556
  38. Roisah, K. (2017). Understanding trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights agreement: From hard and soft law perspective. Hasanuddin Law Review, 3(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v3i3.1153
  39. Roisah, K., Rahayu, R., Al Asy'arie, M. A. H., Mitskaya, E., & Wahyudi, B. F. H. (2025). Empowering Cultural Communities in Protecting Traditional Expressions: Legal Challenges in the Digital Age. Diponegoro Law Review, 10(2), 134-156. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.134-156
  40. Roisah, K., Setiyono, J., Daulay, A. A., & Farida, E. (2017b). Intellectual Property Law Based on Local Wisdom. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(9),183–190. https://iaeme.com/Home/article_id/IJMET_08_09_019
  41. Roisah, K., Setiyono, J., Prananingtyas, P., & Farida, E. (2017a). Trends of global values in legal political formation of intellectual property law in Indonesia. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(9),391–397. https://iaeme.com/Home/article_id/IJCIET_08_09_046
  42. Said, Z. K. (2013). Fixing Copyright in Characters: Literary Perspectives on a Legal Problem. Cardozo Law Review, 35(769), 769-829. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/191
  43. Sajogo, K. B., Sugianto, F., & Yamamoto, A. (2025). Comparative Analysis Regarding the Copyright Law on AI-Generated Art Between Indonesian and the United States: Unpacking Indonesian Legal Framework Conundrum. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 8(2),213–242. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v8i2.12883
  44. Samekto, FX. A. (2017). Revealing Relationship Capitalism, Democracy, and Globalization in Critical Legal Studies Approach. Diponegoro Law Review, 2(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.1.2017.15-26
  45. Samsithawrati, P. A., Ketut, N., Dharmawan, S., Putra, A. P., Ayu, D., & Sawitri, D. (2025). Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions as Communal Intellectual Property: Are They Protected Under the WIPO Treaty on Intellectual Property, Genetic Resources, and Associated Traditional Knowledge 2024?. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 7(1),1–26. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i1.1-26
  46. Sanjaya, K., & Rajavenkatesan, P.R.L. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Rights - A Copyright Perspective. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights,30,26-34. https://doi.org/10.56042/jipr.v30i1.1588
  47. Sihombing, A. K., Permata, R. R., Ramli, T. S. (2021). Comparison of Digital Copyright Protection on Over the Top (OTT) Streaming Content Media in Indonesia and the United States. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum,8(2),183-212. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v8n2.a2
  48. Stein, D. (2013). Every Move that She Makes: Copyright Protection for Stage Directions & the Fictional Character Standard. Cardozo Law Review, 34(4). https://dx.doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.2028161
  49. Wahyuni, R., Ramadhani, D. A., & Tarina, D. D. Y. (2024). Kedudukan Hukum Surat Pencatatan Ciptaan Bagi Perlindungan Hak Cipta Karya Lukisan Dihadapkan Pada Prinsip Outomatically Protection. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 7450-7464. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1606
  50. Wardana, K. A., Rahayu, R., & Sukirno, S. (2024). Redefining Indonesia’s Blasphemy Law in the Digital Age: A Human Rights Perspective. Diponegoro Law Review, 9(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.9.1.2024.19-35
  51. Waspiah, W., Santoso, B., Prananingtyas, P., Baiquni, M. I., & Saputra, D. E. (2023). Indonesian Patent Law Reform for Simple Patent Innovations on Achieving Welfare State Objectives. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1), 199–242. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69214
  52. Waspiah, W., Santoso, B., Prananingtyas, P., Taduri, J. N. A., & Arifin, R. (2022). Technological Advancement on Patent Registration in Indonesia. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2573. https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0104090
  53. Xu, L., Luo, Y., & Xu, J. (2026). Bridging Law and Strategy: How Intellectual Property Courts Reshape Corporate Digital Transformation through Dynamic Capabilities. Technovation, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103387
  54. Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Wang, G., & Liu, L. (2025a). Intellectual Property Governance and Academic Technology Transfer. Technovation, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103344
  55. Yang, X., Yuan, X., Yao, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., & Zhou, F. (2025b). Protecting the Interests of Owners of Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Models: A Style Relationship-Preserving Privacy Protection Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 272. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.eswa.2025.126730
  56. Yuan, X., & Nie, H. (2025). Secure Industrial Federated Learning: Label Encryption for Model Protection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 160. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111806
  57. Zahida, S. I., & Santoso, B. (2023). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Terhadap Gambar Yang Telah Diunggah Pada Media Sosial Instagram. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(1),186–203. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.186-203
  58. Zhou, L., & Wei, J. (2025). Intellectual Property Protection and Industrial Chain Security under the Background of Technology Blockades: Analysis of the Moderating Effect based on Dynamic Capabilities Theory. Finance Research Letters, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108305
  59. Ahmad, N. (2009). Copyright Protection in Cyberspace: A Critical Study with Reference to Electronic Copyright Management Systems (ECMS). In Proceedings of the 11th International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2009 (80-91). https://ibimapublishing.com/articles/CIBIMA/2009/873738/873738.pdf
  60. Jened, R. (2006). Penyalahgunaan Hak Eksklusif Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Dissertation: Universitas Airlangga
  61. Rahardjo, I. S. (1996). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Program Komputer. Thesis: Universitas Airlangga
  62. Azhary, M. T. (1995). Negara Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Yuridis Normatif tentang Unsur-Unsurnya. Jakarta: UI Press
  63. Baulch, E. (1997). Copyright Law. Modulor Teaching Material of IPR Training, held by Indonesia Australia Specialized Training Program (IASTP) and University of Tecnology Sidney (UTS). Sydney: IASTP
  64. Bodenheimer, E., Oakley, J. B., & Love, J. C. (1988). An Introduction to The Anglo- American Legal System: Readings and Cases. St.Paul, Minn: West Publishing
  65. Budi, V. H. S. (2014). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Konsepsi, Opini, Aktualisasi. Jakarta: Penaku
  66. D’amato, A., & Long, D. E. (1996). International Intellectual Property Anthology. Cincinati: Anderson Publishing
  67. Damian, E. (2002). Hukum Hak Cipta. Bandung: Alumni
  68. Dicey, A. V. (1982). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, ed. Roger E. Michener. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
  69. Drahos, P. (1996). A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Sydney: Dartmouth
  70. Holmes, W. C. (1983). Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law. New York: Clark Boardman
  71. Jened, R. (2007). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Penyalahgunaan Hak Eksklusif. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press
  72. Jened, R. (2014). Hukum Hak Cipta (Copyright law) (1st ed.). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
  73. Keough, J. Mc., & Steward, A. (1997). Intellectual Property in Australia. Sydney: Butterworths
  74. Kintner, E. W., & Lahr, J. (1982). An Intellectual Property Law Primer. New York: Clark Boardman
  75. Lewinsky, M. (2004a). European Copyright Law. Teaching material of the Training of European Community and ASEAN Intellectual Property Training Project (ECAP II). Munchen: Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC), Max Planck Institute
  76. Lewinsky, S. (2004b). International copyright law and Policy. Teaching material for ECAP II, organized by the European Patent Office (EPO) and Munich Intellectual Property Law Center (MIPLC). Munich: MIPLC
  77. Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media
  78. Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media
  79. Merrymann, J. (1969). The Civil Law Tradition. Redwod: Stanford University Press
  80. Moufang, M. (2004). European Patent Law, Teaching Material for European Community and ASEAN Intellectual Training Project (ECAP II), organized by The European Patent Office (EPO), Max Planck Institute Munic Intellectual Law Center (MIPLC). Munchen: ECAP II
  81. Postema, G. (2004). Philosophy of the Common Law. Cincinati: University of North Caroline
  82. Schuberth, H. (2004). Protection of Computer, Semiconductor and Internet, Teaching Material for European Community and ASEAN Intellectual Training Project (ECAP II), organized by The European Patent Office (EPO), Max Planck Institute Munic Intellectual Law Center (MIPLC). Munchen: ECAP II
  83. Senftleben, M. (2003). Copyright, Limitation and Three Step Test in International and EC Copyright Law. Hague: Kluwer Law International
  84. Sterling, J. A. S. (2005a). Summary of International Treaties and European Copyright Law Principles, Teaching Material for European Community and ASEAN Intellectual Training Project (ECAP II), organized by The European Patent Office (EPO) and Queen Mary University of London. London: ECAP II
  85. WIPO. (1997). Agreement Between the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). Geneva: WIPO
  86. Budi, V. H. S. (1999). Several Legal Issues in Copyright Protection in the Field of Computer Programs, International Seminar on Copyright in the Computer Software Industry and Its Use in Indonesia, organized by the Law Faculty of Airlangga University, Indonesia Intellectual Property Society (IIPS)
  87. Jened, R. (2017). Information Management Society Proceedings of the International Law Conference (INLAC), held by Law Faculty Airlangga University, Western University Sydney and ICOL. Kuala Lumpur: INLAC
  88. Jened, R. (2025a). As Expert Witness before the Prosecutor and Trial to Copyright Case Atlantis v. DSI, Special Region of Jakarta. Jakarta: 24 July 2025
  89. Jened, R. (2025b). Legal Opinion in the Case of Computer Program for Hotel Management Application between Atlantis v. DSI / BIG Solution. February 18th, 2025
  90. Jened, R. (2025c). Legal Opinion to the Case Atlantis v. DSI dated April 17, 2025, in the Proceeding at Law Enforcement Agency of Directorate General Intellectual Property of Ministry of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia
  91. Microsoft. (1999). Copyright infringement in Computer Software. Seminar on Copyright in the Computer Software Industry and Its Use in Indonesia, organized by the Law Faculty Airlangga University, Indonesia Intellectual Property Society (IIPS)
  92. Nack, R. (2004). Computer and the Law, Teaching Material for European Community and ASEAN Intellectual Training Project (ECAP II), organized by the European Patent Office (EPO), Max Planck Institute Munich Intellectual Law Center (MIPLC). Munchen: ECAP II
  93. Rahmah, M., Widyantoro, A., & Jened, R. (2000). Perlindungan Hak Cipta Program Komputer. Research Report. https://repository.unair.ac.id/115615/1/KKB%20346.048%202%20RAH%20P.pdf
  94. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025). Jumlah Penduduk Pertengahan Tahun (Ribu Jiwa), 2025. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/ id/statistics-table/2/MTk3NSMy/jumlah-penduduk-pertengahan-tahun--ribu-jiwa-.html
  95. Gohain, M. P. (2020). 23% of Urban Population has Access to Computers, Only 4% of rural: Survey. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/23-of-urban-population-has-access-to-computers-only-4-of-rural-survey/articleshow/77075283.cms
  96. Kemp, S. (2024). Digital 2024: Indonesia. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/ reports/digital-2024-indonesia#:~:text=
  97. PennState. (2022). Copyright Information for University Teaching and Research. Retrieved from https://copyright.psu.edu/ copyright-basics/fair-use/#:~:text=
  98. University of Washington. (2024). Source Code and Object Code. Retrieved from https://www.washington.edu/research/glossary/source-code-and-object-code/
  99. Act No.7 of 1994 regarding Ratification on Agreement Establishing the World trade Organization was published in the State Gazette No.57 of 1994, and the Elucidation was published in Supplement No. 3564 to the State Gazette
  100. Act No.28 of 2014 regarding Copyright was published in the State Gazette No. 266 of 2014, and the Elucidation was published in Supplement No. 5599 to the State Gazette
  101. Sterling. J.A.S. As the authority of Copyright Law in Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), England. London: February 2005b
  102. Rochman, H. Director of Legal Division of State-Owned Enterprise PT Pegadaian, Special Region of Jakarta. Jakarta: October 2024

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-02-26 13:02:12

No citation recorded.