DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v22i2.82196

Neuro-Protective Criminal Justice: A New Paradigm For Child Criminal Responsibility And Protection

1Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti, Indonesia

2Faculty of Law, Universitas Pertiba, Indonesia

3Faculty of Law, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

Open Access Copyright 2026 LAW REFORM under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Contemporary criminal justice systems predominantly assess child criminal responsibility through fixed age thresholds and formal legal capacity while often disregarding neuroscientific evidence concerning brain development, impulse regulation, and limited decision making capacity. This article proposes neuro protective criminal justice that integrates neuroscience, neurolaw, and child centered human rights into criminal law policy. The study aims to examine the conceptual foundation of neuro protective criminal justice, analyze child criminal liability under Indonesian law, and develop a model of neurological protection within the child criminal justice system. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The analysis demonstrates that age based responsibility doesn’t adequately reflect children’s vulnerability to social and structural influences. It argues for a framework that prioritizes rehabilitation, prevention of neurological and psychological harm, and long term developmental well being through restorative justice, therapeutic interventions, and diversion. This study positions neuro protection as a foundational principle of child criminal justice while providing normative guidance for legal reform consistent with neuroscientific knowledge and international child protection standards. The study concludes that Indonesia should introduce regulations requiring neurological development analysis throughout juvenile criminal proceedings and reform legal practices across all components of its legal system.

Fulltext View|Download Email colleagues
Keywords: Neuro-Protective Criminal Justice; Child Criminal Responsibility; Neurolaw

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Most cited articles
URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI HUKUM E-COMMERCE DI INDONESIA PENDIDIKAN HUKUM SEBAGAI PENDIDIKAN MANUSIA PRIVATISASI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA GLOBALISASI LESBIAN, GAY, BISEKSUAL, DAN TRANSGENDER (LGBT): PERSPEKTIF HAM DAN AGAMA DALAM LINGKUP HUKUM DI INDONESIA PENGATURAN KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN : STUDI TENTANG PELAKSANAAN KEWENANGAN PEMERINTAH DAERAH DALAM MENGENDALIKAN PEMBANGUNAN DAN BENDA TUMBUH DI KAWASAN KESELAMATAN OPERASI PENERBANGAN BANDAR UDARA AHMAD YANI SEMARANG More cited articles
  1. Adzana, A. S., Muslim, I., & Sunariyo, S. (2025). Analysis of the conformity of restorative justice and diversion principles in the juvenile justice system law with the equality principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. JIHAD: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi, 7(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.58258/jihad.v7i1.8403
  2. Aggarwal, N. K., & Ford, E. (2013). The Neuroethics and Neurolaw of Brain Injury. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(6), 789–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2086
  3. Akhmad, A., Fernando, Z. J., & Teeraphan, P. (2023). Unmasking Illicit Enrichment: A Comparative Analysis of Wealth Acquisition Under Indonesian, Thailand and Islamic Law. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(2),899–934. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69332
  4. April, K., Schrader, S. W., Walker, T. E., Francis, R. M., Glynn, H., & Gordon, D. M. (2023). Conceptualizing juvenile justice reform: Integrating the public health, social ecological, and restorative justice models. Children and Youth Services Review, 148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106887
  5. Ayu, S. M., Shaluhiyah, Z., Widjanarko, B., & Purwanti, A. (2026). Rasch Analysis of the General Life Skills Scale for Dating Violence Prevention in Indonesian Adolescents. Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia, 9(2), 262-273. https://doi.org/10.56338/mppki.v9i2.8555
  6. Balynska, O., Blahuta, R., Sereda, V., Shelukhin, N., & Kharaberiush, I. (2019). Neurolaw: Branch or Section of New Siences, A Complex Branch of Law or A Way To Justify Criminals (Review). Georgian Medical News, 289(4), 162–168. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31215900/
  7. Bush, S. S., & Tussey, C. M. (2013). Neuroscience and Neurolaw. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-013-9144-0
  8. Chandler, J. A., Harrel, N., & Potkonjak, T. (2019). Neurolaw Today – A Systematic Review of The Recent Law and Neuroscience Literature. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 65, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.04.002
  9. Cohen, A. O., & Casey, B. J. (2014). Rewiring Child Justice: The Intersection of Developmental Neuroscience and Legal Policy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(2),63–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.002
  10. Constantinidis, C., & Luna, B. (2019). Neural Substrates of Inhibitory Control Maturation in Adolescence. Trends in Neurosciences, 42(9),604–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.07.004
  11. Corrado, R., & Mathesius, J. (2014). Developmental Psycho- Neurological Research Trends and Their Importance for Reassessing Key Decision-Making Assumptions for Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults in Child/Youth and Adult Criminal Justice Systems. Bergen Journal of Criminal Law & Criminal Justice, 2(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v2i2.707
  12. Delmage, E. (2013). The Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility: A Medico-Legal Perspective. Youth Justice, 13(2), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225413492053
  13. Fadilah, A., Widijowati, D., & Sugeng, S. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Bullying Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 5(2), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i2.1353
  14. Faizin, M., Fahmi, F., & Pardede, R. (2025). Efektivitas Diversi Berdasarkan UU SPPA: Analisis Yuridis dan Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif di Indonesia. Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Pendidikan, 3(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.70292/jpcp.v3i1.130
  15. Faisal, F., & Rahayu, D. P. (2021). Reformulasi Syarat Diversi: Kajian Ide Dasar Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Masalah-Masalah Hukum,50(3),331-338. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.50.3.2021.331-338
  16. Fernando, Z. J., Agusalim, A., Utami, R. A., Albariansyah, H., & Sacipto, R. (2025). Neurolaw: A Concept in Development and Enforcement of Criminal Law in Indonesia. Jambura Law Review, 7(1), 55-87. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v7i1.24144
  17. Fernando, Z. J., Rosmanila, R., Ratna, L., Cholidin, A., & Nunna, B. P. (2023). The Role of Neuroprediction and Artificial Intelligence in the Future of Criminal Procedure Support Science: A New Era in Neuroscience and Criminal Justice. Yuridika,38(3),593–620. https://doi.org/10.20473/YDK.V38I3.46104
  18. Fine, A., Mahler, A., Steinberg, L., Frick, P. J., & Cauffman, E. (2016). Individual in Context: The Role of Impulse Control on the Association between the Home, School, and Neighborhood Developmental Contexts and Adolescent Delinquency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(7), 1488–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10964-016-0565-4
  19. Fondacaro, M. R. (2014). Rethinking the Scientific and Legal Implications of Developmental Differences Research in Child Justice. New Criminal Law Review, 17(3), 407–441. https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2014.17.3.407
  20. Fondacaro, M. R., & O’Toole, M. J. (2015). American Punitiveness and Mass Incarceration Psychological Perspectives on Retributive and Consequentialist Responses to Crime. New Criminal Law Review,18(4),477–509. https://doi.org/10.1525/NCLR.2015.18.4.477
  21. Freeman, M. (2006). Introduction: Law and Neuroscience. International Journal of Law in Context, 2(3), 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552306003016
  22. Goldson, B., & Kilkelly, U. (2013). International Human Rights Standards and Child Imprisonment: Potentialities and Limitations. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21(2), 345–371. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-55680011
  23. Handayani, E., & Hardiyanti, M. (2025). Forging a legal culture: criminal law enforcement in environmental protection amidst the sustainable development era. Clio. Revista de Historia, Ciencias Humanas y Pensamiento Critico., 5(10), 249-281. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14975866
  24. Handriani, A., & Azis, A. (2025). Penghentian Penuntutan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ringan Sebagai Upaya Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif. YUSTISI, 12(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.32832/yustisi.v12i2.19921
  25. Hasibuan, L. R. (2022). The Concept of Restorative Justice in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System: A Narrative Review of the Indonesian Context. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 5(7), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijlcj.2022.v05i07.004
  26. Kamalludin, I., Purwanti, A., Sularto, R. B., Berezniak, V., & Liudvik, V. (2025). Designing a Digital Trust Fund for the Justice for Sexual Violence Victims Based on Islamic Criminal Law. Jurnal Hukum Islam,23(2),459-500. https://doi.org/10.28918/jhi.v23i2.04
  27. Kramers-Olen, A. L. (2015). Neuroscience, Moral Development, Criminal Capacity, and the Child Justice Act: Justice or Injustice?. South African Journal of Psychology, 45(4), 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246315603633
  28. Kristianto, A. M., Suteki, & Geofrey, M. J. C. (2025). Analyzing Bankruptcy Cancellation Through The Principle of Justice: A Case Study of Intidana Cooperative. Indonesia Private Law Review, 6(1), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v6i1.4196
  29. Kuehn, S., & Corrado, R. R. (2011). Youth Probation Officers’ Interpretation and Implementation of the Youth Criminal Justice Act: A Case Study of Youth Justice in Canada. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 35(3),221–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2011.591905
  30. Kurniawan, A., K., H., Hadi, S., Harahap, A. P., & Burhanuddin, B. (2025). Recolonizing Formal Restorative Justice: A Socio-Legal Critique of Indonesia’s Shift From Customary Justice to State Law. Diponegoro Law Review, 10(2), 294-309. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.294-309
  31. Latifiani, D., Yusriadi, Y., Sarono, A., Al Fikry, A. H., & Cholis, M. N. (2022). Reconstruction of E-court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies,7(2),413. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.59993
  32. Lawrence, D. R. (2022). Neurolaw—A Call to Action. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics,31(4),415–417. https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0963180122000123
  33. Levick, M. (2019). Kids are Different: The United States Supreme Court Reforms Youth Sentencing Practices for Youth Prosecuted in the Criminal Justice System. Child and Family Court Journal, 70(3), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12144
  34. Logan, A. C., Caruso, G. D., & Prescott, S. L. (2025). The Bell Tolls for Folk Psychology: Are Societies Ready for a Public Health Quarantine Model of Criminal Justice?. Societies,15(11),1–5. https://doi.org/10.3390/SOC15110305
  35. Lynch, N. (2008). Youth Justice in New Zealand: A Children’s Rights Perspective. Youth Justice,8(3),215–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225408096461
  36. Mahfud, M. A., Siregar, D. M. A., & Malik, M. F. (2026). Nussbaum’s Justice Theory Lens: the Digital Divide and Unfulfillment of the Right to Public Service in Traditional Society. Media Iuris, 9(1), 97-128. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v9i1.77214
  37. Malau, P. (2023). Tinjauan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Baru 2023. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 837–844. https://doi.org/10.37680/ALMANHAJ.V5I1.2815
  38. Marlina, M., Mulyadi, M., & Nurmalawaty, N. (2018). Children in conflict with the law (Study in correctional center Medan). International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 5(11), 5090-5095. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v5i11.05
  39. Meynen, G. (2014). Neurolaw: Neuroscience, Ethics, and Law. Review Essay. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(4), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-014-9501-4
  40. Munshi, A., LaCaze, M., & Karandikar, S. (2026). Between reform and retribution: Navigating ambiguity in India's juvenile justice system. Punishment & Society. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/14624745261445991
  41. Nasution, A. V. A., Suteki, S., & Lumbanraja, A. D. (2025). Addressing Deepfake Pornography and the Right to be Forgotten in Indonesia: Legal Challenges in the Era of AI-Driven Sexual Abuse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 38(7), 2489-2517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-025-10265-0
  42. Natalis, A. (2026). Capitalism, Beauty Standards, and the Law: a feminist-foucauldian critique of body regulation. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 20(54), 343-362. https://doi.org/10.22034/jpiut.2025.69150.4193
  43. Natalis, A., & Purwanti, A. (2025). Dissecting Masculinity: Transformative Strategies to Address Smoking in Indonesia. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 54(2), 434-444. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v54i2.17915
  44. Pillay, A. L. (2015). Deliberating the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility. South African Journal of Psychology, 45(2), 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246315585922
  45. Rahmawati, A., Isnaeni, S., Laela, C. H., Asmara, T., & Waluyadi, W. (2025). The Neurolaw Perspective on Criminal Responsibility of Children in Indonesia. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 10(5), 4841–4849. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v10i5.59359
  46. Ramírez-Rivera, E., & Martínez-González, K. G. (2025). Neurodevelopmental justice: rethinking adolescent criminal responsibility in Puerto Rico. Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1741945
  47. Röpcke, B., Barth, N., & Hebebrand, J. (2020). Die Reifebeurteilung Heranwachsender Nach § 105 JGG und der Umgang mit Jungen Erwachsenen Straftäterinnen und Straftätern aus entwicklungspsychologischer Sicht. Zeitschrift Für Kinder- Und Jugendpsychiatrie Und Psychotherapie, 48(4),318–327. https://doi.org/10.1024/1422-4917/a000717
  48. Sartorio, C. (2025). Agency and Responsibility in Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy,20,1–12. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/S11572-025-09756-9
  49. Şentürk, L. G. (2024). Applying Cognitive Neuroscience to Child Justice: The Role of Brain Development in Decision-Making. Next Frontier For Life Sciences and AI, 8(1),105–105. https://doi.org/10.62802/9DNRNJ41
  50. Setiyowati, D. K., Pujiyono, P., Cahyaningtyas, I., & Simbolon, P. G. M. (2026). The Dynamics of the System of Punitive Measures in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law The Transformation of the System of Punitive Measures in Indonesia’s New Criminal Code. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 8(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v8i1.95-118
  51. Steinberg, L., & Icenogle, G. (2019). Using Developmental Science to Distinguish Adolescents and Adults Under the Law. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 1(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/ 10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121318-085105
  52. Suciati, I., & Setiyono, J. (2023). Legal Protection of Child Offenders in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Perspective in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 6(10), 5943-5947. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-20
  53. Sulistyawan, A. Y., & Ilham, H. (2026). Violence in schools as a social construct: a legal-philosophical inquiry into the Indonesian educational context. Clio. Revista de Historia, Ciencias Humanas y Pensamiento Critico.,2026(11),1963-1995. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17491911
  54. Teicher, M. H., & Samson, J. A. (2016). Annual Research Review: Enduring Neurobiological Effects of Childhood Abuse and Neglect. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCPP.12507
  55. Tesink, V. (2025). Neurointerventions for Criminal Offenders: Psychological Connectedness, Culpability and Justified Punishment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 28, 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10677-025-10526-8
  56. Vincent, N. A. (2014). Neurolaw and Direct Brain Interventions. Criminal Law and Philosophy,8(1),43–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9164-y
  57. Widowati, W. (2024). The Future of Children in the Criminal Justice System: Restorative or Retributive Approach. West Science Law and Human Rights, 2(04), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.58812/WSLHR.V2I04.1308
  58. Febriawati, H., & Ramon, A. (2026). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Padang: CV. Nusantara Press Indonesia
  59. Keating, H. (2018). How Should the Criminal Law Respond to the ‘Special Status’ of Children? Criminal Law Reform Now: Proposals and Critique, 165–183. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509916801.CH-006
  60. Kusumastuti, S. Y., Judijanto, L., Alirejo, H. M. S., Mutoharoh, Umalihayati, Chandra, K., & Ifadah, E. (2026). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif: Teori dan Aplikasinya. Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia
  61. Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana
  62. Perry, B. D., Griffin, G., Davis, G., Perry, J. A., & Perry, R. D. (2018). The impact of neglect, trauma, and maltreatment on neurodevelopment: Implications for juvenile justice practice, programs, and policy. In A. R. Beech, A. J. Carter, R. E. Mann, & P. Rotshtein (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of forensic neuroscience, 813-835. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118650868
  63. Brown, E. (2019). The Brain, The Criminal and The Courts. Retrieved from https://knowablemagazine.org/article/mind/2019/neuroscience-criminal-justice
  64. Pusiknas Bareskrim Polri. (2025). Ratusan Anak Terlibat Tindak Kriminal sejak Awal Tahun 2025. Retrieved from https://pusiknas.polri. go.id/detail_artikel/ratusan_anak_terlibat_tindak_ kriminal_ sejak_awal_tahun_2025
  65. Ridwan, A. (2025). There are More than 1,500 Child Prisoners in Indonesia as of May 27, 2025. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/en/demographics/statistics/68352eb9d6245/there-are-more-than-1500-child-prisoners-in-indonesia-as-of-may-27-2025?
  66. UNICEF. (2025). Justice for Children. Retrieved from https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/justice-for-children/
  67. United Nations. (2025). Deprivation of Liberty of Children in the Administration of Justice. Retrieved from https://violenceagainstchildren.un.org/en/media/586

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2026-10-15 17:21:47

No citation recorded.