skip to main content

Pemanfaatan Fasilitas Pelayanan Kesehatan Primer di Area Perkotaan Berdasarkan Status Ekonomi dan Kepemilikan Jaminan Kesehatan (Analisis Data IFLS 5)

*Achmad Djunawan orcid  -  Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Yayasan RS Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya|Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Yayasan RS Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia
Alif If'al Lillah  -  Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Yayasan RS Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya|Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Yayasan RS Dr. Soetomo, Indonesia
Ratna Sari Dewi  -  Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Insan Cendekia Medika, Jombang|Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Insan Cendekia Medika, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2022 MEDIA KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT INDONESIA under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Latar belakang: Jumlah penduduk miskin di perkotaan masih tergolong besar sedangkan maysarakat membutuhkan pelayanan kesehatan yang berkualitas. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mngidentifikasi kesetaraan utilisasi fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan primer milik pemerintah dan swasta berdasarkan status ekonomi dan kepemilikan jaminan kesehatan oleh penduduk perkotaan Indonesia (analisis data IFLS 5).

Metode: Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh penduduk berumur 15 tahun keatas yang tinggal di perkotaan Indonesia. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan tekhnik random sampling berdasarkan strarifikasi provinsi dan karakteristik perkotaan atau pedesaan. Penelitian kuantitatif deskriptif ini menggunakan data sekunder Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) 5 yang dikumpulkan pada bulan September 2014 sampai Agustus 2015 (Strauss, Witoelar, & Sikoki, 2016). Peneliti menggunakan rancang bangun cross sectional study dengan pendekatan observasional.

Hasil: Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu bahwa semakin tinggi status ekonomi masyarakat di perkotaan maka mereka cenderung menggunakan fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan primer milik swasta dibandingkan milik pemerintah. Masih ada ketidaksetaraan utilisasi pelayanan kesehatan primer milik pemerintah di perkotaan pada awal implementasi JKN berdasarkan status ekonomi khususnya pada pemilik jaminan kesehatan BPJS kesehatan. Masih ada ketidaksetaraan utilisasi pelayanan kesehatan primer milik swasta di perkotaan pada awal implementasi JKN berdarkan status ekonomi khususnya pada masyarakat yang tidak memiliki jaminan kesehatan.

Simpulan: Belum adilnya pemanfaatan pelayanan kesehatan berdasarkan status ekonomi dan kepemilikan jaminan kesehatan. Saran yang dapat diberikan yaitu meningkatkan cakupan jaminan kesehatan ke seluruh masyarakat khususnya masyarakat miskin disertai pembagian manfaat (pooling) berdasarkan status ekonomi atau kepesertaan untuk mencapai kesetaraan.

Kata kunci: Kesetaraan; Pelayanan Kesehatan; Utilisasi


ABSTRACT

Title: Primary Health Care Facilities Utilization in Urban Area base on Economic Status and Health Insurance
(IFLS 5 Data Analysis).

Background: The poor people in urban areas are still relatively large, while the community needs quality health services. The purpose of this study was to identify the equality of public and private primary health care facilities utilization based on economic status and ownership of health insurance by Indonesian urban residents (IFLS 5 data analysis).

Method: The population in this study is the entire population aged 15 years and over who live in urban Indonesia. Sampling was carried out using a random sampling technique based on provincial stratification and urban or rural characteristics. This descriptive quantitative study uses secondary data from the Indonesia Family Life Survey (IFLS) 5 which was collected from September 2014 to August 2015 (Strauss, Witoelar, & Sikoki, 2016).

Result: The researcher used a cross-sectional study design with an observational approach. The results of this study are that the higher the economic status of people in urban areas, the more likely to use private primary health care facilities than public primary health care facilities. There is still inequality of public primary health services utilization in urban areas at the beginning of National Health Insurance (NHI) implementation based on economic status, especially for BPJS health insurance members. There is still inequality private primary health services utilization in urban areas at the beginning of NHI implementation based on economic status, especially for people who do not have health insurance.

Conclusion: There are inequity in health services utilization based on economic status and ownership of health insuranceMost of osteoarthritis respondent are obese. Suggestions that can be given are to increase the coverage of health insurance for the entire community, especially the poor, along with benefit-sharing (pooling) based on economic status or participation to achieve equality.

Keywords: Equality; Health Services; Utilization

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Kesetaraan; Pelayanan Kesehatan; Utilisasi

Article Metrics:

  1. Perpres. Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2013 Tentang Jaminan Kesehatan. Jakarta; 2013
  2. Sparrow R, Suryahadi A, Widyanti W. Social health insurance for the poor : Targeting and impact of Indonesia ’ s Askeskin programme. Soc Sci Med. 2013;96:264–71
  3. Permenkes. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Nomor 71 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pelayanan Kesehatan pada JKN. Jakarta; 2013
  4. Badan Pusat Statistik. Persentase Penduduk Miskin Indonesia. 2017
  5. BPS. Profil Kemiskinan di Indonesia. 2021
  6. Adebayo AM, Asuzu MC. Utilization of a community based health facility in low income urban community in Ibadan, Nigeria. African J Prim Heal Care Fam Med. 2015;7:1–8
  7. Wang Q, Zhang D, Hou Z. Insurance Coverage and Socioeconomic Differences in Patient Choice Between Private and Public Health Care Providers in China. Soc Sci Med. 2016;170:124–32
  8. Uchendu OC, Ilesanmi OS, Olumide AE, Centre FM, State O. Factor Influencing The Choice of Health Care Providing Facility Among Workers in A Local Goverment Secretariat in South Western Nigeria. 2013;11:87–95
  9. Husna A. Pemanfaatan Puskesmas oleh Penduduk Miskin di Kota-Kota Besar Indonesia (Analisis Data IFLS 2014). Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2017
  10. Meirina I. KepemilikanAsuransi Kesehatan Sosial dan Pemanfaatan Pelayanan Kesehatan oleh Penyandang Disabilitas (Analisis Data IFLS 5). Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2017
  11. Djunawan A. Benarkah Subsidi Jaminan Kesehatan Meningkatkan Pemanfaatan Pelayanan Kesehatan Primer oleh Penduduk Miskin Perkotaan. J Kebijak Kesehat Indones JKKI. 2019;8:18–24
  12. Hidayat B, Thabrany H, Dong H, Sauerborn R. The effects of mandatory health insurance on equity in access to outpatient care in Indonesia. Heal Policy Planin. 2004;19:322–35
  13. Strauss J, Witoelar F, Sikoki B. The Fifth Wave of the Indonesia Family Life Survey : Overview and Field Report (Volume 1). 2016. (WR-1143/1-NIA/NICHD)
  14. Basu S, Andrews J, Kishore S, Panjabi R, Stuckler D. Comparative Performance of Private and Public Healthcare Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries : A Systematic Review. Plos Med. 2012;9
  15. Lostao L, Blane D, Gimeno D, Netuveli G, Regidor E. Health & Place Socioeconomic patterns in use of private and public health services in Spain and Britain : implications for equity in health care. Health Place. 2014;25:19–25
  16. Intiasari AD. Kebijakan Single Pooling dan Keadilan Pemanfaatan Pelayanan Kesehatan Pada Implementasi Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2017
  17. Djunawan A. Pengaruh jaminan kesehatan terhadap pemanfaatan pelayanan kesehatan primer di perkotaan Indonesia: adilkah bagi masyarakat miskin? Ber Kedokt Masy. 2018;34:1–5
  18. Fenny AP, Yates R, Thompson R. Social health insurance schemes in Africa leave out the poor. Int Health. 2018;10:1–3
  19. Castel P. Health insurance Use of health care services by the poor efficiency and equity issues in the province of Kon Tum. 2009;
  20. Craveiro I, Ferrinho P, Sousa B De, Gonçalves L. Healthcare access and the patterns of maternal health care utilization among poor and non-poor women living in urban areas in Portugal. J Heal. 2013;5:1954–64
  21. Castiglione D, Lovasi GS, Carvalho MS. Perceptions and Uses of Public and Private Health Care in a Brazilian Favela. Qual Health Res. 2017;1–14
  22. Idris H. Equity of Access to Health Care: Theory & Aplication in Research. J Ilmu Kesehat Masy. 2016;7:73–80
  23. Idris H. Ekuitas terhadap Akses Pelayanan Kesehatan: Teori & Aplikasi dalam Penelitian. J Ilmu Kesehat Masy. 2016;7:73–80
  24. Rolindrawan D. The Impact of BPJS Health Implementation for the Poor and Near Poor on the Use of Health Facility. Soc Behav Sci. 2015;211:550–9
  25. Karan A, Yip W, Mahal A. Social Science & Medicine Extending health insurance to the poor in India : An impact evaluation of Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana on out of pocket spending for healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2017;181:83–92
  26. Suharmiati LAD, Astuti WD. Review Kebijakan tentang pelayanan kesehatan puskesmas di daerah terpencil perbatasan. Bul Penelit Sist Kesehat. 2013;16:109–16
  27. Waters HR. Measuring equity in access to health care. Soc Sci Med. 2000;599–612
  28. World Bank. World Development Report: Investing in health 1993. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Bank; 1993

Last update:

  1. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Pemanfaatan Pelayanan Kesehatan di Poli Lansia Puskesmas Pejagoan Kabupaten Kebumen Tahun 2022

    Dian Fajarwati. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 11 (5), 2023. doi: 10.14710/jkm.v11i5.38530

Last update: 2024-04-18 20:06:11

No citation recorded.