DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.54.1.2025.47-56

REVITALIZING TRADITION: THE ROLE OF PAKAT PERKARA IN RESOLVING LAND DISPUTES WITHIN THE DAYAK TOBAG COMMUNITY

*Salfius Seko  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
Alfonsus Hendri Soa  -  Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Masalah-Masalah Hukum under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Land disputes are a significant issue, especially for Indigenous communities, where traditional customs play a central role in resolving conflicts. In Tebang Benua Village, Tayan Hilir District, Sanggau Regency, the Dayak Tobag community utilizes a unique dispute resolution mechanism known as Pakat Perkara, which focuses on negotiation and consensus-building to resolve land disputes. This study examines the effectiveness of the Pakat Perkara mechanism, which integrates local wisdom and customary law to foster harmony and social cohesion. While the mechanism promotes fairness and inclusivity, challenges arise in reaching agreements, especially when there are significant differences in interests. This research highlights the need for further development and strengthening of this approach to ensure it functions effectively in addressing disputes. It also emphasizes the importance of integrating customary law into the formal legal system, creating a more responsive and equitable framework for resolving land disputes. The study concludes by recommending the revitalization of customary courts and legal procedures to enhance Indigenous peoples' autonomy and justice, promoting sustainable land management and community empowerment.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Land Disputes; Pakat Perkara; Indigenous Law; Dispute Resolution; Local Wisdom

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
REASSESSING LEGAL RECOGNITION OF AI: HUMAN DIGNITY AND THE CHALLENGE OF AI AS A LEGAL SUBJECT IN INDONESIA THE PRAGMATIC THOUGHT AND ECONOMIC RATIONALITY IN LOCAL LEGISLATIVE POLICY FORMATION: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY REFORMING INDONESIA'S AGRICULTURAL LEGAL SYSTEM: EMPOWERING FAMILY-BASED FARMERS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY INTEGRATION More recent articles
Most cited articles
Kebijakan Mediasi Penal Pada Kasus Pencurian di Kepolisian Surakarta INDEKS URGENSI HUKUM PERIZINAN DAN PENEGAKANNYA SEBAGAI SARANA PENCEGAHAN PENCEMARAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP MEDIASI PENAL SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PENGGELAPAN BENDA JAMINAN FIDUSIA PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PENGGANTI DALAM HUKUM PAJAK DI INDONESIA More cited articles
  1. Aziz, A. (2022). Bipartit, Langkah Awal Menyelesaikan Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial (Study Kasus di PT. Yamaha Indonesia). Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua: Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.32493/SKD.v9i2.y2022.26205
  2. Berger, P. L. (2018). The Limits of Social Cohesion: Conflict and Mediation in Pluralist Societies. Routledge
  3. Buscaglia, E., & Stephan, P. B. (2005). An Empirical Assessment of the Impact of Formal Versus Informal Dispute Resolution on Poverty: A Governance-Based Approach. International Review of Law and Economics, 25(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2004.06.004
  4. Daffa, H. O., & Marpaung, D. S. H. (2022). Upaya Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Agraria Dalam Pembangunan Bendungan Bener Di Purworejo. JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 9(2), 1037–1054. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Justitia/article/view/3972
  5. Derevyanko, B., Lohvynenko, M., Nezhevelo, V., Nikolenko, L., & Zahrisheva, N. (2023). Legal Foundations for Resolving Land Disputes Through Mediation as An Alternative Dispute Resolution Method. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 32(5), 248 – 256. https://doi.org/10.54648/eelr2023014
  6. Diab, A. L., Pabbajah, M., Widyanti, R. N., Muthalib, L. M., & Widyatmoko, W. F. (2022). Accommodation of local wisdom in conflict resolution of Indonesia’s urban society. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2153413
  7. Harahap, A., & Hasibuan, A. (2018). Model of Prevention of Social Conflict which Multi Dimensions Based on Local Wisdom of Community Adat Dalihan Na Tolu. Brawijaya Law Journal, 5(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2018.005.02.01
  8. Hartana, & Darmika, P. (2022). Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Melalui Mediasi Sebagai Jalur Alternatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 10(3), 327–334. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/60834
  9. Hartana, M. C. (2019). Persengketaan Persengketaan Tanah di Indonesia Hartana. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 7(3), 72–79. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/60825
  10. Hartini, S. I., & Pabassing, Y. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Ulayat Di Kampung Harapan Kabupaten Jayapura. Jurnal Hukum Ius Publicum, 1(I), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.55551/jip.v1ii.4
  11. Hu, J. (2020). Disputes Resolution in Urban Communities in Contemporary China. Springer Nature
  12. Ihyamuis, M., Patittingi, F., & Lahae, K. (2022). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertambangan: Studi Sengketa Tanah Antara Masyarakat Karunsi’e Dongi dan PT Vale Indonesia Tbk. Amanna Gappa, 30(1), 2022. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/agjl/article/view/19799
  13. Mequanent, G. (2016). The Application of Traditional Dispute Resolution in Land Administration in Lay Armachiho Woreda (District), Northern Ethiopia. World Development, 87(1998), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.06.005
  14. Muhamad, A., Sinaulan, R. L., & Khalimi, K. (2023). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(4), 1275-1289. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i11.1778
  15. Nazia, N., Agustin, R., Agustina, T., Rialdo, F., Saputra, M. D. R., Novrianto, M., & Yustini, L. W. (2023). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Antara Masyarakat Dengan Pemerintah Terhadap Kawasan Hutan. Marwah Hukum, 1(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.32502/mh.v1i1.5601
  16. Nurtjahyo, L. I. (2011). The Issues of Access To Justice in the Case of Dispute Resolution Within the Indigenous Community of Tulehu, Central Maluku. Indonesia Law Review, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v1n3.57
  17. Resmini, R., & Andradi, I. K. (2016). Peran Ketua Adat Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Di Desa Ongko Kecamatan Empang Kabupaten Sumbawa Tahun 2015. CIVICUS : Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.31764/civicus.v4i1.328
  18. Rhode, D. L. (1982). Class Conflicts in Class Actions. Stanford Law Review, 34(6), 1183–1262. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/1228362
  19. Seko, S., Lolita, L., & Soa, A. H. (2023). Hukum Adat Sebagai Sarana Perlindungan Terhadap Tembawang Pada Sub Suku Bayak Tobag Kalimantan Barat. Bina Hukum Lingkungan, 8(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.24970/bhl.v8i1.243
  20. Sherman, N., & Momani, B. T. (2024). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Mediation as a Model. F1000Research, 13, 778. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.152362.1
  21. Siahaan, E., Prananingtyas, P., & Mahmudah, S. (2016). Kajian Yuridis tentang Pelanggaran Prinsip Kehati-Hatian dalam Penerbitan Kredit Fiktif di Bank Mandiri Syariah Cabang Bogor. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(2), 1–12. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/10960
  22. Siregar, T., Lubis, I., & Harahap, A. S. (2023). The Role of Local Wisdom in Law: Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Land Sector in North Sumatra, Indonesia. ISVS E-Journal, 10(1), 312–319. https://isvshome.com/pdf/ISVS_10-1/ISVSej10.1.22.old_Taufik.pdf
  23. Soa, A. H., & Ismawati, S. (2023). Implementasi Mediasi Penal Menggunakan Pendekatan Hukum Adat Pada Masyarakat Adat Dayak Hibun. Jurnal Hukum To-Ra : Hukum Untuk Mengatur Dan Melindungi Masyarakat, 9(1), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.55809/tora.v9i1.205
  24. Sukirno, S., & Wibawa, K. C. S. (2024). Indigenous Land Dispute Resolution in Indonesia Exploring Customary Courts as an Alternative to Formal Judicial Processes. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution-Brazilian Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution-RBADR, 6(12), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v6.i12.art09.en

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-07-26 01:58:06

No citation recorded.