DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/parole.v12i1.81-90

Scientific Approach-Based English Learning Strategy in Online Learning: Learners’ Satisfaction and Obstacles

Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar, Jalan Sangnaualuh No. 4 Pematangsiantar, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia 21132, Indonesia

Received: 14 Sep 2021; Published: 30 Apr 2022.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 PAROLE: Journal of Linguistics and Education under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This research investigated the application of Scientific Approach-Based English Learning Strategy (SABELS) in online learning for higher education level. Twenty items of closed-ended questionnaire were designed to indicate learners’ satisfaction and one item of open-ended questionnaire was to list some obstacles during online learning. The sample of this research was 215 learners who contracted Curriculum and Material Development (CMD) course in the fifth semester. It was found that the respondents were very satisfied towards the application of this strategy in online course. Some problems encountered by learners were unstable internet network, frequent power outage, slow response by lecturer in chatting, time consumption during online team work, and lack of motivation in self-learning. In conclusion, this new strategy has encouraged learners to do collaborative, research-based, and character building-based learning. Further study is suggested especially on investigating its effectiveness through experimental research.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  Data Set
Data
Subject Data
Type Data Set
  Download (115KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: SABELS; online learning; learning process; learning outcomes

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
In Search for Awareness of the Needs: A study of an ESP Intensive Program for Government Official Actualizing Learning English Grammar Strategy Using New Inventory for University Students An analysis of International Baccalaureate – English Language Curriculum for Middle Year Program The Digital Game for the Learning of Reading Skill Effective Classroom Management in English as a Foreign Language Classroom Front Matter Parole Volume 12 Number 1 April 2022 Back Matter Parole Volume 12 Number 1 April 2022 More recent articles
Most cited articles
Backmatter Back Matter Illocution on Speech Acts of Foreign Students in Indonesian Learning The Implication of Curriculum Renewal on ELT in Indonesia Back Cover More cited articles
  1. Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 216. doi: 10.3390/educsci10090216
  2. Bonk, C. J., Wisher, R. A., & Lee, J-Y. (2004). Moderating learner-centered e-learning: Problems and solutions, benefits and implications. In Tim S. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 54-85). Pennsylvania: Information Science Publishing
  3. Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture of Indonesia. (2020). Panduan penyusunan kurikulum pendidikan tinggi di era industri 4.0 untuk menduung merdeka belajar-kampus merdeka [A guide to designing higher education curriculum in industry 4.0 era to support independent learning-independent campus] (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BUKU-PANDUAN-PENYUSUNAN-KURIKULUM-PENDIDIKAN-TINGGI-MBKM.pdf
  4. Ebert-May, D., & Hodder, J. (2008). Pathways to scientific teaching. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates
  5. Foertsch, J., Moses, G., Strikwerda, J., & Litzkow, M. (2002). Reversing the lecture/homework paradigm using eTEACH web-based streaming video software. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(3), 267-274. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2002.tb00703.x
  6. Ghaderizefreh, S., & Hoover, M. L. (2018). Student satisfaction with online learning in a blended course. International Journal of Digital Society (IJDS), 9(3), 1393-1398. doi: 10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2018.0172
  7. Grabe, M., & Christopherson, K. (2008). Optional student use of online lecture resources: Resource preferences, performance and lecture attendance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00228.x
  9. Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. New York: W. H. Freeman
  10. McFarlin, B. K. (2008). Hybrid lecture-online format increases student grades in an undergraduate exercise physiology course at a large urban university. Advances in Physiology Education, 32(1), 86-91. doi: 10.1152/advan.00066.2007
  11. Napitupulu, S., Manalu, D. B., & Siahaan, S. (2019). Scientific approach-based English learning strategy (SABELS). The New Educational Review, 56(2), 41-52. doi: 10.15804/tner.2019.56.2.03
  12. Prunuske, A. J., Batzli, J., Howell, E., & Miller, S. (2012). Using online lectures to make time for active learning. Genetics, 192(1), 67-72. doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.141754
  13. Shahabadi, M. M., & Uplane, M. (2015). Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176(2015), 129-138. doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2015.01.453
  14. Surahman, E., & Sulthoni (2020, October). Student satisfaction toward quality of online learning in Indonesian higher education during the Covid-19 pandemic. In 6th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET) (pp.120-125). Malang: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/ICET51153.2020.9276630

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-11-12 23:33:38

No citation recorded.