The Effect of Environmental Quality and Gender Inequality on Human Well-Being in Indonesia during Pandemic Covid-19

*Shanty Oktavilia scopus  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Andryan Setyadharma  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Tania Wicaksana Yuneldi  -  Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

This study examines the impact of environmental quality and gender equality on human welfare in Indonesia from 2015-2020, using a panel database of 33 provinces. The results of the model selection testing with the Chow test and the Hausman test recommend regression analysis using the Fix Effect Model (FEM). This study resulted in the finding that there is a unidirectional and significant relationship between gender equality and human well-being. That means that gender inequality has the opposite effect. The second finding is that statistically, there is a positive relationship between environmental quality and human welfare in the case of provinces in Indonesia. The estimation results show that economic growth has a positive and significant relationship with human well-being in Indonesia. This study indicates that human well-being in Indonesia before and during the Covid-19 pandemic shows differences. The novelty of this study is to analyze the effect of gender equality and environmental quality indicators in influencing human welfare. In addition, this research also accommodates the Covid-19 pandemic period in an empirical model.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Environmental quality; gender inequality; human well-being; FEM; pandemic Covid-19
Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Constructed Wetlands for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage: A Review Adsorption of Dyes Using Graphene Oxide-Based Nano-Adsorbent: A Review The Effect of Environmental Quality and Gender Inequality on Human Well-Being in Indonesia during Pandemic Covid-19 Assessing Occupational Noise Exposure and Blood Pressure of Cabin Personnel of an Indonesian Diesel Train Environmental Performance with Firm Size as an Intervening Variable Bus Rapid Transport System in Semarang City: Views of Current Users, Potential Users and Related Emission The Effects of Community Characteristics on Solid-Waste Generation and Management in the Village (A Case Study: Kurandak, North Sumatra) Health Risk Analysis of Detergent Contamination in Communities on Kodingareng Lompo Island, Makassar City More recent articles
Most cited articles
KOMBINASI FEEDING BIOSTARTER DAN AIR DALAM ANAEROBIK DIGESTER KONSERVASI ENERGI BERBASIS RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY DENGAN PEMANFAATAN TEKNOLOGI MICROBIAL Inventarisasi dan Sebaran Emisi Aktivitas Pelabuhan dengan Aermod View DAMPAK PENURUNAN TANAH DAN KENAIKAN MUKA LAUT TERHADAP LUASAN GENANGAN ROB DI SEMARANG Potensi Chlorella Sp. untuk Menyisihkan COD dan Nitrat dalam Limbah Cair Tahu More cited articles
  1. Adams-Prassl, Abi, Boneva, Teodora, Golin, Marta, Rauh, Christopher. 2020. Inequality in the impact of the coronavirus shock: Evidence from real time surveys. Journal of Public Economics 189, 104245
  2. Adams-Prassl, Abi, Boneva, Teodora, Golin, Marta, Rauh, Christopher. 2022. The impact of the coronavirus lockdown on mental health: Evidence from the United States. Econ. Policy eiac002
  3. Alon T, et.al. 2020. The impact of Coivd-19 on gender equality. Covid Economics 4, 62–85
  4. Ambrey, C. L., Fleming, C. M. and Chan, A. Y. C. 2014. Estimating the cost of air pollution in South East Queensland: An application of the life satisfaction non-market valuation approach. Ecological Economics. Volume 97, pp. 172-181
  5. Andrew, Alison, Cattan, Sarah, Costa Dias, Monica, Farquharson, Christine, Kraftman, Lucy, Krutikova, Sonya, Phimister, Angus, Sevilla, Almudena. 2020. How are mothers and fathers balancing work and family under lockdown? In: IFS Briefing Note 290
  6. Armbruster, Stephanie, Klotzbuecher, Valentin. 2020. Lost in lockdown? Covid-19, social distancing, and mental health in Germany. Covid Economics 22, 117–153
  7. Ali A and Audi M. 2016. The Impact of Income Inequality, Environmental Degradation and Globalization on Life Expectancy in Pakistan: An Empirical Analysis. International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research 4(4)
  8. Baltagi B. 2005. Econometrics Analysis of Panel Data (3rd ed). ChicesterJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  9. Bibi C Audi M and Ali A. 2017. The Impact of Gender Inequality and Environmental Degradation on Human Well-Being in The Case of Pakistan: A Time Series Analysis MPRA Paper, 83470
  10. Banks, James, Xu, Xiaowei. 2020. The mental health effects of the first two months of lockdown and social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK. Fiscal Studies 41, 685–708
  11. Bonnes, M., Passafaro, P., and Carrus, G. 2011. The ambivalence of attitudes toward urban green areas: between proenvironmental worldviews and daily residential experience. Environment and Behavior 43, 207–232
  12. Burke TA et al. 2017. Rethinking environmental protection: Meeting the challenges of a changing world. Environmental Health Perspectives 125
  13. Carrus, G., Bonaiuto, M., and Bonnes, M. 2005. Environmental concern, regional identity and support for protected areas in Italy. Environment and Behavior 37, 237-257
  14. Cuñado J and Gracia F. 2013. Environment and Happiness: New Evidence for Spain, Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement 112(3), 549-567
  15. Davillas, Apostolos, Jones, Andrew. 2021. The first wave of the covid-19 pandemic and its impact on socioeconomic inequality in psychological distress in the UK. Health Economics 30(7), 1668–1683
  16. Du, Y. H. et al. 2018. Identifying functional network changing patterns in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis and patients with early illness schizophrenia: a group ICA study. NeuroImage: Clinical 17, 335–346
  17. Etheridge, Ben and Lisa Spantig. 2022. The gender gap in mental well-being at the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from the UK. European Economic Review
  18. Fleming R. et.al. 2016. The relationship between the quality of the built environment and the quality of life of people with dementia in residential care. Dementia (London, England). 15, 663-680
  19. Fuller, E.A.; Kaiser, A.P. 2019. The effects of early intervention on social communication outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 50, 1683–170
  20. Garikipati S. 2008. The impact of lending to women on household vulnerability and women’s empowerment: evidence from India. World Development 36(12)
  21. Gujarati N and Porter D. 2009. Basic Econometrics 5th ed. New YorkMcGraw-Hill
  22. Jayasooriya V, et al., 2016. Green infrastructure practices for improvement of urban air quality. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
  23. Krekel C. et.al. 2016. The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being. Ecological Economics 121(C), 117-127
  24. Luechinger S. 2010. Life satisfaction and transboundary air pollution. Economics Letters 107, 4-6
  25. Mabahwi N A. et.al. 2014. Human health and wellbeing: human health effect of air pollution. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 153, 221-229
  26. Mackerron G. (2011). Happiness Economics from 35,000 Feet. Journal of Economic Surveys. 26(10)
  27. Van den Berg, A. E., Wesselius, J. E., Maas, J., and Tanja-Dijkstra, K. 2016. Green walls for a restorative classroom environment: a controlled evaluation study. Environmental Behavior
  28. Welsch H. 2007. Environmental welfare analysis: A life satisfaction approach. Ecological Economics 62(3-4), 544-551
  29. Welsch H and Kühling J. 2009. Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: the role of reference groups and routine behavior, Ecological Economics 69(1), 166-176
  30. Welsch H and Ferreira D 2014. Environment, well-being, and experienced preference. University of Oldenburg, Department of Economics, 367-14
  31. Helliwell, John and Putnam, Robert. 2004. The social context of well-being. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences 359, 1435-46
  32. Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian Republik Indonesia. 2021. Menko airlangga: perlu gagasan baru untuk menjaga dan dorong pembangunan berkelanjutan pasca pandemi siaran pers
  33. Kustanto, Edi. 2020. Water quality in Indonesia: the role of socioeconomic indicators. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan 18(1), 47-62
  34. Levinson A. 2012. Valuing public goods using happiness data: the case of air quality. Journal of Public Economics 96(9-10), 869-880
  35. Frey Bruno S. and Alois Stutzer. 2012. The use of happiness research for public policy. social choice and welfare 38(4), 659-674
  36. McGillivray M and Clarke M. 2006. Understanding human well-being. United Nations University Press
  37. Meylan S. 2014. Partisipasi perempuan dalam pengelolaan lingkungan hidup MUSAWA 6(2) Desember 2014
  38. Mumtaz Z and Salway S. 2009. Understanding gendered influences on women's reproductive health in Pakistan: moving beyond the autonomy paradigm Social Science & Medicine 68(7), 1349-1356
  39. Simona RU Costica M and Cristina C. 2020. Peculiarities of the relation between human and environmental wellbeing in different stages of national development sustainability 12
  40. Zhang G, et.al. 2022. The impact of air pollution on individual subjective well-being: evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production 336

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-26 01:32:16

No citation recorded.