Comparison of Physical Properties and Strength of  Geopolymer Mortar with White Soil Substitution and  Mortar with Portland Pozzolan Cement under Corrosive  Seawater Conditions

Yulita Arni Priastiwi; Rudi Yuniarto Adi; Arif Hidayat; Abi Nabil Hanif; Bima Bima

doi:10.14710/presipitasi.v20i3.534-544

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/presipitasi.v20i3.534-544

Comparison of Physical Properties and Strength of Geopolymer Mortar with White Soil Substitution and Mortar with Portland Pozzolan Cement under Corrosive Seawater Conditions

*Yulita Arni Priastiwi

- Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Rudi Yuniarto Adi - Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Arif Hidayat - Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Abi Nabil Hanif - Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Bima Bima - Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

BibTex Citation Data :

@article{Presipitasi53248,
    author = {Yulita Priastiwi and Rudi Adi and Arif Hidayat and Abi Hanif and Bima Bima},
    title = {Comparison of Physical Properties and Strength of  Geopolymer Mortar with White Soil Substitution and  Mortar with Portland Pozzolan Cement under Corrosive  Seawater Conditions},
    journal = {Jurnal Presipitasi: Media Komunikasi dan Pengembangan Teknik Lingkungan},
  volume = {20},
    number = {3},
    year = {2023},
    keywords = {Mortar geopolymer; portland pozzolan cement (PPC); corrosive},
    abstract = {Construction also causes environmental pollution due to excessive cement production, so an alternative to cement is needed. Geopolymer is considered an alternative material to replace cement. This research compares three variations of mortar (PPC, geopolymer, and geopolymer with white soil) in a seawater environment. Research in the laboratory with 5x5x5 cm mortar specimens and test parameters for porosity, compressive and direct tensile strength, density, and absorption has been carried out. Microstructure due to immersion effect was also carried out but only on MGT15 mortar. The results showed that the PPC mortar had the highest compressive and tensile strength among the three variations, namely 27.80 MPa and 2.540 MPa at 28 days of age, the most negligible porosity and absorption were 1.124% and 76 gram/100cm2, and increased density after immersion. However, when immersing for 56 days, the decrease in strength reached 21%, while geopolymer mortar tended to be stable and even increased to 19%. Microstructure tests in the form of SEM and EDX on MGT15 showed the effect of seawater immersion, such as the presence of cracks, ettringite, and bad reactions. Soaking in seawater caused a decrease in some mortar strength supporting compounds and the appearance of 0.3% free chloride at 28 days of immersion.},
   issn = {2550-0023},   pages = {534--544}  doi = {10.14710/presipitasi.v20i3.534-544},
    url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/presipitasi/article/view/53248}
}

Citation Format:

Abstract

Construction also causes environmental pollution due to excessive cement production, so an alternative to cement is needed. Geopolymer is considered an alternative material to replace cement. This research compares three variations of mortar (PPC, geopolymer, and geopolymer with white soil) in a seawater environment. Research in the laboratory with 5x5x5 cm mortar specimens and test parameters for porosity, compressive and direct tensile strength, density, and absorption has been carried out. Microstructure due to immersion effect was also carried out but only on MGT15 mortar. The results showed that the PPC mortar had the highest compressive and tensile strength among the three variations, namely 27.80 MPa and 2.540 MPa at 28 days of age, the most negligible porosity and absorption were 1.124% and 76 gram/100cm2, and increased density after immersion. However, when immersing for 56 days, the decrease in strength reached 21%, while geopolymer mortar tended to be stable and even increased to 19%. Microstructure tests in the form of SEM and EDX on MGT15 showed the effect of seawater immersion, such as the presence of cracks, ettringite, and bad reactions. Soaking in seawater caused a decrease in some mortar strength supporting compounds and the appearance of 0.3% free chloride at 28 days of immersion.

Fulltext View|Download

Keywords: Mortar geopolymer; portland pozzolan cement (PPC); corrosive

Funding: LPPM Universitas Diponegoro

Article Metrics:

Article Info

Section: Original Research Article

Language : EN

In Vol 20, No 3 (2023): November 2023

Recent articles

Bibliometric Analysis of HHO Gas Production by Electrolysis from 2013 to 2023 Effects of Rubber Factory Wastewater Sludge Compost on the Growth Parameters of Rubber Seedlings: A Nursery Study and Environmental Perspective Comparison of Physical Properties and Strength of Geopolymer Mortar with White Soil Substitution and Mortar with Portland Pozzolan Cement under Corrosive Seawater Conditions The Effect of Addition EM4 Solution on Vermicomposting Fish Waste to Increase CNPK Regosol Soil Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Bahagia Market on Kuala Dua Village Subdistrict Sungai Raya Optimising Flood Risk Reduction in Bali's Provincial Government Center through Cultural Philosophy Approach and GIS-based Conservation of Infiltration Wells Assessment of Cihampelas River Water Quality Status using STORET Method and Pollution Index More recent articles

Most cited articles

ORGANIC WASTE'S POTENTIAL AS RENEWABLE ENERGY AT SUPIT URANG LANDFILL IN MALANG CITY KAJIAN PUSTAKA POTENSI PEMANFAATAN GREYWATERSEBAGAI AIR SIRAM WC DAN AIR SIRAM TANAMAN DI RUMAH TANGGA STUDI PEMBUATAN KOMPOS PADAT DARI SAMPAH DAUN KERING TPST UNDIP DENGAN VARIASI BAHAN MIKROORGANISME LOKAL (MOL) DAUN FITOREMEDIASI PHOSPAT DENGAN PEMANFAATAN ENCENG GONDOK (EICHHORNIA CRASSIPES) (STUDI KASUS PADA LIMBAH CAIR INDUSTRI KECIL LAUNDRY) EVALUASI DESAIN INSTALASI PENGOLAHAN AIR PDAM IBU KOTA KECAMATAN PRAMBANAN KABUPATEN KLATEN More cited articles

Asmara, F.J., Suhendra, & Dwiretnani. A., 2021. Comparative Analysis of Compressive and Tensile Strength of concrete using Batang Asai River Sand and Batanghari River Sand. Jurnal Talenta Sipil, Vol 4(1), pp.1-5
Chen. X., Wu. S., and Zhou. J., 2013. Influence of Porosity on Compressive and Tensile Strength of Cement Mortar. Construction and Building Materials. Vol 40. pp. 869-874
Hunggurami, E., Simatupang, P. & Lori, A., 2015. Feasibility Study of Using White Soil as a Substitute for Fine Aggregate (Sand) for Concrete Quality. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, Vol 4, pp.29-38
Jin., M., Wang., Z., Lian., F. & Zhao., P., 2020. Freeze-thaw resistance and seawater corrosion resistance of optimized tannery sludge/metakaolin-based geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, Volume 265
Mclellan.B.C., Williams. R., and Riessen. A.V., 2011. Cost and Carbon Emissions for Geopolymer Pastes in Comparison to Ordinary Portland Cement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 19(9), pp. 1080-1090
Mellado. A., Catalan.C., Bouzon.N., and Borrachero. M.V., 2014. Carbon Footprint of Geopolymeric Mortar: Study of the Contribution of the Alkaline Activating Solution and Assessment of an Alternative Route. RSC Advances. 4(45): 23846
Masdari,F., Devy, S.D., Winarn, A., Nugroho, W., & Magdalena, H. 2022. Study of The Effect of Grain Size on Porosity and Hydraulic Conductivityof Sandstone and Claystone. Jurnal Teknologi Mineral FT UNMUL. Vol. 10(2). pp. 18-25
Nurruddin, M. F., Haruna, S., Mohammed, B. S. & Sha'ban, I. G., 2018. Methods of curing geopolymer concrete: A review. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(1), pp. 31-36
Parluhutan, S., Fernando, G., Purwanto. & Priastiwi, Y., 2018. Feasibility Study of Utilization of Mixed Fly Ash and Tanah Putih as Alternative Cement. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 7(2), pp. 283-288
Putra, D., 2006. Addition of Rice Husk Ash to Concrete in Anticipating Damage Due to Magnesium Sulfate in Sea Water. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil, 10(2), pp. 195-203
Priastiwi, Y.A., Hidayat, A., Daryanto, D., & Salamsyah. Z., 2020. Effect of White Soil Substitution on Geopolymer Mortar Based on Fly Ash with Sodium Hydroxide Activator. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil. Vol. 26(1). pp. 9-16
Qomaruddin, M., Nabella, R., Sitohan, I. & Lie, A., 2017. Study of the Effect of Sea Water on Normal Concrete Mortar and Concrete Mortar with Fly Ash. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, Vol. 945
Qomaruddin, M., Ariyanto, Saputro, Y.A, & Sudarno., 2018. Compressive Strength Analysis of Fly Ash Concrete Mortar from Tanjung Jati B Jepara PLTU Industry Using Sand from Tempur River, Jepara Regency. RICE, Vol.02 (1), pp.35-40
Sandya, Y., Prihantono. & Musalamah, S., 2019. Use of Rice Husk Ash as a Substitute for Cement in Geopolymer Concrete. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan dan Sipil
Saputra, A., Lie, A. & Purwanto., 2018. Experimental Study of the Effect of Activator Molarity Differences on the Behavior of Geopolymer Concrete Based on Fly Ash. Jurnal Karya Teknik Sipil, 7(1), pp. 89-98
Sorrentino, F., Damidot, D., & Fentiman, C., 2021. Cao-SiO2-Al2O3-Fe Oxides Chemical System, Description and Applications. Materials Journal, EDP Sciences. DOI: 10.1051/978-2-7598-2480-9
Wang, Y., Yang, J., & Quyang, D., 2019. Effect of Graphene Oxide on Mechanical Properties of Cement Mortar and its Strengthening Mechanism. Materials Journal, MDPI.Vol.12. pp 1-18
Yuan, Q., Liu, Z., Zheng, K., & Ma, C., 2021. Inorganic cementing materials. Civil Engineering Materials, From Theory to Practice, Elsevier. pp 17-57

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-12-15 00:44:36

No citation recorded.

The author sends the manuscript and understands that if the manuscript is accepted for publication, the copyright of the article will be given to Jurnal Presipitasi, Diponegoro University, as the journal publisher. Once accepted, the authors will receive a Copyright Transfer Agreement (CTA), which must be completed and submitted to Jurnal Presipitasi.

Copyright includes the exclusive right to publish and provide articles in all forms and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and the like, as well as translations. The publication of every part of this journal, storage in databases, and distribution such as electronic, electrostatic, and mechanical copies, photocopies, records, magnetic media, etc., will be permitted only with written permission from Jurnal Presipitasi, Diponegoro University.

Jurnal Presipitasi, Diponegoro University, and the editors and Editorial of the International Advisory Board make every effort to ensure that no false or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. The contents of articles published in Jurnal Presipitasi, Diponegoro University, are the sole and exclusive responsibility of each author.