skip to main content

Performance Evaluation of Local Organism in Wastewater Treatment

*Hamdani Abdulgani  -  Universitas Wiralodra, Indonesia
Hessy Rahma Wati  -  Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Muhammad Fadhil  -  University of Malaya, Malaysia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Biofilters are a type of attached growth biological treatment that is considered effective among other biological treatments because of their more affordable energy operating costs, easy maintenance and operational requirements, and low environmental impact. However, there is still minimal research related to the use of local microorganisms for biological wastewater treatment. Therefore, this study aims to improve biological wastewater treatment in the cracker industry in Indramayu using local microorganisms equipped with a biofilter that utilizes natural andesite stone as a medium for microorganism growth. The best reduction in BOD anaerobically reached 79.45% and 58.91% aerobically, obtained at a flow rate of 11.11 ml/minute on the 53rd and 45th days. The increase in the BOD/COD effluent ratio from 0.22 to 0.47 during treatment indicated a decrease in biologically degradable compounds and an increase in the effectiveness of local microorganisms in reducing organic matter. Therefore, in this study, we successfully designed a biofiltration system derived from local microorganisms to effectively remove pollutants from wastewater, particularly in the cracker industry.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Anaerobic aerobic system; biofilter; local microorganism; wastewater treatment

Article Metrics:

  1. Andrio, D., Asmura, J., Yenie, E. & Putri, K., 2019. Enhancing BOD5/COD ratio co-substrate tofu wastewater and cow dung during ozone pretreatment. MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 06027
  2. Bader, A.C., Hussein, H.J. & Jabar, M.T., 2022. BOD: COD ratio as indicator for wastewater and industrial water pollution. International Journal of Special Education, 37, pp.2164–2171
  3. Bar-Zeev, E., Belkin, N., Liberman, B., Berman, T. & Berman-Frank, I., 2012. Rapid sand filtration pretreatment for SWRO: microbial maturation dynamics and filtration efficiency of organic matter. Desalination, 286, pp.120–130
  4. Chang, J., Mei, J., Jia, W., Chen, J., Li, X., Ji, B. & Wu, H., 2019. Treatment of heavily polluted river water by tidal-operated biofilters with organic/inorganic media: evaluation of performance and bacterial community. Bioresource Technology, 279, pp.34–42
  5. Dalahmeh, S.S., Jönsson, H., Hylander, L.D., Hui, N., Yu, D. & Pell, M., 2014. Dynamics and functions of bacterial communities in bark, charcoal and sand filters treating greywater. Water Research, 54, pp.21–32
  6. Deng, S., Chen, J. & Chang, J., 2021. Application of biochar as an innovative substrate in constructed wetlands/biofilters for wastewater treatment: performance and ecological benefits. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 126156
  7. Gomes, I., Simões, M. & Simões, L., 2014. An overview on the reactors to study drinking water biofilms. Water Research, 62, pp.63–87
  8. Guo, X., Cui, X. & Li, H., 2020. Effects of fillers combined with biosorbents on nutrient and heavy metal removal from biogas slurry in constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 703, 134788
  9. Gwenzi, W., Chaukura, N., Noubactep, C. & Mukome, F.N., 2017. Biochar-based water treatment systems as a potential low-cost and sustainable technology for clean water provision. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, pp.732–749
  10. He, S.-B., Xue, G. & Kong, H.-N., 2007. The performance of BAF using natural zeolite as filter media under conditions of low temperature and ammonium shock load. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 143, pp.291–295
  11. Hu, Y., Zhao, Y. & Rymszewicz, A., 2014. Robust biological nitrogen removal by creating multiple tides in a single bed tidal flow constructed wetland. Science of the Total Environment, 470, pp.1197–1204
  12. Ibrahim, S., El-Liethy, M.A., Abia, A.L.K., Abdel-Gabbar, M., Al Zanaty, A.M. & Kamel, M.M., 2020. Design of a bioaugmented multistage biofilter for accelerated municipal wastewater treatment and deactivation of pathogenic microorganisms. Science of the Total Environment, 703, 134786
  13. Ji, B., Wang, H. & Yang, K., 2014. Nitrate and COD removal in an upflow biofilter under an aerobic atmosphere. Bioresource Technology, 158, pp.156–160
  14. Kizito, S., Lv, T., Wu, S., Ajmal, Z., Luo, H. & Dong, R., 2017. Treatment of anaerobic digested effluent in biochar-packed vertical flow constructed wetland columns: role of media and tidal operation. Science of the Total Environment, 592, pp.197–205
  15. Lee, A.H. & Nikraz, H., 2014. BOD: COD ratio as an indicator for pollutants leaching from landfill. Journal of Clean Energy Technologies, 2, pp.263–266
  16. Li, J., Zheng, L., Ye, C., Zhou, Z., Ni, B., Zhang, X. & Liu, H., 2022. Unveiling organic loading shock-resistant mechanism in a pilot-scale moving bed biofilm reactor-assisted dual-anaerobic-anoxic/oxic system for effective municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology, 347, 126339
  17. Mahmoud, M., Tawfik, A. & El-Gohary, F., 2011. Use of down-flow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor as a promising post-treatment system for municipal wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 168, pp.535–543
  18. Naz, I., Saroj, D.P., Mumtaz, S., Ali, N. & Ahmed, S., 2015. Assessment of biological trickling filter systems with various packing materials for improved wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology, 36, pp.424–434
  19. Naz, I., Ullah, W., Sehar, S., Rehman, A., Khan, Z.U., Ali, N. & Ahmed, S., 2016. Performance evaluation of stone-media pro-type pilot-scale trickling biofilter system for municipal wastewater treatment. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, pp.15792–15805
  20. Ni, J.J. & Ng, C.W.W., 2019. Long-term effects of grass roots on gas permeability in unsaturated simulated landfill covers. Science of the Total Environment, 666, pp.680–684
  21. Rehman, A., Naz, I., Khan, Z.U., Rafiq, M., Ali, N. & Ahmad, S., 2012. Sequential application of plastic media-trickling filter and sand filter for domestic wastewater treatment at low temperature condition. British Biotechnology Journal, 2, pp.179–191
  22. Rocher, V., Paffoni, C., Gonçalves, A., Guérin, S., Azimi, S., Gasperi, J., Moilleron, R. & Pauss, A., 2012. Municipal wastewater treatment by biofiltration: comparisons of various treatment layouts. Part 1: assessment of carbon and nitrogen removal. Water Science and Technology, 65, pp.1705–1712
  23. Rock, C., Brooks, J., Bradeen, S. & Struchtemeyer, R., 1984. Use of peat for on‐site wastewater treatment: I. Laboratory evaluation. Wiley Online Library
  24. Saminathan, S.K., Galvez-Cloutier, R. & Kamal, N., 2013. Performance and microbial diversity of aerated trickling biofilter used for treating cheese industry wastewater. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 170, pp.149–163
  25. Samudro, G. & Mangkoedihardjo, S., 2010. Review on BOD, COD and BOD/COD ratio: a triangle zone for toxic, biodegradable and stable levels. International Journal of Academic Research, 2
  26. Scholes, L., Faulkner, H., Tapsell, S. & Downward, S., 2008. Urban rivers as pollutant sinks and sources: a public health concern for recreational river users? Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 8, pp.543–553
  27. Shalaby, I.M., Altalhy, A.D. & Mosallam, H.A., 2008. Preliminary field study of a model plant for sewage water treatment using gravel bed hydroponics method. World Applied Science Journal, 4, pp.238–243
  28. Sharvelle, S., McLamore, E. & Banks, M.K., 2008. Hydrodynamic characteristics in biotrickling filters as affected by packing material and hydraulic loading rate. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 134, pp.346–352
  29. Subari, F., Abdullah, S.R.S., Hasan, H.A. & Rahman, N.A., 2018. Biological removal of ammonia by naturally grown bacteria in sand biofilter. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, 22, pp.346–352
  30. Tian, Q., Ong, S.K., Xie, X., Li, F., Zhu, Y., Wang, F.R. & Yang, B., 2016. Enhanced phosphorus recovery and biofilm microbial community changes in an alternating anaerobic/aerobic biofilter. Chemosphere, 144, pp.1797–1806
  31. Verma, M., Brar, S., Blais, J., Tyagi, R. & Surampalli, R., 2006. Aerobic biofiltration processes—advances in wastewater treatment. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 10, pp.264–276
  32. Vigne, E., Choubert, J.-M., Canler, J.-P., Heduit, A., Sorensen, K. & Lessard, P., 2010. A biofiltration model for tertiary nitrification of municipal wastewaters. Water Research, 44, pp.4399–4410
  33. Vymazal, J., 2007. Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 380, pp.48–65
  34. Wallace, S. & Austin, D., 2008. Emerging models for nitrogen removal in treatment wetlands. Journal of Environmental Health, 71, pp.10–17
  35. Wang, L., Wang, X., Yang, F., Kong, M., Peng, F., Chao, J., Gao, Y., Wu, D., Zhu, Y. & Zhang, Y., 2016. Nitrogen removal performance and ammonia-and nitrite-oxidizing bacterial community analysis of a novel industrial waste-based biofilter. Chemical Engineering Journal, 299, pp.156–166
  36. Wang, Z., He, S., Huang, J., Zhou, W. & Chen, W., 2018. Comparison of heterotrophic and autotrophic denitrification processes for nitrate removal from phosphorus-limited surface water. Environmental Pollution, 238, pp.562–572
  37. Yang, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, R. & Morgan, D., 2018. Global development of various emerged substrates utilized in constructed wetlands. Bioresource Technology, 261, pp.441–452
  38. Yeshanew, M.M., Frunzo, L., Luongo, V., Pirozzi, F., Lens, P.N. & Esposito, G., 2016. Start-up of an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor treating synthetic carbohydrate rich wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 184, pp.456–464
  39. Yuan, Y., Yang, B., Wang, H., Lai, X., Li, F., Salam, M.M.A., Pan, F. & Zhao, Y., 2020. The simultaneous antibiotics and nitrogen removal in vertical flow constructed wetlands: effects of substrates and responses of microbial functions. Bioresource Technology, 310, 123419
  40. Zhao, Y., Ji, B., Liu, R., Ren, B. & Wei, T., 2020. Constructed treatment wetland: glance of development and future perspectives. Water Cycle, 1, pp.104–112

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-11-28 20:54:42

No citation recorded.