DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v20i3.51950

Morphological Analysis of River Characteristics in Musi Rawas Utara Regency

*Kiki Nidya Stephanie  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Rukuh Setiadi orcid scopus  -  Diponegoro University, Indonesia

Citation Format:
Abstract

Effective watershed management requires the efficient collection, storage, and use of runoff water, as well as the recharge of groundwater. This study will employ morphometric analysis to determine the characteristics of the rivers flowing through one of the districts of the Province of South Sumatera, Musi Rawas Utara (Muratara). Using DEM data and GIS software, this study conducted a quantitative-descriptive analysis to obtain quantitative information about the watershed. The acquired numbers are interpreted descriptively to provide a description of the watershed's characteristics and their implications for rivers in Muratara. The eighth-order rivers of Muratara Regency are classified as major rivers. A mean bifurcation ratio (Rb) of 3.98 indicates that geological features have no effect on the typical flat drainage pattern. On average, the drainage density of the watersheds was moderate, but a few locations had a very high drainage density range, indicating their erodibility. The basins of rivers with low circularity and elongation ratios (0.19 and 0.48, respectively) are elongated and have a steep slope. The morphometric research reveals that the Muratara rivers have abundant water resources and are also predicted to experience numerous water-related disasters. Using morphometric knowledge, however, the local government could develop mitigation and planning systems for river management. Future measures must include ensuring that adequate drainage systems are in place and that all construction adheres to the principles of proper land management.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Watershed, Morphology, River characteristics, Muratara

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Articles
Language : EN
Recent articles
Dampak Sosial Lingkungan Penurunan Jasa Ekosistem di Kota Semarang Opini Digital Masyarakat Dalam Pembangunan Tol Solo-Jogja di Media Sosial Twitter Rethinking the Tactile Paving Installation System Based on the City Rhythm of Visually Impaired Pedestrians in Urban Networks Menuju Perkotaan Yang Berkelanjutan: Kajian Kampung Kota dan Tipologinya di Kelurahan Baru Ulu, Kota Balikpapan Preferensi Pemilihan Lokasi Idle-Time Pengemudi Ojek Daring di Kota Bandung Analisis Kondisi Eksisting Infrastruktur Kota Balikpapan Menggunakan City Prosperity Index More recent articles
Most cited articles
The Role of Local Champion In Community - Based Adaptation In Semarang Coastal Area Peluang Keberlanjutan Program Penyediaan Air Minum Berbasis Komunitas (PAMSIMAS) di Kabupaten Kendal Pengaruh Sebaran Lokasi Minimarket Terhadap Jangkauan Pelayanan Pasar Tradisional di Kecamatan Banyumanik Arti Penting Ruang Hijau Kota bagi Masyarakat dan Pemerintah Kota (Ruang Hijau Kota di Lyon, Prancis) Peluang Pengelolaan Sampah Sebagai Strategi Mitigasi Dalam Mewujudkan Ketahanan Iklim Kota Semarang More cited articles
  1. Adhikari, S. (2020). Morphometric Analysis of a Drainage Basin: a Study of Ghatganga River, Bajhang District, Nepal. The Geographic Base, 7, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.3126/tgb.v7i0.34280
  2. Asmadi, K., & Kasjono, H. S. (2011). Teknologi pengolahan air minum. Yogyakarta: Gosyen Publishing
  3. Babu, K. J., Sreekumar, S., & Aslam, A. (2016). Implication of Drainage Basin Parameters of a Tropical River Basin of South India. Applied Water Science, 6(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0212-8
  4. Belletti, B., Rinaldi, M., Buijse, A. D., Gurnell, A. M., & Mosselman, E. (2015). A Review of Assessment Methods for River Hydromorphology. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(5), 2079–2100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3558-1
  5. Bogale, A. (2021). Morphometric Analysis of a Drainage Basin Using Geographical Information System in Gilgel Abay Watershed, Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia. Applied Water Science, 11(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01447-9
  6. Haron, N. A., Yusuf, B., Sulaiman, M. S., Razak, M. S. A., & Nurhidayu, S. (2022). Morphological Assessment of River Stability: Review of the Most Influential Parameters. Sustainability, 14(16), 10025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610025
  7. Horton, R. (1945). Erosional Development of Streams and their Drainage Basins; Hydrophysical Approach to Quantitative Morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275–370
  8. Horton, R. (1932). Drainage‐Basin Characteristics. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 13(1), 350–361. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR013i001p00350
  9. Mahala, A. (2020). The Significance of Morphometric Analysis to Understand the Hydrological and Morphological Characteristics in Two Different Morpho-Climatic Settings. Applied Water Science, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1118-2
  10. Miller, V.C. (1953) A Quantitative Geomorphic Study of Drainage Basin Characteristics in the Clinch Mountain Area, Virginia and Tennessee. Department of Geology Columbia University, New York, 389-402
  11. Morisawa, M. (1985). Rivers: Form and Process. (Geomorphology texts, No. 7)
  12. Nag, S. K., & Chakraborty, S. (2003). Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 31(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03030749
  13. Ningkeula, E. S. (2016). Analisis Karakteristik Morfometri dan Hidrologi Sebagai Ciri Karakteristik Biogeofisik DAS Wai Samal Kecamatan Seram Utara Timur Kobi Kabupaten Maluku Tengah. Agrikan: Jurnal Agribisnis Perikanan, 9(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.29239/j.agrikan.9.2.76-86
  14. Prabhakaran, A., & Jawahar Raj, N. (2018). Drainage Morphometric Analysis for Assessing Form and Processes of the Watersheds of Pachamalai Hills and its Adjoinings, Central Tamil Nadu, India. Applied Water Science, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0646-5
  15. Schumm, S. A. (1956). Evolution of Drainage Systems and Slopes in Badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 67(5), 597–646. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1956)67
  16. Seminara, G. (2006). Meanders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 554(October), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112006008925
  17. Strahler, A. (1952). Dynamic Basis of Geomorphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63, 923-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[923:DBOG]2.0.CO;2
  18. Strahler, A. N. (1957). Quantitative Analysis of Watershed Geomorphology. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 38(6), 913–920. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913
  19. Strahler, A.N. (1958). Quantitative Geomorphology of Drainage Basins and Channel Networks. In: Chow, V.T., Ed., Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw Hill, New York, 439-476
  20. Strahler, A. N. (1964). Quantitative Geomorphology of Drainage Basins and Channel Networks. In: Chow, V., Ed., Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw Hill, New York, 439-476
  21. Strahler, A.N. (1968). Quantitative Geomorphology. In: Fairbridge, R.W., Ed., The Encyclopedia of Geomorphology, Reinhold Book Crop., New York

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-12-23 16:22:00

No citation recorded.