DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.8.2.141-148

Comparison of single and double stage regenerative organic rankine cycle for medium grade heat source through energy and exergy estimation

1Research Centre for Electrical Power and Mechatronics (RCEPM) - Indonesian Institute of Sciences (IIoS), Komplek LIPI, Gedung 20, Lantai 2, Jalan Sangkuriang, Bandung, West Java,, Indonesia

2Research Unit for Clean Technology - Indonesian Institute of Sciences (IIoS), Komplek LIPI, Gedung 50, Jalan Sangkuriang, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, Indonesia

Received: 2 Jul 2018; Revised: 26 Mar 2019; Accepted: 20 Jun 2019; Available online: 15 Jul 2019; Published: 13 Jun 2019.
Editor(s): H Hadiyanto
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Cover Image
Abstract
Regenerative organic Rankine cycle (RORC) can be used to improve organic Rankine cycle (ORC) performance. This paper presents a comparison of a single (SSRORC) and double stage regenerative organic Rankine cycle (DSRORC) using a medium grade heat source. Performance for each system is estimated using the law of thermodynamics I and II through energy and exergy balance. Solar thermal is used as the heat source using therminol 55 as a working fluid, and R141b is used as the organic working fluid. The initial data for the analysis are heat source with 200°C of temperature, and 100 L/min of volume flow rate. Analysis begins by calculating energy input to determine organic working fluid mass flow rate, and continued by calculating energy loss, turbine power and pump power consumption to determine net power output and thermal efficiency. Exergy analysis begins by calculating exergy input to determine exergy efficiency. Exergy loss, exergy destruction at the turbine, pump and feed heater is calculated to complete the calculation. Energy estimation result shows that DSRORC determines better net power output and thermal efficiency for 7.9% than SSRORC, as well as exergy estimation, DSRORC determines higher exergy efficiency for 7.69%. ©2019. CBIORE-IJRED. All rights reserved
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: single stage regenerative organic Rankine cycle; double stage regenerative organic Rankine cycle; medium grade heat source; energy; exergy

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Evaluating the materials used for hydrogen production based on photoelectrochemical technology Monitoring the performances of a maximum power point tracking photovoltaic (MPPT PV) pumping system driven by a brushless direct current (BLDC) motor Performance analysis of a fabricated line focusing concentrated solar distillation system More recent articles
Most cited articles
Energy-Exergy Analysis of A Novel Multi-Pass Solar Air Collector With Perforated Fins Renewable Energy in Eastern North Africa in Terms of Patterns of Coupling to Czisch European HVDC Super Grid Evaluation of Physico-Mechanical-Combustion Characteristics of Fuel Briquettes made from blends of Areca Nut Husk, Simarouba Seed Shell and Black Liquor Historic Developments, Current Technologies and Potential of Nanotechnology to Develop Next Generation Solar Cells with Improved Efficiency Modeling and Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Assisted Electrolyzer-Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell For Running a Hospital in Remote Area in Kolkata, India More cited articles
  1. Astolfi, M., Romano, M. C., Bombarda, P., & Macchi, E. (2014). Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium-low temperature geothermal sources - Part B: Techno-economic optimization. Energy, 66, 435–446
  2. Braimakis, K., & Karellas, S. (2018a). Energetic optimization of regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) configurations. Energy Conversion and Management, 159, 353–370
  3. Braimakis, K., & Karellas, S. (2018b). Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). Energy, 149, 296–313
  4. Cammarata, G., Cammarata, L., & Petrone, G. (2014). Thermodynamic analysis of ORC for energy production from geothermal resources. Energy Procedia, 45, 1337–1343
  5. Chaiyat, N., Wakaiyang, Y., & Inthavideth, X. (2017). Enhancement efficiency of organic Rankine cycle by using sorption system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 122, 368–379
  6. Colonna, P., Casati, E., Trapp, C., Mathijssen, T., Larjola, J., Turunen-Saaresti, T., & Uusitalo, A. (2015). Organic Rankine Cycle Power Systems: From the Concept to Current Technology, Applications, and an Outlook to the Future. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 137(10), 100801
  7. Feng, Y.-Q., Hung, T.-C., He, Y.-L., Wang, Q., Wang, S., Li, B.-X., … W. Zhang. (2017). Operation characteristic and performance comparison of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low-grade waste heat using R245fa, R123 and their mixtures. Energy Conversion and Management, 144, 153–163
  8. Ge, Z., Wang, H., Wang, H. T., Wang, J. J., Li, M., Wu, F. Z., & Zhang, S. Y. (2015). Main parameters optimization of regenerative organic Rankine cycle driven by low-temperature flue gas waste heat. Energy, 93, 1886–1895
  9. Imran, M., Park, B. S., Kim, H. J., Lee, D. H., Usman, M., & Heo, M. (2014). Thermo-economic optimization of Regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle for waste heat recovery applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 87, 107–118
  10. Li, G. (2016). Organic Rankine cycle performance evaluation and thermoeconomic assessment with various applications part I: Energy and exergy performance evaluation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 477–499
  11. Li, J., Ge, Z., Duan, Y., Yang, Z., & Liu, Q. (2018). Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles. Applied Energy, 217(February), 409–421
  12. M. Li and B. Zhao. (2016). Analytical thermal efficiency of medium-low temperature organic Rankine cycles derived from entropy-generation analysis. Energy, 106, 121–130
  13. Moloney, F., Almatrafi, E., & Goswami, D. Y. (2017). Working fluid parametric analysis for regenerative supercritical organic Rankine cycles for medium geothermal reservoir temperatures. Energy Procedia, 129, 599–606
  14. Moran, M. J., Shapiro, H. N., Boettner, D. D., & Bailey, M. B. (2014). Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics (8th Edition). Wiley
  15. Rahbar, K., Mahmoud, S., Al-Dadah, R. K., Moazami, N., & Mirhadizadeh, S. A. (2017). Review of organic Rankine cycle for small-scale applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 134, 135–155
  16. Stability, T. (n.d.). Typical Physical , Chemical and Thermal Properties of Therminol 55
  17. Vivian, J., Manente, G., & Lazzaretto, A. (2015). A general framework to select working fluid and configuration of ORCs for low-to-medium temperature heat sources. Applied Energy, 156, 727–746
  18. Xi, H., Li, M.-J., Xu, C., & He, Y.-L. (2013). Parametric optimization of Regenerative organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for low grade waste heat recovery using genetic algorith. Energy, 58, 473–482
  19. Zhai, H., An, Q., Shi, L., Lemort, V., & Quoilin, S. (2016). Categorization and analysis of heat sources for organic Rankine cycle systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 64, 790–805

Last update:

  1. A comparative review of ORC and R-ORC technologies in terms of energy, exergy, and economic performance

    Serdal Damarseckin, Sebe Yves Junior Kane, Ayhan Atiz, Mehmet Karakilcik, Haci Sogukpinar, Ismail Bozkurt, Saadin Oyucu, Ahmet Aksoz. Heliyon, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40575

  2. Two-Phase Expander Approach for Next Generation of Heat Recovery Systems

    Angad S Panesar, Marco Bernagozzi. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 8 (3), 2019. doi: 10.14710/ijred.8.3.203-213

  3. Comparative thermo-economic analysis of regenerative Rankine cycles with two feed water heaters

    Somchart Chantasiriwan. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 28 , 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101476

  4. Evaluation of solar source and ground cooling performance in three different organic rankine cycle (ORC) configurations

    Osman Kara. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 148 (10), 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10973-023-11974-z

  5. Optimal integration of an Organic Rankine Cycle to a process using a heuristic approach

    Maria Nayara Pontes Santos, Mauro Antonio da Silva Sá Ravagnani, Caliane Bastos Borba Costa. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 38 (4), 2021. doi: 10.1007/s43153-020-00077-z

  6. Combination of solar with organic Rankine cycle as a potential solution for clean energy production

    Van Nhanh Nguyen, Nguyen Dang Khoa Pham, Xuan Quang Duong, Viet Dung Tran, Minh Tuan Pham, Sakthivel Rajamohan, Xuan Tuan Cao, Thanh Hai Truong. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 57 , 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103161

Last update: 2024-11-22 03:02:35

  1. Two-Phase Expander Approach for Next Generation of Heat Recovery Systems

    Angad S Panesar, Marco Bernagozzi. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 8 (3), 2019. doi: 10.14710/ijred.8.3.203-213

  2. Solar power - A clean energy source that contributes to energy balance in Vietnam: A mini-review

    Dong V.H.. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments, 42 (5), 2019. doi: 10.26480/jmerd.05.2019.177.181

  3. Development and validation of a simulation model for heat pump water heater

    Van Chuong T.. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments, 44 (2), 2021.

  4. Exhaust gas recovery from marine diesel engine in order to reduce the toxic emission and save energy: A mini review

    Dong T.M.H.. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments, 42 (5), 2019. doi: 10.26480/jmerd.05.2019.143.147

  5. Optimal integration of an Organic Rankine Cycle to a process using a heuristic approach

    Maria Nayara Pontes Santos, Mauro Antonio da Silva Sá Ravagnani, Caliane Bastos Borba Costa. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 38 (4), 2021. doi: 10.1007/s43153-020-00077-z