The Effect of Amine Types on Breakthrough Separation of Methane on Biogas

Kuni Masruroh  -  Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia, Indonesia
Rochim Bakti Cahyono  -  Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia, Indonesia
Imam Prasetyo  -  Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia, Indonesia
*Teguh Ariyanto  -  Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia, Indonesia
Received: 15 Oct 2020; Revised: 3 Dec 2020; Accepted: 15 Dec 2020; Published: 1 May 2021; Available online: 21 Dec 2020.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) are the main components of a renewable energy source of biogas. Separation of CO2 from biogas is significantly important to improve biogas performance, due to heating value in biogas depends on the concentration of methane. One of the gas separation technologies that has been widely used in chemical industries is carbon molecular sieve (CMS). This research explores the potential of CMS for biogas purification. CMS was prepared by modification of palm kernel shell-derived porous carbon using amine groups such as monoethanolamine (MEA), 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), and diethanolamine (DEA). The effect of amine types on the separation parameters was studied by using a breakthrough experiment to obtain the most potential CMS materials. The methods of this research include the process of carbon oxidation using hydrogen peroxide, impregnation with an amine group, characterization of the CMS material obtained, CO2 and CH4 gas separation testing with a breakthrough system. The CMS was characterized by using N2 sorption analysis, fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The breakthrough experiment showed that CMS-MEA had the highest performance for separating CO2 and CH4 gases. In addition, the results also showed that loading of amine groups on carbon caused an increase in the uptake capacity of CO2, and the highest capacity was achieved by CMS-MEA of 13.2 mg/g.

Article Metrics:

  1. Ahmad, M. A., Wan Daud, W. M. A., & Aroua, M. K. (2008). Adsorption kinetics of various gases in carbon molecular sieves (CMS) produced from palm shell. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 312(2–3), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2007.06.040
  2. Akkarawatkhoosith, N., Kaewchada, A., & Jaree, A. (2019). High-throughput CO 2 capture for biogas purification using monoethanolamine in a microtube contactor. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 98, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.05.002
  3. Alcañiz-Monge, J., Marco-Lozar, J. P., & Lillo-Ródenas, M. Á. (2011). CO2 separation by carbon molecular sieve monoliths prepared from nitrated coal tar pitch. Fuel Processing Technology, 92(5), 915–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.12.010
  4. Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J., & Dewil, R. (2008). Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34(6), 755–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002
  5. Ariyanto, T., Cahyono, R. B., Vente, A., Mattheij, S., Millati, R., Sarto, Taherzadeh, M. J., & Syamsiah, S. (2017). Utilization of fruit waste as biogas plant feed and its superiority compared to landfill. International Journal of Technology, 8(8), 1385–1392. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v8i8.739
  6. Bai, B. C., Cho, S., Yu, H. R., Yi, K. B., Kim, K. D., & Lee, Y. S. (2013). Effects of aminated carbon molecular sieves on breakthrough curve behavior in CO2/CH4 separation. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 19(3), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.10.016
  7. Chiang, Y. C., & Juang, R. S. (2017). Surface modifications of carbonaceous materials for carbon dioxide adsorption: A review. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 71, 214–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.014
  8. Cho, S., Lee, D., & Lee, Y. S. (2015). Separation of biomass using carbon molecular sieves treated with hydrogen peroxide. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 21, 278–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.113
  9. Das, D., & Meikap, B. C. (2020). Role of amine-impregnated activated carbon in carbon dioxide capture. Indian Chemical Engineer, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00194506.2020.1760150
  10. Hosseini, S. E., & Wahid, M. A. (2014). Development of biogas combustion in combined heat and power generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 868–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.204
  11. Khalil, S. H., Aroua, M. K., & Daud, W. M. A. W. (2012). Study on the improvement of the capacity of amine-impregnated commercial activated carbon beds for Co 2 adsorbing. Chemical Engineering Journal, 183(2012), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.011
  12. Kongnoo, A., Intharapat, P., Worathanakul, P., & Phalakornkule, C. (2016). Diethanolamine impregnated palm shell activated carbon for CO2 adsorption at elevated temperatures. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2015.11.015
  13. Lee, C. S., Ong, Y. L., Aroua, M. K., & Daud, W. M. A. W. (2013). Impregnation of palm shell-based activated carbon with sterically hindered amines for CO2 adsorption. Chemical Engineering Journal, 219, 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.10.064
  14. Mercedes Maroto-Valer, M., Lu, Z., Zhang, Y., & Tang, Z. (2008). Sorbents for CO2 capture from high carbon fly ashes. Waste Management, 28(11), 2320–2328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.10.012
  15. Mohamed, A. R., Mohammadi, M., & Darzi, G. N. (2010). Preparation of carbon molecular sieve from lignocellulosic biomass: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(6), 1591–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.024
  16. Mursec, B., Vindis, P., Janzekovic, M., Brus, M., & Cus, F. (2009). Analysis of different substrates for processing into biogas Manufacturing and processing. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 37(2), 652–659
  17. Poletti, A., D’Alessandro, E., Poletti, L., Poletti, R., & Arca, S. (2011). Upgrading ff Biogas Technology Through The Application of Gas Hydrates. Icgh
  18. Prasetyo, I., Mukti, N. I. F., Cahyono, R. B., Prasetya, A., & Ariyanto, T. (2020). Nanoporous Carbon Prepared from Palm Kernel Shell for CO2/CH4 Separation. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01006-4
  19. Prasetyo, I., Rochmadi, Wahyono, E., & Ariyanto, T. (2017). Controlling synthesis of polymer-derived carbon molecular sieve and its performance for CO2/CH4 separation. Engineering Journal, 21(4), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2017.21.4.83
  20. Rashidi, N. A., & Yusup, S. (2017). Potential of palm kernel shell as activated carbon precursors through single stage activation technique for carbon dioxide adsorption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.045
  21. Rasi, S., Läntelä, J., & Rintala, J. (2011). Trace compounds affecting biogas energy utilisation - A review. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(12), 3369–3375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.07.005
  22. Ricaurte, M., Dicharry, C., Broseta, D., Renaud, X., & Philippe Torre, J. (2012). CO2 Removal from a CO2−CH4 Gas Mixture by Clathrate Hydrate.pdf
  23. Sevilla, M., Falco, C., Titirici, M. M., & Fuertes, A. B. (2012). High-performance CO2 sorbents from algae. RSC Advances, 2(33), 12792–12797. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra22552b
  24. Silvestre-Albero, A. M., Wahby, A., Silvestre-Albero, J., Rodríguez-Reinoso, F., & Betz, W. (2009). Carbon molecular sieves prepared from polymeric precursors: Porous structure and hydrogen adsorption properties. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(15), 7125–7131. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie900091n
  25. Song, X., Wang, L., Ma, X., & Zeng, Y. (2017). Adsorption equilibrium and thermodynamics of CO2 and CH4 on carbon molecular sieves. Applied Surface Science, 396, 870–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.050
  26. Surendra, K. C., Takara, D., Hashimoto, A. G., & Khanal, S. K. (2014). Biogas as a sustainable energy source for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 846–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.12.015
  27. Tae-Hwan, K., Vijayalakshmi, S., Jin, S. S., & Dong, K. J. (2003). Carbon molecular sieves (CMS) from coconut shell by carbonization and carbon dioxide activation. Indian Journal of Chemical Technology, 10(3), 298–304
  28. Wahby, A., Silvestre-Albero, J., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., & Rodríguez-Reinoso, F. (2012). CO2 adsorption on carbon molecular sieves. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 164, 280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2012.06.034
  29. Zelenak, V., Halamova, D., Gaberova, L., Bloch, E., & Llewellyn, P. (2008). Amine-modified SBA-12 mesoporous silica for carbon dioxide capture: Effect of amine basicity on sorption properties. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 116(1–3), 358–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.023

Last update: 2021-05-15 00:59:51

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-05-15 00:59:51

No citation recorded.