An Experimental Study on the Performance Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Fueled with ULSD-Biodiesel Blends

Viet Dung Tran  -  The Maritime College I, Haiphong,, Viet Nam
Anh Tuan Le  -  Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Viet Nam
*Anh Tuan Hoang orcid scopus  -  Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HUTECH), Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
Received: 30 Oct 2020; Revised: 20 Nov 2020; Accepted: 25 Nov 2020; Published: 1 May 2021; Available online: 27 Nov 2020.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

As a rule, the highest permissible sulfur content in the marine fuel must drop below 0.5% from 1 January 2020 for global fleets. As such, ships operating in emission control areas must use low sulfur or non-sulfur fuel to limit sulfur emissions as a source of acid rain. However, that fact has revealed two challenges for the operating fleet: the very high cost of ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) and the installation of the fuel conversion system and the ULSD cooling system. Therefore, a solution that blends ULSD and biodiesel (BO) into a homogeneous fuel with properties equivalent to that of mineral fuels is considered to be significantly effective. In the current work, an advanced ultrasonic energy blending technology has been applied to assist in the production of homogeneous ULSD-BO blends (ULSD, B10, B20, B30, and B50 with blends of coconut oil methyl ester with ULSD of 10%, 20%, 30% and 50% by volume) which is supplied to a small marine diesel engine on a dynamo test bench to evaluate the power and torque characteristics, also to consider the effect of BO fuel on specific fuel consumption exhaust gas temperature and brake thermal efficiency. The use of the ultrasonic mixing system has yielded impressive results for the homogeneous blend of ULSD and BO, which has contributed to improved combustion quality and thermal efficiency. The results have shown that the power, torque, and the exhaust gas temperature, decrease by approximately 9%, 2%, and 4% respectively with regarding the increase of the blended biodiesel rate while the specific fuel consumption and brake thermal efficiency tends to increase of around 6% and 11% with those blending ratios.

Keywords: ULSD; biodiesel; engine performance; IMO 2020 Sulphur-cap; marine diesel engine

Article Metrics:

  1. Bari, S. (2014) Performance, Combustion and Emission Tests of a Metro-Bus Running on Biodiesel-ULSD Blended (B20) Fuel. Applied Energy, 124, 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.007
  2. Canakci, M and Jon, H.V.G. (2003) Comparison of Engine Performance and Emissions for Petroleum Diesel Fuel, Yellow Grease Biodiesel, and Soybean Oil Biodiesel. Transactions of the ASAE, 46(4), 937-944
  3. Dhahad, H.A., Miqdam, T.C. and Megaritis, T. (2019) Performance, Regulated and Unregulated Exhaust Emission of a Stationary Compression Ignition Engine Fueled by Water-ULSD Emulsion. Energy, 181, 1036–1050
  4. Duncan, A.M., Noorbahiyah, P., Christopher, D. D., Aaron, M S. and Susan, M. S-W. (2012) High-Pressure Viscosity of Soybean-Oil-Based Biodiesel Blends with Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel Fuel. Energy & Fuels, 26(11), 7023–7036
  5. Fayad, M. A. (2020) Effect of Renewable Fuel and Injection Strategies on Combustion Characteristics and Gaseous Emissions in Diesel Engines. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 42(4): 460–470
  6. Geng, P., Hongjun, M., Yanjie, Z., Lijiang, W., Kun, Y., Ji, J. and Tingkai, C. (2017) Combustion Characteristics and NOx Emissions of a Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel Blend in a Marine Auxiliary Diesel Engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 115, 947–954
  7. Geng, P., Qinming, T., Chunhui, Z., Lijiang, W., Xianzhong, H., Erming, C. and Kai, J. (2016) Experimental Investigation on NOx and Green House Gas Emissions from a Marine Auxiliary Diesel Engine Using Ultralow Sulfur Light Fuel. Science of the Total Environment, 572, 467–475
  8. Gude, V. G. and Georgene, E. G. (2013) Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oils via Direct Sonication. Applied Energy, 109, 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.002
  9. Hoang, A.T. and Pham, V.V. (2019) A Study of Emission Characteristic, Deposits, and Lubrication Oil Degradation of a Diesel Engine Running on Preheated Vegetable Oil and Diesel Oil.” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 4(5), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1520344
  10. Hoang, A. T. (2019) Experimental Study on Spray and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Preheated Bio-Oils and Diesel Fuel. Energy, 171, 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.076
  11. Hoang, A. T. and Le, V. V. (2017) The Performance of A Diesel Engine Fueled With Diesel Oil, Biodiesel and Preheated Coconut Oil. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 6(1), 1–7
  12. Hoang, A. T. and Pham, V. V. (2018) A Review on Fuels Used for Marine Diesel Engines. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research & Developments, 41(4), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.26480/jmerd.04.2018.22.32
  13. Hoang, A. T. and Pham, V. V. (2019) A Study of Emission Characteristic, Deposits, and Lubrication Oil Degradation of a Diesel Engine Running on Preheated Vegetable Oil and Diesel Oil. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 41(5), 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1520344
  14. Hoang, A. T. and Tran, V. D. (2019) Experimental Analysis on the Ultrasound-Based Mixing Technique Applied to Ultra-Low Sulphur Diesel and Bio-Oils. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 9(1), 307–313
  15. Hoang, A. T., Tran, V. D., Dong, V. H. and Le, A. T. (2019) An Experimental Analysis on Physical Properties and Spray Characteristics of an Ultrasound-Assisted Emulsion of Ultra-Low-Sulphur Diesel and Jatropha-Based Biodiesel. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2019.1595355
  16. Kumar, B, R., Saravanan, S., Rana, D. and Nagendran, A. (2016) A Comparative Analysis on Combustion and Emissions of Some next Generation Higher-Alcohol/diesel Blends in a Direct-Injection Diesel Engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 119, 246–256
  17. Lin, Y. C., Kuo, H. H. and Chung, B. C. (2011) Experimental Investigation of the Performance and Emissions of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Fueled with Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel/ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel Blends. Energy, 36(1), 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.045
  18. Mangus, M., Farshid K., Jonathan, M., Daniel, T., James, P., Christopher, D., Edward, P. and Susan, S. W. (2015) Investigating the Compression Ignition Combustion of Multiple biodiesel/ULSD (Ultra-Low Sulfur Diesel) Blends via Common-Rail Injection. Energy, 89, 932–945
  19. Mattson, J., Nicolae, V. B., Christopher, D., Dan, M. and Nicolae, B. (2019) Second Law Analysis of Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel versus ULSD during Operation of a CI Engine. Fuel, 255, 115753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115753
  20. Meng, X., Guanyi, C. and Yonghong, W. (2008) Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil via Alkali Catalyst and Its Engine Test. Fuel Processing Technology, 89(9), 851-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2008.02.006
  21. Nguyen, H.P., Hoang, A. T., Sandro, N., Nguyen, X. P., Le, A. T., Luong, C. N., Chu, V. D. and Pham, V. V. (2020) The Electric Propulsion System as a Green Solution for Management Strategy of CO2 Emission in Ocean Shipping: A Comprehensive Review. International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems e12580. https://doi.org/10.1002/2050-7038.12580
  22. Onlamnao, K., Sanphawat, P. and Nakorn, T. (2020) Generating Organic Liquid Products from Catalytic Cracking of Used Cooking Oil over Mechanically Mixed Catalysts. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 9(2), 159–166
  23. Pham, M. T., Hoang, A. T., Le, A. T., Al-Tawaha, A.R.M.S., Dong, V. H. and Le, V. V. (2018) Measurement and Prediction of the Density and Viscosity of Biodiesel Blends. International Journal of Technology, 9(5), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v9i5.1950
  24. Putro, F. A., Sunu, H. P., Joko, W. and Setyawan, A. (2020) Thermodynamic Study of Palm Kernel Shell Gasification for Aggregate Heating in an Asphalt Mixing Plant. International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 9(2), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.9.2.311-317
  25. Ruina, L., Wang, Z., Ni, P. and Jiang, H (2019) Effects of Exhaust Gas Recirculation on the Particulates Structure Characteristics of Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel/biodiesel Blend. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1646351
  26. Sentorun, S., Cigdem, Shyamal, K. S., Xiaoliang, M. and Chunshan, S. (2011) Mesoporous-Molecular-Sieve-Supported Nickel Sorbents for Adsorptive Desulfurization of Commercial Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel Fuel. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 101(3-4), 718-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.11.014
  27. Seraç, M. R., Selman, A., Adem, Y. and Seyfi, Ş. (2020) Evaluation of Comparative Combustion, Performance, and Emission of Soybean-Based Alternative Biodiesel Fuel Blends in a CI Engine. Renewable Energy, 148, 1065-1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.090
  28. Zha, K., Radu, C. F. and Marcis, J. (2012) Soot Evolution with Cyclic Crank-Angle-Resolved Two-Color Thermometry in an Optical Diesel Engine Fueled with Biodiesel Blend and ULSD. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 134 (9), 092803. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006710
  29. Zhou, J. H., Cheung, C. S. and Leung, C. W. (2013) Combustion, Performance and Emissions of ULSD, PME and B50 Fueled Multi-Cylinder Diesel Engine with Naturally Aspirated Hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38(34), 14837–14848
  30. Zhu, L., Wugao, Z., Wei, L. and Zhen, Huang. (2010) Experimental Study on Particulate and NO X Emissions of a Diesel Engine Fueled with Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel, RME-Diesel Blends and PME-Diesel Blends. Science of the Total Environment, 408(5), 1050–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.056

Last update: 2021-03-03 15:49:02

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2021-03-03 15:49:04

No citation recorded.