DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/ijred.2022.44820

Public Support for Feed-in-Tariff and Net Energy Metering Policies in Malaysia: The Role of Policy Information

1School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 06010, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia

2Department of Environment, Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

3Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia

Received: 17 Feb 2022; Revised: 14 Apr 2022; Accepted: 18 Apr 2022; Available online: 26 Apr 2022; Published: 4 Aug 2022.
Editor(s): Grigorios Kyriakopoulos
Open Access Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Centre of Biomass and Renewable Energy (CBIORE)
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract
Renewable energy (RE) policies have proven to be an effective tool for implementing RE. Despite various policies introduced, the RE deployment in Malaysia has been weak, especially individual RE uptake. Lack of policy support has been linked with inadequate policy awareness and information based on the knowledge deficit theory. This study investigates the support for the Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) and Net Energy Metering (NEM) policy of individual solar photovoltaic (PV) technology among landed residents in Malaysia and the effect of information provision on policy support. A Solomon-four-group design was employed to measure policy support and test the relationship between information provision and policy support using a set of Likert scale questionnaires and a poster of FiT and NEM policy prepared in layman's terms as an intervention. Results show that majority of the residents agree with the environmental mission of the policy, except for the reduction of fossil fuel usage. For the economic aspect, the residents prefer a fixed rate for RE produced and generally agreed that high electricity consumers should pay for the RE fund. However, residents were less enthusiastic about the percentage deducted from electricity bills and the 'high electricity consumer' baseline.  There was a significant difference between items scores at pre and post-test when given the intervention, in line with the deficit theory. Therefore, policy information should be communicated strategically, focusing on thepolicy's social and economic components that have the greatest influence on Malaysians.
Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Policy support; Solomon four-group design; information provision; solar PV; Feed-in-Tariff; Net Energy Metering

Article Metrics:

Article Info
Section: Original Research Article
Language : EN
Recent articles
Decision Support for Investments in Sustainable Energy Sources Under Uncertainties The Effect of Wood Tar and Molasses Composition on Calorific Value and Compressive Strength in Bio-coke Briquetting Optimization of Aeration for Accelerating Municipal Solid Waste Biodrying More recent articles
Most cited articles
Modelling the Kinetics of Biogas Production from Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cow Dung with Plantain Peels A Novel Integration of PCM with Wind-Catcher Skin Material in Order to Increase Heat Transfer Rate Evaluation of Energy Use in Public Housing in Lagos, Nigeria: Prospects for Renewable Energy Sources Design, Analysis and Optimization of a Solar Dish/Stirling System The Effectiveness of New Solar Photovoltaic System with Supercapacitor for Rural Areas More cited articles
  1. Ahmed, M. S., Mohamed, A., Homod, R. Z., Shareef, H., & Khalid, K. (2017). Awareness on energy management in residential buildings: A case study in Kajang and Putrajaya. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 12(5), 1280–1294
  2. Azlina, A. A., Mahirah, K., & Sin, M. S. (2018). Willingness to pay for renewable energy: Evidence from Malaysian's Households. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 52(3), 153–161. https://doi.org/10.17576/JEM-2018-5203-11
  3. Braito, M., Flint, C., Muhar, A., Penker, M., & Vogel, S. (2017). Individual and collective socio-psychological patterns of photovoltaic investment under diverging policy regimes of Austria and Italy. Energy Policy, 109(March), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.063
  4. Briguglio, M., & Formosa, G. (2017). When households go solar : Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights. Energy Policy, 108(June), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.039
  5. Brunk, C. G. (2006). Public knowledge, public trust: Understanding the "knowledge deficit." Community Genetics, 9(3), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1159/000092654
  6. Chen, C., Xu, X., & Frey, S. (2016). Who wants solar water heaters and alternative fuel vehicles ? Assessing social – psychological predictors of adoption intention and policy support in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 15, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.02.006
  7. Chua, S. C., Oh, T. H., & Goh, W. W. (2011). Feed-in tariff outlook in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.009
  8. Cui, L., Li, R., Song, M., & Zhu, L. (2019). Can China achieve its 2030 energy development targets by fulfilling carbon intensity reduction commitments? Energy Economics, 83(2019), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.06.016
  9. David Jacobs. (2010). Assessment of the Proposed Malaysian Feed-in Tariff in Comparison with International Best Practise. 3–20
  10. De Groote, O., Pepermans, G., & Verboven, F. (2016). Heterogeneity in the adoption of photovoltaic systems in Flanders. Energy Economics, 59, 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.008
  11. Destek, M. A., & Okumus, I. (2019). Does pollution haven hypothesis hold in newly sindustrialised countries? Evidence from ecological footprint. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(23), 23689–23695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05614-z
  12. Firestone, J., Hirt, C., Bidwell, D., Gardner, M., & Dwyer, J. (2020). Faring well in offshore wind power siting? Trust, engagement and process fairness in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101393
  13. Fleib, E., Hatzl, S., Seebauer, S., & Posch, A. (2017). Money, not morale: The impact of desires and beliefs on private investment in photovoltaic citizen participation initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 920–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.123
  14. Fletcher, F. E., Allen, S., Vickers, S. M., Beavers, T., Hamlin, C. M., Young-Foster, D., Harris-Turner, S., & Erwin, P. C. (2020). COVID-19's Impact on the African American Community: A Stakeholder Engagement Approach to Increase Public Awareness through Virtual Town Halls. Health Equity, 4(1), 320–325. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2020.0029
  15. Frey, B. B. (2018). Solomon Four-Group Design. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n645
  16. Frondel, M., Sommer, S., & Vance, C. (2015). The burden of Germany's energy transition: An empirical analysis of distributional effects. Economic Analysis and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2015.01.004
  17. Gastaldo, N. G., Rediske, G., Rigo, P. D., Rosa, C. B., Michels, L., & Siluk, J. C. M. (2019). What is the profile of the investor in household solar photovoltaic energy systems? Energies, 12(23), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234451
  18. Gurtner, S., & Soyez, K. (2016). How to catch the generation Y: Identifying consumers of ecological innovations among youngsters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 106, 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.02.015
  19. Heidari, A., Esmaeel Nezhad, A., Tavakoli, A., Rezaei, N., Gandoman, F. H., Miveh, M. R., Ahmadi, A., & Malekpour, M. (2020). A comprehensive review of renewable energy resources for electricity generation in Australia. Frontiers in Energy, 14(3), 510–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-020-0671-6
  20. Hin, R. K. B., & Chiah, R. (2021). Malaysia's Clean Energy Transition Plans: Gazing into the Crystal Bal. Lexology. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e882a028-dda6-4bc4-805b-be68d6f76334
  21. IEO. (2019). International Energy Outlook 2019 with projections to 2050. In U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.44-3624
  22. IRENA. (2018). Renewable Energy Market Analysis: Southeast Asia. In International Renewable Energy Agency. www.irena.org
  23. Jayaraman, K., Paramasivan, L., & Kiumarsi, S. (2017). Reasons for low penetration on the purchase of photovoltaic ( PV ) panel system among Malaysian landed property owners. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80(October 2016), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.213
  24. Kardooni, R., Yusoff, S. B., & Kari, F. B. (2016). Renewable energy technology acceptance in Peninsular Malaysia. Energy Policy, 88, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.005
  25. KeTTHA. (2011). Handbook on the Malaysian Feed-in Tariff for the Promotion of Renewable Energy. Handbook on the Malaysian Feed-In-Tariff for the Promotion of Renewable Energy, 28
  26. Kilinc-Ata, N. (2016). The evaluation of renewable energy policies across EU countries and US states: An econometric approach. Energy for Sustainable Development, 31, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2015.12.006
  27. Klein, M., & Deissenroth, M. (2017). When do households invest in solar photovoltaics ? An application of prospect theory. Energy Policy, 109(June), 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.067
  28. Lasco, C., & Chernyakhovskiy, I. (2017). Are policy incentives for solar power effective? Evidence from residential installations in the Northeast. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2016.09.008
  29. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
  30. Li, D., Zhao, L., Ma, S., Shao, S., & Zhang, L. (2019). What influences an individual's pro-environmental behavior? A literature review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146(November 2017), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.024
  31. Li, M., & Zhao, J. (2017). Gaining Acceptance by Informing the People? Public Knowledge, Attitudes, and Acceptance of Transportation Policies. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 0739456X1773262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17732623
  32. Liu, L., Bouman, T., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2020). Public participation in decision making, perceived procedural fairness and public acceptability of renewable energy projects. Energy and Climate Change, 1(September), 100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2020.100013
  33. Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77(1–2), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z
  34. Marks-Bielska, R., Bielski, S., Pik, K., & Kurowska, K. (2020). The importance of renewable energy sources in Poland's energy mix. Energies, 13(18), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184624
  35. Mavrodieva, A. V., Rachman, O. K., Harahap, V. B., & Shaw, R. (2019). Role of social media as a soft power tool in raising public awareness and engagement in addressing climate change. Climate, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/cli7100122
  36. Mignon, I., & Bergek, A. (2016). Investments in renewable electricity production: The importance of policy revisited. Renewable Energy, 88, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.045
  37. Razali, A. H., Abdullah, M. P., Hassan, M. Y., & Hussin, F. (2019). Comparison of New and Previous Net Energy Metering (NEM) Scheme in Malaysia. In ELEKTRIKA- Journal of Electrical Engineering (Vol. 18, Issue 1, pp. 36–42). https://doi.org/10.11113/elektrika.v18n1.141
  38. Rhodes, E., Axsen, J., & Jaccard, M. (2014). Does effective climate policy require well-informed citizen support? Global Environmental Change, 29, 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.001
  39. Rowley, W., & Westwood, A. (2003). The need for renewable energy. Petroleum Review, 57(676), 26–28
  40. Sagar, K. (2021). Importance of Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development in India. Geodiversity & Impact on Environment, 25(3)
  41. Sangroya, D., & Nayak, J. (2015). Effectiveness of state incentives for promoting wind energy: A panel data examination. Frontiers in Energy, 9(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-015-0364-8
  42. SEDA. (2016). SEDA Annual Report 2016
  43. SEDA. (2017). NEM - Main Guidelines & schedule
  44. SEDA. (2019). SEDA Annual Report 2018 (Vol. 4, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.3934/Math.2019.1.166
  45. Seethaler, S., Evans, J. H., Gere, C., & Rajagopalan, R. M. (2019). Science, Values, and Science Communication: Competencies for Pushing Beyond the Deficit Model. Science Communication, 41(3), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019847484
  46. Shahzad, U., Doğan, B., Sinha, A., & Fareed, Z. (2021). Does Export product diversification help to reduce energy demand: Exploring the contextual evidences from the newly sindustrialised countries. Energy, 214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118881
  47. Shi, L., Zhou, W., Kristrom, B., & Kriström, B. (2013). Residential demand for green electricity. Environmental Economics, 4(1), 51–62
  48. Simpson, G., & Clifton, J. (2017). Energy Research & Social Science Testing Di ff usion of Innovations Theory with data : Financial incentives , early adopters , and distributed solar energy in Australia. Energy Research & Social Science, 29(April), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.04.005
  49. Sobri, F. A. M., Ariffin, M., & Sharaai, A. H. (2021). Systematic Review of Public Acceptance of Solar Policies: A Conceptual Framework of Policy Acceptance. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 81(2), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.81.2.3651
  50. Sola, A. O. (2014). Environmental Education and Public Awareness. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(3), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n3p333
  51. Solangi, K. H., Saidur, R., Luhur, M. R., Aman, M. M., Badarudin, A., Kazi, S. N., Lwin, T. N. W., Rahim, N. A., & Islam, M. R. (2015). Social acceptance of solar energy in Malaysia: Users' perspective. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(7), 1975–1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0920-2
  52. Stokes, L. C., & Warshaw, C. (2017). Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States. Nature Energy, 2(8), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.107
  53. Stoutenborough, J. W., & Vedlitz, A. (2014). The effect of perceived and assessed knowledge of climate change on public policy concerns: An empirical comparison. Environmental Science and Policy, 37, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.002
  54. Strunz, S., Gawel, E., & Lehmann, P. (2016). The political economy of renewable energy policies in Germany and the EU. Utilities Policy, 42, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.04.005
  55. Yuan, X., Zuo, J., & Ma, C. (2011). Social acceptance of solar energy technologies in China-End users' perspective. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1031–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.003
  56. Zulkifli, D. A., & Aslam, M. . (2015). Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy in Malaysia : A NIMBY Approach. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 9(8), 74–81
  57. Zverinova Iva, C., Scasny, M., & Kysela, E. (2013). What Influences Public Acceptance of the Current Policies to Reduce GHG Emissions ? CECILIA2050 WP2, 308680

Last update:

  1. A Levelized Feed-in Tariff to Integrate Battery into the PV-Connected System

    Ali Ashoornezhad, Reza Saberi, Qasem Asadi, Hamid Falaghi. 2023 8th International Conference on Technology and Energy Management (ICTEM), 2023. doi: 10.1109/ICTEM56862.2023.10083508

  2. Combination of solar with organic Rankine cycle as a potential solution for clean energy production

    Van Nhanh Nguyen, Nguyen Dang Khoa Pham, Xuan Quang Duong, Viet Dung Tran, Minh Tuan Pham, Sakthivel Rajamohan, Xuan Tuan Cao, Thanh Hai Truong. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 57 , 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2023.103161

Last update: 2024-11-14 11:43:22

No citation recorded.