skip to main content

Eco-friendly packaging: Preferensi dan Kesediaan Membayar Konsumen di Marketplaces

1Departemen Ekonomi dan Sumberdaya Lingkungan, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

2Departemen Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen, Fakultas Ekologi Manusia, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

3Departemen Teknik Sipil dan Lingkungan, Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Indonesia

Received: 11 Nov 2021; Revised: 4 Dec 2021; Accepted: 14 Dec 2021; Available online: 28 Dec 2021; Published: 1 Jan 2022.
Editor(s): H. Hadiyanto

Citation Format:
Abstract

Peningkatan transaksi di marketplaces menyebabkan lonjakan jumlah pengiriman paket belanja online dan berimplikasi pada timbulan sampah yang didominasi oleh material plastik. Penerapan eco-friendly packaging di marketplaces sangat diperlukan dalam upaya mengurangi timbulan sampah dan dampak negatifnya terhadap lingkungan. Upaya ini pun akan mendukung pencapaian Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) poin 12.5 yaitu mengurangi timbulan sampah secara substansial pada tahun 2030 melalui upaya pencegahan, pengurangan, daur ulang, dan penggunaan kembali. Penelitian bertujuan untuk 1) mengidentifikasi bentuk-bentuk eco-friendly packaging yang potensial diterapkan di marketplaces, 2) menganalisis preferensi konsumen terhadap penggunaan eco-friendly packaging, dan 3) merumuskan strategi penerapan eco-friendly packaging di marketplaces. Studi literatur, analisis deskriptif kualitatif, dan Contingent Choice Modelling (CCM) digunakan untuk menjawab tiga tujuan tersebut. Penelitian ini memformulasi sembilan alternatif eco-friendly packaging yang dapat diterapkan di marketplaces. Data diperoleh dari literatur dan survei secara blended terhadap 314 responden di Provinsi DKI Jakarta, Jawa Barat, dan Jawa Tengah. Studi literatur menunjukkan recyclable cardboard dan bioplastic dapat menjadi alternatif eco-friendly packaging yang paling relevan untuk marketplaces di Indonesia karena murah dan bahan terbaik. Analisis CCM mengungkap bahwa konsumen berminat terhadap eco-friendly packaging, mayoritas mengetahui manfaat penggunaannya dan bersedia untuk menggunakannya dengan total WTP maksimum sebesar Rp1.348,47 dan Rp4.237,80. Nilai Willingness to Pay (WTP) berpotensi meningkat jika konsumen diberikan edukasi manfaat eco-friendly packaging, dan berdomisili di DKI Jakarta. Lima strategi agar implementasi eco-friendly packaging di marketplaces dapat efektif, yaitu 1) menetapkan harga maksimum eco-friendly packaging sebesar Rp1.348,47, 2) memberikan edukasi manfaat eco-friendly packaging, 3) bila pilot project diperlukan, DKI Jakarta dapat menjadi provinsi percontohan, 4) memberikan voucher eco-friendly packaging, serta 5) mewujudkan kerja sama antara pemerintah, marketplaces, penjual, dan konsumen.  Pemerintah dapat menetapkan regulasi yang meminta marketplaces untuk menyediakan opsi eco-friendly packaging pada fitur pemilihan kemasan serta pemberian edukasi dan promosi penggunaan eco-friendly packaging untuk menarik minat konsumen.

ABSTRACT

Marketplaces have increased the number of online-shopping package shipments and waste generation, which is dominated by plastic materials. Eco-friendly packaging is imperative to reduce waste generation including its negative environmental impacts. This effort is inline with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) point 12.5 i.e.  by 2030, achieve the sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.  This study aims to 1) identify forms of eco-friendly packaging that to be applied in marketplaces, 2) analyze consumer preferences for eco-friendly packaging, and 3) formulate strategies for implementing eco-friendly packaging in marketplaces. Study literature, descriptive analysis and contingent choice modeling (CCM) were used to answer the objectives. CCM formulated nine alternatives of eco-friendly packagings which can be applied in marketplaces. Data were obtained from literature stud and blended surveys to 314 respondents living in DKI Jakarta, West Java and Central Java provinces. The results show that recyclable cardboard and bioplastic can be an alternative to eco-friendly packaging in marketplaces. CCM analysis reveals that consumers are interested in eco-friendly packaging, most of them are aware to its benefits and willing to use it with a maximum total WTP of IDR 1,348.47 and IDR 4,237.80. These WTPs could increase under two conditions i.e., if the benefits of eco-friendly packaging are described to consumers before they select the packaging and if the consumers are living in DKI Jakarta province.  Five strategies for the implementation of eco-friendly packaging in marketplaces include 1) setting the maximum price for eco-friendly packaging at Rp1,348.47, 2) providing education on the benefits of eco-friendly packaging, 3) if a pilot project is needed, DKI Jakarta province can become a pilot province, 4) provide eco-friendly packaging vouchers, and 5) create cooperation between the government, marketplace, sellers, and consumers. The government could set a regulation which ask marketplaces to provide eco-friendly packaging options in the packaging selection features as well as educating and promoting the use of eco-friendly packaging to gain consumer’s interest.

Fulltext View|Download
Keywords: Bioplastic; Choice Modelling; Recyclable cardboard; Willingness to pay
Funding: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi

Article Metrics:

  1. Aryandi, J. dan Onsardi. 2020. Pengaruh kualitas pelayanan dan lokasi terhadap keputusan pembelian konsumen pada Café Wareg Bengkulu. Jurnal Manajemen Modal Insani dan Bisnis, Vol. 1 No. 1. Hal 117-127
  2. Auliandri, T. A., Thoyib, A., Rohman, F., dan Rofiq, A. 2018. Does green packaging matters as a business strategy? Exploring young consumer’s consumption in an emerging market. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 16 (2):376-384
  3. Azizi, F. dan Yateno. 2021. Pengaruh kualitas produk, diskon dan tagline “gratis ongkir” terhadap keputusan pembelian pada marketplace Shopee (studi kasus pada mahasiswa FEB, Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro. Jurnal Manajemen Diversifikasi. 1 (2):260-277
  4. [BAPPENAS] Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. 2020. Metadata Indikator Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDGs) Indonesia: Pilar Pembangunan Lingkungan. Edisi ke-10, Kementerian PPN/BAPPENAS. Jakarta (ID)
  5. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Statistik Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia 2018. BPS. Jakarta (ID)
  6. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Statistik E-commerce 2019. BPS. Jakarta (ID)
  7. Bermansyah, dan Antoni, Y. 2016. Digitalisasi naskah kuno dalam upaya pelestarian dan menarik minat generasi muda. GaneÇ Swara. 10 (1):120–127
  8. Boesen, S., Bey, N., dan Niero, M. 2019. Environmental sustainability of liquid food packaging: Is there a gap between Danish consumers' perception and learnings from life cycle assessment? Journal of Cleaner Production. 210 (2019):1193-1206
  9. Chedda, B.K., Minocha, D., dan Berger, P.D. 2019. Packaging- An important marketing tool for brands. Global Publication House Journal: Applied Management Science. 2 (3):1-18
  10. Chen, Y., Yan, X., Fan, W., dan Gordon M. 2015. The joint moderating role of trust propensity and gender on consumers’ online shopping behavior. Computers in Human Behavior. 43 (2015):273-283
  11. Coniwanti, P., Laila, L., dan Alfira, M. R. 2014. Pembuatan film plastik biodegradabel dari pati jagung dengan penambahan kitosan dan pemlastis gliserol. Jurnal Teknik Kimia. 20(4): 22-30
  12. De-Magistris, T. dan Gracia, A. 2016. Consumers’ willingness-to-pay for sustainable food products: The case of organically and locally grown almonds in Spain. Journal of Cleaner Production. 118 (2016):97–104
  13. Forbes. 2019. Going green - what’s good for the planet is good for business. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/natalieparletta/2019/05/14/going-green-whats-good-for-the-planet-is-good-for-business/?sh=4586344c3201. Diakses tanggal 22 Agustus 2021
  14. Fridana, I.O. dan Asandimitra, N. 2020. Analisis faktor yang memengaruhi keputusan investasi (studi pada mahasiswi di Surabaya). Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis. 4 (2):396-405
  15. Gheorghita, R., Gutt, G., dan Amariei, S. 2020. The use of edible films based on sodium alginate in meat product packaging: an eco-friendly alternative to conventional plastic materials. Coatings. 10 (2):1-16
  16. Gironi, F. dan Piemonte, V. 2011. Bioplastics and petroleum-based plastics: strenghs and weaknesses. Energy Source. Part A 33: 1949-1959
  17. Herbes, C., Beuthner, C., dan Ramme, I. 2018. Consumer attitudes towards biobased packaging–A cross-cultural comparative study. Journal of Cleaner Production. 194 (2018):203-218
  18. Ittaqullah, N., Madjid, R., dan Suleman, N.R. 2020. The effect of mobile marketing, discount, and lifestyle on consumers’ impulse buying behavior in online marketplace. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 9 (3):1569-1577
  19. Jaafar, S.N., Lalp, P.E., dan Naba, M.M. 2012. Consumers’ perceptions, attitudes, and purchase intention towards private label food products in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences. 2 (8):73-90
  20. Jessica, C. 2021. 11 Perusahaan yang sudah menerapkan go green, cari tahu di sini. URL: https://glints.com/id/lowongan/perusahaan-go-green/#.YSUAm74zbIU. Diakses: 22 Agustus 2021
  21. Jhonson, A. 2019. 9 eco-friendly packaging alternatives for your business’s shipping needs. URL: https://greenbusinessbureau.com/blog/8-eco-friendly-packaging-alternatives-for-your-businesss-shipping-needs/. Diakses tanggal 14 Februari 2021
  22. Kamsiati, E., Herawati, H., dan Purwani, E.Y. 2017. Potensi pengembangan plastik biodegradable berbasis pati sagu dan ubikayu di Indonesia. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian. 36 (2) : 67-76
  23. Kifli, F.W., Mulyo, J.H., Darwanto, D.H., dan Hartono, S. 2017. Pengaruh modal sosial terhadap permintaan pangan rumahtangga tani di Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis. 14 (3):273-283
  24. Klein, F., Emberger-Klein, A., Menrad, K., Möhring, W., dan Blesin, J.M. 2019. Influencing factors for the purchase intention of consumers choosing bioplastic products in Germany. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 19 (2019):33-43
  25. [KLHK] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. 2019. Peta jalan pengurangan sampah oleh produsen. URL: http://jdih.menlhk.co.id/uploads/files/P_75_2019_PETA_JALAN_SAMPAH_menlhk_12162019142914.pdf. Diakses tanggal 08 Oktober 2021
  26. Kusumo, R.A.B., Charina, A., dan Sukayat, Y. 2017. Edukasi ramah lingkungan: perspektif gender dalam agribisnis ekologis. Jurnal Social Economic of Agriculture. 6 (1):24-38
  27. Kuswanto, H., Pratama, W.B.H., dan Ahmad, I.S. 2020. Survey data on students' online shopping behaviour: a focus on selected university students in Indonesia. Data in Brief. 29 (2020):105073. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.105073
  28. [LIPI] Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia. 2020. Peningkatan sampah plastik dari belanja online dan delivery selama PSBB. URL: http://lipi.go.id/berita/single/Peningkatan-Sampah-Plastik-dari-Belanja-Online dan-Delivery-Selama-PSBB/22037. Diakses tanggal 20 Februari 2021
  29. Martinho, G., Pires, A., Portela, G., dan Fonseca, M. 2015. Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 103 (2015):58-68
  30. Munawaroh, N. A. dan Rohman, F. 2014. Anteseden pembelian impulsif produk fashion oleh pria (studi pada toko ritel fashion di Jakarta). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen. 12 (2):340–350
  31. Murti, A.T. dan Putri, S.A. 2018. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi permintaan daging broiler di Kota Malang. Buana Sains. 18 (1):47-50
  32. Nisa, A.C. 2020. 8 Tren pertumbuhan e-commerce di tahun 2020. URL: https://www.exabytes.co.id/blog/tren-ecommerce-2020/. Diakses tanggal 23 Agustus 2021
  33. Orzan, G., Cruceru, A.F., Bălăceanu, C.T., dan Chivu, R.G. 2018. Consumers’ behavior concerning sustainable packaging: An exploratory study on Romanian consumers. Sustainability. 10(6):1787
  34. Puspa, R., Permana, A., dan Nuryanti, S. 2017. Pengaruh harga dan lokasi terhadap keputusan pembelian (studi kasus pada Perumahan Ciujung River Park Serang, Banten). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis. 3 (2):205-215
  35. Putra, D. R. dan Prasetyawati, Y. R. 2021. Pengaruh green product terhadap minat beli ulang konsumen melalui green advertising (Studi terhadap konsumen Starbucks). Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran. 15 (2):69-74
  36. Safaei, A. S., Roozbeh, A., dan Paydar, M. M. 2017. A robust optimization model for design of a cardboard closed-supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production. 166 (2017):1154-1168
  37. Saxena, P., Bissacco, G., Meinert, K. A., dan Bedka, F. J. 2020. Mold design and fabrication for production of thermoformed paper-based packaging product. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 58 (2020):311-321
  38. Scarpi, D., Russo, I., Confente, I., dan Hazen, B. 2021. Individual antecedents to consumer intention to switch to food waste bioplastic products: A configuration analysis. Industrial Marketing Management. 93 (2021):578-590
  39. Singh, G. dan Pandey, N. 2018. The determinants of green packaging that influence buyers’ willingness to pay a price premium. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ). 26 (3):221-230
  40. Sirclo. 2020. Menilik tren perkembangan e-commerce Indonesia di 2020. URL: https://www.sirclo.com/menilik-tren-perkembangan-e-commerce-indonesia-di-2020/. Diakses tanggal 8 Juli 2021
  41. Suryadi, A. dan Lutfi, M. 2020. Analisis pengaruh kreativitas iklan terhadap keputusan pembelian pada aplikasi E-commerce XYZ di Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Industri dan Teknologi. 1 (6):97-108
  42. Susanti, Jasruddin, dan Subaer. 2015. Sintesis komposit bioplastic berbahan dasar tepung tapioka dengan penguat serat bambu. Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika. 11(2): 179-184
  43. Wandosell, G., Parra-Meroño, M.C., Alcayde, A., dan Baños, R. 2021. Green packaging from consumer and business perspective. Sustainability. 13 (1356):1-19
  44. Wang, Y. dan ZHu, Q. 2020. How do you manage online delivery package waste?. IEEE Engineering Management Review. 48 (2):184-192
  45. Wardani, D.K. dan Supiati. 2020. Pengaruh sosialisasi pasar modal dan persepsi atas risiko terhadap minat investasi mahasiswa di pasar modal. Jurnal Akuntansi. 12 (1):13-22
  46. Windle, J. dan Rolfe, J. 2013. Using discrete choice experiments to assess the preferences of new mining workforce to commute or relocate to the Surat Basin in Australia. Journal of Resources Policy. 38 (2):169-180
  47. Yuniarti, L.I., Hutomo, G.S., dan Rahim, A. 2014. Sintesis dan karakteriasi bioplastik berbasis pati sagu (Metroxylon sp). e-J. Agrotekbis. 2(1): 38-46
  48. Yustiani, R dan Yunanto, R. 2017. Peran marketplace sebagai alternatif bisnis di era teknologi informasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer dan Informatika. 6 (2):43-48

Last update:

  1. Comparison Analysis of Eco-Friendly and Non Eco-Friendly Packaging in Meeting Market Demands for Home Industries to Support the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals in West Java

    Rana Ardila Rahma, Fransisca Debora, Hani Fitria Rahmani, M. Setiyo, Z. Rozaki, A. Setiawan, F. Yuliastuti, Z.B. Pambuko, C.B. Edhita Praja, V. Soraya Dewi, L. Muliawanti. E3S Web of Conferences, 500 , 2024. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202450002012
  2. Revolutionizing Marketing: Unleashing the Power of Recycled Product Materials

    Tasya Ainun Nisa. KINERJA: Jurnal Manajemen Organisasi dan Industri, 2 (1), 2023. doi: 10.37481/jmoi.v2i1.92
  3. Corn Cob Waste: A Sustainable Solution for Eco-Friendly Packaging

    Nisrina Khoirunnisa Salsabila, Siti Maryam Ambarani, Uut Ela Triana, Yasmin Aulia Rahmi, Fitri Ayu Puspita Sari, Indah Setiawati. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, 25 , 2023. doi: 10.21070/ijins.v25i.957
  4. Challenges and prospects of multilayer plastic waste management in several countries: A systematic literature review

    Mayrianti Annisa Anwar, Suprihatin, Nugroho Adi Sasongko, Mukhamad Najib, Bono Pranoto. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 10 , 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2024.100911

Last update: 2024-11-24 10:05:08

No citation recorded.