Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara/Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia
BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JAI68607, author = {Imam Syahputra and Rr Sinta Irina and Bastian Lubis}, title = {Comparison of The Effects of Fentanyl versus Ketamine on The Quality of Recovery Post General Anesthesia with QoR-40 Scoring in Laparotomy Surgery}, journal = {JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)}, volume = {17}, number = {2}, year = {2025}, keywords = {fentanyl; general anesthesia; ketamine; laparotomy; postoperative recovery; QoR-40}, abstract = { Background : Evaluating recovery after general anesthesia is vital to assess the success of anesthesia procedures. The quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire comprehensively measures post-anesthesia recovery. Poor postoperative pain management can lead to complications and chronic pain. Researchers studied ketamine because of its potential to enhance standard analgesics, improve pain control, and promote better recovery outcomes. Methods : This double-blind, randomized controlled trial involved 42 patients undergoing laparotomy at Haji General Hospital, Medan. Participants were randomized into two groups: one receiving fentanyl at 0.7 µg/kg body weight (BW) and the other receiving ketamine at 0.2 mg/kg BW. Consecutive sampling was used for participant selection, including patients who met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The QoR-40 questionnaire, validated in Indonesian, was administered postoperatively to assess recovery across five dimensions: comfort, feelings, support, independence, and pain. Results : The results of the study showed that the total QoR-40 score for fentanyl use had an average of 172.4762 + 3.81601, while in the group using ketamine, the average score was 174.7619 + 3.37498, which had a significant difference between the fentanyl group and the ketamine group with p <0.05. Conclusion : Ketamine provides a superior quality of recovery compared to fentanyl, as evidenced by higher comfort and total QoR-40 scores. These findings support ketamine's use as an effective alternative in anesthetic protocols for laparotomy procedures, promoting better recovery and reducing dependence on opioids. }, issn = {2089-970X}, pages = {111--118} doi = {10.14710/jai.v0i0.68607}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/janesti/article/view/68607} }
Refworks Citation Data :
Background: Evaluating recovery after general anesthesia is vital to assess the success of anesthesia procedures. The quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire comprehensively measures post-anesthesia recovery. Poor postoperative pain management can lead to complications and chronic pain. Researchers studied ketamine because of its potential to enhance standard analgesics, improve pain control, and promote better recovery outcomes.
Methods: This double-blind, randomized controlled trial involved 42 patients undergoing laparotomy at Haji General Hospital, Medan. Participants were randomized into two groups: one receiving fentanyl at 0.7 µg/kg body weight (BW) and the other receiving ketamine at 0.2 mg/kg BW. Consecutive sampling was used for participant selection, including patients who met specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The QoR-40 questionnaire, validated in Indonesian, was administered postoperatively to assess recovery across five dimensions: comfort, feelings, support, independence, and pain.
Results: The results of the study showed that the total QoR-40 score for fentanyl use had an average of 172.4762 + 3.81601, while in the group using ketamine, the average score was 174.7619 + 3.37498, which had a significant difference between the fentanyl group and the ketamine group with p <0.05.
Conclusion: Ketamine provides a superior quality of recovery compared to fentanyl, as evidenced by higher comfort and total QoR-40 scores. These findings support ketamine's use as an effective alternative in anesthetic protocols for laparotomy procedures, promoting better recovery and reducing dependence on opioids.
Note: This article has supplementary file(s).
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2025-08-18 20:04:02
The Authors submitting a manuscript do so on the understanding that if accepted for publication, copyright of the article shall be assigned to JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University as publisher of the journal. Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all form and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations.
JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) and Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University and the Editors make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions or statements be published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia) are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
The Copyright Transfer Form can be downloaded here:[Copyright Transfer Form JAI]. The copyright form should be signed originally and send to the Editorial Office in the form of original mail, scanned document:
Mochamat (Editor-in-Chief)
Editorial Office of JAI (Jurnal Anestesiologi Indonesia)
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University/ Dr. Kariadi General Hospital Medical Center (RSUP Dr. Kariadi)
Jl. Dr. Soetomo No. 16 Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50231
Telp. : (024) 8444346
Email : janestesiologi@gmail.com
View My Stats
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License