skip to main content

The CIPP Model of Stunting Management Program During Covid-19 Pandemic in Semarang City

Public Heatlh Program, Faculty Of Public Health, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Received: 15 Nov 2021; Published: 1 Jun 2022.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Background: Semarang City has successfully reduced in reducing the stunting rate by 2.7% in 2018 and 2.5% in 2019. With the Covid-19 pandemic, the stunting prevention program in Semarang City faces problems that have the potential to increase the prevalence risk of stunting. The problem are limited access of intervention and decline of the stunting program quality in work area of the Puskesmas in Semarang City. In addition, it is still unknown how the stunting program was implemented at the puskesmas during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Objectives: The purpose of this research was to identify and evaluate the implementation of the stunting prevention program in Semarang City during the Covid-19 pandemic by using the CIPP model.

Materials and Methods: This research used a survey research with a qualitative approach. This research was carried out from August to October 2021. The informants for this study consisted of 5 main informants: nutritionists at the puskesmas, 15 triangulation informants, the head of the puskesmas, posyandu cadres, and mothers who had stunted children in five health centers in Semarang City, namely Bandarharjo Health Center, Lamper Tengah Health Center, Tlogosari Wetan Health Center, Gunungpati Health Center, and Pegandan Health Center. Determination of informants using a purposive technique based on the geographic location of the Public Health Center. In-depth interviews used prepared guidelines. Data analysis used content analysis.

Results: The results showed that the in the context component, the nutritionists had understood goals and targets of the stunting program. The input component showed that Human Resources was not optimal because they helped in succeed in the Covid-19 program. Funding was disrupted because there were still no technical guidelines for funding during the Covid, infrastructures were not optimal due to a lack of training for posyandu cadres. The process components included: a monitoring program that was carried out door to door, no administration of PMT F100, ineffective online counseling, fewer mothers who were participated in nutrition consultations, no monitoring related to vitamin A administration.

Conclusion: The stunting prevention program in the work area of the puskesmas during the Covid-19 pandemic has not been able to be implemented well during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  common.other
SURAT PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PENULIS JGI
Subject SURAT PERNYATAAN
Type Other
  Download (292KB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: Stunting; CIPP Model ; Program

Article Metrics:

  1. Khoeroh H, Handayani OWK, Indriyanti DR. Evaluasi Penatalaksanaan Gizi Balita Stunting Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Sirampog. Unnes Journal Public Heal. 2017;6(3):189
  2. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. 100 Desa Priorits Pada 10 Kabupaten Prioritas Stunting. Jakarta; 2017
  3. Kemenkes RI. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2019. Vol. 42, Kementrian Kesehatan Repoblik Indonesia. 2019
  4. Dinas Kesehatan Kota Semarang. Profil Kesehatan Kota Semarang. Semarang; 2017
  5. Ariawan I, Riono P, Farid MN, Jusril H, Wahyuningsih W, Ali PB, et al. Proyeksi COVID-19 di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2021. 52 p
  6. Efrizal W. Berdampakkah pandemi covid-19 terhadap stunting di bangka belitung? Journal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia
  7. Clark H, Coll-Seck AM, Banerjee A, Peterson S, Dalglish SL, Ameratunga S, et al. A future for the world’s children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):605–58
  8. Daniel L. Stufflebeam, Shinkfield AJ. Evaluation, Theory, Models, and Application. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass; 2007. 326 p
  9. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2018
  10. Emzir. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan : Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers; 2010
  11. Rustam S. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pemberian Makanan Pendamping Air Susu Ibu (MP-ASI) (Studi Kasus di Puskesmas Konda Kabupaten Konawe Selatan). Universitas Indonesia; 2012
  12. Wuriningsih AY, Wiji D, Sari P, Khasanah NN. Optimalisasi Pencegahan Stunting Melalui Kelompok Pendamping Siaga Risiko Stunting ( KP-Skoring ) berbasis Self Help Group. Journal Community Engagem Heal. 2021;4(1):58–65
  13. Rizki Awalunisa Hasanah RMK. Antropometri Pengukuran Status Gizi Anak Usia 24-60 Bulan Di Kelurahan Bener Kota Yogyakarta. Med Respati Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan. 2018;13(4)
  14. Liang Z. Project Management in Health and Community Services. 3rd ed. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2019
  15. Ayuningtyas D. Perencanaan strategis untuk organisasi pelayanan kesehatan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada; 2013
  16. Mahendradhata Y, Probandari AN, Sebong P. Manajemen program Kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press; 2019
  17. Sabardiman K, Afrizal A, Nurmaesah N. Evaluasi Perubahan Puskesmas menjadi Badan Layanan Usaha Daerah (BLUD) Terhadap Tata Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Jurnal Proaksi. 2020;7(2)
  18. Astuti S. Gerakan Pencegahan Stunting Melalui Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Di Kecamatan Jatinangor Kabupaten Sumedang. Dharmakarya Journal. 2018;7(3):185–8
  19. Muthia G, Yantri E. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Program Pencegahan Stunting Ditinjau dari Intervensi Gizi Spesifik Gerakan 1000 HPK Di Puskesmas. Jurnal Kesehatan Andalas. 2020;
  20. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Peraturan Mentri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 26 Tahun 2013 Tentang Penyelengaraan Pekerjaan dan Praktik Tenaga Gizi. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2013
  21. Misnaniarti M. Development and Empowerment of Health Human Resources the Important Aspect in Decentralization. Jurnal Ilmu Kesehat Masyarakat. 2010;1(1):11–7
  22. Distia Permatasari E, Damayanti NA. Workload analysis for health worker in Pacarkeling Public Health Center Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Kesehatan Indonesia. 2017;5(3):65–73
  23. Gedeona HT, Kurnia D. Implementasi Kebijakan Bantuan Operasional Kesehatan (BOK) di Puskesmas Pagarsih, Ibrahim Adjie, dan Padasuka Kota Bandung. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi. 2016;13(1):111–38
  24. Arianto G, Nantabah ZK. Analisis Pembiayaan Kesehatan Program Upaya Kesehatan Masyarakat Di Indonesia Tahun 2013 & 2014. Buletin Jurnal Penelitian Sistem Kesehatan. 2020;
  25. Wulandari N, Margawati A, Rahfiludin Z. The implementation of nutrition improvement programs for underweight children, wasting and stunting in the Department of Health, Central Buton district, Southeast Sulawesi. Jurnal Gizi Indonesia. 2021;9(2):86–96
  26. Rusdiarti. ANALISIS PENGUKURAN KETEPATAN ANTROPOMETRI TINGGI BADAN PENDAHULUAN Status Gizi balita merupakan salah satu indikator derajat kesehatan di Indonesia . Status gizi yang baik dapat membantu proses pertumbuhan dan. Heal Information Journal. 2019;11:173–81
  27. Didah D. Gambaran peran dan fungsi kader posyandu di wilayah kerja puskesmas Jatinangor. Jurnal Kebidanan Malahayati. 2020;6(2):217–21
  28. Kholidah D, Prawirohartono EP, Nisa FZ. Pemberian makanan F100 dengan bahan substitusi tepung tempe terhadap status protein pasien anak dengan gizi kurang. Jurnal Gizi Klinis Indones. 2013;10(2):92
  29. Fakhriyah F, Athiyya N. PENYULUHAN HIPERTENSI MELALUI WHATSAPP GROUP SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGENDALIAN HIPERTENSI. SELAPARANG Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan. 2021;
  30. Mane MO, Juahaepa, Anggraini D. PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PELAYANAN PUSKESMAS.Jurnal Neo Societal.2018
  31. Utami TN, Harahap DR. Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Kesehatan pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 di Kota Binjai. Jurnal Penelitian Kesehat an. 2021;12(April):2019–22
  32. Adriani P. Faktor-Faktor Yang Berhubungan Dengan Pemberian Vitamin a Pada Balita Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kandai Kota Kendari. Jurnal SMART Kebidanan. 2019;6(1):20
  33. Azwar A. Pengantar Administrasi Kesehatan. Jakarta: Bina Rupa Aksara; 2012

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2024-05-20 10:24:57

No citation recorded.