skip to main content

Analisis Kualitas dan Kuantitas Air Bersih di Pulau Kelapa, Kepulauan Seribu

1School of Environmental Science, Universitas Indonesia, Jl. Salemba Raya Kampus UI Salemba No.4, RW.5, Kenari, Senen, Central Jakarta City, Jakarta 10430, Indonesia

2Departemen Kesehatan Lingkungan, Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

Open Access Copyright 2025 Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Latar belakang: Pulau kecil memiliki kerentanan air bersih karena ukuran, topografi, keterbatasan sumber air, pertumbuhan penduduk dan dampak krisis iklim. Pulau Kelapa merupakan bagian dari Kepulauan Seribu yang memiliki karakteristik pulau kecil saat ini mengalami peningkatan jumlah penduduk ditambah dengan penetapan sebagai Kawasan Strategis Pariwisata Nasional mengakibatkan kebutuhan air bersih semakin meningkat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menggambarkan kondisi kualitas dan kuantitas pada rumah tangga untuk menjamin kualitas dan ketersediaan air di Pulau Kelapa.

Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif deskriptif. Uji laboratorium kualitas air dilakukan dengan sampel air yang berasal dari air perpipaan, air isi ulang, air sumur dan air air hujan dengan menggunakan standar baku mutu air bersih berdasarkan Permenkes 2 Tahun 2023. Sampel rumah tangga sebanyak 240 Kepala Keluarga diwawancara menggunakan kuesioner terstruktur untuk mendapatkan gambaran pemenuhan air domestik.

Hasil: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan penggunaan air sumur mendominasi kebutuhan air bersih untuk kebutuhan hygiene sanitasi. Sebanyak 51% responden menggunakan 120 liter/orang/hari air bersih untuk kebutuhan domestik; aksesibilitas responden ke sumber air (jarak< 500 meter dan waktu pengumpulan air < 30 menit) tercukupi oleh 81% dan 60% responden secara berurutan, sebanyak 76% sumber air yang digunakan oleh responden terasa payau; rata-rata biaya pemenuhan air bersih sebesar 10,76% dari total pendapatan rumah tangga. Secara kualitas, sumber air bersih yang berasal dari air perpipaan dan air isi ulang memenuhi syarat kesehatan secara fisik dan kimia namun tidak memenuhi syarat kesehatan pada parameter total koliform. Sumber air bersih yang berasal dari air sumur memenuhi syarat kesehatan secara kimia namun tidak memenuhi syarat pada parameter TDS, total koliform, dan bakteri Eschericia coli. Sedangkan sumber air hujan tidak memenuhi syarat pada parameter total koliform dan bakteri Eschericia coli.

Simpulan: Berdasarkan hasil penelitian didapatkan masyarakat Pulau Kelapa mengeluarkan biaya yang tinggi untuk mendapatkan akses air bersih namun secara kualitasnya belum memenuhi persyaratan kesehatan khususnya pada parameter total koliform.

 

ABSTRACT

Title: Clean Water Quality and Quantity Analysis in Kelapa Island, Seribu Islands

Background: Small islands are vulnerable to clean water due to its size, topography, limited water resources, population growth and the impact of the climate crisis. Kelapa Island is part of Seribu Islands which has the characteristics of a small island. Increasing number of population,combined with its designation as a National Tourism Strategic Area, clean water demand is increasing. This research aims to describe clean water quality and quantity in residents to ensure the quality and availability of air on Kelapa Island.

Method: This research used descriptive quantitative methods. Water quality laboratory tests were carried out with water samples originating from piped water, refill water, well water and rainwater using clean water quality standards based on Minister of Health Regulation 2/2023. A household sample of 240 heads of families was interviewed using a structured questionnaire to represent domestic water supply.

Result: The research results showed that the use of well water dominates  to fulfill the need for clean water for hygiene and sanitation. As many as 51% of respondents use 120 liters/person/day of clean water for domestic needs; Respondents' accessibility to water sources (distance < 500 meters and water collection time < 30 minutes) was sufficient for 81% and 60% of respondents respectively, 76% of the water sources used by respondents felt brackish; the average cost of providing clean water is 10.76% of total household income. In terms of quality, clean water sources originating from piped water and refill water meet physical and chemical health requirements but do not meet health requirements for total coliform parameters. Clean water sources that come from well water meet chemical health requirements but do not meet the requirements for TDS parameters, total coliforms and Escherichia coli bacteria. Meanwhile, rainwater sources do not meet the requirements for the total parameters of coliforms and Escherichia coli bacteria.

Conclusion: Based on the research results, it was found that the residents of Kelapa Island  had to pay high cost to get access to clean water, but the quality does not meet health requirements, especially in terms of microbiological parameters.

 

Note: This article has supplementary file(s).

Fulltext View|Download |  CTA
Copyright Transfer Agreement
Subject
Type CTA
  Download (324KB)    Indexing metadata
 ES
Ethical Statement
Subject
Type ES
  Download (498KB)    Indexing metadata
 Turnitin
Turnitin
Subject
Type Turnitin
  Download (2MB)    Indexing metadata
Keywords: kualitas air; kuantitas air; Pulau Kelapa

Article Metrics:

  1. Oluwasanya G, Omoniyi A, Perera D, Layi-adigun B, Thuy L, Qadir M. Water quality, WASH, and gender: differential impacts on health and well-being in Abeokuta City, Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess. 1 Oktober 2023;195(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11833-2
  2. Mutono N, Wright JA, Mutembei H, Muema J, Thomas MLH, Mutunga M, dkk. The nexus between improved water supply and water-borne diseases in urban areas in Africa: a scoping review. AAS Open Res. 28 Mei 2021;4:27. https://doi.org/10.12688/aasopenres.13225.1
  3. Aboah M, Miyittah MK. Estimating global water, sanitation, and hygiene levels and related risks on human health, using global indicators data from 1990 to 2020. J Water Health. 1 Juli 2022;20(7):1091–101. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2022.065
  4. Hidayangsih PS, Dharmayanti I, Tjandrarini DH, Sukoco NEW. Relationship Between Climate Variability, WASH and Diarrhea Cases in Indonesia. Dalam: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference for Health Research – BRIN (ICHR 2022). Atlantis Press International BV; 2023. hlm. 642–54. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-112-8_59
  5. Miller GT, Spoolman SE. Living in the environment. 2018
  6. Paudel S, Kumar P, Dasgupta R, Johnson BA, Avtar R, Shaw R, dkk. Nexus between water security framework and public health: A comprehensive scientific review. Vol. 13, Water (Switzerland). MDPI AG; 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101365
  7. Umami A, Sukmana H, Wikurendra EA, Paulik E. A review on water management issues: potential and challenges in Indonesia. Sustain Water Resour Manag. 1 Juni 2022;8(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-022-00648-7
  8. Di Baldassarre G, Sivapalan M, Rusca M, Cudennec C, Garcia M, Kreibich H, dkk. Sociohydrology: Scientific Challenges in Addressing the Sustainable Development Goals. Water Resour Res. 1 Agustus 2019;55(8):6327–55. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023901
  9. Kusumartono FXH, Rizal A. An integrated assessment of vulnerability to water scarcity measurement in small islands of Indonesia. An International Scientific Journal [Internet]. 2019;117–33. Tersedia pada: www.worldnewsnaturalsciences.com
  10. Hidayat ARRT, Wijayanti WP, Kurniati S, Maha EA. Challenge and Opportunity of Settlement and Infrastructure Development in the Small Island (Case Study: Pulau Laut Kelautan District, Kotabaru Regency). Procedia Soc Behav Sci. Juli 2016;227:286–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.073
  11. Wulan DR, Sintawardani N, Marganingrum D, Triyono T, Barid VB, Santoso H, dkk. Water sources, consumption, and water-related sanitation on Pari Island, Indonesia: a mixed-focus group discussion and survey study. Aqua Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society. 1 Agustus 2023;72(8):1359–72. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.137
  12. Alamanos A. Water resources planning under climate and economic changes in Skiathos island, Aegean. Aqua Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society. 1 November 2021;70(7):1085–93. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2021.061
  13. Sharan A, Lal A, Datta B. Evaluating the impacts of climate change and water over-abstraction on groundwater resources in Pacific island country of Tonga. Groundw Sustain Dev. 1 Februari 2023;20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100890
  14. Silangen MG, Tilaar S, Sembel A. PEMETAAN MASALAH PENYEDIAAN AIR MINUM DI PERKOTAAN TOBELO KABUPATEN HALMAHERA. Jurnal Spasial. 2020;7(1)
  15. Odiyo JO, Makungo R. Chemical and microbial quality of groundwater in Siloam village, implications to human health and sources of contamination. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 12 Februari 2018;15(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020317
  16. Howard G, Bartram J, Williams A, Overbo A, Fuente D, Geere JA. Domestic water quantity, service level and health Second edition. 2020
  17. Komarulzaman A, De Jong E, Smits J. The switch to refillable bottled water in Indonesia: A serious health risk. J Water Health. 1 Desember 2017;15(6):1004–14. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2017.319
  18. Asmorowati ET, Sarasanty D. Model Prediksi Kebutuhan Air Berbasis Sistem Dinamik di Kabupaten Mojokerto. 2021;91–9. https://doi.org/10.31258/dli.8.2.p.91-99
  19. Marganingrum D, Ismail MFA, Wulan DR. Assessment of shallow groundwater contamination on Pari Island, Indonesia. Environ Monit Assess. 1 Januari 2023;195(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10649-w
  20. Cahyadi A, Ramadhoan F, Sasongko MHD. Water Resources in Pari Cay, Kepulauan Seribu, Jakarta, Indonesia. Dalam: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Institute of Physics Publishing; 2019. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/f5ysx
  21. Yeboah SIIK, Antwi-Agyei P, Domfeh MK. Drinking water quality and health risk assessment of intake and point-of-use water sources in Tano North Municipality, Ghana. Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development. 1 Februari 2022;12(2):157–67. https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2022.152
  22. Ogoamaka EM. Review of the Effects of Water Characteristics and Quality on Human Health. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review [Internet]. 10 Maret 2022;05(03). Tersedia pada: https://ijcsrr.org/single-view/?id=5376&pid=5310.
  23. Kooy M, Walter CT, Prabaharyaka I. Inclusive development of urban water services in Jakarta: The role of groundwater. Habitat Int. 1 Maret 2018;73:109–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.10.006
  24. Fuente D, Mosites E, Bressler S, Eichelberger L, Lefferts B, January G, dkk. Health-related economic benefits of universal access to piped water in Arctic communities: Estimates for the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta region of Alaska. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 1 Maret 2022;240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113915
  25. Collins SM, Mbullo Owuor P, Miller JD, Boateng GO, Wekesa P, Onono M, dkk. ‘I know how stressful it is to lack water!’ Exploring the lived experiences of household water insecurity among pregnant and postpartum women in western Kenya. Glob Public Health. 4 Mei 2019;14(5):649–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2018.1521861

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-01-20 03:09:26

No citation recorded.