Dominasi Orang-Orang Besar Dalam Sejarah Indonesia: Kritik Politik Historiografi dan Politik Ingatan

*Ganda Febri Kurniawan scopus  -  Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
W. Warto  -  Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Leo Agung Sutimin  -  Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
Received: 30 Dec 2018; Published: 18 Mar 2019.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

This paper departs from the restlessness of some scientists about the dominant of the big man in Indonesia's historical narrative. It also becomes a form of public memory about the meaning of heroism which is more likely to be cultured rather than understanding academically. This article was composed an academic criticism of the conditions mentioned above, the political term historiography or historical writing that is used as a political interest is the most appropriate in describing Indonesia's current historiographic conditions. The dominance of the big man in history requires to be distorted and historiography needs to provide a place for stories of local heroes. Besides, memory politics also requires to be dammed through a counter-narrative that can be presented through critical historical studies, so that the desire to remember the forgotten will continue to live and become a guide for thinkers and activists of history.

Keywords
Big Man; Politic of Historiography; Politic of Memory.

Article Metrics:

  1. Abdullah, T. (2016). “Historiografi dalam Denyut Sejarah Bangsa”. Kalam, (28): 1-28.
  2. Abdullah, Taufik, dkk. (1999). Membangun Masyarakat Madani. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media.
  3. Adam, Asvi W. (2006). Soeharto File: Sisi Gelap Sejarah Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
  4. Adam, Asvi W. (2018). “Beberapa Catatan Tentang Historiografi Gerakan 30 September 1965”. Archipel, Vol. 95 (1): 11-30.
  5. Agung, Leo S. (2015). “The Role of Social Studies and History Learning in Junior High School in Strengthening the Students Character”. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, Vol. 25 (2): 238-246.
  6. Aizid, Rizem (2014). Menguak Kontroversi-Kontroversi Sejarah Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Saufa.
  7. Ankersemit F. R. (1987). Refleksi Tentang Sejarah: Pendapat-Pendapat tentang Filsafat Sejarah. (Terjemahan Dick Hartoko). Jakarta: Gramedia.
  8. Braudel, Fernand. (1980). On History. (Translation by Sarah Matthews). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  9. Budiawan (Ed.) (2013). Sejarah dan Memori: Titik Simpang dan Titik Temu. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak
  10. Budiman, A. “Oei Tiong Ham”, Suara Merdeka, 23 Juli 1976.
  11. Budiman, Amen dan Ong Hok Ham (1987). Rokok Kretek: Lintasan Sejarah dan Artinya bagi Pembangunan Bangsa dan Negara. Kudus: PT. Djarum.
  12. Carnegie, Paul J. (2008). “Democratization and Decentralization in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Understanding Transition Dynamics”. Pacific Affairs, Vol. 81, (4): 1-14.
  13. Carr, E. H. (2014). Apa Itu Sejarah? Depok: Komunitas Bambu.
  14. Castles, Lance. (1982). Religion, Politics, and Economic Behavior in Java, The Kudus Cigarrets Industry. Jakarta: Grafitas.
  15. Collingwood, R. C. (2001). The Principles of History. New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Coman, A. (2018). “Rewriting Israeli History: New Historioans and Critical Sociologists”. Historicka Sociologie, Vol. 1, (1): 107-122.
  17. Crouch, Harold (2010). Political Reform in Indonesia after Soeharto. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  18. Dahm, Bernhard (1987). Soekarno dan Perjuangan Kemerdekaan. Jakarta. LP3ES.
  19. Dmitri A. Funk (2016). “Religious Component of Modern Cultural Identity of the Peoples of the North and Siberia: Introduction to the Issue’s Special Theme”. Siberian Historical Research, (1): 40-45.
  20. E. McGregor, Katherine (2008). Ketika Sejarah Berseragam: Membongkar Ideologi Militer dalam Menyusun Sejarah Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Syarikat.
  21. Erll, Astrid., Nünning, Ansgar. (2008). Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdiciplinary Handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.
  22. Federsfield, Howard. (1970). Persatuan Islam: Islamic Reform in Twentith Century Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  23. Feith, Herbert dan Lance Castle (Eds.) (1970). Indonesian Political Thinking 1945-1965. London: Cornell University Press.
  24. Fernando, M. R. dan David Bulbeck. (1992). Chinese Economic Activity in Netherlands India. Singapore: ISEAS.
  25. Firdaus, A.N. (1999). Dosa-Dosa Politik Orde Lama dan Orde Baru yang Tidak Boleh Berulang Lagi di Era Reformasi. Jakarta: Alkautsar.
  26. Foucault, Michel (1976). The Archaeology of Knowledge. (Translation by Alan M. Sheridan Smith). New York: Harper & Row Publisher.
  27. Gardiner, Patrick (1959). Theories of History. New York: The Free Press.
  28. Hadler, J. (2008). “A Historiography of Violence and the Secular State in Indonesia: Tuanku Imam Bondjol and the Uses of History”. The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 67 (3): 971-1010.
  29. Halbwachs, Maurice (2011). On Collective Memory. (Translation by Lewis A. Coser). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  30. Hasan, S. H. (2012). Pendidikan Sejarah Indonesia, Isu dalam Ide dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Penerbit Rizky.
  31. Herlina, Nina (2009). Historiografi Indonesia dan Permasalahannya. Bandung: Satya Historika.
  32. Hook, Sidney. (1999). The Hero on History. Boston: Beacon Press.
  33. Ileto, Reynaldo C. (2002). “On the Historiography of Southeast Asia and the Philippines: The ‘Golden Age’ of Southeast Asian Studies-Experiences and Reflections”. Proceedings of the Workshop on “Can We Write History?” Between Postmodernism and Coarse Nationalism. Meiji Gakuin University.
  34. Jaiz, H.A. (1999). Di Bawah Bayang-Bayang Soekarno, Soeharto: Tragedi Politik Islam Indonesia dari Orde Lama hingga Orde Baru. Jakarta: Darul Falah.
  35. Kartodirdjo, Sartono (1984). Pemberontakan Petani Banten 1888; Kondisi, Jalan Peristiwa, dan Kelanjutannya. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
  36. Kartodirdjo, Sartono (2016). Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam Metodologi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
  37. Kochhar, S. K. (2008). Teaching of History. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
  38. Kuntowijoyo (2003). Metodologi Sejarah. Edisi Dua. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  39. Kuntowijoyo (2006). Budaya dan Masyarakat. Edisi Paripurna. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  40. Kuntowijoyo (2008). Penjelasan Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  41. Kuntowijoyo (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  42. Kurniawan, Ganda Febri (2018). “Pengajaran Sejarah Lokal sebagai Counter Wacana Ekstremisme Global di Indonesia (Studi Kasus di Dua Tempat)”. Dalam Anne Shakka Ariyani and A. Harimurti (Ed.) Nasionalisme di Tengah Kewargaan Budaya dan Ekstremisme Global. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.
  43. Liem Tjwan Ling (1991). Raja Gula: Oei Tiong Ham, in Yoshihara Kunio (Ed.) Konglomerat Oei Tiong Ham Kerajaan Bisnis Pertama di Asia Tenggara. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
  44. Lohanda, M. (2007). Sejarah para Pembesar Mengatur Batavia. Masup Jakarta.
  45. Mulyana, Agus (2013). Nasionalisme dan Militerisme: Ideologisasi Historiografi Buku Teks Pelajaran Sejarah SMA. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, Vol. 23, (1): 78-87.
  46. Nagazumi, Akira (1968). Toward An Autonomous History of Indonesia. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deve.1968.6.issue-2/issuetoc, accessed 10 July 2018.
  47. Natalia P, Matkhanova (2016). Authorities and State Officials as Potrayed in The 19th Century Memoirs of Siberian Merchants. Siberian Historical Research, (2): 58-75.
  48. Nichterlein, S. (1974). Historicism and Historiography in Indonesia. History and Theory, Vol. 13 (3): 253-272.
  49. Nikolay N, Kradin, et al. (2018). “Cities and Palaces of the Mongol Empire in Eastern Transbaikal”. Siberian Historical Research, (2): 64-80.
  50. Nonna G, Alfonso (2018). “The Buddhist Ritual Dagger “Phurpa”. Siberian Historical Research, (3): 158-177.
  51. Nordholt, Henk Schulte, et al. (2008). Perspektif Baru Penulisan Sejarah Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  52. Poesponegoro, M. D. dan Nugroho Notosusanto. (2011). Sejarah Nasional Indonesia VI: Zaman Jepang dan Zaman Republik. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
  53. Purwanto, Bambang dan Asvi Warman Adam. (2005). Menggugat Historiografi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
  54. Purwati (2018). Lemahnya Moral di Kalangan Peserta Didik. http://jatengpos.co.id/ lemahnya-moral-di-kalangan-peserta-didik/ accessed 30 June 2018.
  55. Radjab, Suryadi (2013). Dampak Pengendalian Tembakau Terhadap Hak-Hak Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Budaya. Bandung: SAKTI dan CLOS.
  56. Ritzer, George. (2006). Teori Sosial Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
  57. Romadi dan Ganda Febri Kurniawan (2017). “Pembelajaran Sejarah Lokal Berbasis Folklore untuk Menanamkan Nilai Kearifan Lokal pada Siswa”. Sejarah dan Budaya, Vol. 11, (1): 79-94.
  58. Sahlins, M. (2018). “Poor Man, Rich Man, Big Man, Chieef: Political Types in Melanesia and Polynesia”. Siberian Historical Research, (1): 18-41.
  59. Said, Edward (1977). Orientalism. London: Penguin.
  60. Shiraisi, Takashi (1990). An Age in Motion: Popular Radicalism in Jawa, 1912-1926. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
  61. Sitepoe (2000). Kekhususan Rokok Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
  62. Skocpol, Theda (1984). Vision and Method Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  63. Soetrisno, Slamet (2006). Kontroversi dan Rekonstruksi Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
  64. Steenbrink, Karel (1984). Beberapa Aspek tentang Islam di Indonesia Abad ke-19. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
  65. Suharso, R. (1994). “Masyarakat Kudus Kulon dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi”. Jakarta: IKIP Jakarta.
  66. Suhelmi, A. (2002). Polemik Negara Islam. Jakarta. Teraju, 2002.
  67. Sulistiyono, Singgih Tri (2016). “Historiografi Pembebasan: Suatu Alternatif”. Jurnal Agastya, Vol. 6 (1): 9-24.
  68. Suryana, Nanang (2012). “Learning Local and National History to Develop Heroic Values”. Historia: International Journal of History Education, Vol. XIII, (1): 131.146.
  69. Warto. (2017). “Tantangan Penulisan Sejarah Lokal”. Sejarah dan Budaya, Vol. 11, (1): 123-129.
  70. Wertheim, W.F. (1999). Masyarakat Indonesia dalam Transisi Studi Perubahan Sosial. Yogyakarta: PT Tiara Wacana Yogya.
  71. Wood, Michael (2013). Sejarah Resmi Indonesia Modern: Versi Orde Baru dan Para Penentangnya. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.
  72. Yuliati, Dewi (2009). Menuju Kota Industri Semarang Pada Era Kolonial. Semarang: Diponegoro University Press.