BibTex Citation Data :
@article{JSCL54439, author = {Fanada Sholihah and Yety Rochwulaningsih and Singgih Sulistiyono}, title = {Timor Zone: Slave Trading Network from the Traditional Era to the Late Nineteenth-Century Dutch Colonial State}, journal = {Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, year = {2023}, keywords = {Slave Trade Networking; Timorese Slave; Maurits; Macau}, abstract = { This article examines the continuity and changes of the Timorese slave trade network from the traditional era to the late nineteenth-century Dutch colonial state. Archival records, newspapers, and other literature were used extensively to reconstruct the map of the Timorese slave trading. Grasping the dynamics of change and trade networks of Timor, there were two proposed research questions: First, how did the Timorese slave trading network experience continuity and change from the traditional period until the late nineteenth-century Dutch colonial state? Second, to what extent does the need for labour in the global and Southeast Asian context play in shaping and catalyzing the expansion of the Timorese slave network? Timor and its surroundings were deemed slave enclaves (peripheries) with several trading centres. Traditionally, slave trade routes formed from Timor to Java and Malacca. In addition, it was intended for Dili and Macau during the Portuguese era. During the VOC era, Batavia and Banda were the busiest routes of the Timorese slave trade. Networking was increasingly across-the-board, along with the need for labour to meet the demands of the global market. Henceforward, during the Dutch East Indies, the slave trading network continued expanding to Maurits, Réunion, Macau, Mozambique, and Mombasa and several years after the post-prohibition of slavery, leaving Ende Bay as the only centre of the slavery trade. }, issn = {2443-0110}, pages = {170--185} doi = {10.14710/jscl.v7i2.54439}, url = {https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jscl/article/view/54439} }
Refworks Citation Data :
This article examines the continuity and changes of the Timorese slave trade network from the traditional era to the late nineteenth-century Dutch colonial state. Archival records, newspapers, and other literature were used extensively to reconstruct the map of the Timorese slave trading. Grasping the dynamics of change and trade networks of Timor, there were two proposed research questions: First, how did the Timorese slave trading network experience continuity and change from the traditional period until the late nineteenth-century Dutch colonial state? Second, to what extent does the need for labour in the global and Southeast Asian context play in shaping and catalyzing the expansion of the Timorese slave network? Timor and its surroundings were deemed slave enclaves (peripheries) with several trading centres. Traditionally, slave trade routes formed from Timor to Java and Malacca. In addition, it was intended for Dili and Macau during the Portuguese era. During the VOC era, Batavia and Banda were the busiest routes of the Timorese slave trade. Networking was increasingly across-the-board, along with the need for labour to meet the demands of the global market. Henceforward, during the Dutch East Indies, the slave trading network continued expanding to Maurits, Réunion, Macau, Mozambique, and Mombasa and several years after the post-prohibition of slavery, leaving Ende Bay as the only centre of the slavery trade.
Article Metrics:
Last update:
Last update: 2025-12-29 20:27:13
Authors whose articles are published in Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha (JSCL) retain the copyright to their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The work is simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. By submitting a manuscript to JSCL, the author(s) agree to this policy. No separate documentation is required.The author(s) guarantee that:
The work is subject to copyright held exclusively by the author(s), is free of third-party rights, and all necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained.The author(s) retain the following rights to the published work, including but not limited to:
If the article is co-authored, the submitting author confirms that all co-authors have agreed to the copyright and licensing terms and have been informed of this policy. JSCL is not responsible for any internal disputes between authors. All communication will be directed solely to the corresponding author.Authors should also be aware that once published, their articles, and any accompanying files, such as datasets or analytical/computational materials, will be publicly accessible. These materials will be governed by the same Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.JSCL allows users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work under this license. Users must credit the author(s) and JSCL when distributing the work through journals or other publication media. Unless otherwise specified, the author(s) are considered public entities upon publication of the article.
Published by Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro UniversityJl. Prof. Soedarto, S.H. Tembalang, Semarang, Central Java 56025Phone: +6224-74680619; Fax: +6224-74680619Email: jscl@live.undip.ac.id View statistics