Dinamika Gerakan Lingkungan dan Global Environmental Governance

*Yety Rochwulaningsih orcid  -  Department of History, Faculty of Humanities, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Received: 10 Oct 2017; Published: 22 Nov 2017.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Article Info
Section: Articles
Language: IDN
Full Text:
Statistics: 1174 3314
Abstract

Melalui metode sejarah kritis dengan pendekatan politik ekologi, tulisan ini mengkaji peristiwa bencana alam tanah longsor yang menjadi ancaman serius terhadap kehidupan masyarakat. Intensitas bencana tanah longsor yang semakin tinggi dan merata di berbagai kawasan di Indonesia tidak terlepas dari kebijakan ekonomi politik pemerintah dalam memanfaatkan sumber daya alam dan masifnya penetrasi sistem ekonomi kapitalis global yang sangat ekspansif dan eksploitatif terhadap sumber daya alam. Fakta empirik implementasi UU No.5/1967, UU No. 11/1967, UU No. 5/1990, dan TAP MPR No IX/2001, justru menjadi pintu masuk bagi pemanfaatan sumber daya alam melebihi carrying capacity yang berdampak terhadap kerusakan ekosistem dan bencana alam yang menjadi ancaman serius kehidupan masyarakat.

Keywords
Politik Ekologi; Kerusakan Ekosistem; Longsor; Ekonomi Kapitalis

Article Metrics:

  1. Baso, Ahmad. 1999. Civil Society Versus Masyarakat Madani. Jakarta: Pustaka Hidayah.
  2. Booth, A. 1989. ‘Export and growth in the colonial economy, 1830-1940’, dalam A. Maddison & G. Prince. Eds. Economic growth in Indonesia 1820-1940. Dordrecht/Providence: Foris, hlm. 67-96.
  3. Booth, A. 1990. ‘Foreign trade and domestic development in the colonial economy‘, dalam A. Booth, W.J. O’Malley & A. Weidemann. Eds. Indonesian economic history in the Dutch colonial era. New Haven: Yale University Press, hlm. 210-243.
  4. Campbell, T. 1993. Applying a Biosocial Perspective on the Family. New York: Plenum.
  5. Castro, C.J. 2004. Sustainable Development.Mainstream and Critical Perspectives. Sage Publication.
  6. Clifford Geertz. 1976. Involusi Pertanian. Jakarta: Bhratara Karya Aksara.
  7. Diesendorf, M and Hamilton, C. (1997). Human Ecology, Human Economy: Ideas for an Ecologically Sustainable Future. NSW: Allen & Unwin.
  8. Dharmawan, Arya Hadi. (2005). Gerakan Sosial Lingkungan dan Perubahan Titik Berat Kekuatan Politik Sipil Era Demokrasi. Bogor: Bahan Suplemen Matakuliah Ekologi Politik Pedesaan S3 Pada Program Studi Sosiologi Pedesaan Sekolah Pascasarjana IPB.
  9. Dwivedi, Ranjit. 2001. Environmental Movements in the Global South. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage Public.
  10. Emmerson, K.Donald. 1972. Exploring Elite Political Culture In Indonesia: Countinuity and Change. Ann Aribor, Michigan : University of Microfilm International.
  11. Forsyth, Tim. 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science”. London: Routlegde.
  12. Giddens, A. 1996. Capitalism, Industrialism, and Transformation of Nature, in Goblatt D (Ed). Social Theory and The Environment. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. http://dte.gn.apc.org/59ifr.htm. Protes Terhadap Bencana Fatal Di Tambang Freeport/Rio Tinto Papua Barat.
  14. http://www.jatam.org/indonesia/berita/uploaded/docbrt10.html. Mendukung Masyarakat Indonesia Melawan Dehumanisasi Dan Kerusakan Lingkungan Oleh Industri Tambang, Minyak dan Gas.
  15. http://www.smeru.or.id/beritadaerah/files/tolaktambanggalianc.htm. Walhi Dukung Penolakan Warga Watusampu: Penambangan Sirtukil Sebabkan Kerusakan Lingkungan Dan Penyakit ISPA.
  16. http://dte.gn.apc.org/44ite.htm. Protes Di Pabrik Pulp PT Tel.
  17. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Bioregionalrevolution. TheBioregional Revolutionary Movement. tanggal 4 Januari 2006.
  18. Jenkins, J. Craig. 1983. Resource Mobilization Theory And The Studi Of Social Movements. Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved.
  19. Langhelle, Oluf. 1999. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Ethics of Our Common Future. International Political Science Review Vol 20 No. 2, 129-149.London: Sage Publication.
  20. Nicoll, Geoffrey Mc. 1989. Social Organization and Ecological Stability under Demographic Stress. Population and Development Review. Vol 15. 1989. 147-167. http://www.jstor.org/
  21. Pingali, Prabhu L. 1989. Institutional and Environmental Constraints to Agricultural Intensification. Population and Development Review. Vol 15. 1989. 243-260. http://www.jstor.org/
  22. Prijono, Onny S., 1995. ‘Peran Organisasi Nirlaba, Lembaga Pengembangan Swadaya Masyarakat dan Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat serta Pola Interaksi dengan Pemerintah’ dalam Bantarto Bandono, dkk. 1995. Refleksi Setengah Abad Kemerdekaan Indonesiai. Jakarta: CSIS.
  23. Robinson, Ricard. 1984. Sejarah Politik Orde Baru. Jakarta : LSP.
  24. Ross, Eric B. 2003. Malthusianisme, Capitalist Agriculture, and the Fate of Peasants in the Making of the Modern World System. Netherlands: Union for Radical Political Economics. Vol 35, No. 4, Fall 2003, 437-461.
  25. Sajogyo. 1974. Modernization Without Development In Rural Java. Bogor : Makalah tidak diterbitkan.
  26. Sudharto, P. Hadi. 2006. Mengurai Bencana Banjarnegara. Semarang: Suara Merdeka 11 Januari 2006. Hal. 6 & 9.
  27. van der Eng, P., 1993. The ‘colonial drain’ from Indonesia, 1823-1990. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies Australian National University.
  28. Veltmeyer, Henry. 2004. Globalization and antiglobalization : dynamics of change in the New World order. Ashgate: Aldershot.
  29. Yearley, Steven 1997. ‘Social Movements and Environmental Change’, dalam: Michael Redclift & Ted Benton eds. 1997. Social Theory and The Global Environment. London & New York: Roudledge.