skip to main content

Slamming Probability and Impact to Speedboats Hull Based on Seakeeping Motion

*amalia ika wulandari orcid scopus  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, Indonesia
Husein Syahab  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Institut Teknologi Kalimantan, Balikpapan, Indonesia
Berlian Arswendo Adietya  -  Department of Naval Architecture, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
Received: 21 Sep 2025; Published: 10 Nov 2025.
Open Access Copyright (c) 2025 Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Citation Format:
Abstract

Slamming is a critical dynamic load for small, high-speed craft because repeated hull–wave impacts can generate intense stresses and deformations that threaten structural integrity. This study investigates the probabilistic risk of slamming and the resulting structural response of an aluminum speedboat by integrating seakeeping motion analysis with structural evaluation. First, vessel motions and wave-induced pressures were computed using the Boundary Element Method (BEM) under regular wave conditions with significant heights of 0.125 m, 0.25 m, and 0.50 m. Heave and pitch motions were quantified through Response Amplitude Operators, and their statistics were used to estimate the probability of bottom slamming. The probability associated with pitch increased from 54 % at 0.125 m to 86 % at 0.50 m, showing that pitch is the dominant trigger for slamming. The calculated hydrodynamic pressures were then applied to a detailed Finite Element Method (FEM) model of the aluminum hull to evaluate structural stresses and deformations. As wave height increased from 0.125 m to 0.50 m, the maximum slamming load rose from 2.28 × 10⁻³ MPa to 9.10 × 10⁻³ MPa, causing peak structural stresses to climb from 4.77 MPa to 19.06 MPa and maximum deformations from 0.19 mm to 0.76 mm. Stress concentrations were consistently located on unsupported bottom plating near the bow, while areas reinforced by transverse frames experienced much lower response. These findings demonstrate that both sea-state severity and hull reinforcement layout govern slamming vulnerability, providing practical guidance for strengthening small craft against impulsive wave impacts

Fulltext
Keywords: BEM, Probability, Slamming, Small craft.

Article Metrics:

  1. T. Rahmaji, A. R. Prabowo, T. Tuswan, T. Muttaqie, N. Muhayat, and S.-J. Baek, “Design of Fast Patrol Boat for Improving Resistance, Stability, and Seakeeping Performance,” Designs (Basel), vol. 6, no. 6, p. 105, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3390/designs6060105
  2. S. Pegorari, “THE EFFECT OF SLAMMING ON COMPOSITE BOATS,” Metstrade
  3. R. S. Thodal, On Full Scale Slamming Testing of High-Speed Boats. United States: Lehigh University, 2016
  4. H. Li, J. Zou, B. Deng, R. Liu, and S. Sun, “Experimental study of stern slamming and global response of a large cruise ship in regular waves,” Marine Structures, vol. 86, p. 103294, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103294
  5. S. S. Mousavi and A. Askarian Khoob, “Effect of Ultra-Lightweight High-Ductility Cementitious Composite in Steel–Concrete–Steel (SCS) Plate to Mitigate Ship Slamming Loads,” Journal of Composites Science, vol. 7, no. 8, p. 331, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jcs7080331
  6. L. S. Gao and P. Zhou, “Three-dimensional simulation of ship bow slamming,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 261, p. 03031, May 2021, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202126103031
  7. D. D. Truong et al., “Benchmark study on slamming response of flat-stiffened plates considering fluid-structure interaction,” Marine Structures, vol. 79, p. 103040, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.103040
  8. M. I. Jifaturrohman, I. K. A. P. Utama, T. Putranto, D. Setyawan, and L. Huang, “A study into the correlation between single array-hull configurations and wave spectrum for floating solar photovoltaic systems,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 312, p. 119312, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119312
  9. M. A. Wahid, A. N. Siddiquee, and Z. A. Khan, “Aluminum alloys in marine construction: characteristics, application, and problems from a fabrication viewpoint,” Marine Systems & Ocean Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 70–80, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40868-019-00069-w
  10. AmesWeb, “Aluminium ALloys - Yield Strength and Tensile Strength,” AmesWeb
  11. ASM, “Aluminum 6061-T6; 6061-T651,” asm.matweb.com
  12. Gabrian International, “6061 Aluminum: Get to Know its Properties and Uses,” Gabrian International
  13. Ferguson Perforating, “6061 ALUMINIUM ALLOY,” fergusonperf.com
  14. AZO Materials, “Aluminium: Specifications, Properties, Classifications and Classes,” azom.com
  15. O. F. Hosseinabadi, M. R. Khedmati, and M. Norouzipoor, “Statistical analysis of initial deflection of aluminium plating between stiffeners,” Thin-Walled Structures, vol. 161, p. 107528, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.107528
  16. Riswanda, Akhyar, Sugianto, H. Kadir, and S. Rizal, “Numerical Simulation of the Effect of Shoulder Rotation on the Tensile Strength of FSW Dissimilar Joints of Aluminum Alloy,” Defect and Diffusion Forum, vol. 402, pp. 90–99, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.402.90
  17. O. F. Hughes and J. K. Paik, Ship Structural Analysis and Design. New Jersey: Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 2010
  18. BMKG, “BMKG Ocean Forecast System,” 2023, Badan Metarulgi Klimatologi dan Geofisika
  19. R. Datta and C. Guedes Soares, “Analysis of the hydroelastic effect on a container vessel using coupled BEM–FEM method in the time domain,” Ships and Offshore Structures, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 393–402, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1080/17445302.2019.1625848
  20. T. Bunnik et al., “A comparative study on state-of-the-art prediction tools for seakeeping,” 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Pasadena, California, USA, 2010
  21. U.-J. Lee, W.-M. Jeong, and H.-Y. Cho, “Estimation and Analysis of JONSWAP Spectrum Parameter Using Observed Data around Korean Coast,” J Mar Sci Eng, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 578, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/jmse10050578
  22. T. G. Tran, V. T. Doan, and H. Tran, “A new approach to improving the accuracy of seakeeping predictions using strip theory for high-speed vessels,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 327, p. 120995, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.120995
  23. S. Bielicki, “Prediction of Ship Motions in Irregular Waves Based on Response Amplitude Operators Evaluated Experimentally in Noise Waves,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–27, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.2478/pomr-2021-0002
  24. H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics The Finite Volume Method. London: Pearson Education Limited, 2007
  25. A. Ion and I. Ticu, “The finite element method for calculating the marine structural design,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Physics Publishing, Nov. 2015. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/95/1/012073
  26. T. Tuswan, K. Abdullah, A. Zubaydi, and A. Budipriyanto, “Finite-element Analysis for Structural Strength Assessment of Marine Sandwich Material on Ship Side-shell Structure,” Mater Today Proc, vol. 13, pp. 109–114, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.MATPR.2019.03.197
  27. B. W. Lenggana et al., “Effects of mechanical vibration on designed steel-based plate geometries: behavioral estimation subjected to applied material classes using finite-element method,” Curved and Layered Structures, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 225–240, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1515/cls-2021-0021
  28. D. L. Logan, A First Course in the Finite Element Method, 6th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2015
  29. H. Syahab, A. Zubaydi, H. Siswanti, and R. C. Ariesta, “Failure Behavior Analysis of Crack Propagation in Ship Sandwich Structures,” Scientific Journal of Maritime Research – Pomorstvo (Accepted to be Published), 2025
  30. H. Syahab et al., “Structural design evaluation for Underwater Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV), case study: Madura Straits,” 2022
  31. R. C. Ariesta, A. Zubaydi, A. Ismail, Tuswan, and M. Z. Al-Syachri, “Identification of damage in a ship hull sandwich plate by natural frequency,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 1034, no. 1, p. 012012, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1034/1/012012
  32. M. N. Misbah, D. Setyawan, T. Yulianto, R. C. Ariesta, and W. H. A. Putra, “Stress Concentration Analysis on Ship Plate with Hole using Numerical Approach,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Marine Technology, SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2019, pp. 117–121. doi: 10.5220/0010855200003261
  33. M. S. Akbar, A. R. Prabowo, D. D. D. Prija Tjahjana, F. B. Laksono, and S. J. Baek, “Assessment of Designed Midship Section Structures subjected to the Hydrostatic and Hydrodynamic Loads: A Convergence Study,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 33, pp. 67–74, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2021.10.010
  34. M. A. Hafiz and A. Sulisetyono, “Structural Reliability Analysis for the Construction Design of the High-Speed Ship with CFRP Material,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 1081, no. 1, p. 012041, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012041

Last update:

No citation recorded.

Last update: 2025-12-09 14:58:55

No citation recorded.