skip to main content

LEGAL POLITICAL OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARK PROTECTION REVIEWED FROM DEVELOPMENT OF TRADEMARK LAW IN INDONESIA TO AVOID FRAUDULENT COMPETITION

*Moch Alfi Muzakki  -  PT. Jasa Marga Tbk. Jakarta, Indonesia
Kholis Roisah  -  Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Rahandy Rizki Prananda  -  Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Open Access Copyright 2018 LAW REFORM

Citation Format:
Abstract

The achievement of a Trademark in order to become famous is not an easy job, the obstacle of building a Trademark into a well-known trademark is a factor that encourages the emergence of fraudulent competition that is detrimental to others. The Issuance  of Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications is deemed unable to accommodate fraudulent competition. This study aims to examine the law politics of famous Trademark protection in terms of the development of Trademark law in Indonesia and to compare the protection of famous Trademarks in Indonesia with other countries to avoid fraudulent competition in the use  Trademarks. This study is applied a normative juridical approach. The results of the study show that even though Indonesia has made  amendment toward Trademark Law (UUM) 5 times, there is no specific definition of a well-known brand within  Indonesia. Indonesia does not yet have arrangements regarding fraudulent competition in the brand, even though Indonesia has anti-competition laws, but fraudulent competition in Indonesia does not use it as a legal basis.

Keywords: Trademark; Well-Known Trademark;  Fraudulent Competition.

Fulltext View|Download

Article Metrics:

  1. Haryani, I. (2010). Prosedur Mengurus HaKI yang Benar. Yogyakarta (Correct Procedure In Handling Intellectual Property Right): Pustaka Yustisia
  2. Hartono, S. (1982). Hukum Ekonomi Pembangunan Indonesia (Indonesia Development Economic Law). Bandung : Binacipta
  3. Hijmans, Isacc H. dalam Het recht der werkelijkheid, dalam Herlien Budiono. (2006). Asas Keseimbangan bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia - Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas Wigati Indonesia (Balancing Principle for Indonesia Agreement Law-TheLaw Of Covenant Based On Principles . Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti
  4. Finnis, John M (2008). Natural Law and Natural Rights, dalam Filsafat Hukum Jilid I( Legal Philosophy Volume. I) , Faculty of Law Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta : UI Press
  5. Jened, R. (2015). Hukum Merek Dalam Era Globalisasi & Integrasi Ekonomi [Trademark Law Inside Globalization& Economic Integrity] Jakarta : Prenadamedia Group
  6. Shidarta. (2000). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen (Consumer Protection Law]). Jakarta : PT. Grasindo
  7. Pearson, Hilary E. & Miller, Clifford G. (1990). Commercial Exploitation of Intellectual Property, London : Blacstone Press Limited
  8. Bafadhal, T. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia : Kasus IKEA ( Legal Protection Toward Well-Known Trademark In Indonesia). Undang:Jurnal Hukum Vol.1 (No.1), pp.21-41
  9. Desmayanti, R. (2018). Tinjauan Umum Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Sebagai Daya Pembeda Menurut Perspektif Hukum di Indonesia (Overview of the Protection of Famous Trademark as a Distinguishing Power According to the Legal Perspective in Indonesia). Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan, Vol.6 (No.1), pp.1-21
  10. Faradz, H. (2008). Perlindungan Hak Atas Merek (Protection to Trademark Rights). Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.8 (No.1), pp.38 – 54
  11. Lohare, J. (2006). “The Practical Value of Defensif Trade Marks”. Australian Intellectual Property Journal, Volume 17, Thomson Lawbook Co, Sydney
  12. Maileni, Dwi A. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang di Kota Batam (Legal Protection of Trademark Rights Holders in Batam City). Jurnal Trias Politika Vol.2, (No.1), pp.64 – 83
  13. Marwiyah, S. (2010). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Merek Terkenal (Legal Protection for Well-Known Trademark). De Jure, Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum,Vol 2 (No.1), pp.39-50
  14. Pratiwi, Ida Ayu W.K. (2014). Pelanggaran Merek Terkenal dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Dalam Perspektif Paris Convention, Trips Agreement dan UU Merek Indonesia (The Infrigements of Famous Brands and Legal Protection for Rightsholders in the Perspective of the Paris Convention, Trips Agreement and Indonesian Trademark Law). . Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, Vol.3 (No.3), pp.423-438
  15. Suryadirja, Muhammad I. (2012). Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Produk Kemasan Tiga Dimensi di Indonesia (Protection of Famous Brands of Three-Dimensional Packaging Products in Indonesia), Tesis, Graduate Program, Faculty Of Law Universitas Indonesia
  16. Boen H.S (2009), Dapatkah Doktrin Passing Off Diaplikasikan di Indonesia? (Can the Doctrine of Passing Off be Applied in Indonesia?).RetrievedFrom www.hukumonline.com/berita/ba ca/hol20887/dapatkah-doktrin-passing-offdiaplikasikan-di-indonesia
  17. Civil Code
  18. Criminal Code
  19. Law No.20 of 2016 Concerning Trademark and Geographical Indication
  20. The Law No 5 Of 1999 Concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition

Last update:

  1. Proceedings of the International Conference On Law, Economics, and Health (ICLEH 2022)

    W. L. Aniek Tyaswati, Setiyowati Setiyowati. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 723 , 2023. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-024-4_59

Last update: 2024-11-19 21:12:17

No citation recorded.